Your Thread – June 26

Here’s Thursday’s thread everyone. As always, we’ll let you know what happens with the grand jury proceedings as soon as we know something.

~By posting on this blog you agree to be bound by the rules of this blog and by our Terms of Use. If you spot a rule violation, send an e-mail to reportabuse@mysuburbanlife.com.

Advertisements

548 thoughts on “Your Thread – June 26

  1. Only matters of public records, so we can really see what types of people, their character, so to speak, and then see if their glass houses are still in tact.

  2. I wonder if gatehouse would be interested in checking ip’s and exposing this troll to be the liar they are?
    huh gate or are these special trolls and allowed to play their games disrupting this blog for their personal vendetta ??

  3. I wonder if Gatehouse will expose you for being uneducated, rude and stirring trouble. I hope so.

    My last post from the other thread. The question still hasn’t been answered and it’s way past my bedtime. Why hasn’t Sharon been on one search????

    I don’t see any Admin claiming to be Stacy’s best friend but there isn’t one photo of Sharon and Stacy together, nor has her “best” friend been on one search?

    Carried from the other thread. Nite all!!
    I have NO opinions on any Admin’s, nor do I see them spewing lies to the public about Stacy and trying to find her.

    You never answered. I’m growing impatient and I am really tired. So, can you hurry. My old age is creeping in and I might not be able to search this weekend. I might have to stay and sip margarita’s in the garden with the rest of the people that visit my house.

  4. Duck
    Why don’t you ask Sharon yourself?

    Have you seen all of Sharon’s and Stacy’s pictures?

    I have an opinion on Admins.

    My opinion is that many felt it necessary to take potshots at the Admin of FSP why not the admins of other forums?

    What is so fascinating about an IP?

    Why am I a troll? I am speaking my mind just like the rest of you.

    What have I lied about?

  5. Rude is subjective on this forum.

    You can speak poorly of Sharon or Stacy’s family or FSP and that is not rude, especially, when the ever-so-concerned people speak in the name of the children?

    The children who could possibly see this?

    Kidding me right?

  6. what is so fascinating about an IP is that it will prove that the lies being spewed by the troll twins are just that lies, freedom08 does not equal this mike guy you are obsessed with.
    who btw is not mentioned in any news article anywhere concerning this case. sharon and fsp admin are in many news articles as are stacy’s family.

  7. Hey Duh-I never said anything to you about anything. The only response that I had to all of your questions were asking you to answer them first.

    I have no problems with any Admins and don’t intend to. Please go back and read your post to me and then answer, then I shall do the same.

    Your response must be in general. Sorry, I was just trying to answer the ones directed to me.

    I have to ask you, why don’t you ask Sharon yourself? I have the answer and it’s very obvious that you do not. So, I would seek the answer if I were you.

    Sleep is really needed. Night for the 50th time. LOL!

  8. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 12:16 am

    Duck
    Why don’t you ask Sharon yourself?

    Have you seen all of Sharon’s and Stacy’s pictures?

    I have an opinion on Admins.

    My opinion is that many felt it necessary to take potshots at the Admin of FSP why not the admins of other forums?

    What is so fascinating about an IP?

    Why am I a troll? I am speaking my mind just like the rest of you.

    What have I lied about?

    ANTHONY? Anthony L. – is dat u?

  9. Wait it’s free speech IKnowEeveryThingLOL.

    Isn’t that what the free thinkers and speakers say here?

    Or is it just for them.

    Man, pass me the rulebook.

  10. I know-you can say anything that you want but it doesn’t mean that it’s correct or is the right thing to say. IMO-it’s not right to post things about others without having facts. What is the obsession with the other Admins when you are safe and sound here? I will never understand. If I don’t like it somewhere, I simply leave.

    Maybe, sleep for all is what is needed.

    Hopefully, the question will be answered. Why hasn’t Sharon gone on one search?

  11. Folks, once again we have had to delete almost half of the posts put up in the last few hours. Please visit our forum rules at https://petersonstory.wordpress.com/forum-rules/

    Failure to abide by these rules can result in being banned from this blog. Stay on topic, stop the personal attacks, and do not list personal information.

    Our intention is not to limit the discussion that happens here but rather to ensure that the discussion stays civil enough to allow everybody to feel comfortable posting here.

    Have a good Thursday and we’ll update you all on grand jury proceedings ASAP.

  12. oh i think some of this came about because Mikey said this board was fsp2 and they were going to tear it up.

    Then the love sprays came up, the fact that his mother was alot like sharon, he seems to be inserting himself in this case and it goes on and on the dramaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

  13. I’m staying out of this kindergarten stuff. This isn’t my idea of intelligent blogging. It’s the McCoys vs the Hatfields.

  14. Deal me in on that I knoweverythinglol.

    No more bashing of Stacy and the searchers and FSP and Sharon and I’m happy, I will even go away.

  15. total insanity!
    attack this place because of why again?
    geesh this is just plain sick.
    sorry gatehouse for my potty mouth next time I’ll refrain if there is a next time don’t know if I wanna even read this insanity anymore. it’s freakin pitiful
    cause mickey said
    geesh how immature.

  16. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 12:38 am

    fsp2? So that’s what this is about? OMG!!!!

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Yes, that is what he called WP and they were going to come here and straighten us out.

  17. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 12:36 am

    I’m staying out of this kindergarten stuff. This isn’t my idea of intelligent blogging. It’s the McCoys vs the Hatfields.
    ++++++++++++++++
    Wel, I’ve been watching it just to see what was coming next, but I’m beat. Have had my precious granddaughter for two days now. She has been sick and my daughter had to go out of town until late this afternoon, so she’se been with me. Husband is out of town too, so it’s been really quiet tonight, but I think I’m headed to bed to get some rest. Will check in tomorrow and see if there’s any GJ news. Nite.

  18. nice civil discussions were taking place until you trolled this place. you came here to set posters straight that is the facts of what took place on here tonight. shame shame blaming others for your trolling.

  19. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 12:39 am

    Deal me in on that I knoweverythinglol.

    No more bashing of Stacy and the searchers and FSP and Sharon and I’m happy, I will even go away.

    iknoweverythinglol // June 26, 2008 at 12:40 am

    Yep done Bashing Sharon, the Cales and other victims of Drews.
    ————————————————————

    Why is it bashing Sharon if we ask why she hasn’t been on one search? That is NOT bashing! Simple question, should be a simple answer.

  20. Well, it doesn’t surprise if that was said, but it does infuriate me. Unbelievable. I wish I had never joined there, but we did have some interesting discussions on that board from time to time. But I found out that it wasn’t my cup of tea, so to speak.

  21. it’s pretty obvious cfs said fireworks these trolls came armed over here because they think I’m BM and they think they are serving justice with their insanity but the reality is they are trolling this boards with the intent to cause trouble and stop all questioning/discussion that don’t focus on drew bashing.
    it’s total insanity and I feel for anyone that admins these blogs that are trolled like this over and over again.
    pitiful.

  22. rescue I didn’t see you or cfs being attacked tonight or trolled so I don’t think you have to play or pay. it was all taken out on me because of someone’s insane thinking.

  23. freedom – it’s cutting both ways. There’s two sides here, if you look closely. Those who bash Sharon, et al, and those who don’t.

    We usually stick to issues here. Occasionally, amanda comes in with her anti-Sharon stuff and it starts all over again. That’s what’s happening now. Everyone comes in, takes sides, and this is what we get.

    Pooey to that.

  24. sorry not two sides rescue in this instance- they came here to attack me because they think I’m am BM. they are hiding behind the so called sharon bashing now.
    that’s the bottom line and they are soooo wrong it’s disgusting.

  25. freedom – you’ve had some intelligent, good conversations here. Don’t let them sucker you into the bashing stuff. Who the hell cares what Sharon does? Drew’s the main player. Sharon, et al., are just a distraction for some. If you let yourself get caught up in it, it’ll eat you up.

  26. Maybe Sharon and family was told to not go on searches for some reason given by ISP.
    WTH is the problem, does it always need to be a dramatized, backdoor agenda, when it comes to any FoSP?
    IMO, its insane…

  27. actually amanda came in after it was posted that sharon has not been on one search. that was the topic and BAM it was trolled immediately.
    but yet they claim ducky who asked the question was not bashing but won’t say who was.
    it’s stupid and pitiful that I can’t post because of these idiot trolls that think I’m the man they are obsessed with.

  28. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 1:07 am

    freedom – you’ve had some intelligent, good conversations here. Don’t let them sucker you into the bashing stuff. Who the hell cares what Sharon does? Drew’s the main player. Sharon, et al., are just a distraction for some. If you let yourself get caught up in it, it’ll eat you up.

    none of this will eat me up especially internet trolls. I will state my mind about them and their games.
    The main player is stacy and finding her IMO. LE needs to focus on drew and finding evidence.
    there are many players in this case and sharon has throw herself out there as a main player so she will be commented on by some, just like cassandra and others will be commented on.
    I look at all and lots out of the box when it comes to this case. that ticks alot of people off it appears and might even be causing insanity for some.

  29. freedom – start paying closer attention to who pops in on here and what is said. I can almost guarantee that the subject never changes, nor is there anything discussed other than people or funds.

  30. sher69 // June 26, 2008 at 1:10 am

    screw um freedom, post and tell um to f off, and have a great day!!! lol!

    hehe I do then gatehouse has to delete my pouty mouth posts!! not fair to gate!! lol

  31. LOL Freedom, you can be whoever you want to be, if you want to be a girl you can. This is the internet and lots of fun.

  32. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 1:12 am

    freedom – start paying closer attention to who pops in on here and what is said. I can almost guarantee that the subject never changes, nor is there anything discussed other than people or funds.

    I haven’t been around much lately to notice anything like that and doubt I will be in much in the future. disagreement is one thing but totally insanity is not what I want to spend my time on.

  33. sher69 // June 26, 2008 at 1:14 am

    never get your panties in a bunch… me too on da potty moff

    I gave up panties for that reason!
    ha!

  34. ISP has never said that Sharon shouldn’t search. No drama, no back door (I will be nice here) just the truth.

    It would be nice if Gatehouse would interview Sharon and ask her why she hasn’t. According to the family and the press, Anthony Cales has been out searching so why not let the “other” family members be looking for Stacy?

  35. Yeah, here. See, cfs, that is exactly why I didn’t go over to that place. I just figured it was a different outlook on things, and I’d not fit in.

  36. I’d rather hear if the teens are going before the GJ, or when LE is going to wrap up their case. Sharon doesn’t interest me the way she does you, ducky.

    No offense.

  37. Freedom, I hate that they were all over you tonight, and it did look like they were gunning for you. Actually, in spite of it all, I learned a lot while they were here, even if Gatehouse deleted most of it. Not about you, but who they think you are, lol. We know better, so don’t let it bother you too much. Best to just ignore them, IF you can, lol. Gatehouse isn’t going to let anyone sabotage this board, so I’m not worried about anything that was said. This is still one of the best ones out there, and the only one I’m posting at now, lol.

  38. What gets me is why on Gods earth, those babies have not yet testified… Maybe saving the bang for last? Its got to suck for them.. God Help them thru!

  39. We’ve had so many discussions here. About KS and the manner of death, her Will, who benefited from her death and why, and on and on.

    Plants on a lawn, registering searches vs searching, just doesn’t do anything for me.

  40. Sher, it’s really good! Wish you had a way to share a cup!

    Rescue, I wished a thousand times that you were there, but I know you didn’t want to go there. I shouldn’t have either.

    LOL, Iknow. That is so funny. I would never have imagined!

  41. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 1:21 am

    I’d rather hear if the teens are going before the GJ, or when LE is going to wrap up their case. Sharon doesn’t interest me the way she does you, ducky.

    No offense.
    ——————————————————–

    No offense taken Resue. I do believe that it was you that said that someone (member here) should trade positions with Sharon on the searches and then they would know how she feels (or something along those lines). It’s difficult to compare when the very person that you are speaking about has not been on one search. Seriously!

    Wait-Sher, aren’t you one of the ones that are searching every weekend. Why don’t you tell us what your observation is? Has Sharon been OUT on one search?

    I only want Stacy to be found but it seems that the entire circus act has gone media crazy and forgets the real reason why each one of us are here. Hell, the eggs got more attention than the actual seaches! That is disturbing!

  42. freedom – you’re all right with us, and we know your ideas are clear and well thought out. You were probably misunderstood by some. The people who get sick of the bashing get passionate, as some of us do about other things. OK? Honestly, I have no desire to either defend, nor criticize Sharon or the plant people. After I made the comment about trading places with her on searchers, well, we all know what happened. I should know better than to even get involved in that stuff. It only leads to trouble.

  43. iknoweverythinglol // June 26, 2008 at 1:30 am

    Wait, I will tell you who does, BM does, go to his board and tell them all about it.
    +++++++++++++++++
    I don’t think I would be allowed back in this lifetime, Iknow. I REALLY spoke my mind today!

  44. Hey knoweverything but really doesn’t-I don’t have to go to any board to ask a question. If you don’t like my questions, skip over them but don’t tell me where to go unless you want me to tell you where to go. I don’t post there and just because I spoke the truth about Stacy’s “best friend” hasn’t been on ONE search nor is there a photo of the two of then together, makes me a little bit uneasy-too freaking bad. If YOU don’t like it, then you can go whereever you choose and if you need my help letting you know where that place is, let me know.

  45. Ducky – my point about trading places was meant as this. I will not criticize anyone who searches for Stacy Peterson, or works in the efforts to find her and find the truth. I sit here behind my keyboard and post my opinions about DP quite openly, but he is the one that gave me the ideas I have about him as a person, as a man, as a husband and, last, but not least, as a father. I can’t stand the sight of him. I hated him once he opened his disgusting mouth on GMA, and it just snowballed from there.

    If Sharon doesn’t go on searches, then so be it. Merely because she’s a thorn in the side of a man being investigated for two deaths doesn’t make me want to google her to see if she’s in pictures or not.

    I’m not trying to be disrespectful to you or your thoughts about her. I’m just setting the record straight about mine.

  46. cfs-did you save that post. You should keep in, just in case. Seriously, there are so many whacko’s out there.

  47. Rescue-I never asked if you liked DP or not. I never told you my opinion of him, nor do I feel compeled to talk like that here as I may get banned. I never googled Sharon’s name and I have first hand experience with the truth. I do care if a woman that is portraying herself as a major player in the case, pretends to search by showing up to them, and takes all the glory for being her “best” friend, but were not ever best friends with the victim and keeps her mug in the media. Again, what does any of this or their antics have to do with searching and finding Stacy? Nothing. There is more media/internet attention on an egging than on a missing young mother. I have said this many times, why is the focus on this garbage and not on Stacy. If Stacy’s family and her “supposed” best friends would put at much energy into finding/searching for Stacy as they do the garden, their mugs being on camera and lying to the press, then Stacy would be home. IMO! Believe what you want, but there are two houses on Pheasant Chase that have visitors that shouldn’t be there, doing things that they shouldn’t be doing. Search for Stacy, that is all.

  48. Iknow, no, I posted this afternoon, and then resigned right after. Personally, I didn’t care what he had to say back to me, or anyone else on there. When I read what he posted this morning, which was for the most part directed at me, I decided to leave today. Had been thinking about for a good while and just didn’t.

    Rescue, I don’t think I should post that here Honey. It might get me banned, lol. The board was just not run very well IMO, and that’s really all I can say. Although, there are people there that will be glad to tell you differently, I’m sure. To each his own. It just wasn’t an atmosphere conducive to intelligent discussions….again IMO.

  49. Rescue-here is a little tidbit. When the first searches began after the long, long winter, they all met in the tent to sign up for the new photo/id system. Each searcher was going to assigned a number (permanent for future searches) and Cassandra wanted #1, as she should have been assigned as the “closest” relative to Stacy. But, guess who INSISTED on having #1??? Yes, Sharon insisted and Sharon received the #1 badge. That might not matter to you but it certainly mattered for all of those in attendance.

    So, rescue-oh, okay. Yeah.

  50. I am way past turning into a pumpkin tonight. My boss is going to have to wake me up at my desk tomorrow. LOL. Have a great evening!

  51. Tomorrow, I am going to find a blackboard, and I am going to write on it, over and over, I will not get caught up in the Sharon game, I will not get caught up in the Sharon game.

    Sorry, ducky, I couldn’t help but laugh at your post. Funny stuff. Serious business about Stacy, and, yet, some take so seriously such as you have posted.

  52. Well Rescue, looks like it’s just us. Would love to share my day at that place with you, but I can’t on here. Hope you understand.:D

  53. freedom08 // June 25, 2008 at 11:13 pm

    cfs7360 // June 25, 2008 at 11:10 pm
    Well, I had absolultely no idea that was who you were referring to because I didn’t know his last name, nor did I care to know. And yes, even though I don’t agree with most of what he says or how he runs his board, I don’t think you should put his name on here.
    —-
    AMEN!
    See CFS in their twisted minds they think I am this person! They are so wrong I am in a totally different state and am a female. But they know more then me about me! sooo until they get board they will continue or maybe they will get some meds!
    I’ll not post for awhile and they will go away! And like flies on shit as soon as I post they will start again!!
    *****************************

    No, I think you’ll find that we regulars here *KNOW* you’re not him- you spell, punctuate and write properly 97.3% of the time…

  54. Hey Bash. Wondered if you were going to pop in.

    Rescue, I know. I just try to wade through what I don’t like until I can’t take it anymore.

  55. CFS-don’t know who was responsible for assigning them. However, Cassandra was not happy at what transpired. Really, not happy.

    Rescue-I don’t feel like I have to answer any of your tunnel visioned questions. Been there, done that, and don’t owe you anything. You seem to be able to speak for the family, the searches, and everyone else, you must know that answer to your own question. Eh?

    Sleep well everyone. See you all tomorrow.

  56. Well, it’s obvious duck is avoiding he obvious questions. I ask, duck doesn’t answer, I get whacked. Typical bull.

  57. How does asking one if one’s been on searches, when one is so knowledgeable, turn into a zing at me? Why, cuz I don’t play by the anti-Sharon rules?

  58. Rescue, if that really happened, it shouldn’t have IMO. Somebody should have stuck up for Cassandra, or she should have stuck up for herself, but maybe she didn’t want to make waves with Sharon. All this case needs now is a lot of bad blood between those two to get people talking. Sad it’s gotten to this point.

  59. Rescue, I don’t either, and I don’t bash her, but I don’t agree with some of the things she’s done.

  60. Well I enjoy stopping in here to read some intelligent conversation, even though I don’t post much.
    We all have faults, and they show more in times of stress. I think sharon did a great job as spokes person with pam. Not everyone can do everything. I have no inside knowledge just watching from a far like most others. I am not into pointing fingers unless it is at a suspect since there is an investigation going on. I let the petty back biting go it’s own way. Even though I have never met them I care about most of these people and hope for the best in their journey through this. I won’t cause emotional pain to people who mean well.

  61. cfs – No, I’m not going there. I asked this duck person simple, polite questions all night, and not once, not once, did duck acknowledge my questions. Were you ever on searches. Why would you even consider what duck says when duck won’t fess up to the questions? That is not right. JMHO

  62. Rescue-here is a little tidbit. When the first searches began after the long, long winter, they all met in the tent to sign up for the new photo/id system
    **********
    The day those #’s were given out, they were in no tent DUCK, so get your story straight!
    That day I was there…

  63. You’re right, and I feel the way you do about not searching myself, but criticizing others who do. Can’t do that.

  64. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 2:09 am

    cfs – No, I’m not going there. I asked this duck person simple, polite questions all night, and not once, not once, did duck acknowledge my questions. Were you ever on searches. Why would you even consider what duck says when duck won’t fess up to the questions? That is not right. JMHO
    ++++++++++++++++++
    That sort of tells me that maybe she didn’t search, you think?

  65. Gosh, sher, we have got to avoid these conversations.

    I also wanted to say something else about the remark about the media focusing so much attention on the egging incident. All I have to say to that is – what? If you asked 10 random people if they even heard about it, what do you think the answer would be? I didn’t ev

  66. Ya know, I like Sharon and Cass, and I will never partake in bringing them down.. They were always very nice, and polite to me..Cass, is sweet girl, and Sharon is just a tough cookie, who isnt bull chitted easily, and will call ya on it..

  67. I am not up with all the drama, but it seems like someone wants to cause problems for sharon, who would want to do that more than discuss the case? any ideas?

  68. Rescue, I wasn’t trying to engage you in bashing Sharon. Hope that isn’t what you thought. I don’t do that, and I already know your feelings on it as well. Whatever people think her motives are, she has helped keep awareness of Stacy’s missing active.

  69. I didnt even here of the eggs until someone came on blueshark, and said this… I had to LOL! DP tends to piss off alot of people, and Im surprised it didnt appen sooner.. Dont get me wrong, I dont condone destruction of property, but I also dont condone DP’s remarks, and inactions to look for his wife..He also appears 99.9% guilty to me…

  70. Rescue, that’s what I said elsewhere about the egging becaue such a big deal was made tu of it. So what! Who cares? But a lot of people apprently do, just not me.

  71. duck’s posts sound so familiar. I just can’t place them.

    How ignorant to put stuff out there and then come up with this baloney:

    Rescue-I don’t feel like I have to answer any of your tunnel visioned questions. Been there, done that, and don’t owe you anything. You seem to be able to speak for the family, the searches, and everyone else, you must know that answer to your own question. Eh?

    Argh!!!!!!!!

    This is how, I guess, one would say, no, I didn’t search, and you have no business asking it. Just believe what I say because I said so.

  72. Well I was disappointed to hear the gun hearing was postponed to july. I was looking forward to some real news. I’ll just have to wait another 2 weeks, like the rest of you!

  73. Guys, I’m gonna have to say goodnight I think. Can’t type very well anymore.

    Guess Bash is reading trying to catch up. Hate I missed her.

    Nite all.

  74. Well I was disappointed to hear the gun hearing was postponed to july. I was looking forward to some real news. I’ll just have to wait another 2 weeks, like the rest of you!

  75. ok – back to reality.

    Since Gatehouse didn’t see anyone last week and the GJ, and since Glasgow hasn’t made final announcements about it, if those teens aren’t there tomorrow, I’m thinking the GJ is done! I still think the kids will be compelled to appear. Only because Stebic tried to do the same with his kids and they eventually appeared before the GJ.

  76. I’m feeling better- just been trying to take things easy. Not much new info has been released lately, so that’s why I don’t post as much, unless it’s to clear up a mistake or provide info if I have it. What can I say? I’m a boring librarian link keeper for these cases! LOL!!!

    Glad I missed most of the drama here earlier- I’m still trying to recover from the drama on another board that’s been simmering for a while before it finally erupted into full out war.

    I’ve never seen anything like this before. It just boggles my mind. I’m glad for the admins who can delete the crapola, but I sure wish there was no need for them to do that in the first place. The internet used to be such a wonder for me, and now it seems to be quite a shady, scary place at times. Know what I mean?

  77. I WONDER WHY STATE IS TRYING TO SQUASH MOTION FRON JB? To vague in motion is what they say… I hope something happens pretty soon, and we get him behind bars.. I just dont think this is what it will be.. I believe KS is what they will get him on…

  78. I feel sure they will too, I can’t believe that they would just take the statements they gave LE. Wouldn’t you think the GJ would have different types of questions for them that LE might now have asked? Someone mentioned they might be interviewed offsite, so maybe they already have been and we just don’t know about it. At any rate, I believe they will be at some point if they haven’t testified yet.

    Nite. This time for real.

  79. Yeah, bash, there was a lot going on here this evening. I stayed out of it, for the most part. CFS had a falling out at the other board, and then some issues spilled over to this one.

    The news has been slow, or non-existent, hasn’t it? Not much to discuss that we haven’t already. I know.

  80. In a few weeks or so, the MRobinson cases are coming up too for finalization. Wonder what will happen with that?

  81. Oh, ok- just one more post… hee hee hee!

    I too am perplexed at the seeming inactivity on the GJ’s part- but it may simply be that they are waiting for the judge’s decision to be made as to whether or not the two teens GJ subpoena will be quashed or not. If it is, then I believe that the GJ will begin deliberations immediately. If it is not quashed, then I believe that the boys will be testfying forthwith and after that testimony has been heard, the GJ will begin deliberations.

    Either way, I hope that there will be some form of communicae from the GJ regarding their status soon. This seems to have dragged on interminably…

  82. but there are two houses on Pheasant Chase that have visitors that shouldn’t be there, doing things that they shouldn’t be doing. Search for Stacy, that is all.
    ********
    Holy cow, wth is this? hmmmm?

  83. cryptic messages only the poster understands. We are not to ask questions. Only listen.

    Now, good night, LOL, I think.

  84. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 12:06 am

    I wonder if Gatehouse would be interested in an expose on these hate forum admins.
    _________________
    Who are you referring to? Also, don’t you know, stories only get done if it won’t upset the one that’s spoon-feeding the media her brand of catnip.

  85. well dam , if this was the FSP site Amy would have deleted most of these post … I don’t miss the witch!

  86. Just got off the phone with Seritha (312-814-2595) at the IL Attny General’s Office – Charitable Trust Bureau. There is STILL NO record of the FSP or FSoP having registered with the AG’s office or the SoS.

    Why the lies?

  87. They still have not registered?
    Why is it they are allowed to collect money from people across the country but yet pay no tax?
    Who has control of the money?

  88. Lena – not sure why. They can’t be stopped until a formal complaint is filed.

    IL Attorney General
    Charitable Trust Bureau
    Attn: Therese Harris
    100 West Randolph
    11th Floor
    Chicago, IL 60601

  89. I have called and complained . I thought I had donated to a charitable fund! Who is in control of the money? They have no record!

  90. Kimmer – I don’t understand why they have not registered as of yet, they have been getting donations months now . I thought the donations were being used to search for Stacy , gas , food ect.

  91. 1wonderwoman // June 26, 2008 at 9:47 am

    I wonder….who or what else will get bashed today…sigh
    ____________________
    Do you think I’ve bashed someone?

  92. basherette // June 26, 2008 at 1:59 am

    No, I think you’ll find that we regulars here *KNOW* you’re not him- you spell, punctuate and write properly 97.3% of the time…

    —–

    Why thank you Bash that’s nice to know!!

    wonder what the GJ will be up to today! I wish LE would give a press release with something anything to update their status on these cases.

  93. It seems to me that people can throw out whatever negative they want to say about Drew or his attorney, without anything solid to back it up. But the minute someone brings up FACTS to another aspect of this case they are accused of bashing or not wanting this mother found.

  94. My comment was directed to all the members here..I was trying to be funny..guess I blew it..sorry 😦

  95. 1wonder…nothing to be sorry about. I was just asking, and I later explained why in my next post. I’m pretty good at thinking of things after the fact…LOL

  96. Kimmer, must be the same old crowd here like at FSP . How DARE YOU QUESTION THEM!
    I’m going to write my letter!

  97. bash sorry to hear you are sick hope you get to feeling better soon.

    still not registered it makes no sense as to why they are not registering but keep insisting they are on the up and up. time will tell, it just makes no sense if the fundraising is on the up and up.
    but it’s not uncommon across america for tragedies to be used to collect donates and the collectors not be on the up and up.
    has anyone lodged a formal complaint? that would put an end to all of this and I would think that those putting their heart and soul into finding stacy would want to follow the letter of the law to a T!!
    oh well what do I know anyway!

  98. Yesterday someone (sorry too much to remember who … maybe iknoweverythinglol … but not sure) posted that, according to the IRS, the process could take up to one year.

    The organization can continue to accept donations as 501 … but I wonder what happens if at the time the decision is made … if they do not qualify … what happens to all those people who thought they donated to a 501(c) company?

  99. kimmer78 // June 26, 2008 at 9:43 am

    You need to write a letter. They will not accept complaints on the phone. At least that is what I was told.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Have you written your own letter, or just good at running your mouth about it?

  100. All this time running off and complaining about it and you just now are sending one? You really should keep it at your own forum.

    Believe me, I’m no more of a troll than you are 🙂

  101. My own forum? This is a public board, and I didn’t know that having a forum negated me from posting here. The illegal fundraising is just as much of an aspect of this case as anything else. Don’t like, don’t read it!

  102. I came here yesterday, not bashing anyone but asking legitimate questions about why Sharon doesn’t search for Stacy. It seems as though if you don’t agree with something, then you are a “basher” or you are some other poster with a different name. I am who I am and I don’t appreciate being called out because I don’t have the “popular” opinion. This is a public blog and it doesn’t belong to one person or a group of people. I thought that our constitutional right gave us freedom of speech. It would be nice if the people that are here or have been here for a long time were welcoming to different ideas and opinions.

    Busy day for me. Have a nice day everyone!

  103. as far as the two oldests boy infront of the GJ. they were interviewed/questioned by a child advocate and the agreement that LE made was if this was alloud they would not have to go infront of the GJ.
    so shouldn’t LE keep their word or is it ok for them to lie inorder to get the kids interviewed/questioned by the GJ?

  104. Freedom, cops can lie to get people to talk. I am sure if you ask your friends Brodsky and Drew they will tell you Drew lied to lots of people when he was a cop to get them to talk. Drew has a problem now with a cop or a DA lying? That is funny.

  105. Since when is a lawyer so stupid that they would take the word of a SA and not get the agreement in writing?

    Oh, Brodsky………………..I rest my case.

  106. “I’d rather hear if the teens are going before the GJ, or when LE is going to wrap up their case. Sharon doesn’t interest me the way she does you, ducky.

    No offense.”

    I agree…. the case, folks, let’s discuss the case.

  107. yes I know cops do lie and will lie, I’m just saying they made an agreement and I don’t look kindly upon anyone that LIES even if it is LE.
    I don’t know if drew has a problem with the cops lying, I don’t know him or how he feels and I highly doubt you do. I say it’s wrong to lie when you are talking about matters concerning the children.
    And HELL NO I would not let my kids go before the GJ if that was the deal that LE made with me. knowing what liars they are just to get a conviction, I would not put my children through that even if I was innocent.

  108. Brodsky was told there would be no written agreement because the SA said they might have to call them to the GJ anyway.

    Brodsky said ok.

  109. That’s cool, Freedom that you have knowledge of all the conversations and agreements between LE and Joel Brodsky. Do you have anything else you would be willing to share?

  110. duckyone said:

    This is a public blog and it doesn’t belong to one person or a group of people. I thought that our constitutional right gave us freedom of speech. It would be nice if the people that are here or have been here for a long time were welcoming to different ideas and opinions.

    ************

    Sorry, but this blog doesn’t fall under “constitutional rights or freedom of speech.” As far as I can tell, we’re all here as the whim of Gatehouse. If we don’t abide by their rules, we don’t get to play here. They have the “at will” right to delete posts, or ban people as much as anyone who runs their own blog. Freedom of speech doesn’t have anything to do with it, nor do constitutional rights.

    They post the rules, they expect compliance. That’s the way it is.

  111. I don’t think JB was the attorney at the time the agreement was made so you need to bash the attorney that was handling the case at the time.

  112. If there was a deal, it would have been in writing. Do you really think Brodsky is the type of lawyer to go on the word of a SA?

  113. Rescue- you’re right, we’re here at the whim of Gatehouse. Not the trolls that roll in and expect complete compliance with their ideals. And when you don’t fall in to line for your daily dose of catnip and kool-aid you are ridiculed and told to go elsewhere.

  114. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 11:11 am
    I don’t think JB was the attorney at the time the agreement was made so you need to bash the attorney that was handling the case at the time.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “Drew’s very pleased that he’s getting his property back,” Brodsky said afterward. “The judge has reviewed the secret testimony of the state, he looked at the affidavits, and still found that there was no compelling reason for the state to retain the property any longer. I think that says something, if you want to read between the lines.”

    He said Peterson and his legal team reviewed the more than 250 evidence photos produced by police as part of the order.

    “There’s nothing very remarkable about the photographs, and we’re more than willing to stipulate that those photographs show the condition of the vehicle on the date that the photographs were taken,” Brodsky said.”

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson-webmar18,0,88861.story

  115. grandma210 said: I agree…. the case, folks, let’s discuss the case.

    ****************

    Yeah, boy, sure do hope we get some GJ news today, or at least some idea what’s happening with the GJ.

  116. Shotgun Joel was the Attorney at the time or else the aggrement would have been in writing. Drew’s first Attorney was a real lawyer but he could not afford him.

  117. I’m wondering if were gonna hear anything about the GJ at all today. Sure hope so. It
    would certainly give us something else to discuss here……….:)

  118. DP’s first attorney is one class act! In fact, I believe I did read recently that Attorney Morelli dropped DP as a client when he went against his advice and appeared on The Today Show.

  119. iknoweverythinglol // June 26, 2008 at 11:12 am

    If there was a deal, it would have been in writing. Do you really think Brodsky is the type of lawyer to go on the word of a SA?
    *********

    What or who is a “SA”?

  120. lookingforthetruth // June 26, 2008 at 11:25 am

    freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 11:11 am
    I don’t think JB was the attorney at the time the agreement was made so you need to bash the attorney that was handling the case at the time.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “Drew’s very pleased that he’s getting his property back,” Brodsky said afterward. “The judge has reviewed the secret testimony of the state, he looked at the affidavits, and still found that there was no compelling reason for the state to retain the property any longer. I think that says something, if you want to read between the lines.”

    He said Peterson and his legal team reviewed the more than 250 evidence photos produced by police as part of the order.

    “There’s nothing very remarkable about the photographs, and we’re more than willing to stipulate that those photographs show the condition of the vehicle on the date that the photographs were taken,” Brodsky said.”

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson-webmar18,0,88861.story
    —-

    thats nice what does it have to do with the boys and them being interviewed/questioned within the first week of stacy’s dissapearance before JB was hired as counsel?

  121. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 11:32 am

    DP’s first attorney is one class act! In fact, I believe I did read recently that Attorney Morelli dropped DP as a client when he went against his advice and appeared on The Today Show.

    yep and the kids were interviewed before the today show!!

  122. Good Morning. Does anyone know exactly when LE questioned the older boys? Joel answered my question on SYM about them appearing, and said they may not since there was an agreement that if they talked with LE they wouldn’t have to, and that “their” attorney was trying to prevent it.

  123. cfs – The whole issue with the teens and the GJ is very confusing. How long can an attorney actually delay the process, I wonder?

    There was a similar issue, I believe, regarding the Stebic children, but they did, in fact, wind up testifying before the GJ.

    Delay, delay, delay.

  124. you are brave rescue putting your email addy out there with all the freaks and nuts that are trolling these boards!!

  125. cfs7360 // June 26, 2008 at 11:36 am

    Good Morning. Does anyone know exactly when LE questioned the older boys? Joel answered my question on SYM about them appearing, and said they may not since there was an agreement that if they talked with LE they wouldn’t have to, and that “their” attorney was trying to prevent it.

    morning cfs I think it was within the first week stacy went missing.

  126. Re: The status of FSP. My guess is that until they get (in writing) a complaint from a citizen, they don’t investigate. Maybe it takes more than one letter, I don’t know.

    Re: Sharon. Don’t care that she didn’t search. Could be a number of reasons: family asked her to stay behind, she has medical condition, she is lazy … just don’t care. I highly doubt she did not search because she “knows” Stacy is alive and didn’t want to waste her time. But that is just my opinion.

    Re: Being called troll or said to be drinking KoolAid or eating catnip … develop a thicker skin and keep posting or run away. Your choice.

    Re: Agreement that the teens would only have to talk with child advocate and not go before GJ. If the GJ is doing its job, then IMO they have to talk to the boys. They may have been the last ones to speak to or see Stacy (if she left the house as Drew says). IMO that is important.

    Today is Thursday … and Gatehouse will be there letting us know what is what.

    I think I’ve babbled enough for one post. Hmm … competing with a fellow poster for the “novel of the year”? 😀 I think she’ll know who she is. 😉

  127. freedom – not to worry. It’s one I don’t use; it’s a “throwaway.”

    Also, first wrong move, I report it to AOL. They’re very good about that.

  128. cfs7360 // June 26, 2008 at 11:36 am

    Good Morning. Does anyone know exactly when LE questioned the older boys? Joel answered my question on SYM about them appearing, and said they may not since there was an agreement that if they talked with LE they wouldn’t have to, and that “their” attorney was trying to prevent it.
    ***********

    Yipper! They were interviewed at the end of November 2007.

    And *YES*, here’s the dadgum link:

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/73095

  129. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 11:42 am

    freedom – not to worry. It’s one I don’t use; it’s a “throwaway.”

    Also, first wrong move, I report it to AOL. They’re very good about that.

    good deal!!

  130. DP’s first attorney is one class act! In fact, I believe I did read recently that Attorney Morelli dropped DP as a client when he went against his advice and appeared on The Today Show.

    _____________

    Morelli was also running for a public office or had been appointed to a new position, hadn’t he?

  131. Also, just for shitake mushrooms and giggles:

    BRODSKY: Well, I know that his older boy is — they were called before the grand jury but they weren’t interviewed by the grand jury. There is a child advocacy center where they were questioned by the state’s attorneys because they are rather young, they’re teenagers, I think 13 and 14, and they were fully interviewed once. I haven’t heard that they were going to be called again, but if they are called, they are subject to grand jury jurisdiction and will have to come.

    ****

    Riiiiiiiiight… so, then *why* did your client hire a lawyer to quash the teenagers’ GJ subpoenas?

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,317634,00.html

  132. oh man bash that pic hurt my eyes!! lol
    thanks for the link that was end of Nov the article came out. wow didn’t know they video taped the interviews of the boys. so knowing that I don’t think they need to be called infront of the GJ, I’m sure the GJ has seen the interview.
    The good morning america interview was Nov 19 jb was not his attorney at that time and I’m guessing he wasn’t the attorney when the kids were intervied.
    also getting it it writing means what? LE can do what they want just like they did when they revoked his foid card to stop him from getting his weapons back when the judge didn’t agree
    LE.
    —-

    Peterson told NEWSWEEK that police recently interviewed his 13- and 14-year-old sons by Savio for three hours. Peterson expects his sons’ videotaped testimony will be submitted to a grand jury investigating Savio’s death and Stacy’s disappearance

  133. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Running for Judge, grandma210. I think election is coming up. Let me check.

    hehe he dropped drew like a hotcake who would vote for him as judge if he was representing drew?
    not many I’m guessing.

  134. I would imagine that when the GJ viewed the tape of the boys, it would depend on whether all of the questions that they answered are actually all of the questions the GJ wanted answered. If not, then they either have been, or will be called to testify, even if it’s offsite. Like Bash posted…JB said if they were called they have to go.

  135. bash- when you open the newsweek link you posted pic of drew first thing that pops up at the top of the article. I stayed up way to late last night and my eyes are tired and seeing that hurt!!
    hehehe

  136. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 11:58 am

    bash I believe it is in the best interest of the children to have their own attorney.
    ***

    No shitake mushrooms, Freedom. I just happen to consider it to be a wee bit suspect that they did *not* have an attorney until the GJ subpoenas were served…

  137. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    bash- when you open the newsweek link you posted pic of drew first thing that pops up at the top of the article. I stayed up way to late last night and my eyes are tired and seeing that hurt!!
    hehehe
    ***

    Oh… eeeeeeeeeeeeek! Sorry about that!

  138. cfs7360 // June 26, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Excellent post Noway. Lavanda would be SO PROUD!!
    _________
    😀

    And cfs, my laptop was slow and then I got booted … laptop tired I guess.

  139. It is common for a GJ to recall witnesses. They often learn new things and have to recall a witness to question them about it.

  140. Is the point you are making that the “agreement” that was made that the children would not have to go before GJ if they talked with ISP/child advocate was made without “their” attorney representing them and therefore it does not need to be held up?

    Hmm. 😉

  141. I don’t know who would have the authority to enter into that agreement for the children; is that legal?

  142. I’m gonna try again today :

    I posted last night and am reposting this info. I am now posting on the Domestic Violence threads at whereisstacy.com. At that site I am under mommyof1. Name change due to when I signed up at whereisstacy, it was during the time that some people who were members of FSP and joined other sites were banned for being member of other sites. I am posting info on where to get help , websites, articles etc on Domestic Violence.

    Also, what I remember is that Drew hired an attorney for the kids – Tom and Kris – these two boys were granted immunity. Their initial interview was with the court advocate.

  143. grandma210 // June 26, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    I don’t know who would have the authority to enter into that agreement for the children; is that legal?

    my guess is it would be the parents authority if there was no attorney representing them.

  144. freedom – i know some people here are not members at whereisstacy. I also do not want to join any other sites (especially ones with locks and the doors) unless I can read first. 🙂

    Just wanted to let people who knew me from FSP to know – I am still trying to help others that are still in a violent relationships, as well as the lucky ones like me that made it out alive.

  145. Ok – it’s too hot in Chicagoland – going for a swim. See you guys later and have a great day. 😉

  146. gotouthappynow that is great you are doing that my mother spent many years working in the domestic abuse field. It’s a never ending problem. we need to teach us women not to pick this jerkoff men!!
    as far as other boards I’m just staying here had enough of trolls/boardwars and all the other drama that comes with them!!
    have fun at the pool

  147. freedom – kudos to your mom. I feel like I have to at least try to help other women somehow with this. I wish I didn’t pick such a man – but I have a beautiful daughter and I concentrate on that instead of all of the bad stuff.

  148. gotoutandhappynow // June 26, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    freedom – kudos to your mom. I feel like I have to at least try to help other women somehow with this. I wish I didn’t pick such a man – but I have a beautiful daughter and I concentrate on that instead of all of the bad stuff.

    she also was a victim of extreme abuse for many years and felt like you did she must help others. I didn’t mean to dis you concerning picking better men, I just feel that some how some way we have to teach our daughters a better way to pick men!!
    Awesome you have a beautiful daughter and much better to concentrate on like you said!!

  149. Amen to that Rescue. I guess if you’ve never experienced anything like that, you really don’t understand what these women go through. Gotout, your trying to help others is very admirable.

  150. I have been there and young women who are raised to believe that the man is the king of his castle, the head of the household demands respect and his demands should always come first – before his wife’s, his children, everyone are the ones who seem to fall into the trap of abuse.

    I realize that I’m older than some of you and part of why I stayed was because a divorced woman was disrespected in small town, no matter what came down the pike – a woman was to ‘stand by her man’. Leaving wasn’t an option, until many years later. It ruined my self esteem, my belief that I could be loved by anyone (even I couldn’t love me) or that anyone even cared about what happened to me. My faith brought me back to reality. God made us with love, he is not the author of fear and none of us should ever have to live in fear. Love isn’t painful; it is respectful. I am so sorry that this horrible thing has been transferred to so many generations.

  151. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 11:36 am

    cfs7360 (you too basherette) – here’s an email address for you to write me, if you wish.

    exlegalworker

    I know you mentioned wishing we had pm ability.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    You guys are welcome to use our chat room anytime you have privacy issues. You can see if anyone else is viewing the room and you can PM other guests in chat by double clicking on their name. You can choose and register a name or go as guest. It will be great for a real time chat but everything posted disappears to the users once the connection is lost, so don’t post anything you want to keep for a later time. Here is the link.
    http://
    http://www.liveharmony.org/chat.html?channel=MyBlueShark&source=chatweb-lhcw

  152. grandma210 // June 26, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    LoL! Branded on foreheads?
    ________________
    I was thinking of wearing a “badge” on a lanyard around the neck, but this works too!

    😉

  153. I’m just glad we don’t have the labels. People would never be fooled long enough to propogate the species. 😉

  154. I was thinking of wearing a “badge” on a lanyard around the neck, but this works too!

    Noway, I do that at work! Photo badge, even (work in a high security area). First thing that comes off when I get in my car, too!

  155. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 12:15 am

    lol ducky sip the margarita it will be more productive!
    *******************************

    LOL – I realize this is old, but I just read it. Post of the night!

  156. cfs … just catching up now that some cleanup has been done. Sorry I missed your final post on the other board. It must have been a doozie. 🙂

  157. Sure wish I knew what board ya’ll are speaking of! I do post at other boards but this is the only one I post at that is Stacy related, since the buh-bye of FSP. …just got me curious, that’s all.

  158. Was hoping to hear something from GJ via Gatehouse before I left. Nice day … park beckons. 😉

    Will check back around 3 my time.

  159. It’s nice here too – yes hot and sticky – but I hate the AC and I want to go outside to go soak up some reality. Later!

  160. No problem, we don’t use it much. Some one might as well get some use from it. Keep the link and help yourself anytime. Have a good day. I will be looking for GJ info after work.

  161. Hello folks,
    We’re currently sitting outside the court annex building where they hold the grand jury proceedings. Still no news. No one has been spotted going in or coming out of the building…just in case ya’ll were wondering.
    We’ll keep ya’ll updated.

  162. MBS, thanks so much! Might take you up on that sometime.

    Fugatz! Nice to see you here. I can’t really explain the koolaid thing to you though. Not a word that I’ve ever used in a post, but from what I’ve read, if you drink it according to some, it disturbs your ability to form your own logical opinion of this case. Sorry, that’s the best I can do.

  163. Grandma, just be careful if you go to that board! The Admin tries to influence ladies with pheromones………LOL

  164. noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    cfs … just catching up now that some cleanup has been done. Sorry I missed your final post on the other board. It must have been a doozie.
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    Noway, it could have been MUCH worse. Had to reign myself in a little.

  165. I would not accept a drink from anyone that was not sealed, actually… can’t be too careful these days, IMO.

  166. Hi CFS, good to see you too. Thanks for the koolaid thing. I figured it was something similar to that (a Jamestown referrence I guess)

  167. Think they’re setting up for a big weekend there, gatehouse, so you better get out of Dodge pretty son.

  168. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    Think they’re setting up for a big weekend there, gatehouse, so you better get out of Dodge pretty son.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++
    Who? Where? What? I’m confused.

  169. I think there’s a big Taste of Joliet this weekend. At least, I think it’s this weekend. Some some advertising for it, and they have a big fest every year. They’d probably be setting up for it, if not already, just like they do here for the Taste of Chicago. Too bad there’s no tasty morsels for gatehouse to sample yet!

  170. fugatzi // June 26, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    Hi CFS, good to see you too. Thanks for the koolaid thing. I figured it was something similar to that (a Jamestown referrence I guess)
    ********************

    JONEStown Fug, not JAMEStown. LOL.

    IMO, there are a number of vats of Koolaid being served at this party. If someone accuses you of ‘drinking the Koolaid’ just ask them which flavor they’re imbibing. 😉

  171. I stopped by last night to see if there was any discussion of the Supreme Court decision on the California hearsay law and how that might affect the proposed Illinois hearsay law.

    I decided that last night wasn’t the opportune time to discuss the hearsay issue. LOL

    Does anyone here feel the proposed hearsay law is now a moot issue with the Supreme Court ruling? And, if so, will the grand jury indict Drew on what they have in the way of evidence?

    Got to run a few errands, but I hope to be able to participate some tonight.

  172. thanks gate for the update!

    grandma that is why my mother stayed with my abusive father for soo long, women did not divorce back then because as you said it was frowned upon. I think even more than being raised the man is the king that having a bad relationship or none at all with your father (ie drunk, loser, etc) also causes many issues and bad choices in men.
    One thing I am seeing more and more of is that more and more women are assimulating into the abuser role more and more. sad!!

  173. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    Noway, CFS’s post wasn’t deleted. It was only moved.
    ++++++++++++++

    That’s interesting. Another interesting thing to me is ProBoard’s Terms Of Service Agreement, one item in particular:

    User’s web site may not contain content promoting the use of illegal drugs, alcohol, sex, pornography, nudity, or any other form of adult content, profanity, hate, “spam,” fraud, racism, mlm, pyramid schemes, or promote any illegal activity.

  174. cfs7360 :
    I did not know that was you. You had some of the best posts there. Some over there like to play mean mind games, which I guess is the style there. (And the style here last night, from what I read) In the end, it’s just a forum.

  175. User’s web site may not contain content promoting the use of illegal drugs, alcohol, sex, pornography, nudity, or any other form of adult content, profanity, hate, “spam,” fraud, racism, mlm, pyramid schemes, or promote any illegal activity.
    +++++++++++++++++++
    I think some read it as ……..”may contain ONLY”…..

  176. I wonder…Does the GJ announce when they are going to deliberate or just when they have a decision..anyone know…..??

  177. 1wonderwoman – everything about the GJ is secret. They don’t announce much of anything. The only thing I’ve ever heard acknowledged by the State’s Atty is that they’re prepared to extend the GJ session, which, I believe, was to end in May. Otherwise, mum is the word.

  178. patmccready // June 26, 2008 at 3:54 pm

    I think some read it as ……..”may contain ONLY”…..

    ++++++++++++++++++

    LOL! You’re too funny. Or some users think the rules don’t apply to them. I could say more, but I won’t. Thank you Pat, and yes I was Angel there. Enjoyed your posts there too.

    It WAS a little wild here last night, but that’s going to happen on every blog now and again. I try to just step over what doesn’t interest me, but sometimes even that it hard to do.

  179. 1wonderwoman // June 26, 2008 at 4:23 pm

    Thank You Rescue….dangit…I don’t like secrets! LOL

    1wonderwoman // June 26, 2008 at 4:25 pm

    Well…actually just the one’s I don’t know…

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I don’t think anybody likes secrets, 1wonder, especially if they think someone is trying to hide something deliberately.

  180. LOL, cfs, someone is hiding something?

    I find that nothing that his posted her is hidden from anyone, cfs. It’s read, copied and even quoted elsewhere. Funny how that happens, isn’t it?

  181. LOL, cfs, someone is hiding something?

    I find that nothing that is posted here is hidden from anyone, cfs. It’s read, copied and even quoted elsewhere. Funny how that happens, isn’t it?

  182. Ok ..So I think I asked the wrong question..what I wonder is…..When and From Whom will hear when the GJ is eventually done with their term and either do or do not have an indictment on either KS or SP ?

  183. Thanks for the update Gatehouse.

    she also was a victim of extreme abuse for many years and felt like you did she must help others. I didn’t mean to dis you concerning picking better men, I just feel that some how some way we have to teach our daughters a better way to pick men!!
    Awesome you have a beautiful daughter and much better to concentrate on like you said!!
    _________________________________
    freedom, i didn’t take it as a dis – besides, when i want to dis myself – that’s when I look at my daughter – that’s what I meant.

    And yes, we have to teach our daughters and sons better. 🙂

  184. oops I meant ” When and From Whom will “we” hear when the GJ is eventually done with their term and either do or do not have an indictment on either KS or SP …

  185. “What did you do this summer?”

    Testified in front of a Grand Jury about the mysterious untimely death of my real mom and the disappearance of my step mom.

    😦

    So so so sad.

    My heart hurts for them.

  186. I am a member @ SYM, why do some of you feel the need to put the place down? It might not be a place of your choosing, but why can’t it be just that? Not every forum is a match for everyone. If we don’t like it, we are not forced to stay, but we don’t have to put it down either. I was a member there before I came here, and I certainly may not agree with everything said, I have never felt uncomfortable until I came here, and my very first post, after months of reading, I was told I needed to research. I have seen some of you post one thing here, and then go there and be so much worse. Those of you that are still members there know they are not over there talking about here. Instead some find it comical that someone’s personal information is splattered everywhere. It saddens me to see this kind of behavior. You may not individually like the board, but why be immature about it?

    I would also like to thank Freedom. I like to read your posts and because I saw you yesterday felt it was okay to post, and one of the few reasons I come back. Amanda and Kimmer would be the other.

    Sorry for my vent – stepping back into the corner.

  187. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    I am a member @ SYM, why do some of you feel the need to put the place down? It might not be a place of your choosing, but why can’t it be just that? Not every forum is a match for everyone. If we don’t like it, we are not forced to stay, but we don’t have to put it down either. I was a member there before I came here, and I certainly may not agree with everything said, I have never felt uncomfortable until I came here, and my very first post, after months of reading, I was told I needed to research. I have seen some of you post one thing here, and then go there and be so much worse. Those of you that are still members there know they are not over there talking about here. Instead some find it comical that someone’s personal information is splattered everywhere. It saddens me to see this kind of behavior. You may not individually like the board, but why be immature about it?

    I would also like to thank Freedom. I like to read your posts and because I saw you yesterday felt it was okay to post, and one of the few reasons I come back. Amanda and Kimmer would be the other.

    Sorry for my vent – stepping back into the corner.

    ************************
    Anyway, you know, it is just funny, that when I joined SYM, I spent the first two weeks I was there defending Word Press. And my posts are no different here that they were there, so I KNOW you are not talking about me if you have read ALL of MY posts here, as well as there.

    You know, I welcomed you yesterday, and tried to encourage you from feeling left out, but since I’m NOT included in the group for while you come here, I don’t really care. Doesn’t matter. However, I do resent your coming on here with the statement that people over there are not talking about this board, and I don’t mean ONLY talking, SOME of them, not all by any means, are constantly are cutting and pasting things over there that posters have written here. So for you answer as to why anyone here might need to feel the need to put it down….why do they need to put this site down, as well as others? If you’re not comfortable here, then please don’t feel obligated to stay. Do what I did at SYM, and just leave.

  188. cfs – I know. I can’t agree more. I’ve seen stuff over there cut and pasted from here too, for whatever it’s worth.

    Let’s get the record straight for all of incoming participants of late.

    NONE of us make the rules here, none of us decide what gets posted, what doesn’t, and none of us decides what to delete. That is for Gatehouse. I’m sick and tired of getting a moral lecture from all of you “newbies.” You don’t like it, get out, SOB, or do whatever it is you need to do. Don’t lecture me, and you won’t get it back. Hot air goes a long way. Use it.

  189. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    You did welcome me, I did not purposely leave you out, but I guess we have shown our true colors now.
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    My colors don’t change Anyway. I’m the same all the time. I just don’t like to see unfounded criticism of something when the facts are incorrect. That’s all.

    I was not telling you to leave….not my job. I just suggested if this board isn’t for you and you are not comfortable, no one will insist that you stay. You have as much right to be here as Gatehouse will alow, just ike the rest of us. It’s your choice.

  190. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    You did welcome me, I did not purposely leave you out, but I guess we have shown our true colors now.

    My point is saying that was to try to make you see that not everybody here tried to make you feel unwelcome. I don’t care that you left me out. Honestly. I do care that you think this board is not very welcoming, and I’m sorry if that’s your opinion.

  191. gotoutandhappynow // June 26, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    I feel bad for Thomas as well. All of those kids have been thru so much.
    ************************

    I do too. What a no-win situation. Wonder why both boys weren’t scheduled today, or if anyone else regarding either matter was scheduled?

  192. anyway, so someone tells you to do research makes you uncomfortable, but someone calling stacy a Walmart Wh..re doesn’t? Or were you one of them that giggled and said shame on you.

  193. That was a person’s opinion, not mine. That is not the point, however. For those bothered, you should have emailed admin. They would have removed it, they have done it before for me. No one told has told me to leave the board either.

  194. Woo, boy. You have got to be kidding?????

    I can’t stop laughing enough to type this. He is one hot papa.

  195. I like that this ‘board’ is really just comments on the “Search for Stacy” blog. There really is no community as such, people come and go and post as they like. There are no PMs, no secrets – it’s just conversation and it is what it is.

    I saw your first posts Anyway31, and I thought you overreacted to some spirited debate and took it way too personally. No one’s going to hold your hand here, but if people insult you personally it’s against the rules and you can complain if you feel it’s necessary.

    If I were you , I’d just meet the challenge about research with as good as you got. I don’t remember who said that to you but just toss it back, show them that you researched and stick to your guns. I don’t think anyone here is out to hurt your feelings.

    It’s not my blog, so not really my place to say it, but ‘Welcome’ from me.

  196. LOL Rescue..I couldn’t agree more…Except had myself a wee bit of an accident here myself over this one….HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!

  197. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:57 pm

    That was a person’s opinion, not mine. That is not the point, however. For those bothered, you should have emailed admin. They would have removed it, they have done it before for me. No one told has told me to leave the board either.

    BigM was sitting there laughing about the post and saying what a brilliant person chuckles was.

    It was pure filth and he thought it was so funny.

  198. Although it’s necessary for the children to go before the GJ, it’s just sad what they must be going through. I can’t imagine being at their dinner table tonight. Sad.

  199. He would have deleted if asked. That doesn’t mean I am going to spread his personal information everywhere and certainly doesn’t explain behavior here. I am done here, I will not post again. This is absolutely ridiculous.

  200. methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Looks like another website about drewpy is out and this one looks like it’s gonna be one that nobody will wanna miss , drew being exposed yet once again .. http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Thanks Methodical, but I think I’ll pass. This site is plenty good for me after my last adventure.

  201. Heaven help those little ones. It’s not what’s outside the house that anyone should worry about, it’s what they see inside the house!!!!!!!! Maybe this is only one innocent picture, but if Methodical has more, I think the naysayers should be calling him an unfit parent! Dead wife/mother, missing/presumed death wife/mother, and he’s gettin’ hot with a computer? What an embarrassment to his children he must be, including the one that is going to be responsible for taking on four minor children if this nut job gets arrested!

  202. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:57 pm

    That was a person’s opinion, not mine. That is not the point, however. For those bothered, you should have emailed admin. They would have removed it, they have done it before for me. No one told has told me to leave the board either.
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    With all due repsect Anyway, admin get the biggest kick out it.

  203. Anyway- I understand how you feel. I really wish that you would stay. This board needs more members like you and you shouldn’t let them drive you away. JMO

  204. So … one son has testified and the other will be soon (next Thursday)?

    Wish they would have testified at the same time.

  205. noway – yeah, I wonder why they didn’t? Maybe, I’m thinking, he was in there for many hours, and they just scheduled it that way knowing it would take some time.

  206. widebirth // June 26, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    I signed up at BigM’s Forum but I didn’t stay long after he announced that he will read our PRIVATE messages and ban us if He Doesn’t Like ‘em. Anyways31 – Your should get out of there FAST:

    “WARNING : Private messages can make there way out in public so be very careful what you say . I would hate to have to ban members because of being underhanded and that is exactly what the ****I will do if I even get wind of any funny business behind the scenes. Because if you don’t like this board Get the **** out and leave period Trust me I won’t loose no sleep over it .”
    —————————————–
    You are wrong.
    cfs misunderstood that post and apparently was not the only one who did.

    What BigM said was be careful of private messages because they are not always private.
    That means that when someone gets pissed enough, they just post your private message.

    BigM or any admin of proboards cannot read members PM messages. It is just not an option on the free proboards.

  207. Posted on Legal Pub about another case. I wonder if Joel was thinking about Drew when he wrote this:

    “Joel A. Brodsky said…
    Certainly prison can modify the behavior of normal criminals. Nobody I have ever represented wanted to go back to prison, (even though it is less terrifying the second time around). There is no question that even hardened offenders have changed there behavior to minimize the risk of being sent back. However no prison is going to change the behavior of someone who is mentally ill or mentally defective, which unfortunately is a significant percentage of the prison population. It appears from what I have read in the papers that Mr. Williams is a psychopath and malignant narcissist. I am sure the guards and prison officials from his first prison stay recognized these traits. The problem is that they had no way to deal with it; no money for treatment or even psychotropic medications. All they could do was warehouse this time bomb until his sentence had run out. If we would take the money that we spend on one day in the Iraq war and spend it on the diagnosis and treatment of offenders we would cut the percentage of repeat offenders by a very substantial percentage.

    June 26, 2008 7:20 AM”

  208. No, facs, this is the first time the son has testified. This was the teenage son, Thomas.

    Kristopher is scheduled to testify but not sure when.

  209. June 26, 2008 · Drew Peterson’s eldest son by Kathleen Savio testified before the grand jury Thursday.

    Thomas Peterson left the Will County Court Annex building about 4:15 p.m. in a red Mercedes driven by his attorney.

    Drew Peterson said his younger teenage son, Kristopher, will also testify but declined to say when.

  210. http://www.19thcircuitcourt.state.il.us/jury/jury3.htm

    INDICTMENTS
    When the witnesses have finished their testimony, it is then your duty to weigh the evidence which has been presented and to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to require the person or persons named to stand trial and answer the charge. The grand jury is the sole judge of the sufficiency of the evidence required to indict.

    After hearing the evidence and discussing the case among yourselves, the foreperson will exclude everyone except the grand jurors from the grand jury room and call for a vote. If 9 or more jurors vote to require the defendant to stand trial for the offense, the State’s Attorney will prepare a Bill of Indictment to be signed by the foreperson and returned into open Court. If the grand jury by its vote refuses to hold the defendant for trial, the Prosecutor may prepare a written memorandum to such effect, entitled, “No Bill.”

  211. If it’s OK to post Whatever you like at BigM’s Board, why does he answer like this when someone Asked a Locksmith question for Joel brodsky ? This questino wasnt even directed at Him . He’s Very Unwelcoming .

    “Why the hell are you so concerned about the name of the locksmith ? You have asked joel that question a dozen times he has yet to answer you because he probably does not want to. “

  212. In this instance, with the two teens testifying before the GJ, I assume the GJ has access to the statements the boys made to the LE advocate. Since RMims was closely involved in the beginning and claims to have had a discussion with the teens early on, as was MRobinson, Steve Peterson (son), and Paul Peterson (brother), I’m sure there’s plenty of testimony regarding what was said by whom, and how the boys were reacting at the time. All of the aforementioned people have appeared before the GJ, some numerous times.

    In addition, I believe it was Tom who stayed at a neighbor/friend’s house the day, or day after, SPeterson went missing. This neighbor/friend is the school principal where the teen attends, and his friend is the principal’s son. They, too, were called before the GJ.

    Can’t keep all the leaks and cracks from happening. Somewhere, somehow, someone has got to be able to make sense out of the whole thing.

    I’ve always been one to think that the teens hold the key to a lot of the dark secrets in that house.

  213. Jun 23, 2008, 8:43pm, johnbearing wrote:I swear there is a feminine slant to Chuckles post, makes me think it is a girl. I studied writing identification in school.

    Chuckles is a man and a highly intelligent man at that if you only knew

  214. I know a lot of people have said that GJ testimony may end with the two boys. Anyone think this is IT?

  215. BigM
    Administrator

    member is online

    Joined: Apr 2008
    Gender: Male
    Posts: 1,594
    Location: Chicago Heights, Illinois
    Re: WTF Sharon Bychowski
    « Result #48 on Jun 23, 2008, 8:46pm »

    ——————————————————————————–

    Jun 23, 2008, 8:43pm, johnbearing wrote:I swear there is a feminine slant to Chuckles post, makes me think it is a girl. I studied writing identification in school.

    Chuckles is a man and a highly intelligent man at that if you only knew

  216. One of the Peterson boys goes before the GJ, something that we have been waiting for, and all that everyone wants to talk about is another forum/person.

    facs-I think that it is coming to an end. JMO

  217. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 6:54 pm
    SAID
    I know a lot of people have said that GJ testimony may end with the two boys. Anyone think this is IT?
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    Sad as the situation, They were there.
    Something had to happen that day and night.
    If this is not “it’, I think it is close.

  218. IMO the questions Joel chose not to answere were more intersting that those he did answer.

    By that, I mean that he is a defense lawyer and his repsonses are going to be phrased to put his client in as positive a light as possible and anyone who speaks against his client will be put in a negative light.

    The locksmith question was one chosen by a member of admin there … don’t know if it was BigM or not … but it was a question CHOSEN and ignored by Joel.

    Now I admit, he’s been a tad busy since Bash asked that question, so he may not have had time to give it any thought or ask Drew about it.

    I am surprised that anyone would not see the value of that question.

  219. Good point, Noway. I think there were other questions chosen that he elected to ignore. I can’t remember them right off the bat though.

  220. noway, thanks for that GJ post, I swiped it for our forum too.

    I have kept up a thread about all the people involved in the case, a who’s-who.

    Most of the ones you’d expect have been to GJ.

  221. Amanda, IMO you have done some amazing research on this case. I’ve swiped plenty from your posts here … 😀

    And I had a thought on the whole FSP thing. In the many posts regarding that topic over the last two days, I thought I saw something that said (and I’m paraphrasing) that they would be able to go a certain route but that they would have to have searched for other people … is that right?

    And I wondered if that was the point of getting them trained. That they will be a search team for other missing persons.

    Do you know what I’m talking about? I’m trying to find your post but am not sure where I read it … here or SYM?

  222. I feel so sad that the boys have to testify. I know it is a must to maybe find the truth. I hope this means this is coming to a close. I also hope an indictment will be handed down and Drew will be arrested.

  223. Okay. Why didn’t I see this the first time I read through yesterday’s posts?

    From Amanda:
    They do not qualify for 501(c)3 as they are set up now, because that cannot be used for one person, they would have to search for more folks.

    amandareckonwith // June 25, 2008 at 8:05 pm

  224. OK, I remember.

    It was when someone said the IRS can take a year to approve. Which is not the case because in IL the first step HAS to be the Attorney General, and that office has never heard of SP, SAP, FSP, FSAPFoSP, FoSAP, none of it.

    IRS told me that FoSP does not qualify for 501(c)3 because an individual cannot be a tax exempt.

    Which is a moot point anyways without going through IL AG Lisa Madigan’s office.

    So… it would be very nice if they (FoSP) were to turn into a real search team and go on to help others, but as far as that making the fund legit,

    it does not.

    Sigh.

    I never reported them because I did not want it to be true. Every time I called one of those agencies, my fingers were crossed that “today would be the day” and I could report back that woohoo, they finally got their sht together.

    8 months now. They said they had it in January and in March and they lied.

    I did not want it to be so, but they did lie.

    They lied on kimmers forum, they lied on FSP.

    Plain and simple. They care more for a garden than they care for IL laws. They spit on the memory of Stacy Peterson, their own namesake.

    Sad and disheartening.

  225. noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 7:05 pm
    SAID
    …The locksmith question…..and ignored by Joel
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Might have something to do with …..when he said it would take hours to pick a lock, then found out about lock bumping only taking a few seconds.
    I don’t think he wants to bring up locks anymore.

  226. Thanks for clearing that up Amanda. It was rather head-spinning here last night. IMO 😉

    Well, certainly there is someone out there who does not feel the way you do and who would (and probably has) reported them.

    While I agree that the important thing is to find out what happened to Stacy, if there is something underhanded going on with the funds, it’s going to affect how people perceive requests for help for other missing people. IMO

    And THAT will be the legacy that Stacy Peterson leaves.

    So, I’m with you … I’m hoping and hoping that it’s just a glitch. And that they will have the intelligence to address this now.

    IMO.

  227. patmccready // June 26, 2008 at 7:34 pm

    noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 7:05 pm
    SAID
    …The locksmith question…..and ignored by Joel
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Might have something to do with …..when he said it would take hours to pick a lock, then found out about lock bumping only taking a few seconds.
    I don’t think he wants to bring up locks anymore.
    ______________
    😀

  228. Noway and Amanda-I hope that this is the legacy that Stacy Peterson will leave. Still hoping that there is a mistake “somewhere” regarding the donations/funds. Isn’t every organization required to post how they spend the funds? Seriously, I don’t know.

    It’s Thursday night and no updates on the Stacy Peterson website regarding the searches. Why? I don’t get it, they can play with flowers every day but can’t update about searches. Boggles the mind.

  229. I find it sad and disheartening to have to sit here and listen to Amanda with her broken record crap.

    If what you say is true, all your squawking would’ve produced and investigation. Good lord I’m ready to call myself to make you STFU.

    You are a horrible person to focus on stupidity instead of the cause. Worry about people not made up fake tax stories.

    Worry about finding out what happened to Stacy not how many more times you van beat a dead horse.

    Could you publish the phone # for 27 more months please?

    Get off it already, your words are evil.

  230. I wish someone involved would speak up about the whole funds thing.
    (I donated) Even though they are dealing with Illinois bureaucracy, I agree by now, someone should know something, or at least say something.

  231. Unfortunately, I do not believe it is a glitch.

    When questions about this were asked at FSP, the poster was banned, the posts deleted.

    They must have thought they could keep it from the majority that way.

    I have no idea how much was raised or how it was spent.

    But I can for sure tell you volunteer searchers do not get paid, or reimbursed for fuel. I know that in the beginning all the printing was donated.

    There were no dog teams hired, no airplanes sent up.

    They bought a boat and went out on the river to remove barrels. It was this very blog/forum that shed the light on the unproffessionalism of that.

    Remember the video?

    Soon someone noticed how stupid that made them look, and soon a new Fox video appreared, with a much better judgement.

    I could go on, but why. The point is:

    Where is the money?
    Why is the fund NOT legit?

    It may well all be accounted for and that is fine.

    But by ignoring the questions and ignoring IL laws governing funds of this sort, they thumb their noses at the giving public just as much as that garden thumbs their noses at Stacy’s own children.

  232. I don’t blame them for not address people who lack integrity.

    Donate or don’t. Simple. Produce documents like that you are accusing someone else of. Prove what you say is true or give it up.
    Proof is in the pudding.

    Where is the pudding?

    Where is a document that verifies your statements?

    Got none? Hmm. Shock.

  233. Well wow, they have swindled the government for what almost 7 months now?

    Yeah O-kay.

    Especially after how many calls from you?

    Oh puh-lease.

  234. Hey duh-Wouldn’t it be nice if Amanda didn’t have to repeat herself over and over again? The reason is because the questions have not been answered. I think that it’s a requirement to release to the public how the funds are used. Don’t know if that is the law but common decency and the right thing to do for people that have given so much money, it to provide this information to the contributors. JMO. The broken record would just go away if the questions were answered.

    My last post said something about the website for Stacy not being updated and it’s Thursday evening. It seems that tending a garden is more important than searching for Stacy. Yes, Stacy will be found in Sharon’s front yard (shaking my head).

    Get the site updated and focus on searching for Stacy. Handle this situation with dignity, respect and class. Release the information and then everyone will STFU (duh’s words, not mine).

    JMO

  235. Prove what you say or move on.

    Prove it.
    Prove it.
    Prove it.

    If you cannot prove it you have even less credibility than those you are accusing.

  236. You know, this is like sitting through one of those college courses that you know you have to pay for and pass, yet it has absolutely no significance or meaningful purpose to get you to your final goal.

    Quite painful, but one of those things you just can’t avoid.

  237. I’m not the one accusing.
    Don’t write checks your a$$ can’t cash.

    Prove it. Still can’t?

    She says I could go on but whats the point?
    Yet, she still goes on. WHY?

    How much hatred must one have bottled up and what kind of miserable life must one have to direct such a tirade of animosity to a group of people who are simply trying the best they know how to cope and deal with a tragic situation?

  238. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    You know, this is like sitting through one of those college courses that you know you have to pay for and pass, yet it has absolutely no significance or meaningful purpose to get you to your final goal.

    Quite painful, but one of those things you just can’t avoid.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    So, just sit back and observe – here have some poppycock! ; )

  239. LOL, sit back and observe? What I observe is that this is going to be a daily thing again, with the same old crap of name calling, phone #s, plants, posters. One big peeing contest.

    We have no choice but to sit back and relax until the usual digs and name calling burns itself out.

    How disgusting.

  240. duh-If that was directed to me, I have never written a check that can’t be cashed. Wouldn’t it just be wonderful if these questions were answered and then others moved on? I’m not questioning the funds but I would like to know how MY money was spent, and I would love to write them off. There is no hatred in my heart, so you must have directed that to someone else. Just because you ask for the non-profit number to write it off, doesn’t mean that you hate Stacy or don’t want her found or for her family to have justice? That is a riduculous statement!

  241. rescue-you could leave if you don’t like it. Isn’t that your own advice. There may be places more “suitable” for you.

  242. I have just the same as you, moreso, because I don’t attack victims and/or their supporters with a daily dose of venomous, vitriolic vulgarities and spew forth tiresome rants about FSP accounting issues.

    You are beyond obsessed. What difference do ANY of the accounting issues at FSP really make to you?

    Seems like you are still able to make it to the computer everyday, unlike Stacy or Kathleen.

  243. Since it’s sounding like a broken record about the FSP donations in here, I’ll do my usual post and say that any individual who thinks they have a legitimate beef with the organization should take whatever legal steps are necessary to get satisfaction for themselves.

    Posting about it here isn’t going to help you. AFAIK, no one here is on the board there or in a postition to answer your questions (I could be wrong but I don’t think so).

    For heaven’s sake, talk to a lawyer and do what you’ve got to do, but trying to convince anyone else of wrongdoing just because you think it might be the case, isn’t going to be very effectual.

    You’ve made phone calls and not been satisfied with the answers. Other people have heard that it’s a long process and still incomplete. Ta da.

    Personally, I don’t think there was any intentional misuse of the funds. Do I know that for sure? No. Do I care. No not really. I’m still interested in the actual homicide/missing person case…not theoretical bureaucratic bunglings nor unqualified opinions about how the searches should be carried out.

  244. Apologies to Rescueapet, but I am ever so weary of Amanda’s broken record.

    Common sense dictates that if her claims were true she wouldn’t be here telling us the sky is falling every day.

    Every day.

    Every day.

  245. ducky – other than to say that I find I find you quite amusing after only one day of posting, and you are telling me what to do, I’ll just laugh it off and go on my way here, thank you very much. You might be better suited at other places as well.

  246. And Amanda, I don’t mean to sound as if I don’t think you have real concerns.

    I just hate to see the focus shifted from the real issue to these peripheral personal ones.

    I understand that you’ll still do what you want. 🙂

  247. methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Looks like another website about drewpy is out and this one looks like it’s gonna be one that nobody will wanna miss , drew being exposed yet once again .. http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com
    —-

    oh dear play with fire and you will get burnt.
    I wonder how old this girl is? If she is of age then it’s nothing more than more tabloid trash like much of this case has turned into with all these insane obsessed freaks.
    so we need to arrest all men in america that are on yahoo chatting with women?
    don’t get me wrong I think drew is a ratbastard and I think it’s shows what head he thinks with but that isn’t illegal, he can be a slutpuppie all he wants and it’s not against the law. entrapment however is.
    let LE do their job people, LE is probably having a field day keeping up with all the insanity surrounding this case let alone the insanity of drew and trying to find evidence to prove him guilty of murder.

  248. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    Since it’s sounding like a broken record about the FSP donations in here, I’ll do my usual post and say that any individual who thinks they have a legitimate beef with the organization should take whatever legal steps are necessary to get satisfaction for themselves.

    Posting about it here isn’t going to help you. AFAIK, no one here is on the board there or in a postition to answer your questions (I could be wrong but I don’t think so).

    For heaven’s sake, talk to a lawyer and do what you’ve got to do, but trying to convince anyone else of wrongdoing just because you think it might be the case, isn’t going to be very effectual.

    You’ve made phone calls and not been satisfied with the answers. Other people have heard that it’s a long process and still incomplete. Ta da.

    Personally, I don’t think there was any intentional misuse of the funds. Do I know that for sure? No. Do I care. No not really. I’m still interested in the actual homicide/missing person case…not theoretical bureaucratic bunglings nor unqualified opinions about how the searches should be carried out.

    Deserves an encore.

    Might I save this for future reposts to save you the hassle? Because it says it all.

  249. No-I like it here. It’s real easy to tell people to leave, isn’t it? It’s more difficult to get along, that is your issue, not mine. If you find me that amusing after one day, you will enjoy me more after a few months.

    Stucky with Ducky! LOL

  250. I saw your post on SYM ducky, where you posted about the revelation you were told about Sharon not going on searches. However, I asked you very politely a number of times if YOU ever went on searches, and you basically ripped me a new you-know-what. So, I assume that means you are an armchair quarterback who gets testy when someone asks for something that qualifies criticizing someone we know who has, at least, helped in the efforts to locate Stacy Peterson.

    Now, I’m done.

  251. Fugatzi, THANK YOU! What a kind thing to say, and quite a surprise to happen upon after reading through all of the posts since I was here earlier. I appreciate the compliment, but I’m sure some there are very glad I left. Thanks again! 😀

    Rescue, humorous analogy, and spot on! 😀

    Just thinking about those sons of Drews. Noway, I can understand why they wouldn’t be interviewed at the same time, but the same day maybe. Feel sure the GJ wanted separate testimony, and maybe they didn’t have enough time to do them both today, don’t know.

    I’m with some of you that feel this is probably the last step before a decision is made, unless new people or new evidence comes to light……like maybe this Ashley webcam thing? next thing you know, she’ll be rounded up to testify. Good Lord have mercy! What’s going to come up next?? This guy has no limit to his stupidity, does he????

  252. Seems like it would behoove them to save the best for last.

    They could possibly be asking the children questions about any number of incidents that have occured up until now. Things Drew may not have thought to school them on.

  253. anyway31 // June 26, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    I am a member @ SYM, why do some of you feel the need to put the place down? It might not be a place of your choosing, but why can’t it be just that? Not every forum is a match for everyone. If we don’t like it, we are not forced to stay, but we don’t have to put it down either. I was a member there before I came here, and I certainly may not agree with everything said, I have never felt uncomfortable until I came here, and my very first post, after months of reading, I was told I needed to research. I have seen some of you post one thing here, and then go there and be so much worse. Those of you that are still members there know they are not over there talking about here. Instead some find it comical that someone’s personal information is splattered everywhere. It saddens me to see this kind of behavior. You may not individually like the board, but why be immature about it?

    I would also like to thank Freedom. I like to read your posts and because I saw you yesterday felt it was okay to post, and one of the few reasons I come back. Amanda and Kimmer would be the other.

    Sorry for my vent – stepping back into the corner.

    anyway thanks for the kind words! I don’t know what to say excpet I have never seen such insaneness in my life as the trolls surrounding this case. I think many want drew convicted so bad they lose track of all their senses or there are just a ton of insane people that come out of the woodwork following high profile cases.
    I have never followed a case on the internet and I think many of these people go from case to case board to board with their insanity from what I can tell.
    It’s stupid why go on and on about another board that is not even associated with Stacy or her family? just stay away, same for any board that goes on and on about this place.
    it’s freakin stupid and why I don’t post at any board. Now it’s looking like these insane idiots are going to do the same here so they can have at it!!
    I predict the chat link that was posted here will soon be invaded, mark my words.

  254. Rescue-I have never, ever posted at SYM. Nice try. Now, I asked you to answer the same questions that you have posed to me. Please don’t “assume” that I haven’t done anything, I may be the biggest contributor or I may not have given a dime. It’s none of your business.

    Why don’t you provide the post from SYM or the link? Do you know how to do that? I would be curious what your horrible armchair detective work has come up with. Why does everyone here get so obsessed with trying to figure out who is who? It’s very odd.

  255. Oh, ducky, by the way, you told freedom last night to do a picture search to see if she could find any with Sharon in them. Why didn’t you save freedom trouble and do it yourself? Why must you come here and criticize someone who doesn’t post here, which, by the way, is against the police rules of the blog administration here.

    You want to get into it with me, fine, I’ll play your silly game. I’ve been here longer, and I feel I’ve contributed a lot more here than silly-ass remarks about Sharon not plodding through long grass and weeds. If that little tidbit gets us to a better place, the place where we all see the day that justice is done, then so be it. Then go for it.

  256. You’ve never posted at SYM? Strange – then someone is using the same nic, coincidently, about Sharon and the searches.

    Wanna see?

  257. I’ll just say one snarky thing about Drew’s webcam and then try to restrain myself.

    For someone who seemes terribly concerned with what a neighbor’s security camera may happen to capture outside of his home, he seems remarkably open about having a camera inside his home sending out images of himself and his kids to strangers on the Internet.

  258. good evening NOWAY , CFS, grandma, REscuea.
    boy did I miss alot last night I just know caught up to all of this.. wow….

  259. noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 6:28 pm

    June 26, 2008 · Drew Peterson’s eldest son by Kathleen Savio testified before the grand jury Thursday.

    Thomas Peterson left the Will County Court Annex building about 4:15 p.m. in a red Mercedes driven by his attorney.

    Drew Peterson said his younger teenage son, Kristopher, will also testify but declined to say when.

    breaks my heart, well atleast this part is over with for him. poor kids even if their father is innocent their mental health is very fragile because innocence won’t fly with many concerning this case.

  260. Rescue-your detective work sucks. Don’t give up your day job.

    FYI-that post that you are talking about was exlawenforcement quoting MY post from HERE. You really do suck at this. Have you graduated high school? Don’t accuse people of things that you know nothing about and can’t even read the facts. I am laughing so hard right now. Sorry to embarrass you! I really didn’t want to get into it with you, as you say that you want to with me. Enough. Agree to disagree.

    Freedom-did you have a nice day? I saw your hello from this morning. Thanks for the welcome.

  261. Rescue-

    There is a small group of hateful people, and they are always the same, they DO post on other forums, they didn’t just fall out of the sky on any given day and start hating Sharon and questioning her integrity (which she has an overabundance of, IMO).

    THESE people are the trolls.

    I only wish I knew why someone could be so hateful and off point.

    There is a missing mother and there is a murdered mother.

    Thats should be the focal point.

    Period.

    Lather, rinse, repeat what Facs posted.

    Oh and my nic? Yes, it was just to point out how stupid the broken record is.

    DUH!
    MAN!
    DUH!

  262. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    You’ve never posted at SYM? Strange – then someone is using the same nic, coincidently, about Sharon and the searches.

    Wanna see?
    ——————————————————–

    Still waiting. Please show me what I said.

    Ok all. Ducky needs to sleep. Don’t want to be an ugly duckling, too much of that going around.

    I pray that the Peterson boys are doing ok tonight. It’s very sad.

  263. ducky – you want to stop the name calling? I don’t think that’s playing nice.

    How would you know what you just posted if you’re not admitting to posting over there? WTH ducky.

    Do you go on searches or don’t you?

    Yes, I did graduate from h.s.

  264. Nope, ducky, ain’t gonna happen. I’m going to follow your advice to me from last night.

    Do you go on searches or have you ever gone on searches?

  265. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    You have not proven anything.

    Show us all a document that verifies everything you say.

    I truly hope you are not elroy talk about evil.
    you want the proof call the #’s and you will have it! seems like you are awful defensive and trying to ensure you keep all this talk about the funds hidden.
    well we already know that daddy cales used the funds his town raised for him when his infant died in their house that burnt to the ground to buy a harley!!!
    now this and a moron like you out here acting like a asshat trying to intimidate all to stfu about the funds that should be accounted for to the public.
    like I said I sure hope it’s not true that you are elroy because if you are then it all makes sense why no accounting of the funds. and a few others things I won’t mention.

  266. facs would you prefer the broken record about BigM along with the personal information that goes with it??
    not trying to be rude but when you want to vent about that stupid board you just left you do.
    so if some other poster wants to vent about something that does actually tie to the case like the funds solicited from the public in the name of finding a missing person I think they have just as much right.

  267. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    Since it’s sounding like a broken record about the FSP donations in here, I’ll do my usual post and say that any individual who thinks they have a legitimate beef with the organization should take whatever legal steps are necessary to get satisfaction for themselves.

    Posting about it here isn’t going to help you. AFAIK, no one here is on the board there or in a postition to answer your questions (I could be wrong but I don’t think so).

    For heaven’s sake, talk to a lawyer and do what you’ve got to do, but trying to convince anyone else of wrongdoing just because you think it might be the case, isn’t going to be very effectual.

    You’ve made phone calls and not been satisfied with the answers. Other people have heard that it’s a long process and still incomplete. Ta da.

    Personally, I don’t think there was any intentional misuse of the funds. Do I know that for sure? No. Do I care. No not really. I’m still interested in the actual homicide/missing person case…not theoretical bureaucratic bunglings nor unqualified opinions about how the searches should be carried out.

    I like this post.

    Spot on.

    Replay for those just arriving.

  268. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Sun,Moon,Sky.

    yep so what?? you don’t scare me one bit you troll. what ya gonna do pilot your john boat down river to scare me??

  269. freedom, well, okay then, let’s just see how many want to stay on here tonight and talk about the fundraising, Mr. Cales, the plant people and Sharon.

    Not me. Call me when I’m needed.

  270. Rescue-I never called you a name and I have NEVER posted over at SYM. Put your money where your mouth is. Why do you have to attack everyone because they are new or you presume bad/evil things about anyone but pe0ple that you have gotten to know from a blog? Open your mind, you will come to like many people and it would be really nice for Stacy. It would reflect well on the family, wordpress etc., if you acted decent to new posters.

    PUT MY POST FROM SYM UP HERE…you can’t because it was a quote from here…my goodness, you need to log off and take a walk. The air will do you good.

    Did you graduate pre-school?

    You owe me an apology. If I said that you did something and I found out that I was wrong, I would have enough class to apologize.

    Rescue-what I do and who I am is none of your business. Do you think that just because you want answers because you are so nosey, that you deserve them? It’s a blog, honey. You are not the owner and nobody has to answer your questions just to satisfy your curiousity.

    Now, post the post that you say that I did over at SYM. Come on. We are all waiting. LOL

    I shall go to sleep because it will be that long and many more days until you can answer your own question.

  271. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Seems like it would behoove them to save the best for last.

    They could possibly be asking the children questions about any number of incidents that have occured up until now. Things Drew may not have thought to school them on.
    +++++++++++++++++
    Duh that’s an excellent point. I originally thought that the GJ would wait until boys were out of school so all of this wouldn’t interfere with their “things.” But given the extra time they had before they testified, it might be good insight into what things were like for them as a family and Drew as father after Stacy went missing. Eight months is a significant amount of time, and there may have been a lot of things going on (or not) in that house that was of interest to the GJ, who knows?

  272. well we already know that daddy cales used the funds his town raised for him when his infant died in their house that burnt to the ground to buy a harley!!!
    ++++++++++++++++++++++
    I have heard this before. How does anyone know what he spent what money on?
    Did he buy a harley? Did someone give him a harley? Did he inherit a harley?
    Just asking.

  273. now this is the second time that my info private personal, only admin can see info from this blog has gotten into FSP hands!!
    WTF??? I think it’s time to make a call.

  274. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    freedom, well, okay then, let’s just see how many want to stay on here tonight and talk about the fundraising, Mr. Cales, the plant people and Sharon.

    Not me. Call me when I’m needed.

    needed for what? how many you think wanna stay around here and talk about BIGM??
    matter of fact I doubt no matter what the topic is that I will stick around.
    seems to be some security issues out here.

  275. Freedom-I am really sorry. That is terrible. Make that call! Really! Duh’s IP address is noted by Gatehouse and they should help you. I am sorry. People are just sick.

  276. duhmanduhwrechinwitch // June 26, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    Do boats go to Hotlanta ?
    Sun.Moon.Sky.

    why don’t you grab the oars and row row row your boat to find out. det

  277. Freedom-I think that the IP addresses have been shared between sites. JMO. If that happens to me, I will make sure that they pay. This is the only time that I wish that there was PM’s. I would share with you.

    Gatehouse better not give out any IP’s to others. I’m not playing around.

  278. Holy palomino- a gal goes to get some zzz’s, comes back here and doesn’t even need tea to wake up!

    I am pleased that Kathleen’s boys are testifying. I am hopeful that this means the GJ will begin deliberating soon.

    Yipper! Good news indeed! 🙂

  279. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 8:37 pm

    I’ll just say one snarky thing about Drew’s webcam and then try to restrain myself.

    For someone who seemes terribly concerned with what a neighbor’s security camera may happen to capture outside of his home, he seems remarkably open about having a camera inside his home sending out images of himself and his kids to strangers on the Internet.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    As Bash would say, BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAA!

  280. CFS-

    I would bet that Drew thought of everything to tell them as far as what he thought they might be question on but there had to be more questions about the goings on after the intitial time perios that Stacy went missing and the 3 day trip.

    Who comes over? Who calls? Things like that.
    Could make for some interesting information.

  281. Well I am not sure about anyone else, but I am sort of lost. It must be an “inside” conversation.

    But while I am at it, I will state what I just did on another forum.

    With all do respect and because I really am curious – – – Am I the only one who finds it odd that the Attorney a his client, a suspect in the disappearance of his 4th wife (who has gotten nationwide attention) has decided to be active on an internet forum?

    His client is entitled to representation and this I believe is doing his client a dis-service IMO

    Despite my personal opinion of his guilt or innocence, I really do believe in and respect our justice system. I was very disappointed to learn that his attorney chose to do “this”. I seriously was disappointed because he has a HUGE uphill battle and I was hoping he would have the best shot at it legally.

  282. patmccready // June 26, 2008 at 8:57 pm
    I have heard this before. How does anyone know what he spent what money on?
    Did he buy a harley? Did someone give him a harley? Did he inherit a harley?
    Just asking.

    did he inherit a harley OMG that is too funny if my post would have said drew took the money that the town donated and instead of providing for his family he bought a harely none would question me.
    Anyway a person from the town that donated to the cales family during that tragedy came out her and posted the information and said if you want to verify it go to Downers Grove and talk to the people in the town that were there at the time and they WILL remember it and give you all the details.
    provide a house, clothing and food for your family or buy yourself a harley.

  283. Fugatzi-
    Is it possible that with all the statements and posting the attorney has made, that he could be called on any of them?

    It seems to me that he has said so much that it would be hard not to reference such things if a trial comes about.

  284. duckyone // June 26, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    Freedom-I think that the IP addresses have been shared between sites. JMO. If that happens to me, I will make sure that they pay. This is the only time that I wish that there was PM’s. I would share with you.

    Gatehouse better not give out any IP’s to others. I’m not playing around.

    well I’m really really suspicious I let the first incident slide but not this one.
    I highly doubt gate would help as he/she was asked in a post last night to put an end to the accusations and ignored.
    Also I’m very suspicious that my info was shared from this blog and there are only so many that can share that info.
    yes I’d love for you to share with me!!

  285. duhmanduhwrechinwitch I was just wondering that same thing?

    I don’t know, I am not a law professional by any means but I would assume that since he Joel has stated certain things in writing on the forum that it would not be good if he had to back step on any of what he said.

  286. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    Oh, ducky, by the way, you told freedom last night to do a picture search to see if she could find any with Sharon in them

    nope rescue ducky did not tell me to search she asked had anyone seen a pic of stacy and sharon together.
    I came back and posted I had just done a google image search and didn’t find any.

    as far as trolls soo far duh and idon’tknowshite are the only trolls that have been vindicative and posted personal information about others on this blog and they are still here and still posting personal information.
    “special trolls”

  287. Prayers for you Thomas – you are a brave young man. 🙂

    Drew Peterson’s 15-year-old son talks to grand jury
    Will County panel investigates death of his mother, disappearance of stepmother
    By Erika Slife

    Chicago Tribune reporter

    8:28 PM CDT, June 26, 2008

    Drew Peterson’s teenage son testified Thursday before a Will County grand jury investigating the 2004 death of his mother and the Oct. 28 disappearance of his stepmother.

    Wearing a suit and tie and appearing composed, Thomas Peterson, 15, left the courthouse garage at about 4:15 p.m. in the passenger seat of his attorney’s car.

    For months, the grand jury has been looking into the death of his mother, Kathleen Savio, who was found dead in an empty bathtub in her Bolingbrook home. She was only weeks away from a divorce settlement with Drew Peterson when she died.

    Authorities decided to take another look at her death—which had been initially ruled an accident—after Peterson’s current wife, Stacy, disappeared. Police named Drew Peterson, 54, as a suspect in Stacy’s disappearance. In February, Will County State’s Atty. James Glasgow said Savio had been murdered.

    Peterson has denied any wrongdoing in either case. Reached by phone Thursday, he said he was concerned about the welfare of his son.

    “He’s been at the grand jury for what? Four hours?” Peterson said. “That’s concerning [to me that] they’d put any 15-year-old kid through all that grilling.”

    A spokesman for Glasgow’s office, Charles Pelkie, said he could not comment on grand jury proceedings. However, he said that in all investigations, young witnesses are always treated with care.

    “What I can say is that any time young people are questioned with regard to any investigation, I’m speaking broadly here, we take every extra step to make sure they’re treated properly and respectfully,” he said. “We do everything that we can to limit the stress and the anxiety that may be caused in any interview.”

    Thomas, and his younger brother, Kristopher, 13, were interviewed in the Will County Children’s Advocacy Center in November.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson_27jun27,0,1841014.story

  288. fugatzi // June 26, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    duhmanduhwrechinwitch I was just wondering that same thing?

    I don’t know, I am not a law professional by any means but I would assume that since he Joel has stated certain things in writing on the forum that it would not be good if he had to back step on any of what he said.

    JB is not under oath and also it could be considered hearsay. He can lie just like LE
    but I’m in agreement it’s stupid for him to be posting and I would guess it’s not him but someone that works for him or a few of them posting under that nic even him.

  289. not only do I think it’s not the right thing for JB to post on boards I also think the the FSP site, thank god it’s gone, has done MUCH damage to this case and turned it into a freak show and many of the same fspers are keeping the freak show alive and well.

  290. Freedom-are you on another site with the same name? Let me know. I will help you as much as I can. Nobody’s information should be shared in any manner. It’s not right and it could be dangerous.

    Is this going to be like last night, where I say goodnight 50 times? hehe

  291. 4 hours of testimony poor kid. well let’s see what happens these boys just might provide some interesting info that might give some a heart attack.
    they were given immunity for their testimony and all assume what they know will be the nail in drews coffin but I’m not so sure.

  292. Freedom, there is a HUGE difference in the FSP board and the Attorney of a suspect in the disappearance of his 4th wife (not to mention the questionable death of his 3rd wife granted he is not a suspect yet)

    You have to admit that you are not comparing apples to apples there?

  293. duckyone // June 26, 2008 at 9:27 pm

    Freedom-are you on another site with the same name? Let me know. I will help you as much as I can. Nobody’s information should be shared in any manner. It’s not right and it could be dangerous.

    Is this going to be like last night, where I say goodnight 50 times? hehe
    —-
    nope not anymore. guess we could sign up at bigm’s and use pm’s there since we supposedly already post there.
    ps-admins can’t read pm’s and from what I read of the statement copied over here there was no mention of reading pm’s it was a warning to anyone that posted a pm to the public.
    not me I’m not staying up late for this bullhockey tonight. lol

  294. but I’m in agreement it’s stupid for him to be posting and I would guess it’s not him but someone that works for him or a few of them posting under that nic even him.

    _______________________________

    I believe that Mr. Brodsky has validated that it is him. This is getting a bit weird actually.

  295. Well I am not a veteran in this board stuff, but even I can spot “it” the alliance/cover your ass and the BS and quite honestly it is pathetic.

  296. fugatzi // June 26, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    I believe that Mr. Brodsky has validated that it is him. This is getting a bit weird actually.

    I have no idea if he did validate it was him or how he would. he could let anyone use his nic. doesn’t matter I dont’ really care if he wants to screw up his case same with fsp if they wanna break the laws in the name of a missing person and spit on the public that has donated to them, they will have to answer to it. I know for a fact they are not legit because I called the #’s several months in a row and that was all I needed to know.
    IMO both sides of this case have no class. with the exception of Pam Bosco.
    I will comment on both though!!

  297. fugatzi // June 26, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    Well I am not a veteran in this board stuff, but even I can spot “it” the alliance/cover your ass and the BS and quite honestly it is pathetic.

    beyond pathetic these trolls are like coach roaches you can’t get rid of them. I can not post for weeks and make one post and bam they come out of the woodwork with their fangs out. what is really sad is these trolls are on the net pretty much 24/7 going from board to board blog to blog where ever they feel they are needed to stop others from posting things they don’t like.
    it has to be some kind of mental issue.
    lol

  298. fugatzi // June 26, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    Freedom, there is a HUGE difference in the FSP board and the Attorney of a suspect in the disappearance of his 4th wife (not to mention the questionable death of his 3rd wife granted he is not a suspect yet)

    You have to admit that you are not comparing apples to apples there?
    —-
    I don’t see much difference, FSP represented the family of the missing person and were giving all kinds of ammo for the defense.
    well yes I do see some difference. I don’t think JB has issued any death threats like some at FSP did.

  299. Freedom, first of all, I think you know as well as everyone here that Mr Brodsky verified that it was him. Then, I am sort of taken back by your claim of he, the Attorney of a suspect of his missing wife, could let anyone use his nic. The fact that a law professional, an attorney chose to go the route of a public forum in a case that has been so contraversial, and then chose a forum that is primarily in support of his client, why not if he felt the need to, go public at webslueths, etc? Then to believe that there would be blatant disregard that he would hand out his name and password.

    I am worried about the representation Drew Peterson will have if it results in an arrest.

  300. fugatzi how would I know what JB did on a message board that I am not a member of??
    secondly IMO what JB is doing is getting a free jury simulation by using the net.
    and yes I do think he would hand out his nic & password to one of his researchers. his time is limited unlike some that hang on the net 24/7. lawyers even crappy ones are pretty busy.
    it’s not uncommon for a lawyer to give his westlaw id/password to his paralegal or even secretary to do research for them. So I don’t think my comment is out of the realm of possibilities.
    as I’ve stated before I don’t think it is a smart thing to do and I also think that if drew is arrested there will be more than just JB heading his defense.

  301. I don’t see much difference, FSP represented the family of the missing person and were giving all kinds of ammo for the defense.
    well yes I do see some difference. I don’t think JB has issued any death threats like some at FSP did.

    _________________________________

    Well I have to disagree with your not seeing any difference. For me there is a HUGE difference in a website – even if collecting monies – and a suspect in the disappearance of his 4th wife, not to mention the mysterious untimely death of his 3rd wife – granted that he is not a suspect in that death which is ruled a homocide now. To me their is a HUGE difference.

    I just wish his attorney would have kept his clients mouth shut AND his own mouth shut.

  302. fugatzi we can agree to disagree no problem!
    Now Now, what would the net have to talk about if JB and Drew keep their mouth shut? most of the boards would be dead.

  303. Believe it or not, my balking about his attorney taking this route, is for Drew Peterson’s good.

    I firmly believe that this is a detriment to his client – and like you, it is only my opinion.

  304. …I believe that Mr. Brodsky has validated that it is him. This is getting a bit weird actually…..
    …but I’m in agreement it’s stupid for him to be posting …
    +++++++++++++++++++++++
    Brodsky tried “let’s try an internet approach”, and imo it backfired.
    I don’t think he did himself, or the idea, any favors.
    Only a hand full of people really know what is up with that, so I don’t think it will hurt him much. Maybe with his peers.

  305. freedom – I like how you can “disagree” with some.

    On the other hand, I get the bullcrap: did you graduate high school, did you graduate pre-school, I don’t have to tell you anything, yada, yada, yada.

    Troll.

  306. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    freedom – I like how you can “disagree” with some.

    On the other hand, I get the bullcrap: did you graduate high school, did you graduate pre-school, I don’t have to tell you anything, yada, yada, yada.

    Troll.

    lol thanks!!
    I can give ya a hint just disagree and keep emotional reaction out of it if possible. Believe me I know it’s hard sometimes and I struggle with it alot myself.
    I really think that you will end up getting along with ducky in time. remember we did not get along to well at first, but in time it was all cool and we can even disagree now.

  307. What do you guys think of this new glob that popped up today, the one that is going to be an enlightening one about DP and his “Ashley?” It certainly has my curiosity piqued.

  308. Why do people think it’s a concern what Joel says on these boards? He’s not a witness and he won’t be testifying nor cross examined. He’s the defense attorney. HE asks the questions.

    That’s why he’s free to spin, dazzle or spout all the bs he wants. He can say whatever he wants in the service of his client. He’ll never be taken to task for it.

    His peers may have their opinions of his tactics, but they don’t pay his fees.

  309. Ha I knew what you meant rescue. maybe the blog will keep the trolls away from here a new place to troll might keep them busy for awhile.
    all it takes is one post they don’t like and bam they appear.

  310. Well Rescue, I imagine trolls will be going there to roost.

    Since it’s an anti-Drew site, they should be all landing shortly once word gets out.

    But…

    Could Drew be smart enough to have that site himself so he could catch some people’s IP’s or other info?

    Hmm…

  311. freedom – getting emotional is one thing. I don’t consider hauling out the wisecracks and smartass names as a valid poster. JMHO. That was childish, uncalled for and just plain ignorant. Quack quack.

  312. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Why do people think it’s a concern what Joel says on these boards? He’s not a witness and he won’t be testifying nor cross examined. He’s the defense attorney. HE asks the questions.

    That’s why he’s free to spin, dazzle or spout all the bs he wants. He can say whatever he wants in the service of his client. He’ll never be taken to task for it.

    His peers may have their opinions of his tactics, but they don’t pay his fees

    yep that is the bottom line, good post.

  313. Facs, I too admire your “standard” reply re funds from FSP.

    I’ve saved it in case I’m the only one around when it’s needed. I will give you all the credit and post in lieu of you.

    I have to admit that I’m intrigued by “Ashley’s glob” too. 😉

    I think Glenn Selig may be pulling out all remaining hair … actually I don’t think I know what he looks like … vaguely remember his photo from The Three Stooges photo on FSP. 😀

  314. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Why do people think it’s a concern what Joel says on these boards? He’s not a witness and he won’t be testifying nor cross examined. He’s the defense attorney. HE asks the questions.

    ______________
    IMO the back pedaling and doublespeak will be of interest to the prosecution. The points that Joel makes are of as much interest to the prosecution as if Drew was posting … as well as the ones he chose not to answer.

  315. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Why do people think it’s a concern what Joel says on these boards? He’s not a witness and he won’t be testifying nor cross examined. He’s the defense attorney. HE asks the questions.

    That’s why he’s free to spin, dazzle or spout all the bs he wants. He can say whatever he wants in the service of his client. He’ll never be taken to task for it.

    His peers may have their opinions of his tactics, but they don’t pay his fees.

    ———————————————————–

    It is a concern because he is supposed to be defending his client, not trying to win a popularity contest.

    It is so unprofessional really. And a tad arrogant actually as I would imagine he thinks that his client has no chance of an indictment.

    “but they don’t pay his fees.” I guess the old saying “you get what you pay for” could be used here 😉

  316. Facs, i believe you are wrong on that. If Joel says his client says something he can be called to the witness stand on it.

  317. You know, I really wondered about JB’s posting too. I just don’t get that. I think it’s more of an ego thing than anything else. I think he’s so caught up in the moment, that he’s lost his way. If he had any sense, he’d drop DP as a client asap, especially if this “glob” thing is going to make DP look like more of a hormone crazed maniac. DP is doing nothing for Brodsky’s career or his practice. At least, I can’t think of anything, except that it’s made him recognizable. But, recognition doesn’t pay the bills, and he needs clients with money. Not every client can set up a website and troll for money.

  318. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    facs would you prefer the broken record about BigM along with the personal information that goes with it??
    not trying to be rude but when you want to vent about that stupid board you just left you do.
    ***********************
    No, I find BigM conversations boring as well. But I do think SYM is pertinent because Drew’s lawyer posts there.

    Why do you think that I left that board?

  319. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    freedom – getting emotional is one thing. I don’t consider hauling out the wisecracks and smartass names as a valid poster. JMHO. That was childish, uncalled for and just plain ignorant. Quack quack.
    —-
    well rescue truthfully that was pretty mild compared to what was thrown at me last night and I can’t even classify ducky as a troll or invalid poster. That type of exchange IMO happens a lot between posters on any board and you just got a dig in on ducky with your quack quack, see what I’m saying?
    I sure can say with 100% certainty that the duh twins are certified trolls who not only are very vindictive but say some pretty nasty things and post personal information about others as part of their vendetta.
    It also appears to me that because they don’t bash sharon or FSP their behavior is accepted and seem to get along just fine with you and others that don’t want to bash sharon.
    just a big bowl of drama!

  320. Geez, there’s been a lot to catch up with!

    freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    facs would you prefer the broken record about BigM along with the personal information that goes with it??
    not trying to be rude but when you want to vent about that stupid board you just left you do.
    +++++++++++++
    Freedom, just for the record, I was the one who left that other board, not Facs. And a whole lot more people had a lot more to say about it than I did. However, I understand your point. Just didn’t want Facs to take any grief on my account.

    I don’t understand all of this about your personal info being known or shared or whatever, but Gatehouse has stated on here before that they do not under any circumstances share IP addresses or personal information. Duckyone nearly blew a gasket with her reaction, which I found a little odd. “Thou protests too much” maybe? Can’t put my finger on it. Sure it’s upsetting to you if this is the only place you post, and it is strange to say the least. Hope you find out what’s going on.

  321. iknoweverythinglol // June 26, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    Facs, i believe you are wrong on that. If Joel says his client says something he can be called to the witness stand on it.
    ****************

    In what capacity will Joel have said anything that matters. He’s not under oath anywhere but the courtroom and they can’t make you testify against your client. That would be absurd.

  322. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:25 pm

    No, I find BigM conversations boring as well. But I do think SYM is pertinent because Drew’s lawyer posts there.

    Why do you think that I left that board?

    same reason I’m not a member. I agree the only thing that is pertinent about bigm’s is that jb posts there but that’s not what the topic is normally about it’s about bigm and who really gives a flying puck about him besides the trolls obsessed with him?

  323. Facs, they sure can make Brodsky testify against his client. If he publicly says drew told him this or drew told him that he can be questioned on the stand about it. He can deny it or say he lied about it and that would be fine. But then they can use that as evidence for the jury to look at concerning a theory.

  324. cfs7360 // June 26, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    Freedom, just for the record, I was the one who left that other board, not Facs. And a whole lot more people had a lot more to say about it than I did. However, I understand your point. Just didn’t want Facs to take any grief on my account.

    I don’t understand all of this about your personal info being known or shared or whatever, but Gatehouse has stated on here before that they do not under any circumstances share IP addresses or personal information. Duckyone nearly blew a gasket with her reaction, which I found a little odd. “Thou protests too much” maybe? Can’t put my finger on it. Sure it’s upsetting to you if this is the only place you post, and it is strange to say the least. Hope you find out what’s going on.

    oh geesh I get you two mixed up all the time I don’t know why!! sorry gals!!
    Yes I took gatehouse’s word as truth but NOW I’m really leary of the why’s behind this because I don’t post anywhere else and haven’t for months so it’s pretty odd.
    I can see a new poster getting upset about reading something like this so no read flags went up for me. I say give ducky a change until they prove otherwise they seem ok to me.

  325. I’m not sure whether I can explain this so my point will be understood.

    Joel does some major backpedaling (imagine watching someone ride a unicycle) on various answers he has given.

    And he avoids and lies about some of the simplest things.

    If JoJo Locksmith opened the door for Drew and crew … what difference does it make if we know the name? And I don’t think Joel needed to check with Drew ‘because he didn’t know’ …

    The money Stacy allegedly took … who said it to whom … not that hard to remember if the truth is told the first time … but Joel’s gone in circles on that one (imagine that unicycle rider going around and around).

    That’s why I think *everything* Joel posts (even the slams against Sandra and EVP) is of interest.

    All just my opinion.

    Does it make ANY sense?

  326. attorney client privilege
    lawyers make statements all the time about their clients even what the client has stated and aren’t hauled into court.
    the DA would have to be even more hard up then he is now to try and put JB on the stand.
    now that would be too damn funny but hey I would not put it past will county.

  327. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:25 pm
    Why do you think that I left that board?

    freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 10:29 pm
    same reason I’m not a member.
    ***********

    Dude, I’m saying I didn’t leave the board. I can totally see how you would read my comment that way though. LOL 🙂

  328. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 10:43 pm

    Dude, I’m saying I didn’t leave the board. I can totally see how you would read my comment that way though. LOL 🙂

    dude?? lol, don’t get the trolls fired up again.
    see above post I had you cornfused with cfs and that comment went right along with my cornfusion.

  329. I’m not saying that they would put Joel on the stand. I just think that what Joel says is of interest to the prosecution. As well as what he doesn’t say. And how many times he changes what he says.

    Say … Gatehouse … will you be posting the Q/As people sent in a different thread or are you going to post them in the midst of this chaos?

    Maybe in their own thread that we can’t touch and then we can discuss them here? And when will that be? (You don’t need sleep, do you? 🙂 )

  330. Joel has also made some public statements that he’s not followed through on, at least IMO. He made a big fuss over the picture that young Anthony was in with his Aunt Cassandra, and said something about filing charges against them for “detaining” the child. Never heard another word about it.

    Then, he said he was going to deal with her over that camera thing. That appears to have gone no where. He talks too much.

  331. I don’t know for sure but it would be really REALLY unusual to call a lawyer to testify against his client.

    I think Joel would basically have to write something like, “Well, HAHAHA because Drew Peterson actually DID kill those women and I have proof but I’m going to help him get away with it!”

    I think then maybe he could be summoned. Maybe.

  332. Freedom, I take it as a compliment to get confused with Facs. She’s a great poster! But I hope she wasn’t offended, lol.

  333. noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    I’m not saying that they would put Joel on the stand. I just think that what Joel says is of interest to the prosecution. As well as what he doesn’t say. And how many times he changes what he says.
    *****************

    OK, I see. I’ll grant you that. If they aren’t reading these boards, then they aren’t getting all the info they should. Might give them some good ideas for what to research and prepare.

  334. His peers may have their opinions of his tactics, but they don’t pay his fees….
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    That is why I said it will not hurt him much.
    From the nonsense that I have witnessed, I find it hard to think his peers would have much respect for him.
    Integrity.

  335. IMO he should focus on the weapons charge and forget about everything else …

    Cass “detaining” Anthony (OMG!)

    Sharon’s cameras (could it be that his invasion of privacy concerns are going to be harder to prove when he’s got his webcam with Anthony behind him for a whole lot more people to see?).

  336. there is a chance that JB just might surprise everyone when he’s in court, including me cause I think he’s an asshat .
    he’s a criminal defense lawyer he is not going to show his hand until his client is on trial.
    Look how upset he makes others, that might be part of his tatics, he’s also fishing for information and just giving out bread crumbs to keep the masses coming back. heck no he isn’t going to tell who the locksmith was/is, heck no he isn’t going to explain the 25k to the net.
    He’s going to play the game just like LE is playing their game.
    IMO

  337. They CANNOT call Joel to the stand for anything he says related to this case. Joel CANNOT tell us anything Drew tells him because of attorney/client privilege.

    I’m just saying that the prosecution and LE of all kinds currently in Bolingbrook are interested in all of this.

    Oh … hi guys! 😉

  338. noway406 // June 26, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    IMO he should focus on the weapons charge and forget about everything else …

    Cass “detaining” Anthony (OMG!)

    Sharon’s cameras (could it be that his invasion of privacy concerns are going to be harder to prove when he’s got his webcam with Anthony behind him for a whole lot more people to see?).

    I think you will find him having his web cam on in his own house is not the same as your neighbor pointing camera’s at your house spying on you.

    There is a possibility that this latest sideshow might not turn out in the bloggers favor.

  339. Both sides have their games to play aka their jobs to do.

    And I wasn’t being sexist by only saying “hi” to the male LE/prosecution members.

    It’s just the way people talk where I was raised. See you guys later!

  340. noway-
    The Q&As will have their own thread. We were hoping to get the first one out today but then things got a little hectic with Thomas testifying and all.

    New goal is to have one up tomorrow. As for sleep…well, that can be sacrificed every now and then 🙂

  341. rescueapet // June 26, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    We’ll not get the chance to see JB in court. No cameras in IL courts!!!!!!

    well I agree with that in away but then again I think many following this case could use a good dose of courtroom reality.

  342. Rescue, I love to go duck hunting. Shoot ’em right out of the sky with my Browning 12 gauge. And that’s the truth.

  343. freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 10:53 pm

    facs I think both you and cfs are great posters!!
    must be why I cornfuse ya’ll.
    ______________
    Agreed 100%!

    freedom08 // June 26, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    I think you will find him having his web cam on in his own house is not the same as your neighbor pointing camera’s at your house spying on you.

    There is a possibility that this latest sideshow might not turn out in the bloggers favor.
    ________________
    What expectation of privacy does Drew have … I guess the webcam shows what’s behind him and the cameras catch his driveway and his swimming pool … so I can only agree 90% on this one.

    I’m enjoying the slowness. It keeps me from having 4 posts in a row.

  344. 😀
    I’m just imagining Joel and Drew mugging for the cameras instead of focusing on the trial.

    Pushing each other out of the way … bunny ears … I know, I’m not playing nice.

    Time for bed. 🙂

  345. What expectation of privacy does Drew have … I guess the webcam shows what’s behind him and the cameras catch his driveway and his swimming pool … so I can only agree 90% on this one.

    I’m enjoying the slowness. It keeps me from having 4 posts in a row.

    so I guess you would not mind if your neighbors point camera’s soley at your property to watch your every move?
    remember Sharon is not LE it is not her job to do surveillance on drew. now if her camera’s weren’t pointed directly at his property there would be no problem but that is not the case.
    drew controls the web cam he knows when it’s on and when it’s off.
    I don’t get into violating the rights that our founding fathers gave us using the excuse well he’s a suspect in his wife’s disappearance so it’s ok to stomp on our situationally rights when it fits our need.
    nope absolutely not! Drew like it or not has the same rights as you and I have. He’s not been convicted of anything at this point.
    That is the scariest thing that I can take from the case the blatant disregard that many show concerning our rights as an american citizen all in the name I think drew is guilty so it’s ok.

  346. Freedom, there isn’t any proof whatsoever that those cameras are pointed “soley” at Drew’s property. None. Even if it may look like the camera is pointed directly at his property, that doesn’t mean that’s what the camera sees, or what the range is. And I’m not taking up for Sharon here, believe me. It’s just that it seems to me you’re implying it’s a fact, and it isn’t. Sorry.

  347. yes at this point there is no proof cfs.
    but as nosey as sharon is I would bet $100 they are pointed at his property and not hers.
    ofcourse she might wise up and do the right thing and point them at her property, one would hope.

  348. facsmiley // June 26, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    I know a lot of people have said that GJ testimony may end with the two boys. Anyone think this is IT?
    ________________________

    Facs………………I tend to think that the two boys may be the last of those to testify before the grand jury, unless they haven’t heard testimony from Tom Morphey.

    Although I don’t know for a fact, I suspect that even though there’s been no report of anyone seeing Tom Morphey going into or out of the grand jury chambers, he may have testified via video link, as courts are using that a lot these days. If that’s the case, we wouldn’t know about his testifying.

  349. Re: GJ – maybe one more witness – Kris, and then they’ll be done. Doesn’t seem like there’s be anybody else.

Comments are closed.