Your Thread – May 29

Here’s the thread for Thursday, May 29.

~By posting on this blog you agree to be bound by the rules of this blog and by our Terms of Use. If you spot a rule violation, send an e-mail to reportabuse@mysuburbanlife.com.

About these ads

410 thoughts on “Your Thread – May 29

  1. Well time to retire for the night…you guys have a good debate.

    If Bash comes in tell her I said hey…

  2. Bringing this over from the previous thread…………….

    mollymcgee // May 29, 2008 at 12:22 am

    rescueapet // May 29, 2008 at 12:10 am

    This is part of Danya’s article, at the top. That picture was probably around 2000-2001. That’s when Battleship Earth was released. Way, way before Chief McGury’s time.

    The Bolingbrook Police Department has said it has no record of the weapon. Brodsky has asked to subpoena the department for all records that might show Peterson qualified with the weapon. The department has said those records do not exist.
    ******************************

    If that picture of Drew and John Travolta was taken in 2000/2001, it would have been long before Chief McGury took over.

    I remember reading that Chief McGury was brought to Bolingbrook to clean up the PD, due to corruption within the dept.
    So all McGury has to go on are the records he has access to.

    If he wasn’t there at the time, (when the picture of Drew and JT was taken), he doesn’t know if the former police chief “looked the other way” if SWAT team members used guns not registered with the dept.

    That doesn’t make it legal, but it would explain why there’s no record of the gun registered with the Bolingbrook PD, and yet a picture of Drew with the gun.

  3. Off to work all…take care and have a good day. Remember…email me when the pic appears with DP and George Clooney!

  4. Regarding the shirtless picture of Drew that was posted at FSP before they blew it up…
    who posted it?
    why did she do it?
    where did she get it?
    did it seem smart at the time?
    did it even seem smarter to put a bra on him?

  5. Reading above, the garden group is being mentioned now as being in on details provided by Sharon… did Sharon give this photo to them to post to embarrass Drew further?

    That photo was labeled taken in 2004.

    I am more curious than ever as to why they would post that on a MP site.

    Was it to nail the last nail into the site’s death?

  6. amanda I ‘ve never seen the topless pics of drew, but I would imagine the bra was a good thing?

  7. Liz/Amanda

    Good morning. I accidentally came across the picture on another site, and it was very distateful. I’m with you Amanda, it probably never should have been posted anywhere, much less on FSP. Gave me nightmares.

  8. my guess is the pic came from Cassandra and a blind man can see the motive behind it! It was pay back for posting morphey’s picture! such class and maturity they showed the public on the MP site! best thing ever happened it was shut down! MEOW splat!

    morning all!

  9. Shr, haven’t heard anything new this morning yet. Will be interesting to see what goes on with the GJ, if anyhing. Gotta scoot. See ya later.

  10. cfs, yes we heard about your nightmares!!

    I wake up in the middle of the night thinking about Stacy. I wonder if I’m Psychic! LOL

    no offense, I really like the psychic pages. I’ve been to lots of places they suggested.

  11. Where does the GJ meet; in town or at the RVJC family court? As far as whether the kids even testify, this was JB
    s answer on SYM last night:

    9. They may never testify. Their lawyers are fighting hard to hold the ISP to its promise that if they talk to the ISP at the child advocacy center they would not have to appear before the GJ.

    Gatehouse–Wondering about today’s location because I think the RVJC holds the child advocacy center, tho I’m not positive, and maybe they’ll be there instead of downtown?

  12. Concerning whose responsible for knowing the AR15 assault rifle was regulation or not, I think it more likely to be the job of the Deputy Chief Kevin J. McCarthy or even the
    investigation commander Keith George. And they both have +20 years of service, so we know they were around.

  13. Good morning. cfs – lucky for you I didn’t have any nightmares. I would have come lookin’ for you!

  14. Gotta run to Target for TP, etc. One errand you can’t put off. BBL

    Haven’t decided on today’s personality yet, rescue.

  15. truthisthere // May 29, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Mona is here? She is Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!
    **********************************

    She IS sweet, but she doesn’t post here. If she did, we’d laugh more often.

  16. wonder when we get to see the other pic so we can determine which chief. Although reading the statement from the article it appears as JB is refering to the current chief.
    Wonder why the chief has not responded to the pics. I’m sure greta would love to hear from him on this.

  17. fascinating, she would … but none of those personalities know Pam. That’s the way it sometimes goes with those split personality issues. ;)

  18. freedom, would a picture of the gun while Drew is on duty actually make it legal? Doesn’t it actually have to be registered with the department?

    If he was on duty, why was he asking a celebrity for an autograph?

  19. “Can’t deal with the hostage situation now, Chief! There’s John Travolta! I’m his biggest fan!”

    Hmm … :D

  20. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 10:08 am

    freedom, would a picture of the gun while Drew is on duty actually make it legal? Doesn’t it actually have to be registered with the department?
    ****************

    Funny, I don’t know why Brodsky is throwing out there that LE should drop their charges. Why not just shut up and show everyone what you’re capable of in Court? He’s always bragging about being a “good lawyer,” (his words, not mine). Time to show us the money. Asking everyone to drop and roll at the sight of a picture just doesn’t do anything for me!

  21. Does it really matter what name people post on. I can certainly see why they do … it’s always a little nervewracking when I’m asked if I’m the noway from FSP.

    Yikes! :shock:

  22. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Joel’s last day for questions will be May 30. (SYM)
    ************************************

    You know how I feel about the ol’ Q&A. May 29th would suit me better.

  23. rescueapet // May 29, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Funny, I don’t know why Brodsky is throwing out there that LE should drop their charges. Why not just shut up and show everyone what you’re capable of in Court? He’s always bragging about being a “good lawyer,” (his words, not mine). Time to show us the money. Asking everyone to drop and roll at the sight of a picture just doesn’t do anything for me!
    ************************************

    Exactly rescue. He’s not even following his own media rules of going mum once charges have been filed. Dude, it’s too late for mediaplay – it’s time to do some laweryin’.

  24. fascinatingtermsofdeservice i said hi to sosoa…strange you should automatically think i was talking to you…right? hi hi.

  25. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 10:08 am

    freedom, would a picture of the gun while Drew is on duty actually make it legal? Doesn’t it actually have to be registered with the department?

    If he was on duty, why was he asking a celebrity for an autograph?
    —–

    lol, I’m sure all around that day were asking for autographs that’s pretty normal human behavior on duty or not.
    The photo’s shows that drew did use the weapon while on duty as his lawyer claim. If it was illegal then the department has some explaining to do especially if the other photo shows the new chief in the pic with drew and the weapon.
    I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. It’s the departments responsibility to insure their officers are not carrying illegal weapons bottom line. Now it appears the chief has made false statements and it doesn’t look good for the chief.
    At some point people are going to have to see this for what it is and stop all the excuses to blame anyone but drew. These excuses won’t work in a court of law.

  26. freedom – yeah, but assuming it was all done under the other Chief, it doesn’t necessarily make this one look bad. He came in, cleaned up, and tried to make his department look respectable.

    If this pic is Brodsky’s way of making the department look bad, well, they did a few other things too involving the KS investigation, right? Doesn’t make it right, but at least this Chief might want to set the record straight. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that.

    He did try to clear the air when he made a definite statement that the KS wasn’t done on his “watch.”

  27. At some point people are going to have to see this for what it is and stop all the excuses to blame anyone but drew. These excuses won’t work in a court of law.
    *************************************

    Unfortunately, I think Drew is the one going to take the fall for this one. They didn’t have to press charges and they had plenty of time to research before doing so. The only way his department shares the blame for his illegal weapon is if it was registered as a service weapon.

    If it turns out that it was never registered as a service weapon, it doesn’t matter if Drew carried it to work, hung it on the wall, or stuck a flower in the barrel. It’s his illegal gun and there’s no way he’s getting out of it.

  28. “It’s his illegal gun and there’s no way he’s getting out of it.”

    Fac, excellent point!

  29. Brodsky showing a picture with Drew using an “illegal” weapon while on the job is another double-edged sword.

    On one hand, he is taunting the BBPD to show they were, ah ha, letting him use it and knew about it. Trying to make the department look silly.

    Why isn’t Brodsky then taunting the BBPD about all the blunders they made in the KS fiasco, starting with all of the domestic violence calls?

    That doesn’t work in his favor, does it? He likes to pick and choose what works for him at the moment. Duh!!

  30. The picture of Mr. Peterson with the gun on duty..i wonder if that will come back to bite him and his pension… now it shows that the felony he has been charged with was involved with his job..if he was carrying it without registering it with the department.. that still makes it illegal..and means he was on duty while committing the crime.. right … that could mean his pension… am i understanding that right…

  31. well I’m sure the pic of the weapon and chief will be out soon and we shall see.
    sorry but you really want me to believe that a police deparment is not responsible for ensuring their officers are following the law regarding the weapons they are carrying? You really want me to believe that a police officer can do as he pleases carry illegal weapons around the department and the department is not responsible?
    I don’t believe it and how is defending yourself taunting the police? I guess none are allowed to defend themselves or only drew?
    I don’t get this line of thinking except many dont’ want to face the reality that just maybe drew is telling the truth and LE isn’t.

  32. Let’s just say that Drew did indeed use that weapon, and their are picture of Drew with it, and the new Chief, or even the old Chief, then the ATF needs to get involved and see what the heck is going on in Bolingbrook with officers’s and their weapons.

    And regardless of who was responsible for making sure the weapon was legal etc, it will all fall on the Chief, thats just the nature of the business.

  33. i have a question… has anyone ever wondered how Mr. Peterson attracts the young girls….Stacy..and now the 22 year old.. is there a trick to it ..or just luck…

  34. Freedom – Personally, I don’t want you to believe anything. I’m just looking at it from a legal standpoint, as far as I understand it.

  35. I think it’s time the ATF look into the BBPD and how they cerified their duty weapons or not!
    Pull all the records for 10 years let’s see how many bbpd were/are carrying illegal weapons, let’s see why these illegal weapons were being carried by their officers for years without anyone in the department questioning it.

  36. freedom – what I mean is this. Brodsky IS defending his client by showing that he has a picture of a gun that he says the dept allowed his client to use. Doesn’t back it up with anything but talk, okay?

    Now, think about the Savio thing. This same police dept turned their heads the other way when the mess with Drew and Kathleen was in full force, down to the actual death. He’s very silent about the dept’s missteps regarding the Savio mess, but he’s perfectly willing to criticize them when it helps his client now.

    That’s my point. He picks and choses when to criticize the dept. He needs to make up his mind. He never opened his mouth about the Savio mess because that wouldn’t have been helpful to his client to do so. Now, he’s ripping them about this gun thing. WTH?

    Okay, freedom? That’s all I mean about that.

  37. We have to find out, which I dont we have yet, who that gun should have been registered with.

    If he was in a multi- jurisdictional group for SWAT, was the whom the gun was registered.

    I have a hard time believing that Bolingbrook PD has their own SWAT team, as its that large of a town.

    Many towns will make up one SWAT team, with each town assigining members to it.

  38. facsmiley // May 29, 2008 at 10:44 am

    Freedom – Personally, I don’t want you to believe anything. I’m just looking at it from a legal standpoint, as far as I understand it.

    Then you should know that legally the police department is supposed to regulate these types of things. Carrying an illegal weapon for 10 years and now it’s only drews fault. You believe that there are not regulations that the chief/chiefs are supposed to follow concerning officers and their weapons?
    Do you think the ATF would not slap charges on the police department if it learns this department let illegal weapons be used by their officers for over 10 years without correcting the problem?
    I don’t.
    So what happens if it’s proven that this weapon was registered?

  39. iknowwhatudont // May 29, 2008 at 10:44 am

    i have a question… has anyone ever wondered how Mr. Peterson attracts the young girls….Stacy..and now the 22 year old.. is there a trick to it ..or just luck…

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    I have wondered the same thing! Do you think he might have been using those phenorems (sp) or something? Some people swear they work in getting girls?

  40. sher69 // May 29, 2008 at 10:47 am

    Sami , i believe the wild hair is hiding
    —————————————————

    r any of these peeps here to defend themselves? besides amandr i dont see the others posting. why gatehouse allows nonposters to be bashed is a question needing answers.

  41. It would be kind of a sticky wicket for Brodsky to go after the BBPD itself since his client was a member of that force for 30 (?) years.

    I think he’d want to think long and hard about how that might paint public perception of Drew. Public opinion already has him painted as a a cop who misused his authority (getting info on friends and family of his wives, wiretapping and bugging homes, breaking and entering).

  42. Holy Moly….a helicopter has crashed into the roof of a hospital in Grand Rapids Michigan.

  43. rescueapet // May 29, 2008 at 10:46 am

    freedom – what I mean is this. Brodsky IS defending his client by showing that he has a picture of a gun that he says the dept allowed his client to use. Doesn’t back it up with anything but talk, okay?

    Now, think about the Savio thing. This same police dept turned their heads the other way when the mess with Drew and Kathleen was in full force, down to the actual death. He’s very silent about the dept’s missteps regarding the Savio mess, but he’s perfectly willing to criticize them when it helps his client now.

    That’s my point. He picks and choses when to criticize the dept. He needs to make up his mind. He never opened his mouth about the Savio mess because that wouldn’t have been helpful to his client to do so. Now, he’s ripping them about this gun thing. WTH?

    Okay, freedom? That’s all I mean about that.
    -
    rescue it’s ok!
    JB can do as he pleases and pick and chose what he wants to defend or not even mention. It’s his job like it or not.
    His client has been charged with a felony concerning this weapon. His client has not been charged with Kathleen’s murder nor has he been named a suspect in Kathleen’s murder.
    He should be ripping them about the gun, why would he not?
    Yes a picture is all we have now. I doubt that bbpd have turned over the records JB requested and once they do JB won’t post that evidence he will use that in a court and then we will see it or hear about it after the fact.

  44. “iknoweverythinglol

    have wondered the same thing! Do you think he might have been using those phenorems (sp) or something? Some people swear they work in getting girls?”
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    those are pheromones…. once you learn this, then you really know everything! LOL

  45. Freedom, you seem to be pro Drew, do you know him in real life? Do you have any idea if he ever used aromas like pheramones to attract girls?

    Something is sure funny about how he draws the women!!!

  46. that is a good point…money… speaking of money did any of you see that JB said that Mr. Peterson would not have had 25,000 around his house.. he would have had it in a bank… so if his wife didnt take the 25,000 from his house like was said..how has she been surviving all this time.. the poor girl.. now it turns out she left without a single penny…

    for a girl who was so attracted to money like everyone says..i can’t believe she left without a penny… she must have really wanted to be gone.

  47. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 10:49
    I have wondered the same thing! Do you think he might have been using those phenorems (sp) or something? Some people swear they work in getting girls?

    oh please!! obviously some women like the drew type!

    yuck!

  48. do you think his wife liked the drew type or do you think she liked the money..and if she liked the money..how come she left without taking any…when at least half the house value would be hers..right…

    i always thought she took the 25,000 like Mr. Peterson said during that interview..but if she left and didnt take any money…she must not have been the money type after all.. which means she must have really just liked the drew type like you said…

    guess after a while she decided she didnt like that type anymore.. who knows…

  49. I have always found it amusing when people talk about Drew, and his looks etc.

    Let’s not forget, Stacy found something in him she loved. She had two children with him.

    So what was that?

    Was it the life he could give her that she never, ever had?

    She was a young lady, about the age that most are getting out of college, starting their careers, paying back student loans etc.

    Stacy had a beautiful home. She was given plenty of plastic surgery. Stacy was given jewerly. Stacy was given lavish vacations. Stacy didn’t have to work.

    Stacy had a nice life for a young women, one that most her age dont have.

    So if this was the reason she loved him, what does that say about the person?

    Or did she simply love him for him?

  50. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Freedom, you seem to be pro Drew, do you know him in real life? Do you have any idea if he ever used aromas like pheramones to attract girls?

    Something is sure funny about how he draws the women!!!
    —-

    oh geesh not another. I’m not pro drew I’m pro truth and justice using the law not dirty tricks!!
    Hell no I don’t know drew and I don’t care for him at all I think he’s a poor excuse for a man.
    Now that being said there are many women who IMO are stupid when it comes to their choices in men and most of them makes choices like drew.
    dont ask me why as I have no clue.

  51. Freedom…these are hit and run posters. I wouldnt waste the energy on them.

    Look at the screennames, say’s it all.

  52. IKWYD – That is an excellent point. Brodsky did say this recently about the $25k.

    “The whole thing about the $25,000 in cash (and bikini) was what Pam Bosco said Drew told Cassandra on the evening of Oct 28. Drew has not publically said that this is was part of the Oct. 28 phonecall from Stacy. However, in resonse I will say that Drew is very sharp when it comes to money, and he would not keep alot of cash sitting around the house when it could be in the bank or mutual fund earning interest. When the police searched the house they did not find any large (or even small) sum of cash, and when I had to bail Drew out this week, his son Stephen had to go to the bank to cash Drew’s check to get the $7500 in cash needed to post paid. That doesn’t sound like someone who keeps stack of cash around the house, does it?”

    I kind of don’t get it. I always thought they planted the idea of the $25k to answer why there has been no activity on her credit cards. Maybe this is Brodsky backpedalling away from that statement for some reason…

  53. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 11:06 am

    I have always found it amusing when people talk about Drew, and his looks etc.

    Let’s not forget, Stacy found something in him she loved. She had two children with him
    ***********************************

    Hasn’t everyone here had a friend who dated older, maybe married men? I even had a friend who went through a cop phase. She got a job at a donut shop just so she could meet LE and date them.

    Good looks and youth aren’t the only things that get people hooked-up. Power, authority, self-confidence, money and lots of other things can be very attractive.

    OK, now I feel icky.

  54. Brodsky backpedalling away from that statement for some reason………

    Maybe he would have to explain why Drew would believe Cassandra would buy into the cash story? What did Cassandra know about his illegal doings? She said on FSP he was into alot of them.

  55. I’m sorry to do this … and I’ll go back and read the posts above, but does anyone know whether the diamond earrings and ring and camera that Kathleen Savio reported stolen were ever returned?

    I found the police report of them being stolen but cannot find anything else.

  56. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Freedom…these are hit and run posters. I wouldnt waste the energy on them.

    Look at the screennames, say’s it all.

    yeah I know, I just might have to swat them around a bit if they wanna play!!! hehe

  57. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 11:16 am

    Brodsky backpedalling away from that statement for some reason………

    Maybe he would have to explain why Drew would believe Cassandra would buy into the cash story? What did Cassandra know about his illegal doings? She said on FSP he was into alot of them.
    —————————————————–

    she knew bout illegal doing? did nothing?

  58. Facs, I know what you are saying. I hope Stacy did love him, but I have questions about it.

    My parents had very dear friends were the husband was 28 years older. They had one of the best marriage around. He passed away 3 years ago, and she is still heartbroken. Her life is, and never will be the same without him.

    So as far as the age difference, I dont get bogged down with that, as many others do.

  59. freedom08 // May 29, 2008 at 11:16 am

    letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 11:07 am

    Freedom…these are hit and run posters. I wouldnt waste the energy on them.

    Look at the screennames, say’s it all.

    yeah I know, I just might have to swat them around a bit if they wanna play!!! hehe

    Next thing you will be telling me is how tuff you are and how much you can bench press. LOL

  60. Maybe that is why Drew is scared of Cassandra, she is a major witness and he has never attacked her.

  61. Maybe he would have to explain why Drew would believe Cassandra would buy into the cash story? What did Cassandra know about his illegal doings? She said on FSP he was into alot of them.
    ***************************************

    Let me make sure I understand this.

    You’re saying that maybe Brodsky is now going to deny that Drew told Cassandra about $25 being missing because if Cassandra didn’t say “Dude, why do you have $25k sitting around” it would imply that it was normal for him to have that kind of cash, and the only way for that to be the norm would be…if he had it through illegal activity?

    Well…maybe. It seems like kind of a stretch, but then I never understood him blurting out the $25k thing anyway. It does seem that once he did say it, he should stick to it but….white noise, my friends, white noise.

  62. Just for the record the “OK now I feel icky” was part of a message I started to write and then deleted. So it’s stuck at the bottom of a comment and…it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.

    Sorry.

  63. The whole business about Drew not having $25,000 cash threw me too.

    IF I was going to believe Stacy left on her own, she had to have some means to survive.

    My guess is that DP doesn’t want to admit to having large amounts of cash around the house. He might have to explain them. Now he doesn’t … unless he is on tape somehwere saying that for himself.

  64. Brodsky said that the “$25,000 cash missing from the safe” is what someone else said, not his client. You’d have to go to SYM to get the actually response. I might be able to get there … am trying to multi-task and having problems.

  65. Noway, it certainly seems that way.

    And maybe they’ve decided that Drew doesn’t need to try to explain what she’s doing for money. He can just say “I don’t know” for anything pertaining to her since the last time he saw her. That would make the most sense for his defense since, supposedly she’s just vanished.

    The whole “Drew has not said publically” statement leaves them an out if at some point they want to go back to the $25k existing.

  66. I don’t know anything about guns and how they record or approve them but what I’m wondering if a fellow officer or the police chief could tell just by looking at the gun hanging on DP that it was not registered or approved.

  67. or if maybe it was just another one of those..don’t worry everybody does it….at the department……

  68. I’m thinking daddy cales, cass and drew had some little illegal op going on. maybe stolen car parts.

  69. :) facs, I wasn’t sure where I’d read the quote … just so it’s here. I didn’t want to have to try to find it!

    Now … IF you believe Stacy left on her own, would she have taken her jewelry? I mean not for sentimental, he’s the man I loved, the father of my children, reasons … but for money?

    I don’t think she would be happy living off the man she ran off with … not with this “new found freedom” …

    What do you think?

    I want both sides. Thanks!

  70. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 11:19 am

    Next thing you will be telling me is how tuff you are and how much you can bench press. LOL


    now why would I do that?

    you know everything lol

  71. the video camera is what stacy used to record kathleen the day stacy and drew came to pick up the kids.
    rumor about the earring was that they were reset into jewerly for stacy.
    who knows I don’t think they got she got them back.

  72. that is a good point… about the guns..im sure that Mr. Petersons fellow officers thought he had properly registered the gun.. it is his responsibility to make sure he has done so… but from what everyone is saying it looks like they made that assumption alot.. that what Mr. Peterson was doing was legal and that he was acting like he should.. seems they learned the hard way that they should have been checking up on him and double checking too….

    i dont understand about Kimmer having a donate button..what were those donations going to..who was responsible for them.. i wonder if Mr. Brodsky ever talks about how many donations he got for Mr. Peterson…

    he should really not have posted on the internet… he has already told a few fibs and those will come back to bite him..it would have been better if he kept quiet like Craig.. notice Craig is not in jail and hasnt been arrested on anything at all…

  73. Could everyone who is bashing other sites, their owners and their members, please do it in invisible typing so we don’t have to read them.

    They will just be removed from Gatehouse anyway when they get back from the GJ.

    Thank you.

  74. maybe you could collect donations at your site and give them to a charity in Mrs. Peterson and Ms. Savios name…or buy savings bonds for the kids.. or donate them to the local animal shelter to be used to help feed starving cats…that would be a very nice gesture..

  75. My vision of Stacy has been expanded since I came here. I think there was a lot protected and some of the facts were not allowed to be discussed at the other site. I can understand that. I have no less respect for Stacy because of things I’ve learned, nor does it change the fact that she is missing. I don’t believe that she would walk away from her children. I’m learning that she must have some street smarts, have experienced life more than I first thought. I’m not being judgemental; it just lets me see her as a more believable person. She isn’t/wasn’t perfect, the Miss Polly Pure-all, but she is a human being, a mother, a daughter, a sister, a friend. She is/was loved and missed. I would very much like to see justice served for her and Kathleen. I have a feeling this is going to involve much more with the department and possibly political persons than I first thought, too. I believe there is more to it than a young, beautiful wife and mother missing.

  76. iknowwhatudont // May 29, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    maybe you could collect donations at your site and give them to a charity in Mrs. Peterson and Ms. Savios name…or buy savings bonds for the kids.. or donate them to the local animal shelter to be used to help feed starving cats…that would be a very nice gesture..
    ++++++++++++++++++++
    LOL! No, thank you. I’ve donated more than enough to the cat-house.

    We are not an “all peterson case” board, per se. Yes, that is what brought MANY of us together. It’s unfortunate that a former member, who was outed and banned feels the need to lie and bash our board here.

  77. grandma I agree hopefully there will be some answers soon and justice can be served. Kathleens family deserves it I can’t imagine what they have gone through and how they felt when the pastor went to the press.
    Both families need answers and closure.

  78. thats just stupid if the person is just telling lies to tell ies.. they must be very lonely… maybe they live in a forgein land and don’t speak the language well.. maybe they dont have alot of friends..maybe are trying to fill a void.. i dont know.. but its very sad and i hope they feel better soon…

    im sorry someone lied about your site…i hope the officials on this site put an end to it…

  79. Thanks, Kimmer… I’m trying my best to ignore the distracting posts here and keep the subject about Stacy.

  80. I heard the SYM board is being watched by LE and FBI so much that alot of people are afraid to post and alot have just left. I have never gone to it yet for that reason. You have no idea who you are chatting with.

  81. I would not doubt if all these drew/stacy posting places are being watched by LE/FBI no biggie what’s to be afraid of if you aren’t doing anything wrong?

  82. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    I heard the SYM board is being watched by LE and FBI so much that alot of people are afraid to post and alot have just left. I have never gone to it yet for that reason. You have no idea who you are chatting with.
    ++++++++++++++++++
    I’m sure there is some level of LE on all of the forblogsite…etc. Especially in a case like this. As for the FBI…I SERIOUSLY doubt it.

  83. i dont know who you are or why you are posting with a name so close to mine..you better not be trying to cause problems for me.. or making fun of me..

    but i did hear that most of the questions that Mr. Brodsky is answering are ones that LE or other officials might want answered..and i know he has fibbed on a few of them.. i wonder if that will come back to bite him… i wonder if Mr. Peterson has bene honest with Mr. Brodsky..or if Mr. Brodsky is lying for Mr. Peterson.. because there is proof that some of what he is saying is fibs.. and i dont know how he’ll explain it now that he is made a public statement about it…

    at first i thought it wasnt really him..but someone from somewhere said they verified it was really really him..so i guess hes locked into what he has said..

  84. Well, I post on SYM … so maybe that explains the man who *said* he was supposed to be interviewing my neighbor for a survey … yet talked to me because he always came when she wasn’t home! ;)

    He was FBI.

  85. Freedom, exactly.

    Im sure they are watching all sites, and weeding through the information.

  86. The children; how my heart breaks for those children! I wonder if they have a privacy fence in their backyard and/if Drew will allow them outside on nice days like this? I understand how he feels about his neighbor and I have no stance on that. Those children have a right to play outside and enjoy the sunshine and laugh …. they have a right to be children! Maybe a privacy fense would be a good investment, if one doesn’t exist.

  87. What makes you think you know who you’re talking to here?

    My parents didn’t name me noway.

  88. Grandma, that couldnt have been said better.

    The Children…that is the most important thing about all this.

  89. Noway, that’s not really your name? Darn it, I have to change my address book now….lol.

  90. randy mucha was a bbpd who got into some trouble and was all over these boards when the case first hit. Here’s some info on him.
    yeah I agree lots of creeps mims is another creepy one!
    h
    t
    t
    p://www.badcopnews.com/category/randy-mucha/

  91. Thanks! I enjoy discussing with all of you here (well, most of you) … except for the occasional ‘visitor’ the conversation usually rolls very orderly and respectfully.

  92. I thought it was Oakbrook. Didnt he have a website?

    If I remember correctly, he had some form of a business.

    It was all very strange.

  93. lettruth I don’t know what happened to him just went off the radar. he was even sending pics to greta of the canal search apparently he could get into some area others couldn’t.
    dk he just struck me as something not right with him.
    kinda like the arsonist that comes back to the scene to see the fire!!

  94. if he was a friend of Stephen Petersons does anyone know how he felt about things…did he think Mr. Peterson was guilty of crimes against the former Mrs. Petersons or does he think that Mr. Peterson is being framed by an angry mob of people… he is a police officer and a friend of his sons..i’m sure he has a better feel for things than all of us do.. has he ever talked to the press and gave his opinion…

    i hope he wasnt really a dirty cop..i dont believe stephen peterson would be friends with a bad cop…do you…

  95. Oh how I remember how he talked in the third person.

    If nothing else, that site is good for a laugh or two.

    He probably wanted to get himself into the news with this case to help his business out.

  96. Iknowwhatyoudont -

    Your asking a lot of questions for someone with a nic such as yours….sounds like you know it all, so you tell us, please?

  97. IS THIS JUST THE WARM UP FOR THE FOLLOWING:

    Release Swing Series
    Leg Swings
    Deep Forward Lunges
    Side Hip Pull

    Perfect for solos, trios, & group choreography!

    Watching some movement analyzed in slow motion increases the stress on GeneGenes’ Dance Floor!!

    Good Bye
    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  98. So bottom line is Mucha has an ego, and wanted to be involved in this case somehow.

    Those are so mighty big judgements against him and the department.

  99. iknowwhatudont // May 29, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    …at first i thought it wasnt really him..but someone from somewhere said they verified it was really really him..so i guess hes locked into what he has said..
    ******************************

    Well, see that’s probably why he has made sure to post a few different versions of the truth, even if they contradict each other. That way, if someone tries to quote him in the courtroom, he can simply pull out another quote that says the opposite.

    Silly Internet!

    As for FBI/LE monitoring the forublogsites, fine with me. I gots nothing to hide.

    As for not knowing who you’re talking to, gosh, if you aren’t aware of that…you shouldn’t be posting!

  100. lol I love you genegene.

    now can I have that dance!! I’m thinking of a saturday night fever dance!!
    woohoo

  101. Iknow, fair enough. Ask away, and people will try to answer. In the meantime could you please inform us of what we dont know.

    That might help in the discussion.

  102. According to the family and friends, search leaders, her services are not needed. She will continue to respect the wishes of the committee with regards to her asssitance.

    We did not collect donations, nor were any solicited, accepted or any other thing you are going to pull out of your arse next.

    So, if you’d like to continue to bash me, my site, it’s members, could you contact me directly? You are being VERY disrespectful to the other posters here.

  103. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    So bottom line is Mucha has an ego, and wanted to be involved in this case somehow.

    Those are so mighty big judgements against him and the department.

    dk or maybe something else.

    lots of missing or dead women in will county.

  104. “ … investigation into Randy Mucha’s activities and his posting of photographs on the Internet of nude or semi-nude women … at least one of whom was partially clad in an Oak Brook police officer’s uniform,”

    ACK!

  105. theoriginal, the only people searching are Roy and gang.

    It’s all very shady to me at best.

  106. It’s time to take on the dance floor!

    Disco is back & hotter than ever!

    The Hustle is characterized by an extremely smooth look, with the dancers turning, rotating, and moving around the floor with seamless motion and minimal vertical movement or bounce.

    Good Bye
    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  107. Here is the question asked of Joel about the $25,000:
    Where did Stacy get the $25,000 she supposedly left with? Was it kept as cash in the home, and if so, why so much money kept at home, or did she make a bank withdrawal prior to her leaving?

    http://wespeakourmind.proboards50.com/in….read=356&page=4

    Here is Joel’s response:
    5. The whole thing about the $25,000 in cash (and bikini) was what Pam Bosco said Drew told Cassandra on the evening of Oct 28. Drew has not publically said that this is was part of the Oct. 28 phonecall from Stacy. However, in resonse I will say that Drew is very sharp when it comes to money, and he would not keep alot of cash sitting around the house when it could be in the bank or mutual fund earning interest. When the police searched the house they did not find any large (or even small) sum of cash, and when I had to bail Drew out this week, his son Stephen had to go to the bank to cash Drew’s check to get the $7500 in cash needed to post paid. That doesn’t sound like someone who keeps stack of cash around the house, does it?
    http://wespeakourmind.proboards50.com/in….read=356&page=4

    The question and answer are only a couple of posts away from each other if you just want to scroll once you get there.

    But now as I post the response here, I see that Joel only says that “Drew has not publically said that this is was part of the Oct. 28 phonecall from Stacy” not that the $25,000 did not exist. He goes on to say that Drew is sharp about money … which what made me believe there was no money.

    I’m back to confused again. Did not state publicly does not mean that it is not so.

  108. but if i told you then i would have to change my name….

    im kidding. haha. i made a joke. i dont know what you dont know that i can tell you really… i know that the only branch of officials i would not want to make mad more than the police is immigration.. those people scare me…

    i know that Mr. Brodsky is lieing when he says that Mr. Peterson never told anyone publically that Stacy left with 25,000 dollars and her bikini.. but i will let him learn how i know that the hard way… im not here to make his job easier.. i’m just here to try to learn..

    in the meantime i am just trying to figure out why there seem to be so many jabs and pokes here… people seem very raw and sensetive..

  109. theoriginal, when the story first came out about all this, somehow Mucha involved himself in it.

    I cant exactly remember how, but I’m thinking he linked himself to it via Stephen working on the Oakbrook PD.

  110. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    theoriginal, the only people searching are Roy and gang.

    It’s all very shady to me at best
    —————————————————-

    so theyre getting the fund money then?

  111. Thats the million dollar question theoriginal, where is the money, and what’s it going to?

  112. They are shrewd, noway… lawyer-talk, it is all in the words spoken, written or the ones omitted.

  113. fascinating

    might there be a search team in illinois willing to help? strange that alot of donated equipment & offers of service but no accounting of funds.

  114. Freedom08, do you think Randy Mucha might be putting himself in the case because he was involved in other crimes? What would be his payoff or why would he do it?

  115. theoriginal, as far as I’m concerned the money with the FSP is all smoke and mirrors.

    There is something very wrong with the way it’s being handled.

    I suspect one day we will know, when the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Illinois gets done with their investigation.

  116. Hey Noway – If you scroll up to 11:08 we started a discussion there that pretty much mirrors what you just posted. We were left wondering if Drew was trying to dodge any associations with that cash being obtained under not-so-legal means.

  117. I think drew said on an interview she took the bikini and cash!!

    btw joel can say what ever he wants or shall I say lie about whatever he wants. it’s drew that can’t and that’s why joel posts and not drew. IMO

  118. i guess i just wouldnt want everyone to know my attorney was a liar.. i mean i would want the jury to believe what he was saying… and not just think… he is lying again…

  119. iknowwhatudont // May 29, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    i guess i just wouldnt want everyone to know my attorney was a liar.. i mean i would want the jury to believe what he was saying… and not just think… he is lying again…
    ——————————————————-

    theres lots of lying on both sides for sure.

  120. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    theoriginal, as far as I’m concerned the money with the FSP is all smoke and mirrors.

    There is something very wrong with the way it’s being handled.

    I suspect one day we will know, when the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Illinois gets done with their investigation.
    —-

    rutro is the AG office investigating? I know some were going to turn them in.
    how stupid why not just follow the law and do what is right unless you have something to hide!
    having a missing friend or relative doesn’t make you above the law. the same law you want enforced on the person you think made your loved one disappear.

  121. Freedom, I have to believe they are investigating.

    I know I have written them, and sent along documentation. I dont think Im the only that has either.

    They told me it would be turned over to a case manager and they review it etc.

  122. theoriginalsami // May 29, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    theres lots of lying on both sides for sure.

    boy is that an understatement and now it looks like LE has joined the liars club.
    whats next!

  123. Time 4 a Group Hug Dance:
    The Huggy Hustle

    Step right up 2 your partner
    Slowly put your arms around them
    Now Squeeze { not 2 hard }

    On the count of 1-2-3 DANCE!!

    There now, don’t U all feel better?

    Good Bye
    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  124. “I’d like to find any poster on any site who would be able to call me a liar.”

    Filthy liar

  125. Have you guys ever sat and took a good hard look at your Ipods, and the music you have on them.

    Mine just went from Barry Manilow “This guy’s in love with you” to Kanye West’s “Stronger”

    Something is wrong with this picture….lol.

  126. grandna210 and letthetruthbefree have
    learned this dance already!

    I am so proud of them!

    Next?

    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  127. Freedom08

    do you think Randy Mucha might be putting himself in the case because he was involved in other crimes? What would be his payoff or why would he do it?

  128. freedom

    so right. liars everywhere in this case. thats why drew will go free. jury will go batty trying to figure truth in any of em.

  129. Imagine, you know there are people out there, even in Will County, that know little to nothing about this case, and they are called to sit on this jury….lol.

    God help them, and I hope they have plenty of medications to get them through this….lol.

  130. sami you are probably correct and what a damn shame it will be.

    if drew killed kathleen and stacy I want him prosecuted with hard evidence that will ensure he NEVER walks the streets again.
    If he’s innocent I will puke at a justice systems that once again puts another innocent behind bars. Illinois has enough of that already. IMO

  131. Thanks, Gene, Gene! Maybe we all need to stop and dance or spin out or something to get back on track – LoL!

  132. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Imagine, you know there are people out there, even in Will County, that know little to nothing about this case, and they are called to sit on this jury….lol.

    God help them, and I hope they have plenty of medications to get them through this….lol.
    ++++++++++++++++
    I wonder if there are people out there, potential jurors, that would “lie” just to get on the jury to sway the case to one side or the other.

  133. Thats a possibility, but Jury consultants are usually very good at weeding those people out.

  134. letthetruthbefree // May 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    Thats a possibility, but Jury consultants are usually very good at weeding those people out.
    ++++++++++++++++
    Even if they answer every question “perfectly”…they could still get on. That’s my biggest fear with this case being as emotionally charged as it has become.

  135. This is going to sound crazy to most of you, but here is my thinking on the trial.

    If you browser the blogs, forums etc about this case, you usually see the same posters, and many of them are not even local.

    So if you take the locals that are interested online, the people that show up to the searchs, and the locals that show up to the fundraisers, there is very little interest in this case.

    The fundraiser and the searchs have very low turn out, for the amount of media they try to generate.

    And the story really isnt in the local news all the much anymore. Its a blurb here and there once in awhile.

    Does any of this make sense….lol.

  136. I’m one of the non-locals, but I’m just down the road and across the stateline. I can’t say what drew me into the case, but from the first news story, I have been interested and probably will stay so throughout the investigation and the trial.

  137. Can we please discuss the case and not the bloggers? Can’t you pm each other to discuss those things? It has no place here, for goodness sake.

  138. I dont know about others, but I have sat on a jury.

    I consider myself a strong person, one that can handle my own.

    But when I was put in the “box” to be questioned about being on the jury, I was amazed at how intimidating it was.

    It might have been all eyes are on you, and I dont like that feeling. It could be what you are being asked, and how personal it is.

    I would hope that if someone has bad intentions about trying to get on a trial like this, they will be scared to death in the box, and think again about it.

  139. fascinatingtermsofdeservice // May 29, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    “I’d like to find any poster on any site who would be able to call me a liar.”

    Filthy liar
    *****************************

    Oh duh. YOU don’t count.
    Find a real person who doesn’t use 10 nics to say I lie. There’s a challenge for you.

    Remember that little “liars” sign at the bottom of our Stacy page? That was mainly for you, sosoa, dandelion, copypastemaster, nero, john vitale, exlawenforcement, thief, fascinatingtermsofdeservice, and God knows what else.

    YOU were run off our forum because of you calling Stacy Peterson a prostitute… how’s that for a walk down the truth memory lane.

    I understand your bitterness towards us. But it doesn’t suit you well. You have an obsession when you try and twist things into lies. Too many people know about you now.

  140. Oh GeneGene, I loved the Hustle.

    That’s where I fell in love with John Travolta!!

    Loved those polyester suits and blow dried hair.

  141. jeepers peepers your post puts you in the name calling group and insulted everyone out here but grandma!
    good job!

  142. jeepers, I think you came in at a bad time, no the usual.

    But the gatekeepers away (at GJ) and the mice will play.

  143. How long is the GJ expected to go today? Anyone know?

    Crazies or non-crazies, responses welcome.

  144. If this offends anyone’s sensitive eyes, my advice is to scroll.

    I would challenge anyone to just pass it up and not speak up when you are reading outright lies.

    Anyone.

  145. Someone has more personalities than I, Amanda?

    Maybe all those nics together shouldstart their own forum and debate each other to the death!

  146. Saturday Night Fever!

    John Travolta as Tony Manero!

    Featuring disco songs by the Bee Gees!

    As long as no ruins my Dance Floor; DANCE!!!

    Good Bye
    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  147. Oh Saturday Night Fever…that brings back memories.

    I can remember having to BEG my parents to be able to go see it. In those days, it was a “dirty” movie…lol.

  148. Where are all those people at the end of “Dangerous Liaisons” pointing and yelling “Ooo! Oooo!” when you need them?

  149. I wish the gatekeeper could IM us here or something deep us updated. But if they did only morning I’d think they’d be done already.

    Did gatekeeper get back about whether they were at the Main courthouse or the River City Judicial Center; where maybe they will do just interviews with ISP at the Child advocacy center? I honestly hope they don’t have to do Grand Jury, as long as the other can be brought in by affidavit or something. It would be awfully scary for them to go to the GJ. JMO

  150. I believe some concession can be made for the kids.

    I would like to see them, if they are forced to testify, do it in a relaxed place, with everyone, Judge, Jurors, Attorneys, and the children all on the same level.

  151. Hey Kidos! Learn all of the best dances from the 1970s with Drew & JB!

    Throw in a mix of John Travolta & what do we have?

    “Disco Mania”!
    Street Hustle, Latin Hustle, Night Fever Line Dance, Bus Stop, Four Corners, Bump & More!

    See U at the Bus Stop Kidos.

    Good Bye
    GeneGene
    The Dancing Machine

  152. I wish the gatekeeper could IM us here or something deep us updated. OOps….keep us updated.

  153. Isnt it funny how generations change.

    In the 70′s men were trying in vain to get chest hair, if they didnt have it. Today they are shaving it off if they do have it….lol.

  154. Thanks, jeepers, for letting me know that. I couldn’t imagine those children being kept inside during this beautiful weather!

  155. Jeepers, this conversation and discussion is far from the norm here. Usually, the discussion is good and respectful. Someone forgot to spray for trolls, I suspect.

  156. If only the beautiful weather could make everything sunny for those little kids.

    No matter what happens, they have a long tough road ahead of them.

    For all Joel’s tough talk about Drew being innocent and it being obvious, I do find it strange that he won’t be answering questions after May 30.

  157. That Joel won’t be answering questions on SYM, I mean.

    Let’s just keep talking about the case and various aspects of that and not mention the other.

    Soon, it will be gone, and then we will look like crazies having a conversation about something that isn’t there. ;)

  158. Noway, I agree with you about the kids. Their lives will never be the same. No one can replace their mother. It seems she was just erased from their lives. Maybe Joel realized that providing any answers to any questions was not a real smart thing to do?

  159. Grandma210, I think that Joel Brodsky is coming to the realization that his strategy of high media attention is backfiring.

    Even seasoned defense attorneys have scoffed at his approach to defending Drew Peterson.

    The only reason I like that he has continued to stay in the media, is because he and Drew are destroying their defense case everytime they are on TV or in print.

    And that, my friends, is a very good thing!

  160. 58apache – agreed. There was a question asked on SYM about him modelling his approach after the media treatment of michael jackson and robert blake and how he thought that was appropriate since those people were already famous before they were charged with anything.

    Naturally his answer didn’t actually address the question. He dragged in R Kelly and the fact that it took 6 years for his case to go to trial. Hmmm. Ist that what he’s after? Is that a good thing?

  161. Well, I don’t think they needed the help that their media play gave them in making themselves look not so saavy; it reinforced opinions formed of them, though. I pray that none of the antics will interfere with a trial. They will go through every tactic to hold off the trial, jury selection, judge, and maybe even a new attorney. At least, this is what I have come to expect from them.

  162. fac: “Naturally his answer didn’t actually address the question. He dragged in R Kelly and the fact that it took 6 years for his case to go to trial. Hmmm. Ist that what he’s after? Is that a good thing?”

    Sure, the longer people have to ‘adjust’ to what has happened, the better their chances with a jury – I suppose that is their thinking.

  163. facs–
    JB answered that OJ wasn’t part of his modeling stategy, but Jackson & Blake were, but that “that’s all they had in common.”

    WTH does that mean?

    Is it that Blake was thought to have hired someone to kill Bonnie while he was tipping the waiter? The child molester thing? What was he backing away from there? Both. And backing FArthest away from the alleged wife killer OJ.

    That would be me reading between the lines.

  164. If Joel realized answering questions was not a wise thing … why not just stop today. Now. Without answering another question.

    His client faces weapon charges tomorrow, so it is possible that he thinks his client will go to prison for that and later be charged with the murder of Kathleen Savio. If that was the case, Joel would be too busy to be answering our questions.

    Also the GJ may be done today. We’ll just have to wait and see.

    Do they make a decision right after the testimony of the last person or do they regroup and make an announcement tomorrow?

    Hmm . . .

  165. maybe joel got what he wanted from the net and is done! who knows I’ve never seen anything like this case from all the players in it including LE.

  166. I read a msg from Joel that he would be back on Friday (I think evening) to answer his SYM Q&As. Taking today off.

    But, DP is no longer answering questions anymore, from what I understand.

  167. When the defense does not have a leg to stand on, they start dancing.

    Someone, please turn up the music!

    …AND DANCE

  168. Night fever, night fever.
    We know how to do it.
    Gimme that night fever, night fever.
    We know how to show it. :D

  169. lizanne61 // May 29, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    I read a msg from Joel that he would be back on Friday (I think evening) to answer his SYM Q&As. Taking today off.

    But, DP is no longer answering questions anymore, from what I understand.

    dp was answering questions on that forum?
    geesh if that’s true really dumb move. I thought only JB was posting.

  170. Night fever brings back the memories.

    I really used to hang out at the disco in West Dundee in the 70′s. God am I old? Nahhh

  171. lizanne61 // May 29, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    facs–
    JB answered that OJ wasn’t part of his modeling stategy, but Jackson & Blake were, but that “that’s all they had in common.”
    ***********************************

    I was mystified by that as well. So…’ll grant that Drew isn’t a suspect in a kiddy fiddling, but he certainly is a suspect in a wife killing. So, like it or not he and Li’l Rascal Blake have that in common.

  172. I guess I’d want my lawyer to focus on my case and not the blogoforiums.—Noway

    I think that’s why he hired the PIs.—–

    Jobs for Drews PIs:

    1. lurk at blogoforiums, take notes
    2 hit & miss post
    3 background checks on all cales family members and friends, and possible prosecution witnesses.
    4 find bootie for DP
    5 discredit anyone who is not DP crew.
    6 Search south of france for stacy.

  173. IMO Peterson is taking a huge gamble with Brodsky and his untried media techniques. I guess we’ll see how it all plays out.

  174. Oh! Can you envision a whole courtroom of people, the judge, jurors, everyone overcome with the song, “Night Fever”? LoL!! Sounds like the scene from a classic movie!

  175. Guys, I remember all of those! Heck I go as far back as the jitterbug, in the 50′s. The Original American Bandstand! Sorry, I have so gotten off topic! My apologies!

  176. Liz, I’d add just a little addendum to your list:

    6 Search south of france for stacy…using the Internet only

  177. Working in a pizza parlor in the late 70′s, I can still hear all those disco tunes from the jukebox. Ahhhhh fun memories…

    Saturday night fever…
    Eagles tunes…
    Dolly Parton’s 9-5…
    Sting tunes…

    And standing there at the register trying to explain to the customer why extra cheese is another 35 cents!!!

  178. So, stranded damsel had to testify anyway, despite the badgering and assurances of the ISP. Interesting.

  179. I think JB and Drew both know there is so much evidence against him that they might as well try anything. They have nothing to lose.

  180. Amanda, maybe they are keeping quiet about the teens?

    Did you find that on WordPress or another source … about Kim “22yo” M. and Aunt Candace?

  181. what they pulled in the 22yo who came in the picture only a month ago.
    boy seems desperate to me .
    aunt candy yes makes lots of sense.

  182. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    I think JB and Drew both know there is so much evidence against him that they might as well try anything. They have nothing to lose.
    _______________
    So much evidence against him? Such as?

  183. Wow, it’s like no wonder no one wants contact with him. The get hauled before the GJ. I wonder if they subpaonaed (sp) all the regulars down at the DP Bar & Grill hangout? Bartenders hear a lot, too!

  184. I wonder if Steve C stopped talking to him. Haven’t heard much from him lately. Do you hear anything, BB girls? I would think his wife would want to protect her family from the attention.

  185. I think it makes perfect sense to subpoena the 22 y/o tanning salon employee. Based on her interview in the Chicago Sun Times, its obvious she needs help, if she is willing to associate with a known spouse killer.

  186. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    I don’t know freedom … pillow talk and all that. Maybe?

    Never nothin’ physical …

    hehe yeah right nothin physical!!
    maybe they thought he confessed to her. To me it sounds like the threats from the state investigator became reality.

  187. freedom08 // May 29, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    what they pulled in the 22yo who came in the picture only a month ago.
    boy seems desperate to me .
    aunt candy yes makes lots of sense.

    If I was on the GJ I would demand to question her. I would want to know if her thing with Drew started before Stacy dissapeared. Goes to motive and goes to Drew’s pattern.

  188. facs, what are you reading?

    And I believe her full name is Kim “I’m not a hooker” Matuska of Darien.

  189. liz, Steve is the one who introduced Kim M. to Drew … and Steve and Drew were out a few weeks ago if the blogboarders can be trusted to know who is who.

  190. No, I am not above doing this.

    Picture here:

    http://xuqa.com/128176

    Full Name: Kim Matuska
    Age: 22
    Gender :Female
    Location: United States
    Relationship Status: In a Relationship
    Interested In: Men
    Member Since: Oct 5, 2005

  191. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    facs, what are you reading?

    And I believe her full name is Kim “I’m not a hooker” Matuska of Darien.
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    You left out the best part!

    “It sucks. I am not a hooker”

  192. 58apache // May 29, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    I think it makes perfect sense to subpoena the 22 y/o tanning salon employee. Based on her interview in the Chicago Sun Times, its obvious she needs help, if she is willing to associate with a known spouse killer.

    ah it’s not the job of the GJ to provide social counseling for anyone!
    a known spouse killer when was he found guilty?

  193. Why haven’t I changed my email signature to that yet?

    “Its Sucks. I’m Not a Hooker.”

  194. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    liz, Steve is the one who introduced Kim M. to Drew … and Steve and Drew were out a few weeks ago if the blogboarders can be trusted to know who is who.
    =============================

    Yes forgot about the intro at the salon. Really too bad to hear SC hasn’t a qualm. What do you know about him? Was he or not the “locksmith” that let Dp into KS house. What kind of business is he in, and did DP bail him out of a gambling debt? So many questions I have on that one.

    Joel was supposed to get back to Bash on the locksmith question and never did.

  195. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    If I was on the GJ I would demand to question her. I would want to know if her thing with Drew started before Stacy dissapeared. Goes to motive and goes to Drew’s pattern.
    —-

    I might buy that but I think she has a boyfriend and he probably should have been hauled infront of the GJ also if that’s the case.

  196. Well, it sounds like she is really regreting making that phone call.

    Hopefully, this will be a heads-up to her on the kind of men to become friends with …

    Really, though, I could picture one of my nieces being this trusting and naive.

  197. It does go to his history that he’d have an affair. If Stacy had a boyfriend, I’m sure Drew left a trail of his investigation into it on the computers etc. and I think most of her male acquaintances did go before the GJ. No APBs out on any others.

    How long til he finds a 21 year old AuPair?

  198. yes she is cute!

    oh maybe drew was trying to make stacy jealous to bring her out of hiding.

  199. Don’t know about the locksmith … it’s been asked but Joel has not given the name . . . said he didn’t know, and that I guess, qualified as “answering” … don’t know if he said he would find out.

    Bash also asked about the security company at the Savio-Peterson home and Joel was supposed to get back to her on that …

  200. Maybe he knows something about what happened to Bash?!?!? Did she ask too many questions?!?!

  201. of all the things we have heard from the family about drew NONE have said that stacy thought he was having an affair.

    now we do know that stacy was texting and contacting other men.

    I think stacy had drew smittened for the first time in his life.

  202. Freedom, if you are truly smitten with someone, you don’t accept that they left you for another man just like that.

    And who knows what Drew was doing … but if he was tracking Stacy as much as they say, neither of them could have been having an affair.

    And heck … she was texting people while she lay in bed next to him … hardly a secret affair if an affair at all. IMO

  203. Freedom,

    At that point in his life, he couldn’t compete with a 20 something guy, could he? His way was to try to buy her love back with jewelry, motorcycles.

  204. IMO neither of them loved the other one. Stacy married him because of the life he could offer … and he married her because she was arm candy.

    Nothing romantic at all.

  205. Ok I just heard on fox news that tomorrow on studio B a guy is going to release a film he has of aliens on earth.

    Do you think this could have anything to do with Brodsky not answering questions anymore?

  206. iknoweverythinglol // May 29, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    Facs, sometimes I think I know who you are and it just makes me smile.
    *****************************

    I hope so!

  207. yep liz I agree no competition at his age. she was more than likely wanting to be around those her age or nearer to her age.

    I don’t think drew was tracking stacy as it has been rumored. I think after he looked into the phone bill he was pretty suspisious of what she was doing and with who but I don’t think he had 7/24 electronic survellance on her.
    she wanted a new phone for some reason one that drew didn’t have access to so who know!!
    and who was she texting in bed next to him? wasn’t she on the phone with bruce and drew was sleeping on the couch or something then he came to bed? doesn’t matter she was texting hot and heavy’s to scott and I doubt she was doing that right next to drew.

  208. For someone who “knows everything lol” you sure ask a lot of questions. :)

    There are alients. Illegal ones. They are cracking down on them.

  209. wonder if the GJ heard from Morphey? how could they complete their investigation without hearing from him?

  210. funny but if drew was texting & meeting another female while married to stacy-he’d be skinned alive for that by all.

  211. I never read the content of the text, but I do know that the y generation (or are they x?) draws the lines a little lower than I did at that age as to what is hot and heavy and what is teasing banter. I sometimes blush at what my sons’ friends & girlfriends talk about openly in front of me.

  212. lol You can text more than one person at a time … so she could have been texting Bruce and anyone else.

    Phone records will tell.

    Unless you have a certain ring for a text from a certain person … it’s all going to sound the same … ding …. ding … ding.

    I probably would have wanted to strangle her if I’d been the one in bed trying to sleep.

  213. theoriginalsami // May 29, 2008 at 3:09 pm

    funny but if drew was texting & meeting another female while married to stacy-he’d be skinned alive for that by all.

    yep double standards run amock in this case!!

  214. freedom08 // May 29, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    wonder if the GJ heard from Morphey? how could they complete their investigation without hearing from him?
    ——————————————————

    maybe still under the protective umbrella. big secret maybe?

  215. Freedom- Does the GJ have remote testimony do you know? Like from a hotel in Milwaukee ie., or wherever TM is.

  216. liz I believe that the texting between stacy and scott was pretty hot, heavy and specific!!
    Also Scott is not a young teen he’s well in his 30′s.

  217. Liz- I don’t know for sure but it is a possibility many deposistions are being handled that way now.

  218. lizanne

    where did i say he wasnt? if his family was posting w/messages from him thats unusual for that to be allowed.

  219. With what I know, the logical reason for Stacy having a new phone is that she thought she might have contact with her lawyer using her cell phone and didn’t want Drew to know.

    She found the cell phone bill with numbers circled etc. about October 14 or so.

    She contacted the lawyer around that time.

    I wondered whether the fender bender she’d had was around the area of the lawyer’s office and that she may have been going to see him way back in April (?) … because it’s still odd to me that she wouldn’t report it to her insurance so that Drew would not know.

    Or maybe she was going to a women’s shelter … didn’t the guy say that Stacy said her husband had been abusive to her that day …

    The GJ has to do something soon. Please. Who could they possibly need to call now …

  220. lizanne61 // May 29, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    sami— how do we know he wasn’t??
    ———————————————————
    did u mean drew texting?

    how do we know? sharon never told us. she knows everything. hasnt come out w/that yet.

  221. the fender bender was back in April of last year no where near the time she went missing.

    yes if morphey is in protective custody I highly doubt he would be passing on notes for the family to post of fsp

  222. liz he did testify at the GJ there was no real relationship.

    yeah right just like the 22yo staying at drews nothing physical.

    when it first came out about the text messages with scott it was reports as the messages were specific with things like that was great last night type of things!!
    who knows so many liars in this case.

  223. Is this right … Stacy dated Scott’s brother Keith … and Keith is/was in the military?

    Personally, if it were my spouse exchanging texts like those described, I would be pretty upset.

    I think Scott is around 35 … and Stacy is 23. Looks like she really never got away from that older man syndrome. But I think it was becacuse she craved the life she never had. Married at 17 is not easy. Four children by 23 is not easy.

    I’m not saying that she would leave her kids. I’m saying that these text messages were a way for her to do that … get away…

  224. no one has accused drew of cheating on stacy as a matter of fact golden boy mims says drew was not cheating on stacy.
    drew on the other hand thought stacy was cheating on him and showed mims some receipts from dinners stacy had with other men, supposedly.

  225. noway

    do u agree had it been the other way around-drew texting another lady he’d be hammered here?

  226. I know the fender bender was in April … but I question why Stacy was too afraid to tell Drew she’d been in an accident . . . wondered if it might have more to do with where she was when the accident happened.

    And maybe that’s not it at all.

    The guy said that Stacy said Drew had been abusive to her that morning (I believe) … so maybe she was just nervous from that.

  227. no way i believe that if stacy didnt tell cass bout drew murdering kathleen would she tell a stranger she was abused.

  228. freedom, lol, how do the receipts show she had dinner with other men.

    I have a receipt from Applebees in front of me … no mention of the 4 women, 3 men, 1 boy, and 1 girl who were with me.

  229. fascinatingtermsofdeservice are you the then the same individual who believes that Stacy may be in California with Julie. Correct? And that Drew is “in on it” with Stacy and FoSP as a money scam. You are one and the same. Yes?

  230. t.o.sami, it’s actually easier sometimes to tell a stranger who you expect you won’t see again personal stuff … sometimes more than family.

    To tell Cass that Drew murdered Kathleen would be admitting (eventually) that she knew too … and married him … and stayed married to him …

  231. theoriginalsami // May 29, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    noway

    do u agree had it been the other way around-drew texting another lady he’d be hammered here?

    ———————————–

    If Drew were trying to leave Stacy because she was controlling, physically and mentally abusive and didn’t let him have any cash to buy a friend a coffee, well then, I’d have to cut him some slack.

  232. noway don’t ask me I’m only repeating what I read!!

    maybe drew went to the places and asked who knows!! or it could have been his high tech survellance system going off when a man came around stacy!! dk

  233. The posts I saw from Toms brother I don’t recall being messages from Tom. I thought they were 1st person.

    Am I wrong? Don’t make me wade thru all that.

  234. I don’t believe the friend some coffee story one bit except maybe she bought someone coffee!! but don’t buy she had no money. how was she going to pay for the fender bender? how was she going to pay for the new cell phone.
    where did she get the money for hair coloring, manicures and pedicures!!
    nope don’t buy it another embellished story to bias the public.

  235. theoriginalsami // May 29, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    do u agree had it been the other way around-drew texting another lady he’d be hammered here?
    **********************************
    I think if he gets hammered here it’s because people are pretty sure he murdered two of his wives. Infidelity is the least of his weaknesses.

  236. ofcourse the pastor claims when he talked to stacy she had no intent on leaving drew and never mentioned it.
    that’s pretty odd!!

  237. If Drew were trying to leave Stacy because she was controlling, physically and mentally abusive and didn’t let him have any cash to buy a friend a coffee, well then, I’d have to cut him some slack.
    *******************

    And don’t forget the part about Stacy coming home late at night and telling Drew “It’s the perfect crime! The cops will be here soon. This is what you need to say”.

    And then she tells you about killing her exhusband and how you need to cover for her…

  238. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 3:36 pm

    t.o.sami, it’s actually easier sometimes to tell a stranger who you expect you won’t see again personal stuff … sometimes more than family.

    To tell Cass that Drew murdered Kathleen would be admitting (eventually) that she knew too … and married him … and stayed married to him …
    ——————————————————-

    agree to disagree-thats stretching it.

  239. Sorry, Sami, didn’t see your post until liz quoted it … and it was addressed to me.

    Yes, Drew would be slammed here, just as is being done to Stacy.

    IMO … if it was me personally involved in texts like that, it would be “cheating” whether or not my spouse had or didn’t have “never nothin’ physical.”

    If all their personal stuff was reversed: *He* was married (to Stacy, age 47) at 17; *he* was a father of 4 at age 23 … then I’d cut him the same slack I cut Stacy … that this was a way to escape without actually leaving.

  240. I think credit card on the cell phone, just to spite him for checking her call records. And she might have borrowed money from Pam or aunt Candace or Dad even to cover the fender bender. We don’t know.

    The point is that most people knew he controlled the money.

    If Drew kept any amount of cash in the safe, she probably didn’t know the combination. And that might be common knowledge. Or not.

    That would be a question for JB I think.

    ANd that is why I think JB backed off the $25,000 claim also, is that she Did Not have access to the safe.

  241. not one single report for abuse only talks of abuse come from stacy’s family.
    seems like they didn’t take it very serious or her cries for help either. IMO.

  242. t.o.sami, I don’t think so.

    But to say that your husband was abusive … could have been verbal … this man testified before the GJ … I’ll find the article and see what he said exactly.

    Are there any police reports with his first wife … or his second wife … I know Kathleen did … looking for a pattern.

  243. all the pictures I have of stacy surely don’t show her lacking for money by any means!
    don’t most husband want their wifes not to spend too much?
    look at the house they live/lived in lots of money spent on that house.
    looks like the cales liked hanging out there also!!

  244. none from the 1st or 2nd wife matter of fact the 1st wife did not say anything about abuse. the second did.

  245. noway

    thats saying that anything the family or strangers is absolute. anything drew says or other is lies. all these peeps saying this & that knowing his & her business but not one doing a thing. sure.

  246. freedom08 // May 29, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    all the pictures I have of stacy surely don’t show her lacking for money by any means!
    *********************

    What did I miss? Who said she lacked money? AFAIK she got to spend all the money she wanted. Drew just tracked where it was spent.

  247. what man the fender bender guy.
    that could have been stacy’s way to get sympathy out of the fender bender guy so it would not be turned into insurance. maybe she’s had to many claims and it would have skyrocketed her rates.
    who knows.

  248. Isn’t that where you are going with this … that if there are no police reports, anyone who says they have been abused is lying?

  249. There are police reports with Kathleen and Drew still denies that he abused her.

    She ran into a door or something like that.

  250. I track where I spend my money most people do and as a couple both should know where the money is going.
    does your husband not keep up with the money spent?

    not at all noway but most times when someone is abused at the level many are claiming there is some documentation of it somewhere.

  251. How’s the loading speed of this thread doing folks? Should be faster than about 5 minutes ago since we deleted about 100 posts. Some of you have asked questions to specific posters…don’t expect answers.

  252. noway

    how many of those reports with kathleen were abuse?

    how many with stacy? none.

  253. the pastor has not mentioned that drew abused her and I would think that of all people she would have confided that to him.

    bbl

  254. Re: access to cash.

    My point was not letting her spend money, but him having control over it.

    You can control a credit card with limits, and you get a list of everything you bought, how much, and where you went and ate and got gas.
    Along with the GPS, it covers a lot of tracking.

    My son once was used my card for coffee + $50 over at Dominicks and I was able to find that out by calling Discover & Dominicks. The wonders of computers.

  255. I’m posting this here but I haven’t watched the video because I can’t on my laptop.

    I’ll go to the desktop ….

    The world watched again, as dribble rolled from Drew Peterson’s lips. Dan Abrams missed the mark on this one. Abrams should have gone back to the interview with the social worker John Lamantia who had a fender bender with Stacy last year and asked Peterson how a complete , trained, licensed professional would make statement like “The relationship was physical and Stacy said they had a troubled marriage”. http://video.nbc5.com/player/?id=184823

  256. does that mean that you believe what the pastor is saying..or if he said it would you still not believe it.. i know some people don’t believe him.. but if you are saying that he didnt say it.. then does that mean that if he did say it you would believe it.. and therefore that you believe what he has said this far…

    i dont recall seeing anywhere that Mrs. Peterson reported abuse to authorities.. just Ms. Savio.. seems like she reported it to just about anyone who would listen.. but no one did…

  257. Caption: Drew Peterson’s girlfriend Kim Matuska, 22, of Darien leaves the Will County Court Annex after testifying before the grand jury Thursday afternoon in downtown Joliet.

    Drew Peterson’s girlfriend … !

  258. So reporting or not reporting abuse is not any indication that it is taking place.

    If Drew was physically abusive to Stacy for the first time on April 13 and never again but made threats and made Stacy fear her life … is that abuse?

  259. “Drew Peterson’s young love was hauled before the grand jury Thursday, and that was just the kind of thing that screwed up the affair. “You guys ruined it for me, again,” Peterson, 54, said of his romance with a 22-year-old tanning salon worker. “It’s too much for her,” said Peterson”

    That Hosey is good isn’t he? :-)

  260. HI LADYS AND GENTS,

    Iam trying to catch up with all of you , hard to when ya don’t know what is being talked of …. WHAT picture of drew with that gun is it posted somewhere.. ????

    I read this belowe and thought what a doofies JB is , JOHN TRAVOLTA will not go and will not remember whom drew is that dimwit …

    This photo should convince the state police that they’ve made a mistake with these charges,” Brodsky said in the release. “If not we might need to subpoena Mr. Travolta when this case goes to court.”

    any news on the court hearing today ??or the GJ anything any links of what your talking of …??

    I will how ever keep up with all of you I took 4days off of work so I don’;t have to go in an stay till 2am and sleep most of the day .. I hate that ya know……

  261. Who to believe?

    Drew Peterson’s young love was hauled before the grand jury Thursday, and that was just the kind of thing that screwed up the affair.

    “You guys ruined it for me, again,” Peterson, 54, said of his romance with 22-year-old tanning salon worker Kim Matuska.

    (Source: See facs’ link above.)

    Matuska denied having a physical relationship with Peterson, saying “I’m not seeing Drew.”

    Source: https://petersonstory.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/22-year-old-woman-appears-before-grand-jury-investigating-peterson-case/

  262. Here’s how Hosey presented that particular quote:

    For her part, Matuska said she and Peterson were not together.

    “We’re done,” said the young Darien woman, later adding, “I’m not seeing Drew.”

  263. Ah … they were seeing each other but are now through. Her mom should be happy.

    And the link above is John Travolta proving that Drew is innocent on the gun charges. ;)

  264. Wonder if that’s Drew she’s talking to on the phone. To tell him they are through of course.

  265. iknowwhatyoudont … I think the actual saying is “Nevermore.”
    :D

    Have no idea what …anymore is.

  266. I don’t see a gun on DREW cause of that big thing in the way infront of him lol

    do any of you see the gun?? in question…

    thanks for the links

  267. facs, it’s from lavanda … I just remembered that I thought she was losing her mind talking about John Travolta … so I went to yesterday’s thread and searched for lavanda and found the link she gave me.

  268. So funny Noway. “Drews girlfriend.” He’s gonna love Joe Hosey!

    Tin Man- If you only had a heart, you’d be brokenhearted over your wife being missing, and of course, you now admit some harm may have come to her, and still no tears.

    Wierd . . . .

  269. CAn anyone inlarge that picture and ZOOM IT IN to see if there is a gun with him in the picture I asked hubby if he could see it and HE to said NO … anythoughts?

  270. Somebody enlarge the photo and changed the contrast and said it was there but that you cannot see the barrel.

  271. OH ok , I put it as a desktop background to see if I could see anything and it did not look like anythinng onn his back side.. hubby said same thing ..

    but if JB thinks to supena travolta he will not remember anything of that at all….

  272. facs, is that Kim M.’s boyfriend with her … I mean the boyfriend who got the DUI.

    Bet he’s pleased.

  273. WWEll lets hope nancy or Greta talks of this and has mike brooks look at photo and tells us , on nancy’s show …. he was a former fbi …. so he could see something ya know….

  274. lugnut, I think there is another photo too … no John Travolta in it but that is still supposed to prove Drew’s innocence.

  275. can you see the serial number of the gun to verify that it is the same gun in question now…i know alot of people have mentioned in the past with Mr. Peterson’s guns that unless you have the serial number its pointless.. i think if you cant see the serial number in the gun you cant be sure its the same gun…just like when Mr. Mims identified the folding gun and everyone said Mr. Mims couldnt be sure without having seen the serial number… you cant identify a gun by a picture alone.. thats what the smart people say…

  276. lugnut96 // May 29, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    CAn anyone inlarge that picture and ZOOM IT IN to see if there is a gun with him in the picture I asked hubby if he could see it and HE to said NO … anythoughts?
    ***********************************

    try this?
    h ttp://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/567-peterson20with20travolta20full2.jpg

  277. Did Stacy actually meet with the lawyer? I thought there had been only calls but I’m reading Susan Murphy Milano’s blog and she talks about Stacy *meeting with* the lawyer.

    Not sure if that part is “her opinion” or fact.

  278. noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 4:48 pm

    lugnut, I think there is another photo too … no John Travolta in it but that is still supposed to prove Drew’s innocence.

    can you give me a link to that picture?? please if you have that one???

    amandareckonwith // May 29, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    lugnut96 // May 29, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    CAn anyone inlarge that picture and ZOOM IT IN to see if there is a gun with him in the picture I asked hubby if he could see it and HE to said NO … anythoughts?
    ***********************************

    try this?
    h ttp://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm166/crankycrankerson/567-peterson20with20

    that link you gave doesn’t work tryed twice and nothing….

  279. Did anyone see an interview by Geraldo with Brodsky about the gun? I was just googling it but came up with nothing.

  280. thanks for those links , looked and yes since they are outlined I seen it, at first my hubby said it looks like an M16 gun….

  281. facsmiley // May 29, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    Did anyone see an interview by Geraldo with Brodsky about the gun? I was just googling it but came up with nothing.

    When was that interview???? he may show that on saturday when his show is on at 7or 8 pm

  282. Ok, personally I find it a bit funny the DA’s called this “so-called” girlfriend into the GJ, what could she, or would she, possible have to add or say?

    And it’s bit strange to me the order they are doing things.

    Aunt Candance just now going into GJ? Is the DA seeing something they don’t like with the GJ and they are trying to get them swayed the other way?

  283. I tried eveything in photoshop on that pic, and I can’t get anything more that an outline of a shadow of a gun that may or may not be his gun.
    I still think he was just pushing the good guy protects your favorite star who has so much in common with him. Maybe DP believes too that there’s a pod up in the atmosphere waiting to take him to a life in heaven with perfect women?

  284. 1.drew put stacy on the deed of the house sometime after he purchased it. giving stacy 50% controlling interest in the home. he did not have to do that.
    2. drew let stacy adopt his and kathleens boys giving her 50% control of the children
    , he did not have to do that.
    3. stacy helped her family out financially many times where did the money come from?
    if he was so controlling why did he allow her control over his home and children?
    see these things just don’t add up to me. he may have made her account for the money she spent many husbands do and for all we know she may have been spend crazy!

  285. Regarding the GJ – I wonder now if a formal announcement is going to be made, one way or the other, regarding this GJ session? This is supposed to be the end of it, unless they extend it. So, don’t you think they’ll make something public about it?

  286. lizanne61 // May 29, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    GeneGene

    I’ll be the one on the bench talking to myself

    Oh you wont be alone darlin

  287. freedom

    good points. not too controlling to give up that much control over kids, house, help her family financially. do the kids have a trust? would that give her control too?

  288. I think Stacy’s words were “controlling and somewhat abusive.” Correct me if I’m wrong. But that’s from the horse’s mouth.

    There are many many ways to control and abuse. Why don’t you let someone in that situation tell you what that means. I wouldn’t personally know.

    In Illinois there is a community property law that says she owns 50% anyway. He’s not giving her anything she is not earning by holding up her end of the marriage contract. Taking care of those kids (btw she is auth to get them medical care if she adopts them, pick them up from school, sign permission slips etc, otherwise its up to DP), taking care of the house cooking , cleaning, even sex earns her some financial rights.

    My only questions is did he give her full access to her 50% on a daily basis. Was the financials in his name or both. My husband & I divide up assets (ie cars) for tax purposes, because his biz is in his name and my assets try to balance his.

  289. 3. stacy helped her family out financially many times where did the money come from?

    Hero personalities like to save people. Look good, earn points, as in you owe me.

  290. Can anyone read this and not LOL?

    “Peterson’s publicist, Glenn Selig, released the photograph of Peterson in his SWAT regalia, including a semi-automatic assault rifle he was arrested for owning last week. Travolta was in town to hype his 2000 film “Battlefield Earth.”

    “They were on their way to a drug bust when they got pulled off, then got assigned to protect John Travolta,” said Peterson’s lawyer, Joel Brodsky.”

    Because…it’s so common to be on the way to a drug bust when BLAM a celebrity pops onto the scene, screw the drug bust – it’s time for autographs!

    I think that may be Brodsky trying to justify why DP chose to bring the semi-automatic to a (had to have been scheduled) celeb protection gig. It’s hard to use a photo of Travolta to back up his assertion that it was Drew’s SWAT weapon, otherwise.

  291. yeah facs that is pretty funny!

    oh hold on druggies we gotta make a celebrity stop before we bust you.

    ah rip harvey!

  292. Ahhh, the drug dealers will be there tomorrow, no need to worry…lol.

    Thats sad about Harvey, he was so funny.

  293. Is the page loading slowly for anyone else?

    I usually dont have a problem, but tonight it seems so slow to me.

  294. freedom08 // May 29, 2008 at 10:28 am

    noway406 // May 29, 2008 at 10:08 am

    freedom, would a picture of the gun while Drew is on duty actually make it legal? Doesn’t it actually have to be registered with the department?

    If he was on duty, why was he asking a celebrity for an autograph?
    —–

    lol, I’m sure all around that day were asking for autographs that’s pretty normal human behavior on duty or not.
    The photo’s shows that drew did use the weapon while on duty as his lawyer claim. If it was illegal then the department has some explaining to do especially if the other photo shows the new chief in the pic with drew and the weapon.
    I don’t see what is so hard to understand about that. It’s the departments responsibility to insure their officers are not carrying illegal weapons bottom line. Now it appears the chief has made false statements and it doesn’t look good for the chief.
    At some point people are going to have to see this for what it is and stop all the excuses to blame anyone but drew. These excuses won’t work in a court of law.
    ++++++++++++
    MUST be one of the “Forrest Gump” people that that one wanna be lawyer posts to.

  295. Maybe the gun was even a movie studio prop??

    So loved Harvey Korman, and that show. I was looking at the full set of Carol B. DVDs but didn’t buy them. Seems worth it now.

Comments are closed.