The search for Stacy: Week in review

April 18, 2008 · 2,201 Comments

Here’s a look at some of the week’s developments in the Peterson case.
Please note, updates are current through 11 a.m. Friday. Please check back often for updates. You can also visit the Bolingbrook Reporter online at mysuburbanlife.com for the latest breaking news.

• Drew Peterson made an appearance on CNN’s “Larry King Live” show Friday, April 11. Peterson and his attorney Joel Brodsky told viewers that Peterson’s sometimes erratic behavior in the days following his fourth wife’s disappearance was a trained response to distress and despair. Peterson said police officers often make jokes to help deal with traumatic situations and admitted his behavior may have been seen as inappropriate to the general public. Peterson also denied claims that he was abusive and controlling in his relationships. Both Peterson and Brodsky said they still believe Stacy Peterson is alive and left Drew for another man.

•The next day, Saturday, April 12, Stacy Peterson’s friends and family fired back at Drew Peterson’s remarks. Family spokeswoman Pam Bosco said police have ruled out the possibility that Peterson left with another man. Bosco also pointed to an order of protection Drew Peterson’s third wife Kathleen Savio took out against him as proof he had a history of abusive relationships. Stacy Peterson’s sister Cassandra Cales then recounted a series of incidents where she had allegedly seen Drew Peterson lose his temper and become violent with her sister.

• On Thursday, April 17, a Will County judge ordered Savio’s estate reopened, paving the way for her family to prepare for a possible wrongful death lawsuit against Drew Peterson. The judge also appointed an attorney to represent Peterson and Savio’s two teenage sons for the estate hearings. The boys are the main beneficiaries of Savio’s estate. Brodsky asked the judge to appoint the attorney to ensure that any legal action taken by Savio’s family are in the best interest of the children. The judge’s order removed Peterson’s uncle James Carroll as executor of the estate and appointed Savio’s father, Henry, and sister Anna Doman as executors.

• Also Thursday, a Will County judge denied Peterson’s request to let his son Stephen, an Oak Brook police officer, hold onto 11 guns seized Nov. 1 from Peterson’s home. Judge Richard Schoenstedt said Peterson’s right to have control of his property doesn’t outweigh the state’s right to retain possible evidence.

In February, Schoenstedt ordered the guns — along with other seized property — be returned as long as Peterson maintained a firearm owner’s identification card. Peterson’s attorney asked the judge to amend the order when state police revoked the FOID card the day after the order. But without an FOID card, Schoenstedt said, Peterson must show he has an intention to utilize the guns in some way before his property rights can trump the state’s rights.

Brodsky said his client will legally transfer the property to Stephen Peterson and then file another request to have the guns handed over to him. Brodsky filed the original request to have the property returned in December, arguing that the state had more than enough time to conduct all necessary forensic testing on the items.

~Compiled by Danya Hooker, Suburban Life Publications

Categories: All · Weeks In Review
Tagged: , , , ,

2,201 responses so far ↓

  • exlawenforcement // April 19, 2008 at 3:02 pm

    How do you know That ?I would love to know. I am really surprised,is she from Bolingbrook?

  • john // April 19, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    Through mutual friends, they were out last night together at a bar, she introduces him as her boyfriend. She is not from Bolingbrook, she is from lemont, but living in Romeoville. They met at Tailgators. They met in March, she goes to his home, hes made her dinner. Anything else you wanna know

  • exlawenforcement // April 19, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    Whoa. I am shocked, guess I am too gullible.I did not see this coming. glad you spoke up. Do you know her ?

  • scott // April 19, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    I’m suprised we haven’t heard anything thru the press on this. If we do, John you get the scoop on this. Like exlaw asked, do you know her?

  • john // April 19, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    lets just say I do know her and leave it at that but I dont need to be hanging around that situation. They have kept it quiet pretty much but now they have gone out in public together, I believe they were at a bar together last night in Joliet. His kids have even met her.

  • exlawenforcement // April 20, 2008 at 2:07 am

    I wonder how long it will take for the press to get on this one ?

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 20, 2008 at 10:22 am

    I’m surprised they haven’t been on it already, but it WOULDN’T surprise me if LE already knew and are watching Drew very closely. If he actually did take her to his home and make dinner for her with the children there, I wonder what the two older boys thought about it. Poor kids are probably so confused they don’t know what to think anymore! I can see certain blogs and forums having a field day with this, and can’t believe he would be so brazen to go out in public with a date!! Just adds more fuel to the fire and certainly will only further degrade the public’s opinion of him. What is he thinking???? Obviously, he ISN’T thinking, and is only being his usual “it’s all about Drew” selfish self! In my opinion, he had better enjoy his freedom while he can, because his days to do what he wants are numbered!

  • john // April 20, 2008 at 10:47 am

    So anyone know how I can get this out to the public without involving who I am, I think the public has every right to know everything there is to know about him being with a woman already. Dont quote me but I believe he mentioned to her that he would be able to apply for a divorce by november if they dont find her or she doesnt show up, yeah sounds like he really loves his wife huh? So please can anyone help me get this info out with out outing me, I dont want my name involved to much you know…So help me out, how do we make this public…

  • exlawenforcement // April 20, 2008 at 11:58 am

    Well guys once again I am proven wrong. I still cannot believe it, not so much the dating but lying on Larry King. I am crestfallen. John can you give us any other info ? How long has she been divorced or do you know her middle name? Theres a listed in lemont, but it shows her as being married. Any info you can give will help. Theres a number of ways to make it public.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 20, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    Exlaw, OMG, surely you can’t believe that this is the first time Drew has lied about anything!!!! I’m just wondering if he has ever told the truth about anything involving ANY of this since Stacy disappeared…..well, maybe when he said he wasn’t sleeping well at night. I could definitely believe that, especially if she was killed in the bedroom he sleeps in. That’s probably the only time that the truth has come out, in my opinion.

  • ladylaw2008 // April 20, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    I told you I was gullible ! And I was not kidding. I just hope Johns info is on the money. I would not want to comprise his position on this.

  • john // April 20, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    this is all the truth I tell you. That is her married last name she neverchanged it but has been divorced for a long time. middle name starts with L but she lives in lakewood falls with her brother. I have a cell phone number. They were just in Joliet together at pom poms bar…I tell you its all true, it needs to come out.

  • exlawenforcement // April 20, 2008 at 6:45 pm

    Was she married to phillip ? Whats her brothers name? Were they out again today ? Do you know what she does for a living?

  • exlawenforcement // April 20, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Where is lake wood falls ? I believe you, theres no problem there. I just want as much info as possible at this point in time. Also to Concerned For Stacy: I have been a fool and I am sorry that I fell for alot of things. I was trying so hard to have faith that he was telling the truth and give the benefit of the doubt, but after this coming out I am not so sure anymore. Like I said he can date but why lie about it? Theres no point to that at all.

  • scott // April 20, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    John, Concerned for Stacy’s statement about seting them up when they go out is the best bet, unless you can get a photo with them together and sending it to the press. Like C.f.S. said you don’t you don’t have to tell the press who you are.
    Now, I understand that you want to expose Drew as a liar, but how much do you want the media on Denise? She is an adult and is responsible for what she does, but you stated in ‘S.P. family fires back at D.P.’s Larry King live apperance’ that Denise has 2 kids. If the press hops all over this, it will affect her kids someway or another, irreguardless of their ages.
    From day one I have been for innocent until proven guilty. And you are saying you have prove he has lied and I have no problem with you giving that proof, I’ll even help you give it. I just dont want to see anymore kids being the innocent victims in this. Drew’s kids (with both Stacy and Savio) not matter how it ends up, have to live without their mother(s) and will either have a father who’s name is descrased for life or in jail.

  • scott // April 20, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    Lakewood falls? not too far away from my brother. pom poms on rt 30?

  • exlawenforcement // April 20, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    All of us want more answers and we are willing to help get them. First off denise is an adult and she already knows that this relationship is a risk and she already took it and the kids are already involved so its too late for that. Theres no one in this state that does not know the entire story, it high profile so as an adult she has to realize that she cannot hide either. Either way the press will know or see something sooner or later. Any one who dates Drew at any point from here out will be talked about. If either of them are thinking they both know this.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 20, 2008 at 9:53 pm

    To John:

    Just wishful thinking on my part, but I sure do wish that she could be a plant by LE to see how Drew treats his women when they break up with him. Any chance of that, or do you know her too well? Like I said….just wishful thinking. All I know is she’d better be careful because something strange could cause her demise as well. Lightning COULD strike three times in the same place in this case without a doubt….in my opinion!

  • scott // April 20, 2008 at 11:08 pm

    Exlaw, what I was trying to ask is overall, does Denise know that she and her family could become under a microscope or is she just thinking of herself? And if I had the info John has, I would try to find the answer to that question. Yes she is an adult and made her bed and will have to lay in it, but someone should mention to her what she could put her kids thru since what we have heard so far she hasn’t.
    Concerned, I have also thought she may be a plant by LE, but John seems to know her too well for that to be possible.

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 4:08 am

    To John: That cell that you have is it hers ? I am willing to give you my e mail if you do not want it out in public. Any other info would be helpful.

  • john // April 21, 2008 at 6:47 am

    I do have her number. My thing is I know her enough to know that she is not to concerned for her kids if she tells them she will not talk to him and then continues to date him. Yes I am concerned for her kids but she apparently is not. Yes she was married to Phillip, her brother is Brian. So are you an ex cop exlawenforcement. (Hence the name huh), If he treated her like crap she would prob stay, Now tomorrow is her birthday, they will prob be together then. Maybe I should get your email exlaw….I think she needs to see he is not a celebrity and this is not a joke, she needs to think about her kids, I mean for god sake I believe her daughter is only 17, just the way drew likes them. I dont think her daughter wants anything to do with them dating. In my opinion Denise is being selfish and should be exposed maybe it will save her kids that shes not thinking about. Shes not a plant she is (not to be nean) but dumb when it comes to men in her life.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 21, 2008 at 7:12 am

    John, please be careful! You truly don’t know who can be trusted on here. Trolls are everywhere. Why don’t you just call Sgt. Burek with the ISP and ask him if any of this is relavent to the investigation. If I were you I woudn’t be giving out anyone’s number to anyone, or contacting anyone of here privately. No offense Exlaw, but he DOES need to be careful.

  • john // April 21, 2008 at 7:23 am

    I think I may of just heard that they will be getting together Wednesday.

  • john // April 21, 2008 at 7:30 am

    Thank you I do understand that but who is SGT Burek and how do you get hold of him.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 21, 2008 at 7:59 am

    He’s with the ISP and oversees all of the public information on this case. I’m out of state so I don’t know much about Illinois, but I’m sure you could call the tip line at 815-740-0678 or the local number for ISP and ask for him, or how to reach him. He was on the news a few days ago discussing the volumes of information he (actually the ISP) has on this case. If you can’t reach him directly, surely someone at ISP can direct you to him or another officer that might be able to help you. Good luck!

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 21, 2008 at 8:22 am

    John, I’ve been thinking about this a little more….Kristy Mergenthal with WQAD is who covered that story. Here’s the link: http://www.wqad.com/global/video/popup/pop_player.asp?ClipID1=2383339&h1=Afternoon%20News%20to%20Go%20-%20Monday%2C%20April%2014th&vt1=v&at1=News&d1=7&LaunchPageAdTag=News&fvCatNo=&backgroundImageURL=&activePane=info&playerVersion=1&hostPageUrl=http%3A//www.wqad.net/homeblock/topvideo.php&rnd=38358395

    Also, here’s the link for all of the contact info for that station. They would probably love to have your info so they could try to “catch” Drew out with this woman.

    WQAD
    3003 Park 16th Street
    Moline, IL 61265
    Please Note: Mail with no return address will be discarded.

    Phone (309) 764-8888
    Newsroom (309) 736-3300 or 1-800-798-8885
    Fax (309) 764-5763
    News Fax (309) 736-3306
    News Email news@wqad.com
    General Email wqad@wqad.com

    News Director
    Leigh Geramanis
    Office Direct: 309-736-3310
    E-Mail: leigh.geramanis@wqad.com

    I bet if you called the station and asked for Krsti Mergenthal, she could help you. Again, good luck!

  • Kassie // April 21, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    Drew is a sick POS and I’m NOT AT ALL shocked about this new info (be it correct and valid). I hope John gets ahold of Sgt Burek and Drew comes under watchful eye if he isn’t already. Complete scumbag, him and his new pet, Denise.

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    John let me know what you decide to do. Everyone is right about trusting just anyone. I am working on a couple of ideas too. Steve Dahl 104.3 would love this, his e mail address is heywhatsup@dahl.com.. My e mail is w.patterson@yahoo.com if you want to send anything there for me, if not thats okay too.What age is the other child of Denise ? Do you know her daughters name ?

  • vomitinginthetoilet // April 21, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    This is the most unbelievable and outlandish LIE Drew is trying to play out. He is an @ss with a capital A. God help the children. How can you intentionally damage your missing wife’s name like that? What a POS!

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    John does denise work ? What is her brothers las name? What age is the other child she has ?

  • Sure You Will // April 21, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    You guys can’t be real. Don’t you see exlaw is “him!” That’s why he’s asking SO MANY ?s about her. Don’t give him anymore info. Read back the ?s and you can see it’s “him.” It’s not too smart to be giving all this girl’s info out. Exlaw asked, was she married to “phillip?” Why would exlaw have a name of her ex if he doesn’t know “her”. And, “i’m gullible” says exlaw. But then under the seudo name “ladylaw” says I told you I’m gullible. Guess he forgot what name he was commenting under. Don’t give “him” any other info!

  • Sure You Will // April 21, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    He’s a known stalker. Don’t give out details such as brother’s name, where does she work, etc., etc. He’s just testing the waters! John, don’t be too sure “he” won’t get mad if he knows “Denise” is talking to another guy. Isn’t that one of the reasons Stacy is not here, because “he” thought she was talking to another guy? Why do you think exlaw wants you to send personal e-mail w/her cell number. Why on earth would anyone need her cell number — especially someone just commenting on here? Common sense says — it’s HIM.

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Hey thats not fair. I am not him and I am trying to help here. I already e mailed the news crew mentioned and Steve Dahl.I am with everybody on this, this needs to get out and the sooner the better. This lady needs to be protected, I am asking because I care. You are paranoid ! Relax. I am a female and totally pissed off that anyone would even think I am Drew ! If I was Drew I would already know all the answers and not have to ask. Lets hope that John called the ISP.

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    I do not care about the cell phone number. That John does not have to give me. Drew would have it anyhow, thats just stupid.

  • Sure You Will // April 21, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    Well, if I am paranoid — sorry. I just don’t understand your line of questioning. Why do you need all this information on her personally. If you didn’t even know Denise, how would you know names and why would you need to know her phone number and where she works? Can’t be too careful.

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    I was on the internet last night trying to figure out where she lived in the area. I found a name and address that matched in Lemont. I wanted to make sure I was right. This lady is in danger. There has got to be a way to alert people around her and help in that effort. John already said that she was not smart when it came to men. If Drew is lying about them dating on national tv what else is going on? After being in law enforcement you do ask alot of questions, its just my nature. If you do not ask you never get the info you need. I just worry that since john does not want to reveal who he is if he will go to ISP ? He has to be careful and I am thinking of anything I can do to help with anything I have raed on here. I even e mailed Stacys family. I am serious about this.

  • Sure You Will // April 21, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Exlaw, well if you trully are trying to help, I apologize. Was just wierd asking so many personal questions about her. Anyway, who knows if this is all a ploy on “his” part in hopes of his new chick getting the spot light and making a buck doing interviews on what’s it like being with a star (in his own mind of course!). If that’s the road she wants to take, so be it. Like others have said, I’m sure ISP is already on top of it and if she’s kissing and telling, she’s not very smart anyway — especially with a guy like “him” and knowing what he is capable of!

  • exlawenforcement // April 21, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    John: I am at w.patterson88@yahoo.com, sorry I forgot the 88. its been a long day for me. I have e mailed Danya hooker on this site,steve dahl at 104.3, kristy Mergenthal, the newsroom and regular news line. Another friend with Pd posted on Fox news blogs. I will do so later. I also used the email to contact Stacys family too. I will let you know what else I have come up with tomorrow, I worked 11 hours today and have a long day tomorrow. Hang in there with all of us on here we can and will help you. If any of you have other ideas please say so, John needs our help. This may save someones life.

  • lee // April 21, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    Roe Con on WLS 890 am radio in Chicago would love this story too!

  • sami // April 21, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    You guys are sick. Leave all this up to LE, but I hope to god that the law calls you on the carpet for harrassing, or planning to stalk this woman. What gives any of you the right to do this?

  • exlawenforcement // April 22, 2008 at 4:05 am

    Who is harassing or stalking ? No one ! Trying to save another life is more like it. AS far as the law goes, hopefully they will be watching over her and her kids.When a relationship is based on lies theres only trobule looming ahead. Just remember that he lied once again on national tv, not dating my foot.There is not one person on here that is not concerned.

  • exlawenforcement // April 22, 2008 at 4:22 am

    Roe con has been e mailed also. Please join me in doing that also just go to the stations site and send in a e mail, its easy. The more people that do it the more likely they will pay attention. And whoever LE is PAY ATTENTION to this !

  • scott // April 22, 2008 at 5:29 am

    John, you had mentioned that Drew and Denise were at pom poms, what day were they there?

  • john // April 22, 2008 at 6:43 am

    I am pretty sure it was friday night(at pom-poms), and we are not harassing her but she needs to realize was a dangerous mistake she is making if not for her but her children. Thanks exlaw for helping to get it out there.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 7:49 am

    John, unfortunately there are some adults that simply do not care about anything but themselves and what they want. Even if, or when this is exposed by the media, it may not make this woman understand, or even CARE how it may affect her in the long run, or her children. That’s one of the sad parts about it. Another is that Stacy hasn’t even been missing six months yet, he’s stilled married to her (because he states she ran off…another huge lie, IMO) and he’s already flaunting this woman in public and in his neighborhood. It seems to me that he’s trying to find someone to help him with being a “mommy” even if it’s a woman that could care less about her own children’s welfare, much less his. If he REALLY cared about public opinion and the welfare of his own children, he would try a little harder to behave himself and do the right things, but he just doesn’t care about anything but himself and what he wants. That’s exactly why Stacy and Kathleen are no longer here, and who knows how many others……IMO. This woman may have a lot in common with him regarding his sociopathic physiology, who knows? Something is definitely wrong with her somewhere if she’s truly involved in a romantic relationship with Drew. He may have chosen her because she appeared to be a woman that he could “provide a better life for” or “control” or even just because she paid him some attention and he’s a man that HAS to have a woman in his life. As I said, who knows? Quite simply, it appears to be futher confirmation that he’s a selfsih, lying, UNfatherly psychopath, and neither one of them obviously give a hoot about how this will affect their children, in my opinion. God PLEASE help those who cannot help themselves!

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 9:42 am

    WOW just wow you folks are rapid and very scary. It’s none of your business who drew associates with or dates and those are his children not yours. If LE thinks those children are in harms way they will be removed. LE doesn’t need you busybodies stiring up stuff because you CARE so much you can’t stand to let the
    wheels of justice turn even if they turn slowly.
    And how stupid can you be, this is a website and you are trashing a NAME of a women that you have NO idea if it’s FACT or FICTION but yet you go on and on with your crazy rantings that this women is in soo much danger she needs YOU to save her.
    GET A LIFE FOLKS AND GET OUT OF DREWS LIFE UNLESS HE ASKS FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT.

    FYI-Drew probably is responsibile for Stacy’s dissapearance and it’s not up to you to stalk him or anyone that he associates with. Also don’t forget Stacy was right by Drews side covering for Kathleens murder and possibly involved in Kathleens murder. So that makes her just as evil as Drew and also shows that she possibly could run off with another man!
    Get real and get a life besides Drew’s.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 9:59 am

    That’s your opinion, and you are certainly entitled to voice it, just as I am are entitled to voice mine. We don’t all have to agree, but at least we have the freedom to say (within reason) what we think on here. I’m sure Drew will welcome any support from anyone at this juncture, and I admire you for standing up for him.

  • john // April 22, 2008 at 10:00 am

    wow freedom, guess you would change your mind if it was your family dating him now wouldnt you. FYI it is fact that he is dating this woman.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Sorry not standing up for Drew. Standing up for freedom. Drew is a free citizen like any other US citizen until he is arrested and convicted. Until then like it or not he has the same rights as anyother citizen. These rights were put in place to ensure that vigilantes don’t take the law into their own hand. Seems like that’s what is going on here with many of you sooo concerned citizens.

    John word of advice if it is a family problem then take it up with the family and not the internet. I would not change my mind either I would take it up with the family member if it was any of my BUSINESS.
    You just opened your family member up to lots of problems by putting her name out here on the web. Is she doing something illegal or something you just don’t like it?
    Or is this your ex-wife and you are trying to stir up trouble?

    like I said get a grip and stop acting like Piranhas.

  • john // April 22, 2008 at 10:16 am

    Oh no its a family thing, more like a friend. I am someone who is concerned for her, she has made it clear she has chosen Drew over all friends and family, so its now her problem and she can deal with all the backlash she is getting. I was concerned for the children the children who are prob worried to death about theie mother. So you wouldnt care if your child or friend was with him

  • Appalled // April 22, 2008 at 10:20 am

    I’m appalled at this woman, whoever she is. She has to be involved for secondary gain and nothing more. I can’t imagine any sane woman on this planet that would give that creep the time of day. And I’m not even talking about the fact that he’s a murderer. He’s an obnoxious, gum smacking, no class, arrogant, neanderthal that has no value as a human being. Any woman, especially one with children, that would associate with that baboon has no self respect and deserves whatever happens to her.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 10:23 am

    John concern for her is understandable. Posting her name on the internet is not! It will probably do more damage then good. Hopefully some crazy nutter won’t latch onto her name and try to take out revenge on her for Stacy’s sake. get my drift??
    You are correct she can deal with the backlash, you showed your concern and she doesn’t care about it. That’s her deal, if she wants to mess up her life along with her children as sad as it is you cannot do anything more then you already have.
    If you can’t understand how posting her name on the internet is not cool then I’m sorry for that.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 10:26 am

    This is just a note of encouragement and thanks to all of you who continue to help out in the search for Stacy Peterson and solving the murder of Kathleen Savio.

    Many people are looking forward to the day Drew is held accountable for his actions. Never give up on the task to find Stacy Peterson. Never give up!

    findstacypeterson.com

  • john // April 22, 2008 at 10:32 am

    that is true, hopefully she will smarten up but until then im no longer going to involve my self with her, I do not need that in my life. Wether I post her name or someone else did, its olny a matter of minutes before they find out about her, she is not quiet about it, and he is now been seen in public with her so regardless she will of been outed.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Goodness Freedom! You’re accusing people of doing certain things and telling people what to do and not to do. What about THEIR freedom, not to mention their freedom of speech? If this woman wasn’t dating Drew, her name wouldn’t even be associated with him. John probably didn’t cause her to have any problems that she hasn’t already create for herself. She’s been see at Drew’s house for God’s sake! For all we know, John has already taken it up with her, and she is doing what she wants regardless. Yes, it’s her business, and Drew’s, but they should expect repercussions from the public for it in my opinion. His whole life is in the public now, and he put it there. They (Drew & his girlfriend) may not care what people think, but people that believe he is guilty will, and do look at this relationship as just another lie Drew told. As for Drew being a free citizen……he’s also an official suspect! He’s all over the news, and puts himself there most of the time, so that’s gives us the right to form our own opinions and discuss them here. As I said, we don’t all have to agree, but I will defend either of our rights to express our opinions, and anyone else’s.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Freedom ~ if this woman was so concerned about her well being, and if you are so concerned about someone putting her name on this site, maybe you should think about all of the other people who’s names are out there that are not on DP’s side. If her name being public has you all that concerned for her, show some concern for the people that are standing up to that monster. I can think of a few. This woman is probably as media hungry and pathetic as he is. No self esteem, no concern her family. I’m sure there’s available SINGLE men around that she could build a relationship with. Playing house with this maniac leaves something to be desired. So, some advice from an observer - she wants attention, she got it. You don’t like it, don’t take it up with John, take it up with her. She seems to need all the good advice she can get. If she was one to shy away from attention, she sure picked a heck of a way to do it. Nope, not feeling sorry or concerned for her at all. You jump into the fire, you burn.

  • Appalled // April 22, 2008 at 10:44 am

    She just wants credit for her involvment in his life when the movie version comes out. What an idiot!

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Concerned yes we all have a right to our opinions and life would be boring if we all agreed. Me saying something isn’t cool is not telling someone what to do. On the other hand the posts I’m reading out here are in fact telling others what to do and how to live their life and then some.
    Being a suspect is not the same as a convicted murderer as many of you have already done. Convicted Drew heck let’s just forgo the trials and save taxpayers $$ ya’ll already have convicted him so why waste anymore time. someone get their rope ready and hang him, save use taxpayers even more $$$.
    Observer, I have no idea what this woman is concerned about or if this is even true. words on the internet don’t make something true. And so what if she is seeking attention, women seem to like drew including stacy. I have no idea what they see in the ratbastard but hey each to their own.
    Now my question to you regarding your comment “you just in the fire, you burn” you do apply that to Stacy correct?? she sure as hell jumped in the fire and according to her words to the pastor not only did she jump in the fire she also is an accessory to murder after the fact!!

    I’m sure ya’ll don’t like hearing that side of the story!

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 10:50 am

    John that is all you can do. Say something to her then move along. I’m sorry for your pain and hope it all works out.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 10:58 am

    John, you have got to be the most vial person I know of. You’re friends with her? Sounds like you have a bit of a jealous streak in her because if you were really concerned about a “friend”, you wouldn’t take your so called concerns out on the internet. What you’re doing is creating a lynch mob to go after her and her family. You know it, and I know it, and I hope the police see it too. You are rallying Cassandra’s mental army to stalk and harras this woman. I don’t give a rats butt about Peterson, but you creating this against this woman is no better than Peterson stalking his wives. Friend? Yea, right.

  • john // April 22, 2008 at 11:05 am

    Me Vial, No, Me Jealous hell no…Im not sending anyone to do anything, the public has a right to know what a liar Peterson is. All the friends have voiced there concerns with him and all she can say is he is so not capable of doing anything bad. Maybe your family or friend can date him and you can see how it really works.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Joel Brodsky, the part of the story that we want to hear is Drew telling us what he did with Stacy. Tell that part of the story and then you can move along.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Sami, I’m sure Cassandra’s mental case army is already on it!!
    I bet there is a thread already on FSP about it and they are already ploting how to deal with this. Like it’s any of their damn business anyway.
    my oh my to think this is 2008 and there is such a lynch mob mentality.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Sami, if she’s in public with Drew, and has also been seen at Drew’s house, this would have come out from someone sooner or later. John was very upset that Drew lied on Larry King, so he brought it up on here because he wanted to show once again that Drew is a liar, as much as anything. How can you thnk John is more VILE than Drew? As for Cassandra’s “mental” army if there is such a thing, I can’t believe that any one of them would physically harass and/or stalk this woman. That’s NOT what FSP is all about.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:11 am

    It’s funny that Joel Brodsky is the only person who ever uses the term lynch mob mentality when complaining about people’s concern with Stacy.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:14 am

    He’s also the only one who refers to the website, findstacypeterson.com as FSP. Interesting.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 11:16 am

    hehehe oh my watching and waiting you aren’t very sharp are ya??
    Ah FSP the site that wanted Gibson to put visine in drews food?? nah that’s not what they are all about. but don’t mind me everyone can read for themselves if they catch the posts before they are deleted.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:20 am

    It’s funny that Joel Brodsky is the only one who claimed that folks were out to poison Drew’s food. Interesting.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 11:23 am

    Freedom - She was a 17 year old when he “found” her. He had years of experience, and they should have been years of wisdom and experience, not of lust and sex craving. So, don’t even go there about Stacy. As far as her being an accessory, as you say, you have “proof” of that? Her only fault was being young, and naive. At the time she went missing, she was 23, raising four minor children, keeping a house (immaculate) and kept on a short rope. She had NO FREEDOM. Now, an accessory after the fact, how do you know she didn’t confront him with all of this and threaten to expose him, for which she paid with her life? Show us your facts, or talk to the hand!

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 11:31 am

    sami, on April 22nd, 2008 at 10:58 am Said:

    ….What you’re doing is creating a lynch mob….

    That term, lynch mob, is exactly what comes out of Brodsky’s mouth, and Peterson’s mouth, time and time again. You can find those words uttered by them by searching the internet.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Freedom, you are definitely correct that some posters on FSP go overboard with cruel, hateful and mean posts. Some are even downright silly and ridiculous, but that site draws a few crazies just like every other forum or blog out here. Admin and Moderators do try to keep it civil, but on occasion a troll or two manages to stop by as well. Also, some of the members are so passionate about Stacy’s cause that they get a little carried away with their posts sometimes, but usually get reigned in for it. All in all though, it’s a great place to support the search efforts and keep up with the lastest developments in the case, and there truly are some wonderful people on there.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 11:38 am

    Concerned for Stacy, on April 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 am Said:

    Freedom, you are definitely correct that some posters on FSP go overboard with cruel, hateful and mean posts. Some are even downright silly and ridiculous, but that site draws a few crazies just like every other forum or blog out here.

    Well said.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 11:39 am

    watching you must not really be watching!! if you think I’m brodsky then it’s just more proof of how clueless you really are!!

    observer she was a willing find and rumor has it she chased Drew until she caught him.
    Stacy’s own words to the pastor make her an accessory after the fact. She claims drew told her right after he killed kathleen. Stacy then provided an alibi for Drew, adopted kathleens children and helped drew spend the $$$ that were made off of Kathleens assets. You think plastic surgery, cruises, harley davidsons, diamond rings, etc are cheap??
    You have no idea what freedom she had or not you are just guessing and listening to the rumor mill. She certainly had enough freedom to text racy messages to a so called friend and meet him for dinner. Save the poor poor me story. Stacy is responsible for her actions just like Drew is or any other adult.
    How about you show us some facts?? You can’t, you can only show what the rumor mill has told you.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Concerned for Stacy, the Admin of FSP creates the cruel and hateful environment. Not only that, but god forbid you ask anything about where the donations go and you get promptly banned. Isn’t the ADMIN the one who told people that if they didn’t like when someone made fun of the mentally handicapped children, they could leave. Yea, real good ADMIN!
    Freedom, you’re right, FSP is on a mission to go after this woman as we speak. The threads are full and popping. Who needs the police when we have CASSANDRA’S ARMY going after people.

    John, if you’re as concerned as you say you are, what kind of help are you looking for out here? Hmmm, I can bet I know. Why don’t you got to the police and tell on her. I’m sure they’ll think you posting this crap out here is of the highest esteem.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 11:43 am

    it’s a great place to support the search efforts and keep up with the lastest developments in the case, and there truly are some wonderful people on there.

    Concerned that’s great and as it should be, the other things IMO need to not be on a missing person site regardless if someone is passionate or not. It doesn’t look well in the overall IMO.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Sami, I figured FSP would not let me down!! I’m seriously wondering which is worse for this woman.

    Drew or FSP

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 11:49 am

    I say we report every solitary move that Cassandra, Sharon, Roy and ADMIN do and who goes in and out of their houses. Heck, let’s where Tshirts that say “WHERE’S THE MONEY ADMIN”! If you’re going to do a “full” investigation, then investigate ALL parties that ever had anything to do with Stacy or Peterson. Cassandra sure didn’t mind Peterson when he helped support her wants. What about Cassandra’s friend? Wasn’t he the last to speak to Stacy? What is he doing these days? Who is he going out with? Where does he live? What does he do? What kind of clothes does he wear. What is Cassandra’s arrest record? Who is she seeing? Does she drink? What does she drink?

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:50 am

    For some reason, Drew and Joel are obsessed with the finances at findstacypeterson.com. Why, I will never know.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:55 am

    And I bet 99.99% of the public did not know that Drew, “…helped support her wants”. The only two that probably know that are Drew and Joel Brodsky.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 11:56 am

    And it was Joel Brodsky who make some snide remarks about Cassandra the morning that she reported Stacy missing. His comment was, in effect, “…isn’t that about the time the bars close?”.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 11:58 am

    As for FSP, I only read the posts I’m interested in, so I haven’t seen the one about handicapped children. I may not have even been a member at the time it was posted, I don’t really know. At any rate, if that happened as you say, it was very cruel and should have been deleted with the poster being reprimanded in my opinion. Some people are just too inconsiderate for words, and I’m personally sorry that is happened. As for Admin and all of the moderators, I don’t know any of them, but I’ve seen several incidences where they’ve effectively controlled unpleasant situations, so I know they do at least try, even though they may not always be successful. As I said, I’m personally sorry if anyone has been offended by anything they’ve read or seen on there, and I do not represent FSP in any way whatsoever on this blog or anywhere else. These are all my opinions only.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 11:58 am

    Sami - as to your comments. Ask Drew. He knows everything about everyone!

    However, he’s the only one that has two wives that have met with misfortune. Maybe you should be the lucky one that lives next door to him. Just be sure to sleep with one eye open at all times. You never know when you’ll get in his way!

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    poor watching just hoping and praying this is drew and joel posting to them!!
    damn your life must be really empty if you think that drew or joel care about keeping up with this thread!!

    sami I would bet you good money if someone did post their everymore on the internet they would scream they are being stalked.
    as far as cassandra’s arrest record, she’s got one!!

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Why is it that anytime someone questions the money, it has to be the old, “you must be Drew or Brodsky” syndrom? Get a clue people, there are many, many people that find the money thing very suspect.

    Am I speaking to Cassandra or Sharon? Must be, they like to harrass people, so gee, you must be them.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    Just an Observer, I never said one minute that Drew is not a complete jerk, he is. I think he did something bad to both wives.

    However, let the Law take care of that. Who are you people to constantly harrass anyone. I teach my kids that two wrongs don’t make a right. You have no jurisdiction to stalk and harrass anyone. I can’t stand Peterson, but I have faith in Law Enforcement and hope that you people know enough to get out of their way and let them do their darn jobs. Clue: They have more experience with the laws than you all do.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Oh, and by the way, SAMI, Ms. Cassandra Cales doesn’t blow hot air into the media microphones, lashing out against DP or JB (maybe that would be either one of you), the way you throw unkind words out against everyone that isn’t a wife-killer fan!

    Your words are so laughable. Typical DP and JB. Hate and unkindness towards everyone not defending DP.

    Why don’t you go spend the next few hours trying to find some unkind words any of the SP close family has uttered about DP or JB, specificaly Ms. Cales, instead of your rantings here. Maybe it’ll soften you up a little and you’ll come to our side.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:04 pm

    well why did cassandra wait until the bars closed before going to look for Stacy? She was soo concerned that stacy’s life was in danger she stayed with her friday night late then keep in touch all day saturday and then stayed with her late Saturday night. but yet when cassandra could not reach stacy at 1:00pm Sunday afternoon she waited until after 11:00pm to take action?
    hmm something sure does stink about this.
    details folks stop letting your emoitions and possibly the abuse you have suffered cloud your judgement.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Drew and Joel are the only two people who accuse Sharon of harassing.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    Concerned for Stacy, have you read any posts whatsoever about where the money proceeds are going, exactly? You won’t see one question on there.

    Why? Because ADMIN promptly bans anyone who dares to ask. Many, many people with good hearts have been chastised for having the nerve to question why, with an all “volunteer” search thingy going, food donations, boat donations and more, then where is the money going to. BAM, banned and posts deleted.

    By the way, ADMIN encourages harrassment. Have you ever been to coffee talk or off topic? He completely encourages bad behavior towards Peterson and anyone else they deem as “bad”. Sharon and Roy announce on the board when they “think” the children are “alone” and for somebody to do something.

    How crazy and dangerous is that?

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    Cassandra was looking for Stacy at about 11:15 pm when she talked to Drew on the phone. It has nothing to do with any bars.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    There’s your problem, Just and Observer, you feel that your speech is the only speech protected by the “Freedom of Speech” act. Sorry, Stacy Fan Club, there’s different views and Stacy’s family is not the angels that people on your fan club site want everyone to believe.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Oh, and by the way, SAMI, Ms. Cassandra Cales does not post very much on FSP. Most of the posters are passionate about their feelings and, yes, some do get carried away. With words. If you feel you must continue to drag a young woman’s name into your rantings, meaning Ms. Cales, a woman that has lost her beautiful sister to an untold demise, why don’t you find it in your heart to quit doing so. Leave her out of it. She’s not said anything publicly by way of name calling as has Peterson and Brodsky. Where do you get off by dragging her into this when she has done nothing to warrant this?

    WHY, WHY, WHY????????

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Yea, ok, Drew and Joel are the ONLY ones in the world that would say anything bad towards Cassandra.

    Get a grip, you have got to be kidding? Cassandra Cales was a nothing until this happened and now she and her friends are basking in the celebrity of it all.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Watching and Waiting, on April 22nd, 2008 at 11:55 am Said:
    And I bet 99.99% of the public did not know that Drew, “…helped support her wants”. The only two that probably know that are Drew and Joel Brodsky.

    lol you are clueless all this info is out there but I guess when your only watching and waiting on rumors you miss the actual FACTS.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    Cassandra, aka as she calls herself the “Guardian Angel” (give me a break), Guardian Angel, my butt. She is on that board more times than you say and she sees all the crap. She’s also been notified several times about ADMIN and staff saying no to professional search teams. Why would they say no to professionals, but yet bring in Granny down the street to search instead?

    Gotta guard that precious money for themselves rather than hire ones that know what they’re doing!

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    You want to talk money? Eh. Satisfaction will be watching DP talk all the money talk he can when a Court of Law wants to know where the money is that he “inherited” from his dead ex-wife.

    As to the FSP finances, go find something else to rant about. No one gives a darn what you want. In fact, if you want financial accountings, have Brodsky account for DP’s website money.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Only Drew and Joel are paranoid about what Sharon is or is not doing. We have never heard of another person upset with Sharon. Only Drew and Joel.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Watching and Waiting, on April 22nd, 2008 at 12:08 pm Said:
    Cassandra was looking for Stacy at about 11:15 pm when she talked to Drew on the phone. It has nothing to do with any bars.

    and you know this how? where was Cassandra then? by your own statements she waiting until 11:15pm to start looking for her sister even though she could not contact her all day and she was sooo afraid for stacy’s life. makes no sense, so make some sense out of it for me since you seem to know all.
    why oh why would she wait over 6 hours before trying to track her sister down? Cassandra’s own words state she was worried that drew was going to hurt stacy. but yet her and bruce wait over 6 hours to look for her?

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Watching and Watching, stop drinking the Kool Aid.

    How many people do you presume in this country? Can you honestly make such an ignorant statement to believe that Drew and Brodsky are the ONLY ones that could possibly have a problem with the old bat neighbor?

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    notwatching and waiting, do you get out much? seems like you live in a bubble and there’s more to this world and this case then drew and brosdsky but that’s ok stay in your bubble you could not handle the truth anyway.

    it’s sharon and fsp that are stalking and obsessed with drew and now thanks to John they will stalk and be obsessed with his friend.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Oh, Sami, may God find a way of reaching your cold heart.

    I’m done with you.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    Hello? I’m still waiting for your “informed” answer as to why professional search teams have been told that their help is not wanted. Isn’t that a good way to find your sister? You know, hiring professionals?

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    hahahaha oh the drama!

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    Cop out, avoid the question. If you were truely concerned about find Stacy, you would want to know why you’re precious Stacy staff would rather have Julie from CA sell buttons, rather than hire search teams that are continually turned down.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    professionals that offer their services free of charged but are turned away by admin and FOSP.

    yeah that’s the ticket on finding your sister, here’s more ways

    1. post signs in your yard that only drew sees
    2. post on the internet that stacy’s children are home alone
    3. NEVER register your sister in the national missing persons database

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    Sami & Freedom,

    You guys are being worse than ANYONE I’ve seen on FSP!! And I’ve seen a lot!! Good grief!! There’s no need in being so nasty on here.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    the true is nasty isn’t it.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    Concerned for Stacy? Why can’t you answer the question? Seriously, if you truely want to find Stacy for those poor kids, why are search teams being told to take a hike elsewhere? Doesn’t that concern you even just a bit?

    It just proves it’s just a fan club and not really about truely finding her. I donated and then when I found out they turned teams away and were rude to them, I tried asking.

    Guess what, I was told that the teams were not welcomed and yes, I was promptly banned when I pushed on why my money was not going to help find her, for real.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    pardon my spelling error

    THE TRUTH IS NASTY ISN’T IT.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Wow, Sami and Freedom. Way to go. You have inside information!!! That means you can enlighten the rest of us and tell us what really happened to KS and SP, and clear DP’s name once and for all.

    Now that you’ve shared your valuable “information” about FSP, how about the real facts about DP?

    Go for it.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    You guys are pathetic. It just goes to show you that everyone on that pathetic site is more concerned about being a celebrity than actually finding that mother for her children.

    Answer the questions please. Why are “real” search teams told to take a hike?

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    No Freedom, the TRUTH is not nasty at all, but the way some people try to tell it IS. I really hate we can’t all have differing opinions without things turning into a “blog brawl.”

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Just an Observer is too scared to answer an important question.

    She’d rather just sell signs and pretend it goes to professional searchers. What a scam.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    I don’t know anything about professional search teams, other than Equus was involved early on. I do know that for the past few weekends, volunteers have gathered at the aquatic center and freely given their time and effort to find Stacy. I think that people giving their time freely says alot.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Ok, Concerned for Stacy, tell it your way. Why are professional searchers being turned away but old ladies and lonely women are welcomed to search?

    That’s a legitamate question but obviously one that you want to avoid like the plague. Just like the Stacy board, refuse to answer why real searchers are shot down.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    No, Sami, you answer the question. Where did you get this information? Who told you that? How do you know that to be the truth? Who is on the FSP board that told you that, and what is their screen name?

    Otherwise, you’re blowing out hot air. You’re making up remarks to suit yourself, and your full of it. Don’t call anyone pathetic. Quit the name calling. Start acting like a “man” and state your facts. You’re only stating what YOU believe. You want people to answer to you, when you are offering NO PROOF of what you say. Go away.

    “Show me the Money.”

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    no inside information at all, everything is out there for the public to find if you care to step out of the tunnel and look at all sides and question instead of drinking kool-aid.

    Real facts about DP you should know them as well as anyone else.
    FACT wife #3 dead
    FACT wife #$ missing
    FACT Drew is suspect in Stacy’s dissapearance
    FACT LE has not declared ANYONE a suspect in Kathleens death

    other than that LE hasn’t released any other facts.

    now can you answer sami as to why FSP turns away professional search organizations that offer their services for free??

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    Answer the questions please. Why are “real” search teams told to take a hike?

    PROOF, PROOF, PROOF, PROOF, PROOF.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    now can you answer sami as to why FSP turns away professional search organizations that offer their services for free??

    PROOF? PROOF? Is it on the internet, like the other facts? Where? Get it for me! Show me. Tell me how you know, where you found this out.

    PROOF? PROOF?

    Shut up.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    If you are so concerned about your donation, go get a refund. Show up this Saturday at the aquatic center and get a refund.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Oh, Just an Observer, it is the absolute truth, just ask Cassandra, ADMIN, Kerry, Roy or rock star Sharon. They are all fully aware of ADMIN and moderators shutting down any professional help. Hmmm, wonder why they don’t do anything about it.

    I know of one team that was willing to go for free, and because they were professionals, they were shut down. How suspect is that?

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Ah, just ask……

    Proof? Do you have it? Put up or shut up? Quit justifying your remarks by your words. Proof. I want proof. Where is it?

    What team you know of? Who? Get your proof, and maybe someone will listen to you.

    Proof. No ideas, no thoughts, proof!!!! Show and tell.

    Proof.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    hehehhe we have to shut up now?

    geesh Concerned thisis why things turn into a blog brawl some folks just can’t stand others not drinking the kool-aid and thinking for themselves.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Just as I thought. All wind. You’re “both” all wind. You haven’t got an ounce of proof to back up anything you say.

    Baa bye.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Hold on Just an Observer, I will get one of the search team members exact post name and I’m sure they will be happy to inform you of the “facts”.

    I have personally seen ADMIN’s pm’s to this person and it’s appalling. I’m sure they won’t mind me giving their post names so you can contact them. Give me a few minutes.

  • Watching and Waiting // April 22, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Who are the professional teams that have been turned away? I will contact them personally.

  • Concerned for Stacy // April 22, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Sami, I’m sorry but I can’t answer that because I don’t KNOW why. It doesn’t make much sense to me either, but I’m in another state and not in much of a position to get that infomation. I have no idea who (Admin or others) makes those decisions, or why they were made. Looks to me like that’s what the money is being raised for as well…..to find Stacy in the best and quickest way possible, whether it’s by a professional service, volunteer efforts, or both. I DO understand where you’re coming from, but I also understand things are discussed at a meeting on the morning of searches, and that information is not put on the forum. I can’t go to those meetings or help search, so that’s all I know. Sorry.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    observer offers no proof but yet wants others to offer proof.

    here’s proof what professional search teams are showing up on saturdays??

    why aren’t they there? they don’t just shun familes that need help they give of their own time and money to help families locate their missing loved ones, so again what professional search teams are showing up on saturdays to help the locals search for stacy?

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    By the way, show me the PROOF that somebody else might have had something to do with Stacy missing. PROOF please. I’m sure that the cops would love to see YOUR PROOF!

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    Concerned for Stacy, thank you for understanding that there are questions, on both sides of the issue, not just Drew’s. People want her found and the best way to find her is bring in professionals. Thank you for understanding at least that issue.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    Are you getting that proof? I will contact them. Get it.

  • freedom // April 22, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    concerned like you said it makes no sense why professionals are being turned away along with their free services. This action along with a few other actions of that site have pushed many away and made many take a long hard look at what exactly is going on.
    It’s very easy to get wrapped up in only questining drew. he’s a smuck I don’t deny it and possibly a murderer but there is more to this tragedy then just Cassandra’s & FSP’s stories.
    even greta said it herself “all is not as it seems in this case”

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:46 pm

    Since I have been banned for asking about money going towards professional teams, I’m not allowed to see the membership names,but the K9 team was something like Bravas with numbers on the end. If you have membership, go look for that name and pm them for info, if they aren’t already banned for being professionals.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:47 pm

    Just an Observer, are you getting the PROOF about Drew’s guilt also? I will contact the police for you when you get it for me. Get it.

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    I’m not looking for anything. You’re the one making all of these accusations. You said to hold on while you got your proof.

    Where is it, you bag of wind?

  • Just an Observer // April 22, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    LOL. You just made my point for me with this nonsense. No proof, just rants.

    LOL.

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    I just gave you one of the names, you take it from there.

    You have made Drew to be guilty and probably is, but you have yet to provide “PROOF”.

    Also show me “PROOF” that the money goes to professional search teams and not just the dog tags or bumper stickers, or let’s auction the sister for the day, or flowers, or pizza (oh wait, that’s donated), or signs, or pinatas, or parties, oops, did I say that?

  • sami // April 22, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Freedom had a great “proof”. Where are all the professionals on search days? Yea, I know, there’s a whole bunch of lonely women walking through the grass with their canes, but where are the professionals? Professionals want to help, they are not cold hearted, so where are they? Me thinks you spin way too much.