Your thread – May 15

It’s Thursday so you all know what that means…grand jury day. We’ll give be out covering the grand jury proceedings and give you all an update as soon as we know something. In the meantime, here’s a new thread.

Advertisements

261 thoughts on “Your thread – May 15

  1. Danya,

    I am assuming that the grand jury will convene today, since it’s Thursday. Please keep us up to date on any information regarding persons testifying today.

    Thanks for all your work on this forum. Sometimes it is a thankless task. And having to be the moderator can grate on your nerves. Thanks for all you do.

  2. Considering who showed up to testify the last time you said “No one who was recognizable was there”, ya might wanna hang around longer this time, check out, and ask about all those “unrecognizables” who might bloody well turn out to be very important witnesses for THE murder case of the new millenium…

    OJ- Smojay.
    Scott Peterson? Pblttt…
    The Austrian Incestuous Pedophile? Blech…

    YOUR GENERAL PUBLIC SPEAKS.

    WE WANT THESE CASES SOLVED AND JUSTICE SERVED FOR STACY AND KATHLEEN, DAMMITALL.

    Now, go and get ’em, tigers!

  3. FRICK! Sorry about the “Oh, ()%(#”…

    Damn!

    WAIT- no, how do I friggin’ erase this crap cause I do NOT want to get banned!!!

    I am SORRY!!!

    Oh for G*d’s sake…

    Beans…

    I’m off to bed now.

    Can someone delete this crap? please?

  4. I love it Bash…good laugh this morning. And I couldn’t agree more, justice needs to be served. But I’ll add…it needs to be served in the right way.

  5. The ebay hat is overpriced, she could sell it if she started bidding lower. Not to mention her sellers fee is going to be pretty high.

    Does anyone remember the Runaway Bride Jennifer Wilbanks? On ebay, someone sold “runaway bride running shoes, and a slice of toast with her eyes on it like this @@, sort of a parody on that grilled cheese sandwich with mary face someone sold for thousands…

    Maybe Drew toast? @@ Nah… Gotta think of something good… clicking “watch this item” just in case. He says for $20 he’ll autograph stuff.

    ^yes, I am kidding.

  6. Drew’s complete timeline for October 28-October 31. On a grilled cheese sandwich or any other way. That might get a bid or two.

  7. I’ve met Ripkin, he was kind of an ass.

    Wait…is that attacking someone who isn’t on the board? Dang.

  8. ‘And one need not even send a letter to get an autograph from Peterson.
    “For 20 bucks,” he said, “they can bang on the door and get a signature.”‘

    I guess the time to do that is *before* he gets his guns back. 😉

  9. It looks like JB has stopped posting on the LegalPub blog and is now trying to ferret out a new location where the weak-minded and gullible can be bent to his will:

    http://wespeakourmind.proboards50.com/

    “I was sent an e-mail to check out your board. It seems very fair minded. However, I fear that if I start posting I will attract the FSP fourm posters who will overwhelm this board with their unthinking comments. They stalk the internet and did this on another board I did some posting on. Lets see what happens.

    Joel A. Brodsky”

    “If you have questions, post them and I will try to answer. The only subject that I can’t go into is the timelines for October 28. 2007 and the weekend Kathy died. (there are some decent timelines on the internet that you can look at, but it can’t come from me for legal reasons) Lets see how this goes and see if the FSP fourm crazies don’t jump in.

    Joel A. Brodsky”

  10. A signed confession by drew would bring alot of money on ebay. That ninga outfit he wore to kill Kathleen would bring a nice sum.
    An explantion by Lenny and Paula telling why they run to the aide of a suspected murderer every chance they get would sell. God dang there is alot of money to be made by Drew and his friends if he just used his head!!!!!!!!!

    Oh, wait little minnie blue barrells with signed confession in each one!! At the end of the confession he says it is just kidding it is his humor, LOL LOL

  11. Truth, do you mean this Paula?

    “”I don’t know who I autographed one of these for. It’s not even real,” Peterson said.

    But after some checking around, he recalled signing a hat for a friend who watched his children while he was in New York City for his “Today” show appearance. The friend, Paula, gave the cap to her mother, and she is the one apparently holding the auction.

    “I just signed it for Paula, she gave it to her mom, and her mom needed some money,” Peterson explained.”

  12. I just don’t get the mindset of people who would try to make a buck off of this . . . whether you “need some money” or are just an idiot. Or both.

  13. At this time we have decided to close the forum to the public. The forum will remain intact, but will not be accessible for public viewing. Thank you to all who have contributed to this site. Just because we have closed the forum does not mean we are giving up. We will continue to search for Stacy until she is found!
    ____________________
    That is a good idea. I hope the search areas discussed this week pan out.

  14. Every little tiny thing drew does is put down. The man signed a hat for someone, how was he supposed to know that someone would sell it on E bay ? Gosh give it up, hes not a monster. As far as Joel, he does answer people with no problem. Its sad that both men are dragged around & criticized no matter what is going on. You may hate both of them but I will never join in that trashing of people.

  15. The only reason Brodsky posts on any blog or forum is to benefit his client by attacking the victim, her family and friends. I’m not saying it makes him a bad person, it’s just something to be aware of.

    Presently, his only job is to use the media to promote his client and he’s doing this under the direction of Gregg Selig. Therefore, anything the man posts is fair game for scrutiny.

    As for Drew Peterson signing autographs, that’s just tacky. He’s no hero. If someone wants to sell it, yay for them.

  16. facs, I think it’s Glenn Selig.

    And my gripe is not with Drew signing the hat. It’s with the women selling it on e-Bay.

  17. The point is that he has no control over that happening. Its probally something he never even thought about.

  18. Although, I have to agree with facs, and it is tacky for him to have signed it in the first place. He really does think he is some kind of celebrity. And I guess other people do since they are having him sign stuff.

  19. goldmustang // May 15, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    The point is that he has no control over that happening. Its probally something he never even thought about.
    ________________
    No control. Our Drew? I don’t think so.

    It’s in his control … just don’t sign stuff! For 20 bucks or free.

  20. Gold, I don’t think anyone’s mad at Peterson for the hat being sold on Ebay. I agree with others that they’re starting bid is too high, though.

  21. they’re/their

    God, I just need to open a grammar and spell check in another window and run everything through it before I click Submit.

  22. A thought just crossed my mind. Last weekend (I believe) FSP posted that searches would take place but they were searching in areas that were not safe for the public.

    It made quite a stir here.

    A psychic (and I’m using that to mean anyone with a gift in the supernatural although some people use it for a particular area) revealed what had happened to her when she recently visited Bolingbrook. The whole experience shook her to the core. The area that she wanted searchers (divers) to go was extremely dangerous and required closing part of Dresden Dam.

    At the time, I wondered why she was able to post this … but now I think it’s because the searches had already taken place. She posted it yesterday (I think) and if any guilty party had wanted to get rid of evidence, he would have time since the next search was not scheduled until Saturday …

    Just want to know what anyone and everyone thinks.

  23. I just went on FSP and the following message is posted.

    Forum Information:
    This board is in Maintenance Mode. We are restructuring our site to become an information based only site. Thank you to all who have contributed to this forum. Just because we have closed the forum does not mean we are giving up. We will continue to search for Stacy until she is found! Please continue to visit the main website for updates on searches and events going forward. http://findstacypeterson.com

  24. Forum Information: We are restructuring our site to become an information based only site. Thank you to all who have contributed to the forum. Just because we have closed the forum does not mean we are giving up. We will continue to search for Stacy until she is found! Please continue to visit our website for updates on searches and events going forward.

    Now it says, that. It’s shut down, seems like.

  25. Okay if this person thought her body was there why were divers not sent right away ?I find it interesting that the minute anyone asks about the money theres a problem, and now out of the clear blue sky its gone ? Makes you think that someone is really on the hot seat and has made a mint off of this & its not Drew.

  26. Noway, I don’t understand what you are saying about the psychic and a search. Are you wondering if maybe something was found last week?

  27. I first got the message that it was closed to the public (which I figured it meant that certain people could still post there).

    The next time I went there the “Forum” option was gone and the message on the Home page was what kimmer posted about at 3:07.

    I’d gone there the second time to verify what I had read (closed to the public or closed to all posting … not the same thing).

  28. Goldmustang, it’s not that easy to get police to believe psychics. And my thought is that the divers went there before Sonia posted her information … not that the divers will be going this Saturday.

  29. Gold, only the chatty forum is gone. The site is still there, the organization is still intact, searches are still scheduled and donations are still being accepted.

    IMO, they just realized that the forum was becoming a burden to maintain and was doing more harm than good. Who has time to moderate that mess when there’s a missing woman to find?

  30. Hmm, maybe only committee members are posting there now. Or maybe they meant that it is no longer active but has been preserved…just taken offline?

    I couldn’t say. I do think it was a good step to take.

  31. I never found a police dept. that did not use people with the 6th sense. They are used alot. Most cops believe in that and full moons.

  32. facs, yes, I think something was found.

    I don’t know if you read Sonia’s posts, but she believes that Stacy is there and gave specific area. She said that the searchers needed to get there right away … but I’m wondering if this area (Dresden) was the area searched when FSP posted that searches were taking place in areas that were not safe for the public to participate.

    From what was said, the Dam is dangerous, and they would have to close part of the Dam so that the water flow would not be so strong (protecting the divers).

    Sonia’s posts made it sound like the divers had not gone there yet, and I thought it was stupid to post it (if evidence really was dumped here by Drew or anyone else, wouldn’t they try to go back and get it or move it? I know they wouldn’t be able to get into the water, but who is to say that the evidence was all put in the water? Some psychics “get” that area, but believe that Stacy is on land.

    My horrible thought is that both are true.

  33. facsmiley said: IMO, they just realized that the forum was becoming a burden to maintain and was doing more harm than good. Who has time to moderate that mess when there’s a missing woman to find?
    _________________
    Good way to summarize this whole thing.

  34. Its interesting that all the things that have stacys name on them for sale is okay, but one ball cap that drew is not selling causes an uproar. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander as the old saying goes. Alls fair in war.

  35. Noway, I don’t know.

    I do think that if there had been a search with boats and divers that the media would have been covering with helicopters as they did before. On the other hand, the case is no longer new and fuel is very expensive now…so maybe not.

    I do know that I’ve been hearing “dresden dam” for a long time. I always thought that if LE had any leads that supported the theory, that they would have searched it long ago. But then, I’m far from psychic and I’m not in law enforcement.

  36. I don’t think Sonia has her own site. She had been in contact with “Sandra” … and she does have a website … but I don’t know what it is.

  37. goldmustang // May 15, 2008 at 3:28 pm

    I never found a police dept. that did not use people with the 6th sense. They are used alot. Most cops believe in that and full moons.
    ____________________
    Well, from what the psychics who DID contact law enforcement said, they were met with skepticism if not downright disbelief.

    And some have had that problem in the past with other law enforcement, so they were gunshy about contacting law enforcement in this case.

  38. noway – I wanted to mention that I am glad you didn’t take last night’s “post” to be directed to you. You’re a blogging buddy for sure!

  39. Note to Danya – if you went to the Will County Courthouse today, did you miss getting caught up in the “flying Elvis’? You’ll know what I mean if you were there!

  40. Oh, now this is funny. This is JB posted on the Legal Pub Blog. I can’t stop laughing as I’m typing this. My eyes are tearing, and I’m having a hard time sitting still, LOL, LOL.

    Joel A. Brodsky said…

    To those who said I have abandoned this board, you are wrong. I have just been posting on the other very interesting legal issues that LP has been blogging. Unlike the FSP crazies, my entire life does not revolve around Drew Peterson and Stacy’s dissapearance. You guy’s really need to get a life.
    May 15, 2008 10:27 AM

  41. This man is a lawyer. Check out his spelling:

    “dissapearance”

    ah, when I was in school (not law school either), it was “disappearance.”

    Ah, what money will buy. What a great idea to hawk funds for legal fees. Maybe Brodsky should go back and take a basic spelling course, or, at the very least, use spell check. LOL.

    P.S. Note to Brodsky. We ALL have lives. Stacy Peterson and Kathleen Savio were robbed of that God given gift!

  42. On that same board, Brodsky is now saying a car w/dealer plates pulled at at Sharon B.’s and a well-dressed man and woman went in to Sharon’s house and stayed like an hour and a half. When they left he says Sharon came out and looked all dejected, no her usually snearing look at Drew’s house.
    I have no opinion other than if this is truly Brodsky, he is pretty unprofessional to be engaging in such posts.

  43. A well dressed man came to my house to day and when he left, I came out looking dejected.

    It was the UPS man, but he had the wrong house.

    Shortly after that, I took a nap.

  44. rescue-
    haha, yes I saw the flying Elvis…all 12 or so of them actually. I made the terrible mistake of parking in the lot next to the one they landed in so I couldn’t go to lunch until they all landed (apparently the cops were worried one of them would miscalculate a landing and take out pedestrians).

    -d-

  45. morecurious // May 15, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    Oh, and then shortly after the FSP Board went down.
    ________________________

    Personally, I’m glad it went down and away from the actual Find Stacy Peterson webpage/info. It always should have been maintained seperately. There is no reason they can’t start a new site elsewhere so that posts of eyebrow raising concerns are not reflective of the site itself.

  46. As for Brodsky, he is just looking for more media attention. I’m not sure who is more into themselves? Brodsky or Drew? I saw his post in which he said an “FSP person” mentioned he should be ashamed in front of his peers….well, that means he must have been reading here as that is what I stated this morning. I stand by that post, too.

  47. Danya – they were delayed doing it because they lost their courage due to the wind/weather. What a fiasco!

    Glad you got out eventually. Me too.

  48. This has got to be one for the books. Brodsky blogging on boards, trolling for positive results!

    Wonder if they’ll include that in law school lectures in the coming school terms? Bettcha that’s a new one for budding defense lawyers. Use your blogging skills when you’re bored, with nothing to do. Cuz, I’m thinking Brodsky is SOL in potential clients ringing his phone, or any other legal work, for that matter.

    Drew IS is only client. Who’s he kidding?????

  49. I have signed up myself on all kinds of sites as “Joel Brodsky” “Joel A. Brodsky” “Joel a. Bafoonsky””Melonheadbaldsky” “Joel A. Barfsky”
    Get my point?
    (I really didn’t, but you know what I mean, it’s the internet) for christ sake.

  50. well it was verified to be jb. i bet he has really got some ideas off all these forums. we are the typical jury pool out here in internet land. not that any of us could ever serve on this jury.

  51. JB, in my opinion, found the wonders of the internet, and is addicted (albeit too late) and THAT will be his downfall.

  52. Well, here is the way I look at it…in the State of Illinois, in 2006, the US Census Bureau calculated exactly 12,831,970 people resided in the state of Illinois, of those people, let’s say 9,831,970 people are excluded due to their age, incarceration, or knowledgable of the case. That leaves 3 million people who could be jury pooled. Of those 3 million, I’m sure at least 13,000 will reside in whatever community of Illinios that they choose for the trial. I don’t think there will be a problem finding 12 people who have no clue about the case. Whose Brodsky kidding anyhow? Actually, I think he is trying to convince himself.

  53. Well, damn damn double friggin’ damn! I should have saved copies of the most pertinent posts, because I had no idea that I wouldn’t be able to re-read them one day. Now, it’s too late- they’re *poof* gone. All that time consuming, seeking/finding/organizing every little possible detail that could be found, little gray cells toiling for the truth’s work, down the drain. Kaput. Finis.

    Fit to be tied, I am right now…

  54. Cy, gevalt! What’s next up on eBay? Drew’s last bowel ovement? One of his nose hairs?

    If there was no one out there to buy it, then it wouldn’t be for sale.

    Forget “Sinister Sells”- this is “Sensationalism Buys”!

  55. I’m not complaining, mind you, but I was gone all day, and I came back to calmness and serenity. Why?

  56. goldmustang // May 15, 2008 at 3:32 pm SAID:
    Its interesting that all the things that have stacys name on them for sale is okay, but one ball cap that drew is not selling causes an uproar. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander as the old saying goes. Alls fair in war.
    ————————

    To: goldmustang
    I would like to be in a REAL war with the likes of you!
    Go Away! One is a crooked, useless EX-cop, and possible DOUBLE murderer, that was chastised by his Chief, as an “embarrassment to the badge” and the other is some cool chick, you would probably want to hang with (IF she was still around) Get REAL!

  57. It’s a cosmic burp in the universe, Rescue. Should be over soon as the sharks start circling round the boats again…

  58. basherette:
    jfyi
    When you come across stuff you might want later: make a pertinent folder, and use “save page as”

  59. They’ve probably all retreated to their own boards where they can fawn over Brodsky and blush because they assume that he’s there because he has an interest in them.

    Meanwhile, he thinks he’s getting some free press for himself, his practice and his client.

    He’ll disappear as soon as he realizes that most of those boards can not be viewed by the public and are register-only forums.

  60. Yeah, I did that with a few posts already. Doesn’t help to assuage the utter frustration I feel after losing all of that information…

    Why the hell couldn’t they just make the forum an historical ARCHIVE only? That way, it would still be available to read, but no one would be able to post/alter a post/delete a post.

    There is NO reason why that information should NOT be accessible- alot of people worked pretty damn hard on these cases, and though we may just be “arm chair gumshoes”, and not LE, we came up with some really good info, clues and timelines.

    I think it’s deplorable. Downright deplorable.

  61. Pick your poison, basherette. some kind of shot that goes down smooth, warms the belly, and makes ya feel good.

  62. Uh, maybe regional slurs?

    Ya know, because I live in AK, so that makes me a bloody “Northerner” in some eyes…

  63. basherette – I think JB thought this would fill his cup and make him a wealthy dude. Isn’t he in for a big surprise?

  64. I really can’t believe, after knowing what I know now, that he even ever had a career (in his particular field)
    Never call a lawyer from the Yellow Pages!

  65. don’t let sami hear that patmccready. She’s not a fan of people that aren’t up to her “speed.”

  66. Any news regarding whether the judge has decided to allow /disallow the boys’ testimony at the GJ yet?

  67. Yes, I have a great dislike for the ones that have the John Wayne Syndrome, as I call it, and DP certainly can fall into that category. Or, more like the guy that turned into that awful robot cop in Terminator 2. Blasted everyone in sight.

  68. Oh, I definitely think the boys’ testimony could shed some much needed light on both cases. If they knew nothing of value, then why would DiP even bother to try and quash the subpoena?

  69. Did you remember the moving Internal Affairs, with Richard Gere? Now, that was one bad guy. Better looking, of course, then the Drewman, but same way of thinking.

  70. Seriously, what happened to everybody? There’s no back biting going on. What’s up with that?

  71. You mean it was frozen? Sometimes it works for me to stop it, and try it again, or just go out altogether and come back in.

  72. rescueapet // May 15, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    Seriously, what happened to everybody? There’s no back biting going on. What’s up with that?
    ________________
    If you’d like, I could say something mean about you. 😉

  73. Bash, they might allow access to the site at some point … I like the idea of locking all the posts. What you see is what you get. Read only access.

  74. 😀
    I don’t think I can top Melonheadbaldsky! And I’d just look lame trying.

    Guess we’ll just have to get along.

  75. noway – I think that was the first step to getting organization of the site. I can understand Basherette is upset about losing her “stuff” though. That site should remain informational, because it was getting too wayward sometimes. I, personally, felt some posters were over-the-line with their rants. There was a post that referred to the judge, among other things, as a “nut job” in considering the gun issue. Whew, that was particularly eye-opening.

    Well, I hope everyone is comfortable with what happens in the future with it. This is more the place to do the bantering and opinionating, although, it can get hotted up in here!

    noway – Chitown Are!

  76. I think everybody must be on that “other” board asking Joel Brodsky questions, lol. Really surprised more people aren’t here talking about the forum at FSP being gone since so many posters wanted that to happen. Really quiet tonight, huh? By the way, I saw that awful picture of almost naked Drew on that other site. What was that woman thinking that posted it on FSP??? GEEZ! I would be FURIOUS if someone posted a picture of me half naked on a public forum without my permission. Surprised Brodsky hasn’t already filed a lawsuit on Drew’s behalf. Guess if he had, we would have heard about it already.

  77. Resue, did you see that he had his own thread where is takes questions and answers them? One woman asked how he had so much time to be blogging on a message board, lol.

  78. Noway, Joel said he had not seen the picture of Drew, but that he had pictures of Stacy and Cass in his files.

  79. ddgechrgr
    Observer
    member is online

    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2
    Karma: 100 Re: All Peterson Related Here
    « Reply #93 Today at 5:26am »

    ——————————————————————————–
    The only reason, that I can see, that Joel Brodsky would post in this forum would be to once again utilize the “media” in a different approach to make more of a mockery of Stacy’s presumed, and most probable, death status. It was quite apparent in his post that his purpose was to divulge the “AK47-near nude” photo’s of Stacy and her sister, Cassandra. What he forgets is that Drew took those photo’s. What kind of police officer dresses his wife and sister in law in provacative poses and proceeds to take photographs? That man is not right. Brodsky, your trial by media is going to fail your client. His history and actions are certainly not celebrity status. This is the case that those of your peers will walk away shaking their heads and laughing at the ridiculous means that you’ve partaken to try and prove your client innocent. A jury of twelve-year olds can see through all this. I hope you have a back up career in the works.
    « Last Edit: Today at 5:27am by ddgechrgr » Link to Post – Back to Top Logged

  80. And if this is true, it may be Melonheadbaldsky has not filed a lawsuit on behalf of his client … there’d by one comin’ right back at ’em.

    Oh … I think that was a broken rule. I don’t think this person posts here and cannot explain his post. Gatehouse will remove if necessary.

  81. Noway, I posted Joel’s actual comments on yesterday’s thread. What you posted was an elaboration of that by another poster.

  82. To my knowledge, those pictures of Stacy and Cass haven’t been posted anywhere and are just in Joel’s files. Drew gave them to him for some reason, as well as vacation pictures of Stacy and the family. Probably to try to prove what a happy family they all were, ya think?

  83. cfs – fsp name. My favorite post, which I started, was called something positive, something beautiful. It was pictures of Stacy, which I found here, and posted them over there to set a tone of good things, not the crap I was reading. I tried often to do that.

  84. A pic of DiP “en totale flagrante creepius maximus”?

    *BARF*

    Oh, I am SOOOOO glad my eyes never saw that…

  85. You should be!! Wish I hadn’t either, but it was just there, and I stumbled upon it , and then quickly looked away!!! OOOOoooo!!!!

  86. I have to sit on my fingers more when it comes to Brodsky and his posts. It makes me crazy to look at them. He’s a putz and I can’t stand a word that comes out of his mouth, or through his inarticulate fingers.

  87. Rescueapet, were you able to save your posts? I had saved mine (minus coffee talk … they made it much easier for me by eliminating those).

    I’m not sure I had anything useful in there. But I’ve got ’em.

  88. no, I didn’t really have anything there I need. Towards the end, I didn’t post much. Too much going on there. How did you retrieve them, noway?

  89. I had a hunch that the site would go away. Once JIC’s post count went down to zero … or not really. (My theory is that she just would have posted under another profile after having removed her JIC profile.)

    Anyway, I just started saving the pages of posts and got done yesterday.

  90. We all wish we could take some stuff back. Not bad, just kind of rambling, I guess. It’s hard to stay focused sometimes when it comes to Brodsky and Peterson! But there’s a lot of stuff there we’re not going to take the heat for! Huh, noway?

  91. Yes, thankfully, nobody put me in charge! 😉

    But it’s kind of like a family member moved away. A family member you might not have liked all the time, but who, for the most part, was okay.

  92. We’re here now noway. Hopefully, it’ll be civil here. Just gotta no who to walk by and who you can reason with. Some not.

  93. I was also a poster there and was pretty moderate, but did get carried away one time. If you remember when Drew’s picture was taken with his mouth hanging open after the ISP officer refused to shake his hand when he picked up the Denali? I photoshopped a pic of an orangutan with a similar expression and put them side by side. Childish, I know, but no worse than a lot of the other stuff done there. Anyway, people thought it was funny, then all of a sudden J in CA comes on and has a fit about it being very inappropriate and boom my post and all that ensued were gone.
    Like, I said, I know it was childish, but no worse than hundreds of others and I never figured it out. I was expecting to get banned, but didn’t.

  94. The following are just my opinions that to the best of my knowledge are based on factual data.

    1. I do not believe either of the older boys will have any testimony to break anything wide open. (These are two nice, intelligent young men. One extremely intelligent. IMO if either of these boys felt they had knowledge of something terrible that happened there have been many, many opportunities for them to “flee” or talk to share their knowledge).

    2. I cannot find any reason to think DP has any sort of John Wayne or Terminator type syndrome – blast everyone in sight. (I believe he never fired a weapon in the line of duty in all of his years in LE. I cannot even recall any mention of him drawing a weapon)

    3. The pictures of Cass & Stacy in Drew’s SWAT uniform? I do not think Brodsky has that in his file as I read somewhere today, someone representing themself as JB, asking where he could see said picture.

  95. Maybe we are all getting the feeling that it’s getting close to the beginning of the end. When they do finally charge him, it’s going to be a long haul. I think they’ll start with the Savio matter first. Whew, it’s going to be complicated. I just wish IL had cameras in the courtrooms.

  96. I could be wrong, but my recollection is that the person representing himself as JB was asking to see the half-undressed photo of Drew. And then he said he’d never seen it be he had seen the one you described of Cass and Stacy.

  97. I only know of him from what I’ve learned by watching him from day one. I don’t like him, or anything about him. As to his career, it was also publicly reported that the chief was not fond of his antics, and wanted to have him fired. What’s up with that?

  98. bbismytown // May 15, 2008 at 9:30 pm

    The following are just my opinions that to the best of my knowledge are based on factual data.

    3. The pictures of Cass & Stacy in Drew’s SWAT uniform? I do not think Brodsky has that in his file as I read somewhere today, someone representing themself as JB, asking where he could see said picture.
    *******************************************
    It’s all on this site if you haven’t checked it out already.

    http://wespeakourmind.proboards50.com/index.cgi?board=stacy&action=display&thread=339

  99. I just went there and looked again. “Brodsky” or whoever is saying he hasn’t seen the pics of Drew, but he does have in his file the ones of Stacy and Cass.

  100. Well, that’s where it came from, and supposedly Brodkly has his own question and answer thread going. You said you were basing your opinion on factual data, so I wasn’t sure if you actually had the “facts” as they may or may not be on the pictures.

  101. rescueapet // May 15, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    Seriously, what happened to everybody? There’s no back biting going on. What’s up with that?
    —————————————-
    The ones who were rude here were the ones who had an axe to grind about being banned from FSP.

    Now that FSP is gone, they have nothing to gripe about.

  102. In regards to the Cass/Stacy photo, Brodsky posted this at LegalPub:

    “I have never seen the picture of Drew you are reffering to. I have seen (and have in my very large file) alot of pictures of Stacy and Drew on vacation and some pictures of Stacy and Casandra posing for pictures with Drew’s swat outfit and AR-15. There are some levels of nudity in these pictures, but nothing obscene or exposing of “private” parts. I would be interested in seeing the picture you are referring to. Where can I see it?

    Joel A. Brodsky”

  103. cfs7360 // May 15, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Noway, you must have joined that other site too, huh?
    ___________________
    I actually found that on Lavanda’s thread. I couldn’t figure out where it came from but the link was provided upthread so I did check out the original.

    I may have questions for Brodsky. Of course he won’t answer the timeline question but I do have a few more. I just need to have a fresh brain and a new attitude. 😀

    Good night everyone!

  104. I meant Lavanda’s website not thread.(www.angelsforstacy.hqforums.com … I think).

    This is running slow … my computer or need my daily thread!

  105. I will pray for the healing of your eyes, minds and souls, those of you that saw the DiP pic.

    Barouch atta Hashem, and may peace saturate you with its loving & healing light, my worldwide friends…

  106. Noway, Brodsky is a total fool for going on a public forum and offering to answer questions. I also saw where he said that all his attorney pals are supporting him. I don’t believe it. (Yes, his posts are on my site.)

  107. NOT him. (Brodsky) Just his posts are on my site. I can assure you if he tried to sign up I would flat out tell him “no thank you.” My site is named after Stacy but we do have threads for other lost and missing loved ones, as well.

  108. It’s been pretty quiet in the media. I noticed Grace and Greta have not had much lately. When it gets quiet…you know what happens…ol’ Drew will do something to get the media camera’s rolling again….or Brodsky. I still cannot get over how so many people are supporting Brodsky’s posts of what may have happened to Stacy. He reads far too many Danielle Steele novels. Nobody can convince me that she is “hiding” and like the “Runaway bride”. Not when she was an adoring mother. If she were one to run off like that…she surely would not have reached out to so many for help. The Pastor, previous friends, present friends, a lawyer, Sharon, her sister, Pam Bosco. No way did she up and run off “like her mother”, per Brodsky. Not too mention, as distressed as she was over her sister Tina’s death…she would not have left her ashes behind in the house with Drew either. Think about it. If we were to believe Drew and IF she ran away…(which I’m 100% pos she didnt) “to where she wants to be”…she would have taken Tina’s ashes with her. Certainly she would have taken the two smaller children.

  109. Good day all. Have to get to work. Be back tonite. Prayers that some miracle occurs and Stacy will be found and buried properly…SOON.

  110. Joe Hosey got some statements from the 22-year old.

    http://tinyurl.com/65d6uc

    BOLINGBROOK — The latest lady in Drew Peterson’s life — a 22-year-old he rescued from a Naperville traffic stop last week — is keeping an open mind about her older man “friend.”

    “I’ve always been the kind of person, I’m not going to judge someone,” said the young woman, who asked that she not be identified.

    The woman said she met Peterson about three weeks ago through their mutual friend, Steve Carcerano, who tans at the salon where she works. Since then, they have spoken often and she has spent the night at his home — but nothing physical took place, she said. Peterson did not seem so sure about that.

    “Never ‘nothing’ physical,” Peterson said enigmatically…

  111. Can this be quote of the day?

    *************************

    …Peterson’s friend from the tanning salon was not looking forward to appearing before the grand jury. She also did not appreciate the criticism she has taken for befriending Peterson.

    “It sucks,” she said, “because I’m not a hooker.”

  112. Rescue, they haven’t made a new daily thread yet today. You posted on the Grand Jury thread from yesterday. 😉

  113. facsmiley // May 16, 2008 at 7:42 am

    Can this be quote of the day?

    *************************
    “It sucks,” she said, “because I’m not a hooker.”

    ________________________________

    Facs, that’s a good one! I liked this one too from another article:

    I don’t know if people are looking because it’s me or the age difference,” he said.
    *********************************

    Ummm, how about both?????

    By the way, someone actually bid the $1000 for Drew’s cap on eBay. Wonder if it will go for that, or go higher? Will be interesting to see.

  114. Facs, I guess I just can’t see a cap, ANY CAP, (and especially Drew’s) being worth a $1000, but that’s just my opinion.

  115. CFS, just for the record, you and I are both quoting from the same article – Joe Hosey’s in the HeraldNews.

  116. My tinyurl goes to the BBSun, but it’s the same newsgroup and the article appears to be identical.

  117. Sorry, Facs. There were two articles, and one of them had more info. I may have posted the wrong one.

  118. I know this is completely subjective and not very nice, but I just looked at the picture of DP that is posted with the latest story and…he just looks like a miserable old bastard.

  119. Not sure if I want to sign up on another site. Some of the sites listed here you can’t read unless you register. Do I want to share my personal info with people I don’t know? IMO it would be nice if you could at least read what’s on their site before deciding if you wanted to join.

  120. luvpups // May 15, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    rescueapet // May 15, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    Seriously, what happened to everybody? There’s no back biting going on. What’s up with that?
    —————————————-
    The ones who were rude here were the ones who had an axe to grind about being banned from FSP.

    Now that FSP is gone, they have nothing to gripe about.
    ___________________
    No, we still want to know what happened to the money. I still want to know where Stacy is.

  121. Well, here I am! Back where I am supposed to be.

    This guy is just frightening, isn’t he? Can you imagine the look of horror when this woman’s mom got wind of it?

    Maybe he’s just trying to line himself up another babysitter. One that babysits for him too. Doesn’t seem like he’s got too many family members rushing to help him out anymore. Just seems to me that most everyone that is close to him has flown the coop. Except for Robinson, Carcerano and “Paula.” Paula’s the hat lady.

  122. Yes he does, but that’s also the picture that really captured his resemblence to the cowardly lion, and it’s just amazing to me the similarity of the two.

  123. Gooutandhappy – the ‘must register to even read’ to me implies that there’s drama at the site. It’s a red flag for me, too.

  124. Not that it’s any of my business, by why in the world, if that girl has only known him for three weeks, would she be spending the night at his house?? I’m telling you…..those poor children have GOT to be so confused!!!

  125. kimmer – I think everyone is united in wanting to know where Stacy is. I also think that the more news that DP makes, the sicker he is beginning to look.

    I think that is a bad thing for his children to have to endure – their father allowing his pick-ups to spend the night at the house, especially since their mother has only been gone a few short months.

    Someone mentioned earlier last night, I believe that the boys are extremely intelligent, and if they knew something, they had more than ample opportunity to talk to someone.

    I highly doubt that. Just because they’re “book” smart doesn’t mean they know how to deal with the situation they may be in. Maybe they’ve had it pounded into their heads by their father that he’s the only one left, and if he goes, their whole lives will change. They’ll go from their home, their friends, their schools, to a completely different place. That doesn’t exactly sound like a pleasant thing to have to consider.

    I absolutely think those boys have something to add to this whole mix. Many, many children live their home lives in secret. NO ONE knows what goes on there but them, and until I see otherwise, I will go on believing they know more than we’ll ever imagine.

  126. CFS, I know! I read her quotes and she sounds so naive. “He’s not my boyfriend, he’s just really nice to me!” I wish I could shake her.

    No 22-year old needs a ‘nice’ 54 year old murder suspect for a friend.

    Do you ever watch the show Intervention? So often the addicted subject is a young woman with much older male ‘friends’ who pay her for spending time with them, then eventually stripping and then eventually…whatever. Why does this situation remind me of that?

    “I”m not a hooker!”

  127. So nice to see you all here. I was hoping that with the changes to FSP they would post something about the tax status issue … but nada yet.

    And I’m not sure what my vote is for quote of the day:

    facsmiley // May 16, 2008 at 8:06 am with this one: Rescue, they haven’t made a new daily thread yet today. You posted on the Grand Jury thread from yesterday.

    OR

    cfs7360 // May 16, 2008 at 8:08 am with the 22-year old’s statement: “It sucks,” she said, “because I’m not a hooker.”

    😀
    I’ll be in an out today. I had to laugh at the warning to FSP members on the “speak your mind” site warning them to be nice to Joel or pay the price!

  128. You know Rescue, since the boys haven’t testified at the GJ yet, it looks like the more Drew does with his carousing at bars and bringing women to his home (especially a 22 years old) that it would just provide that many more questions to be asked of the boys. Not sure of the GJ questioning process, and they may not be concerned with the “current events” in Drew’s life. If they are, then Drew is just giving those boys more to have answer to, in my opinion.

  129. I still check acandyrose.com for past and current info. She has so much info at her site and it’s organized. She has links there to some forums which discuss Stacy as well. Interesting to read other peoples theories and thoughts.

  130. Facs, I have seen Intervention, and it breaks my heart to see those people so tormented. Yes, it does remind me of this situation. Drew is going to “keep on keeping on” with his womanizing until those older children are going to be his nail in the coffin.

  131. First I want to post about the article in the paper today about Drew’s 22 year old friend. This I hope will answer the question on alot of minds. I will answer your other questions latter today.
    You have to understand Drew to know what is going on. He has a habit of befriending younger people who are lost and misdirected so to speak. For example he brefriended Ric Mims, who was just some young man without a family, who lived in Bolingbrook and was hustleing to make ends meet. They went on Drews ultralight, hung out, and Drew helped him out when he needed it. There are numerous examples of Drew doing this with both young men and women. There is nothing awry with this. (excpet in the imaginations of some people) The artcile ends with the woman saying that Drew was “nothing but nice to me”. Thats all that is going on. Thats what Drew is, the helpful neighbor, the friend who will always lend a hand.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    This is Joel’s (supposedly) response to the article about Drew and the 22 year old.

  132. Yipee. I sent Greta the email about Drewpy, and it looks like the staff forwarded it to her (she’s away from DC). It’s on her blog.

  133. I have to wonder why the 22-year old didn’t call her friend Steve Carcerano instead of “a friend of a friend” Drew Peterson.

    They both live in the same neighborhood and would have been the same distance away . . .

    And JB … oh, my. “He has a habit of befriending younger people who are lost and misdirected so to speak. ” And then controls them. IMO

    My advice to 22-year old: Get new friends. Get new friends of friends.

  134. I mentioned earlier how embarrassing it might be for Peterson’s police officer son to have to work alongside his partners with articles like this in the news. Not that it should make any difference in his endeavors to fulfill his job requirements in stopping speeding citizens, etc., but what must they think when they’re in Oak Brook and along comes Officer Stephen Peterson???? Can you imagine the excuse: “but, Officer Peterson, I was on my way to rescue a 22 year old babe in distress.” Gimme a pass!

    However, on a sadder note, how do 13 and 15 year olds endure going to school with this kind of sickening stuff? Kids talk. And, you all know, kids can be the cruelest people in the world. They are sometimes too naive to know when to use diplomacy, and don’t always stop to think about what they’re saying that could hurt the feelings of another. You’ve all seen how young people can make fun of others. It’s lack of life experience that may be the reason for that. In any event, that just pains me to even think about those young men and what their father does to possibly humiliate them.

  135. Let me point it out:

    Just got this email from my executive producer Meade Cooper….read and POST YOUR COMMENT

    From: Cooper, Meade
    To: Van Susteren, Greta; Howard, Cory; Watts, Stephen
    Sent: Fri May 16,2008

  136. Thanks Rescue. I saw it!

    Noway, I have to wonder why she didn’t call anyone else period. Even a taxi!! Or her mother!! Something really doesn’t jive with all of this about that young woman, and I sounds like she wanted to be with Drew for some reason. The article said she was talking on the phone with him (which would have been around 2:30 am) while she was in the car with the driver, who was supposed to be, according to Drew in the first article, her boyfriend.

    So, let’s get this straight………she was in the car with her drunk boyfriend talking on the phone to Drew at 2:30 in the morning. Police pulled them over, hauled the boyrfriend to jail, towed the car, left the girl standed, and Drew came to her rescue. Wonder if that was the night she stayed at Drew’s house?? Or if she came back to stay after that? Not that I really care that he’s digging himself a deeper hole, but the whole thing doesn’t make any sense……unless there’s more to it than we really know…..and there probably is.

  137. cfs – there isn’t a publicity hole deep enough to hide the likes of Drew Peterson. His poor kids. What a disgrace to them.

  138. Quote from the article: She was talking to Peterson on her cell phone early on May 3 when Naperville police stopped a car in which she was riding. When the driver was taken into custody, she asked Peterson for a ride — prompting him to hurry to Naperville so quickly that he was stopped for speeding.
    ___________________
    Okay, now I see why Drew and not Steve. But why was she talking to him in the first place?

    They are just friends of a friend … friends with benefits?

  139. who cares about this 22yo, seriously it’s her deal if she wants to screw up her life with a loser and possible murderer named Drew.
    so I guess the story about Denise was nothing more than rumor. What the person soo concerned about Denise said doesn’t fit with this 22yo.
    just more drama and the media and sheeple suck it up.

  140. Oh wait … my bad.
    Quote: Since then, they have spoken often and she has spent the night at his home — but nothing physical took place, she said. Peterson did not seem so sure about that.

    “Never ‘nothing’ physical,” Peterson said enigmatically…

  141. Freedom, why would you think the story about Denise was a rumor just because there is a 22-year old in the picture.

    When has Drew Peterson ever limited himself to one woman?

    I agree … let’s find something else to talk about for awhile.

  142. Freedom, you may not care, but it WAS in the papers today, and there are those of use who want to hear and express opinions about it. Personally, I think there is/was a Denise that is/was involved with him as well. Who knows? Since he met this 22 year old three weeks ago, maybe he decided to trade Denise for a younger model. That seems to be his MO regarding women.

    At any rate, you have your opinions, others have theirs. If that make for “sheeple” then so be it.

  143. Well, then, noway, wonder if the GJ focus has changed now from SP, and they have just about everything they need about that, do the KS matter? Other than the GJ subpoena regarding DP’s teens, seems like they’re done with those witnesses.

    You know, I find it very curious that no one is coming forward to defend DP, except for an occasional Steve Carcerano blip, or his current hottie. Where’s his family and other friends? The “Paula” he referred to in the newspaper yesterday didn’t even want to give her name when she was questioned by Hosey, I think it was, the day they were coming out of the GJ. That was her, right, with her husband? Didn’t they also help him retrieve his cars, and now it’s learned they watched his kids?

    Ah, it’s been too quiet lately, and I’m sure he’s storing up for another biggie.

    Except, it looks like the only place JB can get recognition lately is on blogs. Which are then turned into three-ring circuses.

  144. has anything ever been proven that the rumor about denise is FACT? nope so I say rumor until FACTS prove it’s true. Me thinks someone was trying to get back at Denise for whatever reason.

    There is one curious and telling piece of info in this article. this statement leads me to believe the police are bullying anyone that comes in contact with peterson and even threatening them with being called before the grand jury, (another article states about bringing her in front of the grand jury). My response to this state investigator if you are 100% sure then arrest the man already!!

    The young friend of Peterson said a state police investigator gave her an earful about what he thinks of Peterson’s involvement in the disappearance of Stacy and the death of Kathleen.
    “They’re like, ‘We’re 100 percent positive he killed them. His family thinks he killed them. You’re going to be next,’” she said. “And I’m like, ‘Then why isn’t he in jail?’”

  145. No, it was better to slam me first, THEN come out with an opinion. Can you see where that was going? Get my name removed from an email to Greta, instead of posting a thought first.

    Come on. What’s up with that?

    I call it the usual back biting.

  146. cfs over and over you tell others to change their topics because it has nothing to do with finding stacy.
    so tell me what does this 22yo have to do with finding stacy?
    nothing, just more fuel for the media to pour on the fire and keep the sheeple fired up!!
    carry on!
    I wanna know what evidence LE has that they are 100% sure drew is guilty of 2 murders but yet 6months down the road no arrest.

  147. Denise’s name being brought up and the way it was done was in extremely poor taste. I agree with that. That’s an issue for the person that did that, and it’s their issue about why they did it.

    But this woman allowed herself to be interviewed, and spilled her guts out about how her mother ripped her, and apparently felt it her responsibility to let the public know she likes Drew enough to spend the night at his house.

    We didn’t make this stuff up, she admitted to it. We’re talking about it – pros and cons.

  148. It doesn’t help to find Stacy, but it sure adds more fuel to the fire about how zombie-like the man is. He has no clear way of thinking about his young children’s daily lives.

    Providing food and housing for them doesn’t make him a great father. What he is doing is outrageous, and I feel so bad for his kids.

    He’s trying to block his sons from appearing before the GJ to help with them trying to find out what happened to Stacy. I certainly don’t think that’s any more traumatic for them to answer questions that losing two mothers within four years, and spending this and future Mother’s Days without them. I think DP did more to traumatize them then anyone ever will.

  149. Freedom, I totally agree with you about what the girl stated regarding the police. I was actually surprised to read that they had taken the liberty to say that to her. Maybe it was threat, maybe it wasn’t. They could know more than we do, and are still waiting on the GJ to end for an arrest is made. And since it hasn’t ended, she may very well be called if they are interested in Drew’s current affairs. Denise may be called as well, if that’s the case. I’m sure a lot of people know more about the GJ proceedings than I do since I live out of state.

  150. freedom08 // May 16, 2008 at 10:30 am

    cfs over and over you tell others to change their topics because it has nothing to do with finding stacy.
    so tell me what does this 22yo have to do with finding stacy?
    nothing, just more fuel for the media to pour on the fire and keep the sheeple fired up!!
    carry on!
    I wanna know what evidence LE has that they are 100% sure drew is guilty of 2 murders but yet 6months down the road no arrest.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    What planet do you live on? I have NEVER told anyone to change any topic whatsoever!! Where in the heck did you get that? My opinion is that everyone has a right to an opinion, and that’s what I’ve stated several times on here!

  151. HEY noway, lavadoles,

    WHERe did everyone go from the fsp site, to be posting. I went to that site before it said all that and I was like what the heck happend….. do you all know can anyone elaborate about it…. I wish they would of gave notice… of what was going on… so where is everyone hanging out at????

    I just found this here , and hope to be talking with you guys …

  152. I can’t say I blame him from trying to block the kids from testifying at the GJ. As a parent I don’t know if I would let mine either, even if I am innocent.
    I can’t say what type of father he is either, I don’t recall hearing anyone state he is a awful father. Awful husband but none have stated he is a bad father. Many parents go out and leave their kids at home when the kids are old enough, so I don’t consider that any worse then all the other parents that do it.
    All reports of the older boys and their well being are positive.
    Now do I believe those kids have suffered trama, yes I sure do. It started for the older boys when drew and stacy were taughtin Kathleen. Matter of fact those kids never should have gone through what they have for the last 4 years all of them. Stacy should have did the right thing as a mother and turned drew in when he told her he killed kathleen. There is no happy ending when you find out y our husband is a murderer. all the money in the world can’t make a postive outcome happen. IMO

  153. My opinion is that if LE comes out and clearly indicates that SP did not willingly leave her home, and that he is a suspect in a homicide, as opposed to the generic term “person of interest,” they KNOW he killed her. They have nothing to lose by letting the GJ run it’s course and continue to get damning information against him. Once he’s charged, it’s 120 days to trial. They know they need to get it right.

    Besides, maybe they’re going to wait until they finish up with the KS GJ witnesses. Of course, I would think they’d do one charge at a time. After all, there are “two” crimes. Why lump them together? What purpose would that serve?

  154. Freedom, why wouldn’t you let your kids testify? I certainly would let mine if they knew the truth and could help clear my name. It’s not like they’re going to be sent to reform school for gosh sakes!!

  155. I don’t have a problem with a parent “going out and home alone” during certain circumstances, but I would certainly, as a parent, be concerned about a man leaving his home during early morning hours to go and “rescue” a 22 year old. Come on, freedom, he would have had to wake up the 15 year old and tell him what he was doing. He wouldn’t just out and leave the house and not say anything, would he? Isn’t that just a tad unsettling for you?

    Ah, son, I’m leaving now to go get a friend. If I’m not back in time, feed your little brother and sister some breakfast.

    That is absurd. Absolutely absurd, to leave four minor children in a house at the wee hours of the morning. God forbid, what if something happened to him, or he was delayed? What would they think?

  156. I believe he’s not letting his sons testify because they can’t be prepared for every possible question that might be asked of them.

    I understand that they are “first” in their classes and are very intelligent young men. But, no one has a crystal ball, and since LE has probably some damning evidence in their “files,” I’m sure there’s questions that even Brodsky can’t prepare them for.

  157. Rescue, that’s the point. What if something did happen? Anything is possible. And he’s supposedly so concerned over death threats, why would he leave his children alone in his house in the middle of the night with no defense whatsoever except 911?

  158. I guess he thinks the deat threats are directed at him and not the kids, but something else….a fire, kids choking, or even fighting could happen. Of ocurse there are the neighbors who would come I’m sure, if they were needed.

  159. There are numerous examples of Drew doing this with both young men and women. There is nothing awry with this. (excpet in the imaginations of some people) The artcile ends with the woman saying that Drew was “nothing but nice to me”. Thats all that is going on. Thats what Drew is, the helpful neighbor, the friend who will always lend a hand.

    **************

    I just threw up a little in my mouth.

  160. Well, I have a problem with his leaving the kids at that time of the night. That’s insane, absolutely insane.

    I have neighbors who have a 13 year old daughter, and I go over there many nights to stay while they’re in-between shifts leaving and coming home. They would never think of leaving her, especially if she’s in bed already, and that’s just for a couple of hours. Who does that?

  161. But we don’t know where Drew was when he got the call, do we?

    Ms. 22YO was “on the phone with Drew” when the car she was a passenger in was pulled over.

    Drew could have been anywhere. He could have left the kids at 9 p.m. and hadn’t been back since.

    And maybe we should cut him some slack. After all, he hasn’t been doing this Mr. Mom thing very long. He’s bound to get mixed up and make mistakes.

  162. what has been going on in the news about drew, I have been out of the loop , cause me work till 2am ya know how that goes…. can anyone update me on anything would appresiate it alot…

  163. cfs7360 // May 16, 2008 at 10:55 am

    I guess he thinks the deat threats are directed at him and not the kids, but something else….a fire, kids choking, or even fighting could happen. Of ocurse there are the neighbors who would come I’m sure, if they were needed.
    ______________________
    Right…they have a neighbor right next door…giving play by play to the entire internet. I don’t understand how that is though, aren’t all of her windows covered with posters of their missing mom?

  164. hey all it’s me

    I’m bummed…I didn’t save my posts either, I do still have my journals though I guess that’s a plus?

    so what’s the haps?

    can anyone elaborate on why it was shut down? I did notice the day before JIC was gone…I mean poof…gone….wth?

    fill me in please? and Lavanda honey whats your site address again?

  165. No, it was better to slam me first, THEN come out with an opinion. Can you see where that was going? Get my name removed from an email to Greta, instead of posting a thought fNo, it was better to slam me first, THEN come out with an opinion. Can you see where that was going? Get my name removed from an email to Greta, instead of posting a thought first.

    Come on. What’s up with that?

    I call it the usual back biting.
    first.
    ——

    Oh sorry I missed this. Back biting, rescue you have some paranoid imagination. The only back biting I see is your comment to me.
    If you take someone letting you know that your name might be posted for public knowledge as backbiting then I don’t know what to tell you.
    If I wanted to backbite you I would have posted
    hey butthead you suck!
    Instead it appears you are the one interested in keeping the backbiting going. It’s pretty obvious when I just sit back and read for days upon ends and see all your paranoid comments.
    get over it you aren’t important at all and there is no need for me to back bite you or anyone else.

    Come on. What’s up with that?

    I call it the usual back biting.

  166. Freedom says:
    If I wanted to backbite you I would have posted
    hey butthead you suck!

    Having a bad day, huh?

  167. having a great day you should try it.
    Take a paranoid free day it will do wonders for you.
    and my apologies for even caring if your name was possibly put out to the public.

    paranoia will destroy ya!!

  168. You aren’t even honest enough to admit you were being a smart ass. Come on. You meant it in a derogatory way. LOL, LOL, LOL.

    Remember that? If you would have read my post in the first place, I even mentioned it was forwarded to her. Who are you trying to kid?

  169. oh brother rescue is still back biting. get over it. you are way off base as usual. chomp chomp

    cfs, my apoligies if I got you confused with those that continually tell others what to talk about and what not to talk about.

Comments are closed.