Your Thread – July 7 2.0

Here’s a new one to help speed things up.

Advertisements

130 thoughts on “Your Thread – July 7 2.0

  1. What is going on? I thought that I would have so much to catch up on tonight. Pretty boring. Let-it may be time to start passing out the colorful ones. 😉

  2. Ducky, not boring.

    We just don’t know what is going on.

    Ashley back everything up … good advice. Who said that? Don’t want to go back to other page. 😉

    Am thinking Miss A, brilliant web designed would already have everything backed up. 🙂

  3. I hope this isn’t stupid to post. It is my first one so I am a little nervous.

    Someone mentioned earlier to look at Ashley’s commas. There is a space before it and after it.

    Like , this

    methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm
    ill wanna miss , drew being

    thats me 46732 said
    This blog is great , just

    and

    Ashley from her blog
    some of them also , looks like Drew

  4. rescueapet–You did but I only saw the methodical one so I thought I would put the others together. I am sorry if I stepped on toes.

  5. I still say SHE is the HE that I am thinking of. Course the HE I’m thinking of I don’t think would be intelligent enough to come up with the word “methodical”, lol.

  6. Well, methodical probably knew that a lot of people from different sites (even those with their own … Amanda, Lavanda, Sher …) also read here … and if posted here would bring back to their sites.

  7. I’m sorry … but ANYONE can imitate the comma thing. I just don’t see it as tried and true evidence.

  8. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Ducky, not boring.

    We just don’t know what is going on.

    Ashley back everything up … good advice. Who said that? Don’t want to go back to other page.

    Am thinking Miss A, brilliant web designed would already have everything backed up.
    ———————————————————
    You would have thunk that one! lol Not boring? I think that Ashley flew the coop.

    Rescue-I have thought that she was methodical for a few days. How would methodical know about Ashley’s to begin with? Where is your secret decoder book-hurry 😉

  9. IMO

    Someone said “I think Ashley is _________” and that was not Ashley but is one of Ashley’s friends or maybe was one of the other women who came forward or just someone Ashley knows. And that is why she is quiet.

    But Basherette thinks it is because her IP is now known and JB has silenced her (through LE).

    But was that fact or just Bash’s guess?

    IDK.

  10. Wonder if someone chatted with DP and didn’t realize that BPD95969 was Drew Peterson until it was posted on her site.

    And wonder if someone saw THEIR photo on the adult site screen that Ashley posted.

    I wonder a lot of things.

  11. Ashley the blogger, at least on her “new” site, has a distinct way of writing. Like putting things in parenthesis by leaving a space ( such as this ) , and leaving a space before a comma , such as this.

    Ashley doesn’t use a period after the end of a sentence – she does the dash thing. She ends sentences like this …

    Not that any of this means anything, but it’s just what I observed. That’s exactly the style “methodical” used for the one and only post here to direct us to Ashley’s site. At least, I think it’s the one and only time “methodical” posted here.

  12. Wonder if someone chatted with DP and didn’t realize that BPD95969 was Drew Peterson until it was posted on her site.

    And wonder if someone saw THEIR photo on the adult site screen that Ashley posted.

    I wonder a lot of things.
    ______________-

    That’s why I went and told Ashley to remove the women’s faces. I don’t think it was right. Even if they did post their own…they have the right to determine if they want their photo’s associated with Drew Peterson all over the net. Not Ashley’s right.

  13. Confused me because it was #9 and we already had a #9. Don’t know how long it’s been there.

    Are you all reading!

  14. Wow. I think that I was just given the creeps by someone being able to get his receipt from AmeteurMatch. I’m sure that it can’t be legal. Anyone?

  15. OK.. Ashley says this “don’t mind my name being blacked out I did this one last week before I decided to let me yahoo screen name be known ..” Then why on that picture does it show her name blacked out on July 4th? That was not last week? That was three days ago. When did she divulge…or whomever divulge her screenname?

  16. duckyone // July 7, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    Wow. I think that I was just given the creeps by someone being able to get his receipt from AmeteurMatch. I’m sure that it can’t be legal. Anyone?
    _________________

    Ducky, I am POSITIVE that would not be let go by Brodsky and Drew. Wouldn’t ya think? That is personal info. The only way AGAIN that could have been achieved is if she signed him up herself and the fax is legit coming to her/him. Darn. It’s all so confusing. She/He is probably having a good laugh at us all and I will admit…she/he has reeled us in! I’ll give her credit………..she has no fears of the law. YIKES! I just cannot imagine getting that info illegally and then posting it!

  17. Guess I wouldn’t say “last week, on the 4th” we went to the beach. I would say “we went to the beach a few days ago for the 4th of July”. Ok. sorry. Just getting literal again.

  18. margee – no problem!!!!!

    Many of us could see that “methodical” is Ashley. At first, it was meant to look like just anyone sending us over there, but we can deduce it was and is Ashley.

    As to all the chit chat about her being found out, she sure proved us (me!!!!!) wrong. She is one, smart, methodical lady!!!!!

  19. Some of Ashley’s stuff is so technical, at least to someone like me who’s not that computer savy, that I wouldn’t know what it means, but if she says it “proves” something, I’m with her!

  20. Don’t think methodical was Ashley but is someone who is Ashley’s minion.

    Wonder what time Ashley’s new post went up. Because didn’t someone knew about Drew not hiding is IP when chatting with Ashley before it was posted on Ashley’s site?

  21. I am still in shock that she got that receipt. Yesterday, or the other day, she said that she called AmateurMatch and they gave her information on Drew’s account. Simply, not legal. Since she admitted to getting it faxed to her, she may be getting into trouble.

    None of this, and what has been going on for the past week is a good reflection on all parties. I wish that everyone would take clues from the Savio’s and Stebic’s on how to act with class. JMO

  22. What is the point? Drew was on a sex site. So, Ashley commits a criminal act to gain that information? We all know he’s a creep. Never mind. I am just so sick of all of this drama. How does this benefit Finding Stacy? It’s a ping pong match on who can stoop the lowest. JMO

    Ducky stepping away for now.

  23. Ducky,
    I got the impression that someone faxed it to her, not AmateurMatch. A citizen.

    And I don’t see where winnts sees that DP was a member since 1995!

    Winnts said…
    Hmmm 1995…let’s see that made Stacy only 11 when he was trolling the net.

    July 7, 2008 9:09 PM

    (and a second post later).

  24. I am still in shock that she got that receipt. Yesterday, or the other day, she said that she called AmateurMatch and they gave her information on Drew’s account. Simply, not legal. Since she admitted to getting it faxed to her, she may be getting into trouble.

    None of this, and what has been going on for the past week is a good reflection on all parties. I wish that everyone would take clues from the Savio’s and Stebic’s on how to act with class. JMO
    _______________

    I agree . However, how can we NOT talk about it when she keeps reeling us in with all the Drew evidence? If anything, I think people are just bored with waiting for the GJ to be done and for Drew to be arrested and the media hasn’t covered anything on Nancy Grace or Greta…so it is “logical” that everyone is now embroiled in reading this stuff she is posting. Also, even those involved in the Lisa Stebic’s case do not have one as blatantly assinine as DP is!

  25. ducky – I understand your thought, honestly, really, I do.

    My explanation is that she is just proving a point with that. Yes, he’s doing something some find distasteful, but he’s within his rights to do so. What Ashley is doing is proving him to be a liar, because he denies, denies, denies doing things like this, and then sends out his lawyer to do the same thing. If he hasn’t learned to keep his mouth shut by now, he might as well just sit back and enjoy the show, because it’s going to be very entertaining.

  26. Hey all..gotta go now…hubby has a show for us to watch…will catch up in the morning. Oh it’s going to be a busy a.m. , I just have a feeling! LOL. G’nite all.

  27. What would be the best way to aquire IPs from members of certain forums? The same IP’s someone I will call “j” has been saying have been threaten his client online…

    What type of lawyer would love dragging certain bloggers into court?

    What would be the best way to elicit negative reponse’s from people?

    What type of lawyer would have a great time suponeaing certain people, just to annoy them and get some more chapters for a book?

    Why would ISP let this type of thing go on? We all know what they did to Ric Mims over his blog…

    Please be careful.

  28. Rescue, can you PM me somewhere (dont’ ya hate that) and I’ll read it late late late tonight or tomorrow … facs knows all about my laptop … ask her if she comes back!

  29. pamom40ish-love the name. lol. Are you thinking that JB is doing all of this to gather IP’s because he says that Drew has been threatened? Ok-I would think that if JB wanted the IP addresses then he certainly would have subpoenaed the Admin at FSP. This is where he was saying that DP was “threatened.” I’m not excluding that Ashley might be JB or someone in their “camp” That may be a real possibility.

    Noway-you slipped that one in on me. Not a crime yet, but if that document was obtained in an illegal way, there will be heck to pay. Provided that Ashley isn’t JB 😉

  30. Ducky, I don’t think JB is 100 lbs and wears a size 5, lol. Seriously, I think she’s a woman, and is who she says she is. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see. She’s fooled a lot of people so far, and personally, she’s really beginning to earn my respect for being smart enough to outwit everyone so far. Legalities aside, she really seems to know what she wants to do and how to get it accomplished. JMO.

  31. I, for one, have learned my lesson about Ashley’s vulnerability! I am certainly no longer going to express an opinion about her being busted and shut down. She’s proven everyone wrong.

    As to LE coming for her, maybe they can’t find her! She certainly seems to know what she’s doing.

    Mission Impossible IV. Make that Mission Accomplished!

  32. Cfs-where did you get that one? Ashley is 100 lbs. and a size 5. She’s not bald is she? lol I dunno what to believe anymore. If she has outsmarted all of them, kudos to her. I really hope that she has legal representation. That would be a smart idea. I would hate to see her doing this, speaking the truth, and then in legal trouble for not doing things the “right” way.

  33. Ducky, Ashley said so, in response to Lavanda asking her if she was male or female.

    Ashley said…
    Lavanda , I am 100% female – I weigh 110 lbs and wear a size 5 .

    July 7, 2008 9:15 PM

  34. Sorry for the typo, and Noway thanks for correcting the 110 pounds. But yes Ducky, that’s where I saw it. Usually don’t read the comments there except the first few after she posts new stuff. Then it gets to be too much.

    However, I’m really confused about why so many people think she’s this person or that person, or three people, or a man, or whatever else. I have to admit at first I thought I knew too at the very beginning after her first post, but boy was I ever wrong. Guess people are just speculating maybe? Or do they have more than just speculation to go on? Hmmm.

  35. lol … cfs didn’t realize you were wrong on the weight. Just read Lavanda’s Q and saw the response.

    I’m sticking with she is who she says she is but have to admit that behavior around here is wonky … so maybe her friends told two friends and they told two friends … and her pals are everywhere!

    😀

  36. Now this is funny, I wonder if they are interested in making a video for BMs new porn site or maybe not…………………….LOL

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    nobigots said…
    Hey bigM
    if you see this go to Jimmys on rt.30 tomorrow at 8:00 pm
    My cousins wanna chat with you.

  37. I saw that too … wondered whether it was a threat and it was the last thing BM would ever do. 😀

    I posted at SYM too. BM was gone by then …

  38. I don’t know. Had to email Rescue just to help me figure out why everyone thought her site was down, lol. I had already seen her stuff about 7:30 after 1wonderwoman came on at 7:21. It always seems to pop up after one of her posts for some reason. 😀 At any rate, I knew her site wasn’t down and she wasn’t buted, at least I didn’t think so, but then I thought you all knew something I didn’t, but for the life of me, I could see what it was, lol.

  39. cfs, I’m the village idiot, so don’t ask me anything!

    I’m going to get some sleep. I’ve read my bedtime story and need time to digest it all.

    😀

  40. I’m back, and let me say I’m horrified that someone was able to get Drew’s receipt, if in fact it is his.

    That is a complete lack of security and privacy, and it makes me sick.

    Regardless of what anyone thinks of Drew, he has not been arrested, charged, nor convicted of any crime. I know some of you want nothing more than Drew to put on the stake, but enough already.

    I’m personally going to contact the ISP myself in regards to this.

    What a stupid, inmature, dangerous game someone is playing, but it’s time it stops.

  41. Oh and if she does have a lawyer, it must be Joel, there can’t possibly be two just like Joel.

    No lawyer in their right mind would advise her to put a receipt of someone elses on the internet. Regardless of how she got it, it wasn’t right to post.

    I think she is on borrow time, and falling for everyone telling her how wonderful she is.

  42. LLTBF – okay, but Chief McGury might have some tales to tell about Drew using the company computer to do the very same thing.

    Just sayin……

  43. How are you getting Chief McGury into this?

    Does it say he was logged on at work?

    And just sayin….

    If Chief McGury is going to go after Drew for doing things on the computer, for instance running people etc as a favor, he should watch where he is throwing stones.

    Show me one cop that has never, ever done that, not once in their career?

    I remember it was brought up by the Chief, and hasnt been spoken about since.

    And I really do have to say, I’m shocked Rescue that you are applauding her behavior. You seem to be a person that is on the up and up, and one that understand’s and follows the law.

    What she has done is clearly a violation of many laws.

  44. The recent posts by “Ashley” with Drew’s supposed receipt and the other items are total frabrications. They were all created by her, and are fakes and forgeries. “Ashley” must have been up for days with photoshop or other such software creating them. (She got his IP from previous e-mails and used it to try to give some validity to the forgeries, but they are fakes) Mr Brodsky has spoken……

  45. Let, no offense, and truly I see exactly where you’re coming from, but Ashley isn’t trying to do what’s in the best interest of Drew. She doesn’t give a hoot in hello about who cares if Drew hasn’t been charged with a crime. All she wants to do is expose him for the liar he is, and so far, she’s doing a dang good job. If you feel the need to contact someone to try and stop her, that’s certainly your prerogative. However, I think if Drew Peterson wants to be filmed as a Mr. Mom who does no wrong, that’s just a much of an underhanded tactic as what Ashley is doing, legalities aside. Personally, I’m glad she’s got the good on him and is exposing him for the liar he is. JMO.

  46. cfs –

    I understand what you are saying, I really do.

    But she has crossed a line, and it’s gone beyond her original mission.

    In my eyes, not that it makes any difference, she is just as sleazy as Drew.

    And how do we even know she is completely honest?

  47. tributelady1949 // July 7, 2008 at 11:16 pm

    The recent posts by “Ashley” with Drew’s supposed receipt and the other items are total frabrications. They were all created by her, and are fakes and forgeries. “Ashley” must have been up for days with photoshop or other such software creating them. (She got his IP from previous e-mails and used it to try to give some validity to the forgeries, but they are fakes) Mr Brodsky has spoken……

    +++++++++++++++++++++

    I’m sure.

  48. This whole case has been mudded, and I’m afraid if it ever comes to trial, there isn’t going to be a clean person to put on the stand.

    You now have the Sharon and friends people fighting. You have Ashley posting receipts that don’t belong to her.

    When does it stop and get back to what this is really all about? We know Drew is sleazy.

    And you know what, not directed at you cfs, but you wanna talk about sleazy, sleazy is trying to auction off Cassandra for a day also. Every person involved in this case has done something sleazy.

  49. Let, we don’t know anything for sure in any of this. I’m not saying at all that she is pure and pristine, and judging by their communications, I doubt Drew would have wasted his time on her if she had been. Maybe it was all setup, I don’t know. Bottom line, she got what she wanted if it was. If it wasn’t and she’s doing this for revenge, she still got what she needs to expose him.

  50. Expose him as what, a sleazy guy? For the love of God, he’s been married 4 times, and cheated on all of them, we know he’s sleazy.

    It’s the supposed receipt that really has be fired up. I’m shocked, seriously, that people would think “it’s fine, she’s showing him to be what he is.”

  51. cfs, sorry I’m not anger at you, at all. You have been kind enough to respond to my posts, to make me at least see where everyone is coming from.

  52. Let, I don’t worry about any of that, or even give it a second thought. Who they put on the witness stand is totally out my control. All we can do really is talk about the things that are going on, and Ashley happens to be one of them. We all have our own opinions about her, but what else is new? Yes, there’s a lot of sleaze in this, but that’s also out of my control. There just aren’t very many upstanding characters in this whole mess, but so what? They are what they are. I can’t change them, nor control them…but we can discuss them. 😀

  53. cfs, exactly.

    And shouldn’t the point and focus be put on seeking Justice for these women?

    And with Justice comes a trial, and I’m afraid this case will be so broken, that it may never come to a conviction…..:(

  54. And yes Let. We all know what kind of person Drew is, so it’s almost like over exposure if you know what I mean. Really, I do understand what you’re saying.

  55. Let-thank you. I thought that I was the only one to think that this is not only creepy but illegal. I do not understand why LE has let this continue. IMO-Drew Peterson is the scum of the earth, but Ashley’s actions are no better. If she had Stacy or Kathleen in mind, she wouldn’t be posting his porn activity, she would be going to LE.

    I keep going back to none of this matters (we all know Drew is a liar), and NONE of this helps bring a missing woman home or helps with convicting him with 2 deaths.

    Has the world gone mad? Really? I’ll hop down off my soap box now. I am just so disgusted.

  56. Yes, the point and focus should be on that, but it’s hard to stay on that topic and nothing else when all of the outlandish events and circumstances come into the picture. We can’t ignore those either, and it wouldn’t be fair to expect everyone to. They’re just part of the scenery that you pass by on the road to finding out where this is going to end up. 😀

  57. cfs, first of all, I appreciate being able to be open with you, and toss things back and forth….:)

    Ducky, I think they have all gone mad, seriously.

    She may not be going to LE because she has nothing, other then them chatting. So what, they chatted, he’s a liar, but so far he hasn’t done a crime in regards to her.

    And the porn business is BIG business, its not shocking that he might go to porn sites. Do you know how many men, and women go to them? It’s none of our business what anyone does in their own home, and what they might enjoy. Now if he truly believes Stacy ran off, then I say he has ever right to go to what he wants to.

    What God forbid I bring up Stacy’s racy text messages, or going out and meeting Scott, even when Drew asked her not too.

    I don’t understand the double standard.

  58. Hey Ducky. Seriously, you and Let just have more principles than I do. I’ll admit it. And I admire you for it. I’m just not taking it that seriously because I didn’t cause either one of them to be the kind of people they are, or to do what they’re doing/have done.

  59. I think the only reason the porn stuff is interesting is that it was brought up in a couple of other cases (in the courtroom), like the Lacy Peterson case and more recently the Neil Entwistle case, to show that these men were not the faithful doting husbands that they claimed to be at the time of their wives’ deaths, but rather men who were looking for new partners.

  60. cfs, ok that made me laugh, thanks…..;)

    Me with principles…I don’t even know if that’s what I would call it. To me it’s just a matter of Justice, plain and simple.

    If Drew killed Kathleen and Stacy then he needs to be convicted and put away for life. If he didn’t, then he needs to be left alone to live his life.

  61. Facs, I think you are exactly right.

    But there is one big difference. Both Rachel and Lacy had no “baggage” per say.

    I am not saying Stacy is guilty of anything. But we do know she had exchanged messages with Scott, and they were racy in nature. She also went out to meet him.

    Rachel and Lacy had none of that. They were almost as clean as pure white snow.

  62. Oh Cfs-you have principles. Come on! I do take invading someone’s privacy and forgery very seriously.

    None of us caused either of them to go to a porn site, nor do I really care. Plenty of people visit those sites 😉

    My only opinion is that this is just another reason why these families aren’t given much respect, and the respect that they once had, is long gone. It’s been ages since I read something about the victims, Stacy, Kathleen and the children. THAT is what truly saddens me. I do believe that something needs to happen to make these poor women the focus. Not someone like Ashley. I do agree that she “got him good,” but who the hell cares-there are two dead women and children that have NO MOM’s!

    Ok-really going to bed and getting off that box of mine.

    Night all!

  63. The wierdest part about all this is, if you knew me in real life, I take nothing serious, I can laugh at just about anything/everything.

    But for some odd reason this is all just rubbing me wrong. I can’t put my finger on it.

  64. letthetruthbefree // July 7, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    Facs, I think you are exactly right.

    But there is one big difference. Both Rachel and Lacy had no “baggage” per say.
    *****************************************

    I’m just saying that there’s a precedence for the husband’s interest in dating prior to his wife’s death/disappearance to be admissable in court.

    That’s why it’s significant here.

  65. Facs, do I agree. I think we will hear about it more and more, with a good majority of spouses that kill.

  66. Rut roh, big storms coming. Be back after they are gone.

    Take care, and cfs, thanks again for allowing me to vent, and trying to see my point of view. I value that, as I value your views and wisdom.

Comments are closed.