Your Thread – July 7

Here’s Monday’s thread folks.

~By posting on this blog you agree to be bound by the rules of this blog and by our Terms of Use. If you spot a rule violation, send an e-mail to reportabuse@mysuburbanlife.com.

Advertisements

326 thoughts on “Your Thread – July 7

  1. Good Morning all! Bucket, just try to wade through the poop Dear. Word Press may need some of these comments for something down the line since certain threats have been posted here in the recent past. 😀

    Looks like I’ve missed some interesting conversation since I was here last, and will again today probably. Lots going on at the moment, but I’ll be checking in when I can. Bash, I hate I missed you last night. Good to see you back, and I hope you’re feeling better.

    From the gist of things, looks like Miss Ashley might have a little something on Mr. Brodsky too, or at least that’s what I seem to be getting out of the name she called him that is on T-shirts that PM said are sold in department stores and on the Internet, according to Noway. Wasn’t aware of them myself, and I can’t imagine anyone having such low self esteem to wear one, but to each her own. Will be interesting to see how Ashley puts the finger on Joel, as well as Drew, if in fact she does have anything incriminataing on him. Bash may have been spot on with her post about a threesome, but gosh I hope not! Perish the thought!

    Well, you all have a great day, and I’ll pop in when I can.

  2. Morning Wonderwoman. It will be interesting to see what today brings. Hope it will be something good…..

  3. Wonder who the common friend is that Drew and Briney Spears are supposed to have? Maybe Ashley will share that at some point in the very near future. Would be too funny if it was Glenn Selig. 😀

  4. I’m here and reading, CFS. Going to pop on and off, but I wasn’t liking what I was seeing. However, I support Basherette 100%! Enough of that crap.

  5. Rescue, I do too, but he really isn’t worth the trouble. I mean, most of us really know what he is. Although, I might feel differently in her place.

  6. cfs, that would make sense … getting them both the publicity they deserve. 😀

    Glad I didn’t stay up after all … not only the battle here but Ashley didn’t post anything after all.

  7. cfs7360 // July 7, 2008 at 8:36 am

    Morning Wonderwoman. It will be interesting to see what today brings. Hope it will be something good…..
    ********

    Good morning Cfs…It certainly sounds like it will be an interesting day

  8. Then again, Drew might know a street rat he’d tried to help in the past, and at some point the guy was “dating” Britney Spears. 😉

  9. rescueapet // July 7, 2008 at 8:54 am

    Good morning. I’m here too. But I can see that I ‘m wondering why.
    ********

    Good one….careful now your starting to sound like me …lol

  10. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 9:07 am

    Hi, all! Just catching up and will be back.
    *******

    And I will expect a full report when you get back …lol j/k

  11. Full report? Nothing anywhere except people who stayed up late waiting for Ashley to post something (which she did not) and the discussion about what she might be posting … webcam photos of a nekkid DP?

    If that’s it, I hope it comes with a warning screen first … that’s somewhere I just do not want to go.

    Not even in the interest of justice. 😀

  12. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 9:42 am

    Full report? Nothing anywhere except people who stayed up late waiting for Ashley to post something (which she did not) and the discussion about what she might be posting … webcam photos of a nekkid DP?

    If that’s it, I hope it comes with a warning screen first … that’s somewhere I just do not want to go.

    Not even in the interest of justice.
    ++++++++++++
    Ditto that!

  13. I was wondering…kinda off topic…but…has anyone else done the math on this….If DP was able to lets say actually avoid prison and somehow get to raise his children…He will be
    69yrs when his youngest hits 18. SO much for retirement eh ?

  14. Maybe if that’s what Ashley has in mind she will put those black marks over the pertinant parts. 😀 At any rate, I hope that is something she will NOT post. Gross.

  15. 1wonderwoman // July 7, 2008 at 9:52 am

    I was wondering…kinda off topic…but…has anyone else done the math on this….If DP was able to lets say actually avoid prison and somehow get to raise his children…He will be
    69yrs when his youngest hits 18. SO much for retirement eh ?

    ++++++++++++++++++++
    Sorry, not following this….

    I don’t think having his children at home has really stopped him from doing too much….at least it seems that way to me.

  16. BigM was speaking the truth about one thing. I do disagree with most of what he says, and I do say so.

    He didn’t like that I was posting Joel’s comments here, but I explained that I copied them so as to not misquote Joel. I said I’d try to refrain from doing so in the future.

    It became a nonissue when several others said that it was a way to get information out (and in fact, many of our posts here are quoted there or paraphrased there) so it was a little like the pot calling the kettle black.

    It really became a nonissue when someone other than me posted Joel’s last comment. 😉

    I just try not to get involved in the name calling or personal attacks, but believe me, I’ve erased my share of erasing and editing before posting … here and at SYM. 😉

  17. “erased my share of erasing” …. maybe that should be “done my share of erasing” 😀 😀

    Okay. . . there will be no more making fun of anyone who mistypes … unless they are making fun of someone else and make mistakes in their post!

  18. It looks to me like Mr. Mom is staying up late cruising for dates and porno on the Internet, or else hanging out in bars till all hours. Wonder who’s looking out for the little ones in the morning while he’s sleeping in….the older boys?

    The video Glenn Selig did of his making sandwiches in the kitchen should have included him sitting in front of his computer chatting it up with the girlies on the net too, IMO. And followed him to the bars and watched him fawn all over the chickydoos. That video was only part of the story……

  19. cfs, someone is bound to make a video with pictures of Mr. Mom interspersed with pictures of Porno Drew … and set to some appropriate music!

    😀

  20. Hi everyone,
    We just went through and deleted some posts from early this morning and will be going back to delete posts that contain references to them. Just a heads up so ya’ll aren’t left wondering where your comments went.

  21. Morning All –

    What a yucky day today is. It’s a good day to nap, and read a book.

    I haven’t looked at Ashley but read here that she didn’t put a new post up, so I didn’t miss anything.

    For someone that doesn’t seem to like liars etc, she doesn’t have a problem not keeping her word either…..hmmmmm!!!!!

  22. 😉 Gatehouse, if we comment on your comment, will that make more work for you?

    cfs, I have a good friend who is a bad speller but for whom I would not trade anything; I’m short; my husband is follicly challenged. There is always someone we love who has the attributes that are being attacked.

  23. Just wanted clarify the previous note…we deleted certain comments. All actual posts are still here.

    noway-
    as long as the comments are kept dinner-table clean, comment away on our comments 🙂

  24. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Gatehouse, if we comment on your comment, will that make more work for you?

    cfs, I have a good friend who is a bad speller but for whom I would not trade anything; I’m short; my husband is follicly challenged. There is always someone we love who has the attributes that are being attacked.
    ++++++++++++++++++++
    That’s so true Noway, and as I said, you have such great diplomacy, and humor. You have such a wonderful way of diffusing a bad situation that many of us wish we had as well. 😀

  25. http:// drewpetersonforum.smfforfree4.com/index.php

    http:// drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

    Will be moving to my laptop shortly and wanted these links. 🙂

  26. Thank you for the kind words, cfs. My hubby is still laughing at the comment about me having tact … now we add diplomacy … he’ll probably need oxygen after his laughing fit stops. 😀

  27. cfs7360 // July 7, 2008 at 9:27 am

    Wonder who the common friend is that Drew and Briney Spears are supposed to have? ****************************************

    Maybe a gossip reporter or paparazzi? She started confusing them with friends at some point.

  28. Should I bother going back to read last night? I got so annoyed at about 1am that I just signed off. I was afraid of what I was going to say! 🙂

  29. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 11:27 am

    cfs7360 // July 7, 2008 at 9:27 am

    Wonder who the common friend is that Drew and Britney Spears are supposed to have? ****************************************

    Maybe a gossip reporter or paparazzi? She started confusing them with friends at some point.

    +++++++++++++++

    Or Drew.

  30. Thanks, Gatehouse.

    I’m loving the Britney nonsense, because it’s surely a fabrication; it’s obvious he tells porkies (rhyming slang. pork pie = lie) all the while and especially to women.

    Ashley’s method’s exquisite because I’m sure he hasn’t a clue which he’s said to whom, if anything at all. It’s brilliant to see to witness his come-uppance and it doesn’t matter in the slightest who Ashley is.

  31. Does anyone have a court date for the gun charges?

    Bash, your list of possible revelations to come…I can’t decide quite if it is even funnier because it’s all so (unbelieveably) plausible.

    Does that make sense to anyone?

  32. Rescue, I saw that you have registered at Ashley’s new site. I haven’t yet, and don’t know that I will. Just thought I would do a little waiting and watching before I made the leap. Still a little gun shy from the last time I ventured away. 😀

  33. CFS – I registered on Saturday night (I think that’s when I did it), but deactivated it Sunday morning when there was discussions regarding scrapping it. At least that’s what I thought was going to happen.

    I’m really on the fence about it, because it’s just too volatile for me, as the blog has become. Not that there’s anything wrong with it, I guess, it’s just not for me. Like SYM. Once I registered, I didn’t go back and just read here what Noway would post regarding Brodsky’s comments. When I went back around the time you mentioned some things, I was deleted from his site shortly thereafter.

  34. I wondered…but no more..I was the one that misbehaved this morning……..I guess I just lost my cool. No excuse. Sorry to all.

  35. Oh, what the heck, CFS, what I really think I don’t know what impact anymore Ashley’s stuff is going to have. There’s too many sideshows going on. It’s turning into a Mr. and Mrs. Bickerson kind of thing now.

    Rather, I hope we hear something in the mainstream media about the fiasco regarding DP’s comments to the crime writer, and if the writer is even worthy of a GJ appearance. Now, that would be interesting!

  36. Rescue, didn’t see that conversation about scrapping it. Hmmm. Just caught a small post with your nic on it while I was skimming. Since I’ve been accused (and others here as well) of some posts on the old blog that I didn’t make, I’m just stating publicly that I’m here only…..at least for now. 😀

  37. Yes it would Rescue, but I think Joel has his hands full right now trying to worry about what all Ashley has, maybe even on him, lol. It wouldn’t surprise me though if the GJ did call Matt Phelps to testify, and I hope they do.

  38. 1wonderwoman // July 7, 2008 at 12:23 pm

    I wondered…but no more..I was the one that misbehaved this morning……..I guess I just lost my cool. No excuse. Sorry to all.
    +++++++++++++++++++
    I think we all lost it a little this morning Wonder. Sometimes it’s just a little hard to keep quiet when others don’t. 😀

  39. This is coo-el. I’m not usually around at the same time as everyone else.

    LOL, cfs…”hands full” is a bit of an understatement! …and I’d only been reflecting on the 2 court dates looming just 3 days apart.

  40. I missed all the ruckus, I guess. Anyway to describe it in a nutshell without risk of it starting up again?

  41. Not really Facs. Suffice it to say “someone” made a bunch of posts that were bad enough to get deleted, and some of us responded to them when we shouldn’t have. This may get deleted too. 😀

  42. When I say “shouldn’t have” I mean me in particular. Others had a reason, but their’s were deleted too for reasons I understand. Capiche?

  43. sher69 // July 7, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    I was referring to last nite is all!
    Need a break, I forgot I had an appt. this morn, and stayed up till 6 am…Im draggin tail!
    +++++++++++++
    I wasn’t on until this morning and saw what was still there from last night. Glad it’s gone now.

  44. MBS, that’s why I just stay away from posting or reading on there, except for what Ashley’s posts about Drew and the im’s, etc.

  45. MBS, I guess there’s some entertainment value in watching the mental cases go at each other. 😀

  46. Hi again everyone,
    We just wanted to remind you all of the report abuse option if any of you spot rule violations. There were a handful of posts this morning that violated nearly every rule of this blog but we did not receive any abuse reports. If you spot anything like this in the future send an e-mail to reportabuse@mysuburbanlife.com and an e-mail will be sent to everyone that monitors comments here. This helps us catch violations quicker so we can delete inappropriate comments as soon as one of us receives the e-mail notification.

    The vast majority of the other comments were deleted because they contained copied information from the offending comments or simply to help make the thread read better.

  47. MBS, I have to laugh at the number of Ashley suspects everyone has … me included. No matter where you read, you will find someone suspecting a poster from another board.

    And when the mask comes off … who will it be?

    Oh … the drama of it all! 😀

  48. Gatehouse, I guess it’s better that you get duplicate reports than none at all. I will keep that in mind next time I wake up and find the remains of a battle. 😀

  49. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Gatehouse, I guess it’s better that you get duplicate reports than none at all. I will keep that in mind next time I wake up and find the remains of a battle.
    ++++++++++
    Good point Noway, as I should have done this time. But…I am glad I got to read them before they were deleted, sorry. 😀

  50. Hey Noway – I sent you a PM at Lorie’s.

    I hate when people announce that they sent PMs so I apologize to everyone for doing that! It’s just that I don’t normally post anywhere but here, so I don’t think she would be on the lookout for it and might miss it.

  51. Facs, that’s why some of the rest of us have to do that too. It’s not meant to be snooty or secretive at all. This seems to be the only place we can tell anyone to look for one, you know?

  52. I think so Facs. I’ve never posted there, but if there’s not a CFS7360, it’s Angel. I’ll go look. I only use those two nics.

  53. Hi, all. I’m back and forth … just leaving my computer running. My laptop is acting up and keeps shutting down so I’m going to go back to the desktop eventually. 😀

  54. I wonder how Joel’s lawsuit against Sharon for obstruction of justice is going.

    He’s got another week to prepare for the weapons charge (unless it gets postponed again).

  55. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    I wonder how Joel’s lawsuit against Sharon for obstruction of justice is going.

    He’s got another week to prepare for the weapons charge (unless it gets postponed again).
    ++++++++++++++
    Noway, looks like Joel is going to get him a BUNCH of lawsuits to handle from having Drew as a client. 😀

  56. Noway, I’m like you in that I swap from desktop to laptop when I’m online. Nice to take the laptop outside and sit by the pool. 😀

  57. I’m stuck behind my desktop. I need to rearrange this room so I’m not staring at a wall behind it tho.

    And yeah, I wonder if Sharon has actually been served with anything at all via Brodsky.

  58. I sometimes forget to log off the desktop so people think I’m online 24 hours a day. What a life that would be … 🙄

  59. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    I wonder how Joel’s lawsuit against Sharon for obstruction of justice is going.
    ***********

    Ah, yes, that lawsuit. That was for forbidding the cops to look at her video capture of the egging, right? Don’t forget, he went berzerk about the picture taking incident with Anthony (“detained” him) and threatened lawsuit for that. Plus, I’m sure he’s probably very busy preparing his lawsuit against Matt Phelps also.

    I’m anxiously awaiting for JB to tell us how the CT Attorney General’s Office handled his forwarding to them of his allegations about Phelps.

  60. Rescue, I guess he’ll just have to pick his battles and figure out which if any of these things deserves his attention.

    The weapons charge IMO is the only thing he should be concerned with right now.

    One the GJ makes a decision, then he can decide how he is going to spend his time.

  61. Joel has discovered the importance of being e-savvy:

    Joel A. Brodsky said…
    …I just took a CLE course on e-discovery (Illinois just started requiring CLE last year), and there are new federal rules on e-discovery. The gist of the course was that under the new rules almost everything on one’s hard drive (or in this case a database) can be copied so the parties experts can look for information. It’s scary, but you have to remember that everything that you put out on the net, or type on your computer, can be gotten to and can possibly be traced back to you. I have started to take precautions, such as “self-destructing” (self erasing) e-mails and im’s, automatic de-fragging of hard drives, and even periodic cleaning of the drives with specialized security programs. Welcome to the digital world.

    July 5, 2008 10:01 AM

  62. Well, I’m outta here for awhile. Don’t know when I’ll be back, but probably sometime late tonight. Maybe Ashley will get more “stuff” up, hopefully before midnight anyway. 😀

  63. I’m sure he is also passing his learnings on to his #1 client, especially in the light of Ashley’s discoveries.

  64. It’s scary, but you have to remember that everything that you put out on the net, or type on your computer, can be gotten to and can possibly be traced back to you.
    _____________
    NOW he tells Drew that! 🙂

    What’s in those emails and IMs that they need to be erased? 😉

  65. I’m not sure, but wouldn’t you have to reformat your entire hard drive to actually get rid of anything that couldn’t be traced?

  66. LE might need to get a warrant to search the computer he has now. No telling what they would find on it. Could be more than what was on the ones they took the first time. You never know.

  67. AFAIK – it is just about impossible to completely remove files and Internet history from your harddrive. Even if you delete something or add it to the trash, it’s still actually there (albeit, possibly in pieces).

    There may well be utilities that can scrub it though. I wonder how well they work?

    I guess Drew could tell us.

  68. Maybe Joel is planning for the possibility that one his clients would need to scrub their hard drives clean. 😉

  69. Bye, cfs … I was switching from laptop. I’ll be going to library whenever my little one wakes up.

  70. Joel is probably just letting his buddies at SYM know they better clean their hard drive which is about impossible. For the time and money to do that you can buy a new hard drive and burn the old one.

  71. iknoweverythinglol // July 7, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    For the time and money to do that you can buy a new hard drive and burn the old one.
    **********************************

    I took a hammer to one once…

  72. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    Joel has discovered the importance of being e-savvy:

    Joel A. Brodsky said…
    …I just took a CLE course on e-discovery (Illinois just started requiring CLE last year), and there are new federal rules on e-discovery. The gist of the course was that under the new rules almost everything on one’s hard drive (or in this case a database) can be copied so the parties experts can look for information. It’s scary, but you have to remember that everything that you put out on the net, or type on your computer, can be gotten to and can possibly be traced back to you. I have started to take precautions, such as “self-destructing” (self erasing) e-mails and im’s, automatic de-fragging of hard drives, and even periodic cleaning of the drives with specialized security programs. Welcome to the digital world.

    July 5, 2008 10:01 AM
    ______________________________

    Facs, that is probably the reason the ISP folks kept Drew’s computers so long. Probably had Drew worried that they would find stuff and that is why Brodsky researched it…. I’m sure they probably got a lot from those computers. More than enough!

  73. IKELOL – For the record, I lifted that quote from Joel’s comments on a story about the Viacom/Google decision at legalpub.

  74. Lavanda, do you get the feeling that Joel has the current Ashley situation very much on his mind? And maybe he’s done a little surfing himself that he’s not feeling too good about? He’s already had one drama-laden divorce…

  75. Facs, I imagine it depends on how much more that “Ashley” divulges. Thus far, in my opinion, nothing much was divulged that most people didn’t already know about. With the exception of the braziness (or should I say stupidity) to pose for a one way Webcam with a stuffed animal while one’s child is in the background! Now that totally is disgusting! Makes one wonder what he was chatting and talking about while doing something so ridiculous? So much for Mr. Mom. Course we should have known when he dragged in the pizza boxes from the grocery store and paper plates at dinner time! LOL

  76. Lavondadolce – Where did you get the idea there is a court date for the cameras in Sharon’s yard? Brodsky threatened her with his usual legal mumbo jumbo, but there was nothing, at least that I’m aware of, filed or we would have heard about it. He did write to Chief McGury, who turned over his letter to the State’s Attorney, but I don’t think it went any further than that. I could be wrong.

  77. Facs, I think Brodsky is as full of himself as Drew is…I don’t think that either of them even realize that they are truly transparent and thier lies, white lies, stories and explanations just don’t jive with physical evidence and previous lies, white lies and stories that they’ve BOTH told…so yes, I believe he is nervous…but not too much…he’ll just keep digging a bigger hole. I do believe, however, Glenn Selig is probably pounding his desktop!

  78. rescue, ok. That was basically a question that I asked. I didn’t “hear” of a court date…I was responding to the post above in which someone asked about a lawsuit filed. When one is filed there is usually a court date. My mistake in not interpreting sarcasm? Never was good at that! LOL….nor in getting jokes. Sometimes too literal. Drives my husband nuts!

  79. Lavandadolce – sarcasm? Huh? I just wondered where you might have heard that because I didn’t, and I, in fact, said I could be wrong. I am sorry if you interpreted my answer to you as sarcastic. In fact, I’m quite shocked at that. Sorry.

  80. rescueapet // July 7, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    Lavandadolce – sarcasm? Huh? I just wondered where you might have heard that because I didn’t, and I, in fact, said I could be wrong. I am sorry if you interpreted my answer to you as sarcastic. In fact, I’m quite shocked at that. Sorry.
    ++++++++++++++
    Rescue, I think Lavanda was referring to Noway’s sarcasm about wondering about Sharon. I thought she (Noway) was being humorous and a little sarcastic, but Lavanda may have taken her seriously.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    I wonder how Joel’s lawsuit against Sharon for obstruction of justice is going.

    He’s got another week to prepare for the weapons charge (unless it gets postponed again).

  81. 😀
    I was being sarcastic when I asked about the lawsuit re Sharon’s cameras.

    Rescue, Lavanda recognized that the comment as being sarcastic (albeit a step or two later) but I don’t think she meant your reply was sarcastic!

    I see how the posts can be misunderstood!

    😀

  82. whew, oh, good. Am I glad you straightened me out about that. I thought that was unusual about Lavanda thinking that!!!!!! I am sorry, I had a “duh” moment.

    Bash – what update!

  83. I’ll be brief then.

    1) JB *can’t* file the obstruction charges- DA Glasgow determined he didn’t have a case. End of that story.

    2) *ALOT* of VERY personal information was posted several times late last night at Ashley’s blog- of course I made copies before it got deleted. The info has something to do with the FSP jihad *AND* who Ashley is. I’m still working on it.

    3) Kris will be testifying on Thursday at GJ.

    4) BigM is a putz.

  84. I think Ashley has been outed and is nervous about posting … have my own ideas on who she and the triad are. 😉

    Going out to blow bubbles … back soon …

  85. Thanks Bash!

    1. Great news. Doesn’t surprise me.
    2. I missed all that, but it’s probably a good thing.
    3. Glad to hear that. Thought he probably would.
    4. My sentiments exactly.

  86. Wow!

    What great news.

    Oh, how we are anxiously awaiting more.

    We appreciate you very much, Basherette!

  87. I wonder……is it safe for me to come back yet ?
    Again, I am so sorry for being disrespectful and rude earlier this morning .Thanks for the great update Bash.

  88. I just think that Ashley is Ashley but as far as the mutual friend or her DrewPettes (from whom we have not heard a word) … someone has hit the nail on the head and she is feeling a little more nervous.

    All speculation on my part.

  89. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    I think Ashley has been outed and is nervous about posting … have my own ideas on who she and the triad are.

    Going out to blow bubbles … back soon …
    ************************************

    Hey not fair, Come Back…Please share 🙂

  90. 1. Where did you hear about Sharon?
    2. What is the news from Ashley’s on who Ashley is? Don’t care about the personal stuff so much esp. about FSP.
    3. Where did you hear about Kris testifying?
    4. I can understand your personal feelings on this.

  91. Apparently Ashley knows the person who took some pics of DiP and co. at Tailgaters around 2:30AM recently…

    And whomever posted the identifying info had a rather below the belt attitude as they denigrated and identified family members, not to mention the horrific display of their absolute lack of knowledge with regards to the English language. To be honest, I can’t tell which one I am more upset about- the personal info or the massacre of English. It was all so amazingly squallid!

    I went ahead and registered at the new Ashley forum, just in case more info gets dropped off inadvertantly inbetween fluff posts.

    Does anyone here who has been to the “spew your anger” forum recommend it? I’m a bit curious to see if it really *is* JB and DP fronting that bit of guttersniping…

  92. I thought the spew your anger was all a joke … but you say people are actually posting there … as Anonymous or as their “real” user name?

  93. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    iknoweverythinglol // July 7, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    For the time and money to do that you can buy a new hard drive and burn the old one.
    **********************************

    I took a hammer to one once…

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Oh boy, there is a story there I am sure!!!!! LOL

    tt

  94. Bash, is the stuff from Ashley’s from her blog (with the pix) or from the new site where you have to register?

  95. Aw, you guys, I’m not keeping up with the new forums. Are you talking about the Justice for Stacy forum Ashley started that I registered for the other night (and since deactivated), or is there another one. Cuz, honestly, I pretty much stay here for the sanity.

    TIA.

  96. 1) Called Glasgow’s office. I certainly couldn’t expect JB to be honest about what was occurring regarding that!

    2) Still trying to decipher and segregate the crap from the pertinent info on the expose’ posts. Without names, the info I posted above is what I have determined so far.

    3) Deduction and process of elimination. If I’m wrong, you are more than cordially invited to witchslap me. 🙂

    4) Thank you. Even now, I find I am occasionally a bit shocked at his nefarious effrontery- so I do my best to fart in his general direction whenever possible.

  97. I just wondered where Bash saved the posts from … the insanity on the blog or the new forum that was supposed to eliminate the insanity.

    And I’m just trying to verify what Bash said about her 1-3 items … lol … I need the source of her info … 🙂

  98. Thanks, Bash … you went to the source, which is what Brodsky said to do (for # 1).

    I can wait on #2.

    Re #3 Since when anyone is testifying is hush hush … I wondered, but I agree with you. Thursday is as good a day as any. 🙂

    #4 … No comment. 😀

  99. The posts I am referring to regarding various people’s identities were posted after midnight on the original blog. They were deleted shortly thereafter. Hopefully anyone else who saw them and “copied” them also has honorable intentions for their use. Thus, I refuse to print anything that does not have any crucial info relating to her identity or the criminal/civil cases.

  100. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 5:14 pm

    1) Called Glasgow’s office. I certainly couldn’t expect JB to be honest about what was occurring regarding that!
    ***********************************

    You are my hero!

    4) Thank you. Even now, I find I am occasionally a bit shocked at his nefarious effrontery- so I do my best to fart in his general direction whenever possible.
    **********************************
    I’m sorry I wasn’t here for backup.

  101. Almost forgot to mention- ALL of the slander was posted by “Anonymous”. Clever of them, eh? NOT.

  102. Evening All –

    I have read the “new” site, and its very comical.

    The greatest part about it is, they are blaming it on Drew and Joel, but it’s very obvious that is all the cat people. And boy are they letting it all hang out.

    Just like FSP, no attention to Stacy and the case, it’s all about them, who’s friends with who, who *really* talks to Cassandra, who’s had Cassandra in their car blah, blah, blah.

    Oh and these are so called good friends of Sharons, so the focus really should be in Stacy and finding her.

    The DA’s office I hear need a new *HUGE* bottle of Advil along with the ISP.

  103. You couldn’t pay me to join at Ashley’s site. Sorry. But all that drama and divulging of personal information is a nightmare to people. I had enough of trying to “mommy” that blog site when it turned into a rally to harp on my son and his autism. Talk about sicko people.

    By the way, Rescue…lol…sorry that my post came off wrong. Whomever explained it to you that I was not directing that to you was accurate. Basically, I am not good with sarcasm, jokes, or anything stated as “jokingly” as I have the habit of taking things “literally”. (ESPECIALLY jokes!) And I cannot tell a joke, either. I always mess them up. lol. Sorry for the confusion.

  104. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 5:21 pm

    Almost forgot to mention- ALL of the slander was posted by “Anonymous”. Clever of them, eh? NOT.
    _____________

    I know what you mean. Make fun of children with disabilities and slander them….all anonymously of course. The cowards.

  105. Thank you. Even now, I find I am occasionally a bit shocked at his nefarious effrontery- so I do my best to fart in his general direction whenever possible.
    _______________

    Funny to see effrontery and fart in the same sentence. I love it!

  106. I went ahead and registered at the new Ashley forum, just in case more info gets dropped off inadvertantly inbetween fluff posts.

    Does anyone here who has been to the “spew your anger” forum recommend it? I’m a bit curious to see if it really *is* JB and DP fronting that bit of guttersniping…
    ______________-

    Ok, now you’ve peaked my curiosity, or I am confused too. Are you talking about the NEW Ashley site that everyone is signing up at? OR are you talking about the “old” Ashley blog? Or are you talking about the site that was set up to confront an 10,000+ poster of FSP? I’m trying to stay out of any and all sites except here and my own. Too much drama and I tend to get involved in “mommy’ing” those that are “out of hand”. Been told to stay out…in nice terms of course…(rolling eyes)…however, I will go and read but refuse to sign up. By the way, chat is open tonite at 8pm eastern. Need to go to my forum to click link. Hopeful to see you later. Until then, take care. Time to get dinner going.

  107. 😀
    I think Lavanda just admitted that she doesn’t understand most of what I say! The humor and jokes anyway! 😉

    Lavanda. This. was. a. joke. too. 😀

    Good call on those posts, Bash. I have to say there are way fewer posts on the “new” Ashley site than her blog … but was afraid for a second that you were talking about the “new” site.

    Lol … I’m trying to cook and type, so it’s a little hard!

  108. LTTBF: The DA’s office I hear need a new *HUGE* bottle of Advil along with the ISP.
    ___________________-

    Forget the Advil. Not potent enough to keep up….If all this continues they just may be hanging out and drinking at that BB establishment themselves! LOL

  109. OT:

    Can life get any better, the Chicago Blackhawks and the Red Wings playing hockey on New Year’s Day at Wrigley Field…..I’m one happy girl…..;)

  110. I don’t know what I’m basing this on, call it intuition, but something happened today. For all we know, maybe LE “found” Ashley, who knows.

    Granted, she has to make a living and can’t be on that blog 24/7, but she dropped off abruptly, without a word. Doesn’t mean she still doesn’t have the goods, but she may be holding back now, just as Ric Mims did when he said he was working on posting his complete timeline regarding the initial hours/days.

  111. I think Lavanda just admitted that she doesn’t understand most of what I say! The humor and jokes anyway!
    _____________

    Noway, lol…you have no idea what it’s like to be in a crowd and something is said…I hear it….and everyone is rolling laughing and I don’t get the joke! ROFL. Then 3 minutes later, after a long time of contemplating and rehashing the joke….I GET IT! Then I burst out laughing and everyone looks. LOL. My youngest son inherited my literal brain too…even moreso. It’s like he and I have this inner ability to understand things that others have no clue and vice versa. lol

  112. letthetruthbefree // July 7, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    OT:

    Can life get any better, the Chicago Blackhawks and the Red Wings playing hockey on New Year’s Day at Wrigley Field…..I’m one happy girl…..
    **********************************

    My BF told me about this like it was big news. As usual, when it comes to sports I couldn’t get it up. I just said ‘It’ll probably be cold’ or something like that.

    I just don’t have the gene or something…

  113. Rescue, I can both things. Noway thinking she might be a bit nervous, or your theory that someone got ahold of her.

    Interesting though. She hasn’t posted anything new since Saturday I believe.

  114. I don’t know what I’m basing this on, call it intuition, but something happened today. For all we know, maybe LE “found” Ashley, who knows…
    __________________-

    Facs, I think Ashley knows that “her” identity was divulged and now has to think as to what to do next. By the way, my thoughts are that she is not a she….but a HE.

  115. Facs, I think I got the gene from brother’s. I’m a huge hockey fan, and just about fell over when I heard the news today.

    I would *almost* sell my soul for a ticket to that game…..;)

  116. I think if you link things together with what happened last night at Ashley site and this site, you can come to a conclusion that *Ashley* was outted, and became very angry.

    Just a theory. And if it does weed out that way, it’s the people I have been thinking about all along.

  117. I was wondering when we would get back to figuring out why we have not seen anything new from Ashley……
    Things that make you wonder………

  118. I think more along the lines that someone got a hold of her. Or something, LOL. Trolls are everywhere!

    Seriously, she may be sitting on a wealth of information that LE would probably want to look at.

    But, I could be 100% wrong. We’ll hear one way or the other, of that I am sure! There’s way more people interested in what she has got to say than us. Just think about it.

  119. Well, if someone feels like cluing me in on the outing but prefers to remain discreet, I’m facs at Lories and Ashley’s and you can PM me.

    I’d love to know what you think.

  120. This is bugging me, why has no media agency – even the lowest, dirtiest TMZ/Enquirer quality media agency, picked up on Ashleys’ dirt on DP? You can’t tell me that they have their limits.

    Has the public really had enough of DP?

  121. Ok, here’s a hint: someone forgot to use an anonymous IP when chatting/emailing DP.

    It was traced.

  122. Basherette – and one thing led to another!

    It only stands to reason that if LE visited Ric Mims and his web page designer, there’s absolutely no reason to believe they wouldn’t do the same with Ashley. The difference, at least initially, is that Ric Mims was well known, and he openly stated what he was going to do. Here, Ashley was anonymous. At least for a while.

    Records of an ISP have to be subpoenaed. So, if she was tracked down by her IP address, or someone associated with her was, it was done by LE, and a subpoena was issued.

    Right????

  123. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    Ok, here’s a hint: someone forgot to use an anonymous IP when chatting/emailing DP.

    It was traced.
    ************************************
    But that means that Brodsky and Co. would have had to do the tracing. Right? And they posted what they knew on Ashley’s blog? That seems unprofessional…but then so did the Matt Phelps discussions that Brodsky do.

    I read somewhere that someone posted Smootch’s personal info on Ashley’s blog last night (not to out her as being Ashley but in retaliation for all the JIC crap that has been posted), could that be what you saw Bash?

  124. FYI:

    Q. I have the IP address from someone who’s causing me some problems. Can I get their name and location from that?

    Yes and no.

    But mostly no.

    I get this question a lot, so let me explain.

    As I’ve discussed in previous articles, there are common services on the internet that will return information about an IP address. Services like ARIN, PlotIP and others will return information about the ISP or hosting company that owns the block that the IP is a part of. Typically that will include the name, address, phone number of the ISP.
    “… if you’re a regular person just trying to track something down on your own, you simply can not get the information.”

    At that point your only option is to contact the ISP and ask them. They do know which of their customers the IP is assigned to. The problem is that ISP’s will not give this information out to just anyone. Typically it will require legal actions, as part of some kind of police or court proceeding, to get the ISP to release the information.

    So can you get a name an address from an IP? Yes … if you have the legal backing to go get it. Otherwise, if you’re a regular person just trying to track something down on your own, you simply can not get the information.

  125. Not *just* by LE. Who else would be determinedly looking for Ashley? Bingo.

    Cannot confirm subpoena yet.

  126. What would give Brodsky the LEGAL right to call (per above) an Internet Service Provider and get a name, address and/or telephone #? I’d like to know the answer to that.

    Now, if he has a private investigator, I don’t know what legal standing they have, but I’m thinking they’re no more entitled to legally obtain that information than we are.

    Oh, heaven help her.

  127. Ashley said that Joel ‘couldn’t touch her on the Internet’ or words to that effect.

    Guess we’ll see.

  128. Saw on TMZ that Britney had been texting someone and her dad was pissed. Turned out to be that photographer from the Enquirer or wherever … say! Mutual friend?

  129. How do we know it wasn’t someone that had connections to getting this information?

    I personally think Ashley, whomever she may be, is gonna be a little hot water, and she might not be as tough as a cookie as she pretends to be.

  130. Don’t play games, Bash. Just give us the answer. 😀

    Now … Ashley had mutual friend with Drew … but was it Britney or the photographer … or Joel … or ?

  131. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    Ok, here’s a hint: someone forgot to use an anonymous IP when chatting/emailing DP.

    It was traced.
    ________________
    If by traced you mean that she’s been IDd then it would have to LE of some kind who traced her … or traced one of the DrewPettes.

  132. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Who would be appallingly irate about their “sex” life being made public in such a manner?
    ____________
    Mother Theresa?

  133. Oh, please. LE is *NOT* the only group in the world with the ability to trace IP’s or find “Anonymous” people who do not want to be found.

    That’s just silly.

  134. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Who would be appallingly irate about their “sex” life being made public in such a manner?
    ____________
    Mother Theresa?

    ***

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 🙂

  135. Would they give the area or the actual person … unless they talked to ISP they couldn’t get that from the IP.

  136. There was a very long weekend for people to look into all this…..interesting, and I agree, it’s not just LE that can find out people’s information.

  137. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Who would be appallingly irate about their “sex” life being made public in such a manner?
    ____________
    Just tell us. You are acting just like Ashley.

    😉

  138. Let, what boards are “both board”?

    Ashley’s blog (where all the bashing went on) and the bash JIC site?

    Didn’t read what went on … you’ll have to spell it out for me. Small words. Short sentences.

  139. Noway – let’s sit on these big comfy chairs and maybe someone will clue us in.

    Honestly, I used to think I had some sort of handle on what was going down…

  140. Sorry Noway. Ashley’s original site, and this site.

    People were outted last night on Ashley’s site, and then it seems that some of it spilled over here.

    Could what have spilled over here been outta frustration for what happened at Ashleys?

  141. Noway – Facsmiley – I don’t understand the thing with “both boards,” except that it was two sides in a civil war of words, from what I’ve heard.

    Other than gleaning information in-between the rants, it has no bearing on the issue at hand.

    Ashley was posting chats and emails. She was setting everyone up for a new one – she disappeared.

    Somehow, it looks like she may have been “discovered.” I’m not sure by whom, but let’s just assume LE has her logs. If not, then someone else got them, in which case, she’d be talking to LE anyway. For her own good and safety.

    Other than that, what do I know?

  142. I’m waiting for an actual name and some good evidence. I’m not going to play anymore. If someone wants to PM me, feel free.

  143. I don’t think Ashley ever talked to LE. My personal opinion is it was someone that was just trying to play with Drew, and it got a bit out of hand. She/he was outted last night, and is now doing the slow burn, wondering what could possibly happen to her.

    jmo of course.

  144. basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    Ok, here’s a hint: someone forgot to use an anonymous IP when chatting/emailing DP.

    It was traced.
    ************************************

    rescueapet // July 7, 2008 at 6:25 pm

    Drew.

    basherette // July 7, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    Rescue at 6:25PM- bingo! Be back soon!
    ____________
    So Drew was chatting with himself about his sex life?

  145. P.S.- NO, I am certainly *NOT* Ashley or anyone else in that sordid group. I would never lower myself to utter the kind of obscene language that flows so casually in her posts. Career sailors exercise more restraint in their speech than Ashley, for G*d’s sake.

    I certainly *am*, however, an intensely curious and downright nosey broad who lives in Alaska. 🙂

  146. Okay, nosey broad. Explain for the village idiot here what the heck you are talking about.

    Remember it takes a village to raise the village idiot.

    😀

  147. Help! I have no clue what ya’ll are talking about… I’m trying to, honest! I guess I have missed the posts that were revealing …and deleted… I feel like I’m on the outside looking in!

  148. Oy, vey! NO, DiP was NOT talking to himself about his sex life. 🙄

    DiP is *NOT* Ashley. 🙄

    He *DID* want to find Ashley though.

  149. Remember it takes a village to raise the village idiot.

    ***

    How strange. I always thought the saying was:

    “It takes a Viking to raze a village.” 🙂

  150. Noway – this is what I’m figuring out so far.

    Of course, Basherette is right. Who had the most to lose by these Ashley posts? Drew! So, I’m assuming Drew told his lawyer to stop the leak in the dam. Either Brodsky went to LE himself, with the IP address, and it spiraled from there, or he had his investigators do it.

    I doubt that Brodsky would do this on the QT, so, I’m assuming, one way or the other, LE is sitting in the middle of all of this right now.

    It stops the leak in the dam, and that’s Drew’s main concern right now. What is in the logs is another thing. But, there’s no way (play on words, noway) he wants anymore of this to come out publicly.

    Have I got all that now?

  151. Bash said: Ok, here’s a hint: someone forgot to use an anonymous IP when chatting/emailing DP. It was traced.

    Bash then said: Who would be appallingly irate about their “sex” life being made public in such a manner?

    Rescue said: Drew

    Bash said: Bingo.
    __________
    Which is how I read it and why I was confused. And remain so.

    TVI

  152. So now, Ashley’s posts abruptly stopped. Think about this. JB was mysteriously quiet about all of this. He must have had that IP address from the get-go. He was working on tracking her down, by whatever means he used.

    Now, he can spin her logs for his purposes all he wants, but there’s more in there we don’t know about, and, I am relatively sure we’re not going to know about. Unless, of course, Ashley shared her information with a trusted source or someone else. My guess would be that she ran to a printer and had thousands of copies made of her logs, LOL. 🙂

  153. I think TVI has got it!

    In the heat of one of the chats, Ashley forgot to block her IP.

    Now that Joel has taken the computer class, he was able to figure out Ashley’s IP.

    Drew was irate about his sex life being ade public, so Joel took Ashley’s IP to LE with the order for her to cease and desist.

    Which she has.

  154. Couldnt it also be that Ashley is really someone from the FSP site, that really hates Drew, and it was discovered whom she/he is, and some damage control is going on?

    And possibly authority are looking into other people in regards to this other than Ashley, hence the reason for all sites being a bit slow today, and some even shutting down?

  155. Makes sense to me. But why so admant that it was Drew and not Brodsky? For all intents and purposes they are the same…

  156. What if it is someone from the FSP site? We all went to that site? What’s the difference. It’s obvious she followed what was going on somehow, Let.

  157. Oh Im so torn, stay here and figure this out, or watch my show….the show is being tivo’ed….lol.

  158. Rescue, lets just pretend that it was a player from the fsp site, one that was very active on that site, it would go to show credibility of those that claim to want to just seek justice.

    I’m not saying it’s that at all. But I’m not convinced it’s as *dark* as Ashley really has some good stuff on Drew and LE is now involved. They might be involved for other reasons.

  159. LTTBF – I just mean it could very well be someone who was a member of that site, yes. But she “admitted” that she never went on searches, if I remember correctly. Being a member of the site and being closely involved with the family are two different things, is what I mean.

    She had to reach her anger point somehow, and, obviously, it was through reading the papers, media, tv, etc., and blogging or reading sites. So, yes, she very well, IMHO, was an fsp member. Maybe blogged here too. She surely admitted she follows this blog.

  160. Exactly, facs … it’s not rocket science that it is gone.

    But the whole Anonymous posting that first site and Ashley deleting it … that was interesting.

  161. letthetruthbefree // July 7, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Rescue, lets just pretend that it was a player from the fsp site, one that was very active on that site, it would go to show credibility of those that claim to want to just seek justice.
    ******************************

    Who DIDn’t belong or at least read at the FSP site from time to time? And how does outing Drew show whether one isn’t or isn’t credible?

    I’m not getting this…

  162. What, noway? Speculation about what is going on now, as I “explained” it? Speculation on my part. I’m just trying to reason it in my mind what is going on and that’s just my explanation.

  163. Facs, in my own opinion, if it was someone that was very close to the investigation part (by this I mean, those who have been instrumental in searching, fundraising etc) of this case, and they went about trying to bait Drew with pm’s, im’s etc….it doesn’t speak very highly of them.

    I believe it was all done without the knowledge of the ISP.

  164. Speculation on my part also Noway, just like Rescue, trying to figure it out in my own mind.

  165. ISP doesn’t need to trap people using something as silly as blogs and message boards and goofballs who think it’s fun and edgy to try and trap DP into cybersexing them.

    Come on. No way is it ISP and no way did they ever approve it or sanction it or any part of it.

  166. I meant what Bash posted … how does she know someone forgot to block their IP?

    That’s what I meant.

    I’m trying to multi-task and for TVI, not easy!

  167. letthetruthbefree // July 7, 2008 at 7:13 pm

    Facs, in my own opinion, if it was someone that was very close to the investigation part (by this I mean, those who have been instrumental in searching, fundraising etc) of this case, and they went about trying to bait Drew with pm’s, im’s etc….it doesn’t speak very highly of them.

    I believe it was all done without the knowledge of the ISP.
    ***********

    LOL, LTTBF – cuts both ways. Doesn’t do much for DP’s integrity now, does it.

    Please share your reasons for believing it’s someone close to the “investigation.” I don’t know one way or the other myself, but why this Ashley would go out of her way to say one thing publicly, only to have her shown to be a liar like Drew, is not making sense to me.

    LTTBF – just as there are women out there that don’t mind hooking up with DP (read – Kim M), there are, I’m sure, plenty who would be absolutely willing to snare him for exactly this thing. He’s hated by a lot of women for how he degraded and slammed his wife. This is a world full of passionate people, on both sides. He may have just met with on the I-net with the wrong one this time.

    He’s lucky she didn’t come in his home and hurt him in front of his children, heh?

  168. What if Ashley is a friend of someone who has anger at DP and has for some time? Say before Stacy. Four years ago.

  169. Amanda, I agree, and *if* they did it would have been handled much differently than Ashley handled it.

  170. I wonder…what the heck all this means….I guess I am slow..I am so lost…..I feel like Who is on first, what is on second and I don’t know…well that’s me and I don’t know who or where or what anything is……….I am more lost now than when I loose my invisible plane…dangit !!!!!

  171. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    But the whole Anonymous posting that first site and Ashley deleting it … that was interesting.
    ***********************************

    I have to disagree wtih you about that site Noway. I googled Ashley looking for more info and came upon that initial site myself, before I saw it posted anywhere. Since she had talked about starting up a forum, I assumed that was gonna be it and I even signed up. At this point I believe that she was trying out different forums and settled on the SMF.

    I just can’t see anything weird about that. It WAS a pretty crappy forum and I can see why she chose to start over somewhere else.

  172. Did Anonymous just want to be cool and be the first to know about the site?

    That’s what I found weird.

  173. He may have just met with on the I-net with the wrong one this time.

    I mean – he may have just met up on the I-net with the wrong one this time.

  174. Uh-oh! Oh no! Mr. Billllllll! I thought I understood; but now the rug has been pulled out from under me…..

  175. I agree that there’s no reason to think that Ashley is an FSP’er. I wasn’t and I admit I wouldn’t mind a little risk-taking if it meant throwing a smut-wrench in his Mr. Mom machine.

    C’mon folks, there’s a big wide world out there that doesn’t include the people that you hate…or the people you love for that matter. Thank heavens!

  176. I wonder if someone “set” Ashley up … with that first PM “not from Drew” … knowing she would respond to it because she is the type of person who responds to all PMs.

    But that she was in on it and if a chat started fine, if not on to Plan B.

  177. noway406 // July 7, 2008 at 7:25 pm

    Did Anonymous just want to be cool and be the first to know about the site?
    *******************************’

    I think that could be it. Either they wanted to be the first to know and post about it, or they somehow they they were ‘outing it.

  178. It made people nervous … having signed up there and no posts … no ashley

    Lucky for me, my laptop crashed. Didn’t sign up.

  179. Another interesting thing about Ashley and these sites she *found* Drew supposedly belonging too.

    If she had it out for Drew so badly, you know if she is legit, that she did many searchs for anything Drew related, right?

    And then all of a sudden, wow, look Drew is on smut sites. She was asked numerous times when Drew signed up on those sites, and she never responded.

    I believe it was she that mentioned Drew had the *paid* service on those site, and she somehow got that information out of a customer service rep for the company.

    She then mentions that she would have no problem paying for her message board.

    Whats to say that she didn’t set up those accounts in Drew’s name? And who’s to say she was busted for something like that today?

    And I don’t be busted as in arrested, but busted as in someone is speaking to her

  180. Noway –

    I didn’t sign up either. I was with a lot of other people in just wanting to see where it was going.

  181. There are so many questions.

    Did the other women find Ashley or the other way around.

    Who found the smut sites … sounds like one of the others chatted with DP there…

    Guess we’ll never know …

  182. I absolutely believe that it was Drew chatting with Ashley on IM and sending her emails and that those are his profiles on the dating sites.

  183. Drew chatted with Ashley.

    JB agreed with that.

    I just am confused about what happened after that. Who found who.

    I believe that the adult sites were sent to DP (don’t you guys get that in your junk email) and he signed up.

    Dont belive what he told JB (or what JB passed on to us).

  184. This is the first post to us on WP guys.

    Now, if look verrrrrrrrrrry carefully, there is a space after the comma in the sentence. If you “know” Ashley’s style from her posting on her blog, it’s identical. Uses ….. also.

    Here’s another little tidbit for you. Methodical is a WP user, and has an IP address.

    Slammer. (That’s my word for “gottcha”)

    methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Looks like another website about drewpy is out and this one looks like it’s gonna be one that nobody will wanna miss , drew being exposed yet once again .. http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com

  185. Oh I beleive it was Drew that was chatting with Ashley, no doubt in my mind.

    But as far as the new smut sites she found, I’m still questioning that.

    Hopefully I’m wrong, we’ll have to wait and see.

  186. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    Joel has discovered the importance of being e-savvy:

    Joel A. Brodsky said…
    …I just took a CLE course on e-discovery (Illinois just started requiring CLE last year), and there are new federal rules on e-discovery. The gist of the course was that under the new rules almost everything on one’s hard drive (or in this case a database) can be copied so the parties experts can look for information. It’s scary, but you have to remember that everything that you put out on the net, or type on your computer, can be gotten to and can possibly be traced back to you. I have started to take precautions, such as “self-destructing” (self erasing) e-mails and im’s, automatic de-fragging of hard drives, and even periodic cleaning of the drives with specialized security programs. Welcome to the digital world.

    July 5, 2008 10:01 AM
    ———————————————————

    that is too funny, cause everything is still on that hard drive even if he does all that stuff..teehee.
    the only way is to get eraser utility or reformat the hard drive so nothing shows up of what was on there before. heheehe… even I know that one ..

    ———————–

    HI everyone, missed all the action last night, and boy did I.. NOWAY your to funny , so did hubby get that paper bag that one of the lady’s said he’d need lol… it is great humor on this site that is why we all like it here… 😉

  187. Oh, and if you didn’t know this, that little avatar next to your name, if you do not use a picture, is all based on mathmatics, meaning, your email, your IP, your location. It follows you everywhere you go on WordPress blogs.

  188. Ok, got one more detail out of the crapola posts-

    He’s been a member of at least 2 sex sites for longer than Stacy has been “missing”, and the bpd95669 @ yahoo addy was created before then also.

    Gee. Big surprise there… 🙄

  189. REscue is right, my daughter posts on this site but some where else, and she has a neopet pic for hers and if you do a search on google with her name it shows that pic as well …. so yup she is correct

  190. Sooooooooooo, if “methodical” didn’t hide her IP, cuz I’m relatively sure “methodical” is Ashley, anyone who is interested in a look-see as to just who “methodical” is has a place to start, heh?

  191. I’d like to go back to my identicon but dont know how.

    TVI

    Bash … yeah … like that blows my mind! NOT.

  192. BASH,

    how are you doing hope your feeling better?

    how are ya getten this info ….. I could look but don’t want to keep up good work …

  193. Yes, noway, it would be interesting. But, if LE wanted to find Ashley and started with “methodical,” they might have gotten somewhere.

  194. I’m sure they looked at whoever posted the first posts on her site too.

    The posts there were made before it was given to us … and SYM copied the post from here … so where was the first post?

    Or did someone just search for websites an that popped up?

  195. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 7:37 pm

    I absolutely believe that it was Drew chatting with Ashley on IM and sending her emails and that those are his profiles on the dating sites.
    ——————–
    I agree, Facs. However, I also believe Drew was set up by Ashley from the get-go. Remember, lots of family members of Stacy knew Drews email and most probably his screennames. I think Ashley posted Drews email/info into those sex sites. Even though if he did it himself, it would not surprise me…hwoever, my thoughts are the conversations and posts were LEGIT but the posting of DP on those sex sites were done by Ashley himself. ….errrr, herself.

  196. Rescue, methodical posted the link here but when I clicked on it, there were comments from an earlier time … so I wondered how those first 7 or so posters had heard about Ashley’s site.

    Wasn’t from SYM; they copied methodical’s post from here.

    My Blue Shark … or Sher … not sure how they heard about it … maybe here too.

  197. Ok for real this time I’m going to watch my show.

    I hope you all get it figured out and clue me in when I get back……;)

  198. Question, can everyone remember exactly how they found Ashley’s site? I can’t remember who told me or how I found out about it. I know someone gave me the link.

  199. thats me 46732 said…
    This blog is great , just when you think drewpy can’t get any dumber he proves ya wrong , i’ll stop back often .

    June 26, 2008 3:43 PM
    ________
    This is first, all others anon … until ashley next day at 8:43 a.m.

  200. methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    Looks like another website about drewpy is out and this one looks like it’s gonna be one that nobody will wanna miss , drew being exposed yet once again .. http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com
    _________
    This was posted at 5:54 … comment from thatsme46732 posted at 3:43)

  201. Blogger trintrin said…

    Ashley if you are reading this I suggest you backup everything you have and share it with a trusted friend. Strong rumor is you are about to loose your internet service at the very least.
    *******************************************

    This was on the old and new Ashley sites I wonder what this means. I don’t know if I am allowed to take this from other sites if not, I am very sorry.

  202. Ahhhhhhhhhhh. Yes. That is the link I saw that took me to Ashley’s site. And yes…..the poster I know that you know uses the dots a lot too. So do I for that matter….but never just 3. LOL. I just hold on to the ……………button.

  203. Gatehouse – can we have a new thread, if possible. Seems to be running slow, at least for me it is.

    Thanks.

  204. I am wondering what this person knows that no one else that I have seen knows. I hope Ashley doesn’t get in trouble I enjoyed the information she has to offer.

  205. I am not one to critique spelling or grammar……but I do really have a pet peeve with lose and loose. LOL. Saw a REAL diet ad in the newspaper or magazine that said “Do you want to loose 40 lbs?”……..rofl

  206. facsmiley // July 7, 2008 at 8:04 pm

    bpd95669
    ******************************************

    I thought Drew’s ID was bpd95969?
    __________
    facs where is the 9 5 6 6 9?

  207. What is going on? I thought that I would have so much to catch up on tonight. Pretty boring. Let-it may be time to start passing out the colorful ones. 😉

  208. Someone mentioned earlier to look at Ashley’s commas. There is a space before it and after it.

    Like , this

    methodical // June 26, 2008 at 5:54 pm
    ill wanna miss , drew being

    thats me 46732 said
    This blog is great , just

    and

    Ashley from her blog
    some of them also , looks like Drew

Comments are closed.