Your Thread – September 25

Happy Thursday folks!

~By posting on this blog you agree to be bound by the rules of this blog and by our Terms of Use. If you spot a rule violation, send an e-mail to reportabuse@mysuburbanlife.com.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

Advertisements

23 thoughts on “Your Thread – September 25

  1. Hi Facs….my nic stands for quarter horses which are my passion. I hope you didn’t mean everytime you see me respond that you want to say goodbye….

  2. From Lennys

    trintrin said…
    So I wonder what torture the Sharon crew has planned for the little children this weekend.

    Maybe an evil nursery rhyme reading hour?

    Oh, how about a mock execution of their dad, now that would be funny!!

    September 25, 2008 8:55 AM

  3. Morning, Happy GJ Day, Just got back from surprise vacation from Superman to Hawaii. Woohoo. However, I did miss you guys. Did I miss anything exciting ?

  4. http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2008/09/25/news/doc48da7f723a9bd833110520.txt

    or

    http://tinyurl.com/3qxdjc

    Author won’t divulge results of Drew Peterson polygraphs


    Drew Peterson, a former sergeant with the Bolingbrook Police Department, leaves a Will County courthouse complex in Joliet on Nov. 7, 2007. (AP Photo/Chicago Sun-Times, Rich Hein)[/i]

    Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:55 AM CDT
    By Associated Press

    CHICAGO — The author of an upcoming book about a former Bolingbrook police officer suspected in the disappearance of his wife says the former officer took two lie detector tests.

    Derek Armstrong won’t say anything about the results of Drew Peterson’s polygraph examinations until “Drew Peterson Exposed” is released next month. But Armstrong says he insisted that Peterson take the examinations.

    Peterson is a suspect in last October’s disappearance of his wife, Stacy. He denies any wrongdoing.

    Armstrong says Peterson’s lawyer, Joel Brodsky, advised Peterson not to take the polygraph. He only agreed because Peterson wanted his whole story told in a book.

    Brodsky wouldn’t talk about the results but says he isn’t concerned because polygraphs aren’t admissible in court.

    Copyright © 2008, Pantagraph Publishing Co. All rights reserved.

  5. Brodsky wouldn’t talk about the results but says he isn’t concerned because polygraphs aren’t admissible in court.

    ****

    Hmmm. I would have thought he would have said he wasn’t worried because his client is innocent. 🙂

    And he still may want to worry that if Drew did provide a different timeline or different story to the author during the interviews which were taped that those things could be admissable in court. But I’d think Drew wouldn’t have really said anything much different than he has already said regarding the case or the timeline. He probably just provided new dirt on people.

  6. Welcome back Wonder – more of the same. Brodsky’s a boob, Armstrong is greedy, Drew is a murderer…

    Qhorses, awwwww. I don’t ever think that!

    Morning, HDI, IKELOL and Think!

  7. thinkaboutit2

    Brodsky wouldn’t talk about the results but says he isn’t concerned because polygraphs aren’t admissible in court.

    Hmmm. I would have thought he would have said he wasn’t worried because his client is innocent.
    **************************

    No kidding!

  8. Hi everyone! aloha and welcome back wonder!

    I wonder (!) if we could hijack google news search to knock Mr Alexander off the top?

  9. I wonder why we wonder so much, when all wondering does is make you wonder more, and then you wonder why you bothered to wonder in the first place. How is everyone today ? GJ news would be WONDERFUL !

  10. If Brodsky says he isn’t concerned about the results of the lie-detector than the results couldn’t have been good or I’m sure he would have been bragging about them….. assuming he was privvy to the results…..

  11. It’s completely meaningless. JB advises against and then hosts the “tests”? Alexander didn’t pay for them to “prove” some kind of impartiality (???) but team DPJB paying for it wouldn’t make it look impartial (???)

  12. I wonder (!) if we could hijack google news search to knock Mr Alexander off the top?

    LOL I’m such a twit. I mean Armstrong (even with all the pr I can’t remember his name…..) not Alexander.

    Armstrong didn’t pay for the tests so that “proves” some kind of bogus impartiality, but DP/JB pays and it looks impartial???

  13. Bucket, I’m glad you said something. With that “Alexander” I thought you had moved on the to OJ trial!

    Nothing about the polygraphs makes any sense whatsoever.

  14. Is there any update from the GJ today??? Have been searching but can’t fnd anything.

    Things are out of control on Lenny site.

  15. http://kunati.blogspot.com/2006/04/kunati-featured-in-quill-and-quire.html

    Apr. 21, 2006: Staffed by a crew of book-publishing rookies, a new company by the name of Kunati hopes to release six books of genre fiction by national and international authors by early next year. Spearheaded by ad exec and published author Derek Armstrong, the firm hopes to get ahead, at least in part, with the help of Armstrong’s expertise in marketing and publicity.

    With six employees and eight investors – all of the latter, according to Armstrong, are authors – the Mississauga-based Kunati bills itself as a publishing firm founded “by authors for authors.” But in order to position the company as something more than a self-publishing venture, Armstrong has established some rules. “The principals of the company are allowed to submit one manuscript every 12 months,” he says. “And they need the okay from three different principals. They need to go through an editorial review just like everyone else.”

    *******************************

    Madicine
    by Derek Armstrong (Author)
    ISBN: 9781601640178
    Publish date: May 2008.

    Drew Peterson Exposed
    by Derek Armstrong (Author)
    ISBN-13: 978-1601641878
    Publish Date: October 2008

    Blogertize: A Leading Expert Shows How Your Blog Can Be a Money-Making Machine
    by Derek Armstrong (Author)
    ISBN: 9781601641649
    Publish Date: January 2009

    Oh well, rules were made to be broken I guess! 😦

Comments are closed.