Yesterday, the Chicago Tribune ran a very nice story about Thomas Peterson, Drew Peterson‘s 18-year-old son being named as valedictorian of his high school, despite the death of his mother, the disappearance of his adoptive mother, and his father being charged with the murder of his mom.
Uplifting and balanced as the Tribune story about Tom Peterson is, I can’t help going back to the fact that Joel and Drew’s PR firm sent out a press release about Tom being valedictorian, and I can’t get beyond the fact that Joel not only used the press release to market himself and his web site, but also to attack the the prosecution’s case, and as it also appears, to try to gain some ground towards getting Tom’s name off the civil suit the Savios have filed against Drew.
If you recall, the Savio’s lawyer, Martin Glink, has commented about that case:
“He’s basically saying, ‘I’m letting my father go regardless of what a jury may find,’ even if his moneys have been misspent,” But filing a release is not enough to make it happen, Glink said. “If someone is unduly influencing him, it’s a different story,” he explained.
So…maybe not too surprising that Joel Brodsky made a point of commenting about the Tribune story (via his facebook walll) with these words:
…He supports his dad Drew Peterson 1000% and as this article shows, Tommy is his own man, and nobody is pulling the wool over his eyes or making him do or say anything.
That’s really what this is all about, isn’t it? Continuing to use whatever means he can to benefit Drew, even the successes of Drew’s children. Why does Drew’s lawyer have any public opinion at all about the accomplishments of his client’s children? Does he host their birthday parties as well?
For heaven’s sake, Joel wants the public to believe that no one is manipulating this teenager, but it wasn’t Tom who sent out the press release, it was Joel Brodsky! His name is plastered all over it.
Lastly, watch the video again and listen for Tom to use Joel’s pet phrase “white noise”. At least Tom uses it correctly…
Tom Peterson, I hope your mom’s words continue to inspire you.
As for that press release, why not put Kathleen Savio’s face up next to Tom’s? Think how proud she would be of him…
There’s a new, shorter AP version of the Tom Peterson story up at the Tribune:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-drewpeterson-teen,0,570539.story
Poor Tom Peterson. Just think of him at 16(?) babysitting his little brother and sister while Drew was doing this:
Or imagine sitting at home, wondering what happened to your new mom who disappeared without a trace, and then overhearing your dad on the telephone doing this:
Why on earth should poor Tom, who had already suffered through the reality of a losing two mothers, have had to deal with the further trauma and humiliation of stunts like this? My sincere congratulations to this young man for rising above this sort of fiasco.
ABC news is carrying a story about Tom as well today. Some snippets:
………………
………………
………………
………………
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/tom-peterson-son-drew-peterson-accused-killing-mother/story?id=13184772&page=1
Facs- Thank you for all of this. I missed it on TV. I think there are a lot of heartfelt messages from Tom to his dad. What kid doesn’t want his or her parent to just stay home and make the family the focus? A lesson to many out there who have lost a sense of what’s really important in life. I hope Drew is truly hearing what Tom is saying.
Saw that Joe Hosey will be doing a show and talking about the Peterson case. I couldn’t find the date or time on this link though…:
http://imaginepublicity.com/2011/03/22/the-roth-show-welcomes-journalist-and-author-joe-hosey-2/
The show was today at 6pm (central time). If you missed it, the archives are already up. Start at Hour 2 for the discussion of Stacy Peterson and Kathleen Savio.
http://therothshow.com/show-archives/march-2011/
If it’s easier for you to listen this way, here’s a video. You can open another window if you don’t want to keep looking at the artist’s rendition of Drew.
Another missing woman in Indian Rocks Beach Florida…. I wonder if he watched too much Drew on TV…
Facs or Rescue…..am I hearing right? According to Susan-Murphy Milano….when Vicki Connley was in the car accident, she had a passenger in that car who DIED? I have listened to the above audio 5 times.. and this is what I understthisand. Please clarify this….I thought she was in the car alone, after being told by Drew to go home from the bar.
Irish, I’ll check into that and see what I can find out. I don’t think I had heard that before either.
Meanwhile, new appellate decisions handed down. No Peterson:
http://www.state.il.us/court/opinions/recent_appellate.asp
Thanks Facs
Just from looking things up I can’t confirm that there was a fatality in that accident but it is creepy that it happened on March 1, 1990 (in unincorporated Naperville).
Kathleen died March 1, 2004.
I can only find a record of there being one fatal car accident in Naperville in all of 1990.
Naperville fatal car crashes and road traffic accidents (wrecks) list for 1990:
Jan 25, 1990 01:45 AM, Naper Blvd, Vehicles: 1, Persons: 1, Fatalities: 1, Drunken drivers: 1
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/accidents/acc-Naperville-Illinois.html#ixzz1HXY4ITyS
I think he likes to see it all done and dusted in time for the new financial year..
I dimly remember that there was a passenger with Carol, but I can’t be sure. Perhaps they meant that the passenger has since died?
I spotted something on Joel Brodsky’s facebook wall the other day that is very interesting and something that anyone who blogs or posts anonymously on Internet comment threads should know about.
Your anonymity is not protected if you set out to defame someone (with libelous comments) via the Internet. There was a recent case that ruled against a certain party for posting numerous libelous claims that a city officials had been bribed (when they had not). Of course, you’d think any dummy would know that it’s illegal to spread lies online, but nice to see that the law is on the side of those who post factually and/or state their opinions and ask questions.
Liars and defamers take warning. The Illinois courts have ruled!
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2010/3rdDistrict/June/3080805.pdf
Thankyou once again FACS, You are amazing with all the research you do.
Thanks, Irish. I’m just Googling stuff. Haven’t really found out anything for sure, but this is all interesting:
http://www.topix.com/city/bolingbrook-il/2007/10/bolingbrook-cop-speaks-about-wifes-disappearance
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35319700/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
http://archive.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/02/ex-peterson-co-worker-says-he-was-asked-to-kill-savio.html
I just found it strange that Suasan Murphy-Milano would say that in the audio, like I said, I played it back a few times, and made a phone call to a friend to find out if they had ever heard of this. And they had not.
I hadn’t heard that either, but in all honesty, everything I’ve seen about that incident is second or third hand. I’ve never seen a statement from VC about it.
I’ve sent SMM an email and I’ll let you know what she replies.
Thanks
FYI:
HOPE LIGHTS THE WAY
The 7th Annual National Round Table Conference
March 24th thru 27th of 2011
Holiday Inn Hotel Conference Center 5032 Market Street, Wilmington, NC 28405
(910) 392-1101
Everyone is invited to attend our upcoming national conference for missing persons and all who work in the arena from advocating, volunterism, investigation, search and rescue and identification process of those who are lost. This event is open to all who support the mission of finding a resolution for families who have suffered a missing loved one.
Please share this information to anyone in this line of work and or a family of a missing person or homicide victim. To learn more about CUE Center for Missing Persons please visit us at our web sitewww.ncmissingpersons.org or email us cuecenter@aol.com
http://www.ncmissingpersons.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/flyer.pdf
S M-M is out of town for a bit so she couldn’t give us details about the Connolly car crash.
Bear in mind, Vicki C didn’t say anything about the car accident when she testified at the Hearsay Hearings. This makes me think that whatever her opinion may be about the cause of the incident, there’s no evidence to support it in court.
Interesting blog post about psychopaths and seduction – using Drew Peterson as an example:
http://psychopathyawareness.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/psychopathic-seduction-the-case-of-drew-peterson/
IIRC, it was another employee of the bar who was in the car with Vicki.
But I thought both had survived … in fact that the employee pulled Vicki to safety.
I’m trying to find where I read that … so until then I guess it’s considered rumor.
Great article Fac’s
I’m very impressed with Tom’s maturity. But at the same time I can’t help but feel sad for him, and the other three children. We all know that Drew has told them he’s innocent, and they hold that belief. As their only parent, they’ve placed great faith in him. When Stacy disappeared, he told them, “she’s on vacation.”
I’ve always held out hope that Stacy’s remains would be found and Drew charged in that case too. But after 3 and 1/2 hears, I now doubt Stacy’s remains will ever be found. I think the only possibility in that case is if someone helped Drew in the disposal and that person eventually comes forth.
I have high hopes that Drew will eventually go to trial in the murder of Kathleen, and be found guilty, resulting in spending the rest of his life in prison.
Someday, as adults with maturity, Tom and his brothers and sister will learn the truth, and I think there will be a lot of emotional turmoil for all of them.
I have a friend who has always known that her father killed her mother. She was 4-years-old when it happened. Her father spent most of his life in prison, and my friend was raised by her maternal grandmother. But, my friend was more than 50-years-old when she finally felt ready to learn the details of what happened. She spent days looking at newspaper archives on microfilm of the murder and trial. Later, she went through prison records and learned that her father had been released from prison after spending 20 years for the murder. Shortly after being released from prison, he died in a car accident.
Thanks for sharing that story, Molly.
Another mysterious story – missing woman. controlling ex-lawenforcement boyfriend left the state, refuses to provide DNA sample, sent an adult son to remove items from their home…
http://largo.patch.com/articles/missing-police-cadets-boyfriend-back-in-florida-refuses-to-provide-dna-sample-3
http://clearwater.patch.com/articles/sheriffs-office-executes-second-search-warrant-at-kelly-rothwells-condo
New appellate decisions posted. Still no Peterson:
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/recent_appellate.asp
Tune in Tuesday, March 29th at 9 PM Eastern, 6pm Pacificto http://www.party934.com, 94.9 FM Hudson Valley, NY to hear Rosa Torres, author of Abuse Hidden Behind the Badge and learn more about her harrowing story.
when will this case finally be tried…
Hi Horses. we’re all waiting for the decision on the hearsay appeal. Once that happens, they can finally go to trial…that is unless the appellate decision is challenged and it ends up in supreme court.
Meanwhile, I wonder how Drew is getting along with his day room buddy. The way things are going, this guy is going to finish his sentence and be out before Drew’s case goes to trial.
Hi Facs….I am hopefull that the hearsay law is allowed after all it was this case that created it. Also if you think about it when a witness is killed to silence them it should be aloud so they can still speak, and it might cut down on witnesses being murdered….
Keep in mind, Qhorses, that SA Glasgow no longer wants the new hearsay statute to come into play when it comes to hearsay and this trial. Judge White decided not to allow the majority of the hearsay statements based on the standards of the statute.
The prosecution is hoping that Judge White’s decision will be tossed out and that the new judge will re-examine the evidence using the common law hearsay exceptions, which require a lower standard of reliability than the statute does.
Its nice to see Tom doing well and its his mother to be thanked for that. I pray for all the children of Drew Peterson to be as Tom-living life despite the dark cloud their father put over them.
Eleven new appellate decisions posted. No Peterson on the list:
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/recent_appellate.asp
How ironic would it be if we heard something on April Fool’s Day?
I thought Drew’s attorney said he heard from his “sources” that a decision was coming soon. Still waiting … and waiting… and waiting… and waiting…
Tom Peterson, it is being reported, has been accepted into the University of Pennsylvania, where he’s hoping to study medicine. Kathleen Savio’s sons were the beneficiaries of her insurance policies, and Tom is paying for his education from those proceeds.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/4618333-452/cortez-trotter-in-running-for-top-cop-spot.html
Sounds like a great place to study medicine. I imagine Kathleen would be very proud.
maybe Tom is trying as hard as he can to become someone to be proud of to honour his mother and the legacy she left for him…also putting his whole self totally into his studies at school took his mind off of everything else going on in his life. What happened to him could have turned him good or bad. I’m glad he took the right path…
It’s too bad Joel had to circulate all the PR about Harvard. Now, instead of just enjoying the fact that he was accepted to several schools and has chosen U of P, the public is left asking, “Huh,wonder what happened to Harvard?” Tom can thank Joel Brodsky for that.
It just goes to show you what I’ve said all along. Whatever Brodsky says, expect the opposite. If this hasn’t happened 100% of the time, it’s damn near close. I don’t know what it is with him already, but whenever he opens his mouth to say something Peterson related, it’s because Brodsky likes to hear himself talk. The last couple of statements from him just go to prove what he’s been doing all along. He makes comments to get attention–more for himself than anyone else. Who looks like the dufus posting incorrect Appellate Court rumors and/or inaccurate Tom Peterson college choices when they turn out to be a matter of blowing out hot air?
Remember, this is the guy that was adamant that Drew Peterson would not be charged in the Kathleen Savio matter, that he’d get his bond lowered, and that he’d be out soon. Let’s see, Peterson is approaching the two year mark of being locked up, he’s dreaming of getting himself pressed into diamonds for his kids upon his death, and he’s supposedly a tough guy, handling it all. Since Brodsky is the one that has been enlightening all of us about Drew Peterson’s coping mechanism in confinement, I’d say Peterson is probably a mass of mush about now.
So, the purpose of these little tidbits was…..??????? Who tells him to post this stuff on his facebook page, and what’s the point when it’s idle prattle anyway? Oh, and the Appellate Court must be sleeping on the job, since they’ve disregarded the lawyer man’s prediction that a decision is near (one month ago) and it’s outcome (who knows??).
If you don’t like what’s being reported, give the press your own story.
That does seem to be the approved Selig/Brodsky approach.
This is what the Chicago Tribune reported as being some of Tom Peterson’s school choices, after interviewing him personally. Not sure if he’s asked or approves of what his father’s lawyer posts on his facebook page. Maybe he reads it when everyone else does, and doesn’t have a say in what his father’s lawyer decides to tell the public about his client’s children. In that case, what a shame.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-met-drew-peterson-son-valedictoria20110319,0,3755294.story?page=1
Joel’s call-in segment is up next on the Pinkus Show. Yawn
Spin it Joel, spin it.
Joel is heading out of town for a couple of weeks? Drew will have an extra visitation slot available.
No one calling in for Joel tonight? Where are his “followers” ?
Didn’t Joel say if the Appellate Court decision came down, he could be ready to go in a couple of weeks? It would appear he’s not planning on being in court anytime in April for this case. IMO
DD – doesn’t matter if the defense has to be ready to go. He’s not a court participant anymore.
I went back to past news pieces about the possible time frame regarding the Appellate Court’s ruling, and found this. April 16 will be the two-month mark, so it would seem that a ruling should be coming soon.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=7961881
30 Appellate Court Opinions Posted to the IL Courts Website
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/recent_appellate.asp
No Peterson…
New post is up!
http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/woman-comes-forward-to-share-her-love-letters-from-drew-peterson/