Here’s a quick look at some of the major dates associated with the disappearance of Stacy Peterson, the Bolingbrook mother missing since Oct. 28, and the investigation into the 2004 death of Kathleen Savio, Drew Peterson’s third wife.
2001 - Bolingbrook police sergeant Drew Peterson, 47, begins dating 17-year-old Stacy Cales. The romance continues despite Peterson’s marriage to Kathleen (Savio) Peterson, his third wife.
June 2003 - Drew Peterson and Kathleen Savio are divorced; issues remain unresolved with regard to the distribution of marital assets.
July 2003 - Drew Peterson and Stacy Cales marry; Stacy is pregnant; Savio remains in the home she shared with Peterson at 392 Pheasant Chase Drive. The Petersons move into a home at 6 Pheasant Chase Court, a few hundred yards from Savio’s home.
March 1, 2004 - Savio’s body is found in an empty bathtub in her home. Illinois State Police are called in to investigate her death. Final financial arrangements regarding the division of martial assets between Peterson and Savio, 40, are still unresolved. Savio’s family members said the issue was supposed to come up again in about a month.
March 20, 2004 - Dr. Bryan Mitchell, with the Will County Coroner’s Office, releases an autopsy report, saying the cause of Savio’s death was accidental drowning. Mitchell notes that Savio’s hair was soaked with blood from an inch-long laceration on her scalp, her tongue was partially clenched between her teeth, and she had several small abrasions on her body.
May 2004 - A coroner’s jury rules Savio’s death an accident. No charges were filed in the case.
Oct. 26, 2007 - Stacy Peterson allegedly tells Drew Peterson she wants a divorce, according to her family.
Oct. 27
11:30 p.m. - Cassandra Cales leaves Stacy Peterson’s home with plans to meet at 10 a.m. the next morning to help paint a house
Oct. 28
9:40 a.m. - Peterson neighbor Sharon Bychowski leaves her home to go to the grocery store and notes seeing both of the Peterson’s vehicle in their driveway.
10:15 a.m. - A friend calls Stacy Peterson about painting the house that day. Peterson, still in bed, says she will meet to paint the house later.
11:15 a.m. - Bychowski returns from the grocery store and says she saw only one of the vehicles in Peterson’s driveway. Bychowski calls next door to see if the Peterson children want to come over for suckers. She asks for Stacy when one of the children answers the phone and Drew Peterson tells her his wife went to visit her grandfather.
1 p.m. - Drew Peterson brings the children over to Bychowski’s home and tells her he has an errand to run. He returns in about 15 minutes.
9 p.m. - Drew Peterson says Stacy called him to tell him she was leaving him for another man.
11 p.m. - Cales goes to Peterson’s home and does not see either vehicle in the driveway. One of Peterson’s children opens the door and tells Cales that he is home alone with his three siblings and that Stacy and Drew had gotten into a fight. He said Stacy Peterson had left the house and Drew went out to look for her.
11:15 p.m. - Cales calls Drew Peterson and asks for Stacy. Cales hears shuffling and keys going into the ignition. Peterson tells Cales he’s at home and had been out looking for his wife.
Oct. 29
1 a.m. - Cales goes to the Bolingbrook Police Department to file a missing persons report.
2:30 a.m. - Cales returns to Peterson’s home and sees both cars in the driveway. Cales’ friend calls Drew Peterson and asks him where Stacy is at. Peterson said his wife left him, took money and left her car at Clow International Airport.
4 a.m. - Cales files a missing persons report with Illinois State Police.
Later - Illinois State Police interview Drew Peterson regarding his wife’s disappearance. They ask to look at both of his vehicles. He allows access to one but not the other. The massive search for any evidence of Stacy Peterson’s whereabouts begins.
Nov. 7 - Will County Coroner Patrick O’Neil states that he never agreed with a coroner’s jury that Kathleen Savio’s death was accidental.
Nov. 9 - A judge orders the exhumation of Savio’s body from Queen of Heaven Cemetery in Hillside. Officials, for the first time, label Drew Peterson a suspect in his Stacy Peterson’s disappearance. Will County State’s Attorney James Glasgow publicly states that crime scene evidence of Savio’s death appears to show her death may have been staged to look like an accident. Glasgow was not in office at the time of her death.
Nov. 12 - Drew Peterson hands in his letter of resignation to the Bolingbrook Police Department, just shy of his 30th anniversary with the department. The resignation is later accepted and Peterson retires. He will receive more than $72,000 annually in pension benefits.
Nov. 13 - Savio’s body is exhumed and a second autopsy is performed. The results are not expected to be made public.
Nov. 20 - Bolingbrook Police Department Chief Ray McGury says Peterson was a disgrace to the department and was under investigation for unspecified violations that occurred over about a year-long period while Peterson was still a sergeant. The internal investigation was discontinued when the village’s Police Board accepted Peterson’s resignation.
Nov. 28 - Volunteers searching for Stacy Peterson announce they are now looking for a blue container similar to the one described by a male relative of Drew Peterson’s. The relative had recently told police that Peterson asked him to come over to the house and help him lift a large blue rectangular container into Peterson’s vehicle. The relative believed the container may have had held the body of Stacy Peterson.
Dec. 10 - Planfield minister Rev. Neil Schori tells Fox’s Greta Van Susteren that Stacy Peterson told him her husband admitted to killing his ex-wife, Kathleen Savio.
Dec. 17 - A Will County judge denies part of Drew Peterson’s request to have property seized by police during searches returned to him. The judge allows Peterson to regain possession of music CDs, an iPod, and other items but says other property, such as two vehicles and 11 guns must remain with the state for now.
2008
Feb. 21 - Dr. Larry Blum–an independent pathologist who performed the autopsy on Drew Peterson’s third wife, Kathleen Savio–rules her death a homicide.
~Compiled by staff at Suburban Life Publications
50 responses so far ↓
Gwen Riggs // February 14, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Does it take killing two or three wives to make Drew a serial. Or do they let him get away with it and kill his next wife?
He’s a waste of oxygen…..and hell will not be hot enough for him. God knows he commited these murders and I can’t wait “vingence is mine , sayith the Lord’
They should let he and OJ share a cell,
Maybe the next nut that marries him will get him before he has another chance to commit another murder!!
I’m curious what he was under investigation for with the polce dept ?
Ok I’ve waste enough breath and the basset hound.
MPEA // March 12, 2008 at 11:30 pm
just hearing about the 15 minute errand he ran,still leads me to believe he hid her in a storage unit.i think the contents of the blue barrel were other incriminating evidence which may or may not pertain to her disappearance.it would also be interesting to know about his physical health,and any recent doctors visits.also might want to check his toolbox for trace evidence.i also think she was killed at the airport,and moved in that 15 minutes,which should narrow search area.
JLT // March 31, 2008 at 4:59 pm
It occurs to me that investigators should review the cases Drew Peterson was exposed to during his career in which a body was disposed of in a way that made arrest difficult or impossible. People have a tendency to use information that made an impression on them - do any of his coworkers ever remember discussing a “perfect crime” with Drew Peterson? Telling him a story about clever disposal of a body that resulted in acquittal of the accused murderer?
exlawenforcement // March 31, 2008 at 6:09 pm
In this country you are innocent until proven guilty. No far nothing. And that is the way it will stay, mark my words he has done nothing.Just because hes a cop means nothing !People get over it, you are looking in the wrong direction.You will eat your words in time.
jeannienphoenix // April 6, 2008 at 11:15 pm
EX lawenforcement:
Would your initials be M. R.? I bet they are. Or D.P.
jeannienphoenix // April 6, 2008 at 11:32 pm
EX lawenforcement,
I forgot to ask, You certainly talk like you know D.P. What do you know about this case, that the rest of us do not know?
You sound like you “Know” Stacy’s body will be found a long ways away from Bolingbrook. Is that because You helped him move her body, or did Drew tell you where he took her body ??
You certainly seem awfully sure of your statement. We have already been saying, we would NOT be surprised if her body turned up away from BB. Then Drew can Claim, Someone else murdered her, he was never in that area, etc.
The only way, I will eat my words are to see Stacy Alive and Well and in a reunion with her sister Cassandra and family, and friends. I would be more than happy to Eat All my Words, if that happens. That would be the ONLY way. I don’t care if her Body was found overseas or any where in another country, I would always believe, Drew or Someone helped him Ship her body there, and will have someone (maybe You?) go there and put the body where it will be “Found” whenever he is ready to have it Found.
Like I said, Alive and Well Or NOTHING, buddy. I believe you will be the one to Eat Your Words.
exlawenforcement // April 7, 2008 at 12:10 pm
I do not know Drew or the family. I have done alot of research, things do not line up. I am questioning everything. I just really think since he is a cop that he is being judged long before anything has been prove,the kevin fox case is an example. Everybody thought he killed riley, well in the end he did not. I learned a good lesson from that. Everyday only bad things are posted about drew, I find it hard to believe that hes a monster that never did anything good in life. If you look at the photos from his daughters bedroom you see a paper that stacy put up saying that daddy is a prince. All the phots show a happy family. He was a good provider, she got everything she wanted per rick mims.Her mom disappeared, so is this something the family does to cope ? I do not know the answers but I am not afraid to question. Personally I would never hurt anyone unless it was self defense.
exlawenforcement // April 7, 2008 at 6:15 pm
My initials are K.M….The first 48 hours are the most critical, after that chances go down more and more. Weather is a large factor and we have had a terrible winter. I am not a buddy, as I have stated repeatedly, I am a female. Since I have experience in the field of law enforcement ofcourse I would have more knowledge than the average person.
jeannienphoenix // April 7, 2008 at 7:23 pm
exlawenforcement
I would like to hear what you think does not line up.
I am Not Judging Drew, Because he was a cop. That is a Part of it,sure, that is what he was. My main issue with Drew is his Background with the women in his life. If you are LE, you should know, that is an important issue. Isn’t that what all LE do, when they arrest someone? Look at their Rap Sheet? And they certainly judge that person from it, as they should. It tells a lot about what kind of a person they are..
I am looking at how he treated his other wives, and the kind of person I think he is. I think that is “Facts”. All those women, who do not even know each other, say the same things about Drew.
He is a narcissistic person. Definition for you, I too research things.
http://www.mentalhealth.com/dis/p20-pe07.html
This type of person thinks nothing of Lying, Manipulating, Using, Controlling other people to Get What They Want. I think Drew lacks a Conscience. He can justify anything he does, in his own mind.
They do not have the Normal Feelings, for other people. . Everyone around them, is used for their own gain. When they are no longer of use to them, and becomes a liability to them, the other person becomes a Disposable Item. (Why do you think Ric M is hiding, and Thomas Morphey is in protective custody?) Just listen to how Drew Runs Down All of his ex-wives, girlfriends, their families, or anyone else who disagrees with him. His friends have become “Street Rats”, and “Street Kids”. Now, do you see the narcissistic side coming out. His sense of Superiority over everyone? That is why he picks these kind of people to be around. He does have a sense of superiority, because he can easily Lie and Manipulate these people, and then have them believe he is such a great guy. I refer you to “Steve Carcerona”.
Yes, Drew has done some good things in his life, this is how he gains peoples allegance. He picks them well, He is still only doing it to later use it against them. Look how he set Steve C. up to Find Kathleen’s body? But yet, made sure he was there to take over the scene and Controll everything, but yet, he can say, I didn’t find her body. Trying to take suspicion off of himself. These type of people do not care if you Know they are lying, Just so they have you in a position to “go along with the lies”. They want to keep you in a position of feeling Obligated to Them. He uses his money in that way. Remember the $2,000.00 he gave to Thomas Morphey for helping him move the blue container?? He knew Thomas had lost his job, and Needed Money, Why do you think he called him? That was “Hush Money”, you don’t pay that kind of money to someone to help you move something, that just takes a few minutes. Plus, he didn’t want him to tell anyone about the Krispy Kreme deal, where he left his phone with him, and went someplace else and called his phone from Stacy’s phone. You see, why he paid him $2,000.00? PLUS he involved him as an unwittenly accessory to Murder. Yeah, Drew, is a Great Guy, huh?
He didn’t care how he involved Steve C. or Thomas M., or Ric M, did he? Remember the BTK murderer? He was a member of his Church, lived a so called normal life, and I am sure he did nice things for people, but that did not change Who he Really Was, did it?
As far as that picture of his little girl, sitting in front of that sign, that was totally staged from his new publicist. The publicist picked that place to sit that little girl, and take that picture. That is what he is Paying Him For. To make him look good. That whole interview was planned, and arranged, for Drew by the publicist. Again, Drew is using his money to get someone to “help” him, in this Mess. Drew is doing nothing but Using and Exploiting those little Kids for his Own Gain. I found that terribly disturbing. To go so far as to set up his own little kids, and use them in that way, just like he uses everyone else around him. That was Low., in my opinion.
As far as Stacy’s Mother disappearing, do you know that the Blue Island Police, has just recently reopened her Case? They think her mother was probably murdered, also.
I would not hurt anyone either, but it does not mean that I do not realize there are lots of other people, that seem to lead a completely normal life that do commit murder, and or murders. I am glad you are questioning things, I do to.
These are just some of my opinions. Thanks for listening.
exlawenforcement // April 7, 2008 at 7:42 pm
Hey, no problem. You have a right to express yourself too. I guess we both see it from different views, thats life. I am not afraid to listen. Thanks for the updates.
jeannienphoenix // April 7, 2008 at 9:08 pm
exlawenforcement,
I am amazed that is all you have to say, about your views. I still would like to hear your views on what doesn’t line up.
I am new on this thread, but I did go back and read a few posts, and I notice that you said, no, I don’t date Drew, but I would be happy to stand by his side. The Thin Blue Line sticks together. This may not be your exact words, but close enough. Sounds like you are almost jealous of what all Drew gave to Stacy, wishing it was you, getting all of that stuff. Just Remember what Kathleen and Stacy GOT in the end. Is it worth it???
I really feel sorry for officers of the law, that feel they Must stick together, no matter what.
That is Exactly what happened when Kathleen got murdered. Too many officers like you, thought they had to Stick Together. In my Opinion, That is a Crime. Covering Up, Aiding and Abetting a Murderer !!!! Don’t you think Drew Knew that would be the reaction of all of his fellow officers??? Of course, he did. Now, can any of them say anything? Nope, that would incriminate them in Murder. But what are they going to do now? This new investigation may come up with the Truth about what Really Happened, and how it was Covered Up. Do you think Drew cares, if those fellow cops go down with him??? Not at all. Which they should, if this can be proven, and it looks like it will be. That is Exactly why, they had to exhume Kathleen’s Body, and after extensive investigation, NOW have changed the official Coroners Report to Say, “Homicide” instead of “Accident.” If more officers would have been doing their jobs, and Maybe believed it Was Possible that “One of their Own, Behind That Thin Blue Line, could have been responsible for her Murder, Maybe they could have avoided Stacy’s death, and carried out Justice for Kathleen, years ago, like they were Sworn to do. That is just Another Example of Drew Using whoever he has to, to get his Own Way. Here he Used all of LE to help him get by with Murder. Wow, what a Great Guy he is.
I would Stick UP for him if I were you, Stick Together….. Why do you ignore The Facts, Just like those other Officers did, When Investigating Kathleen’s Murder, and letting him get by with Murder??? This is Why people have a hard time believing in LE. Just like the Chief of Police in Bolingbrook said, “Drew is a Disgrace to our Department”. I have to agree with Him.
I am not a cop basher, I am a Realist, I have many, many cop friends, and many, many of them agree with me. You may be surprised at how much I know about LE. You act like, just because you were in LE, that you Know More Than Any One, just because of that. How long were you in LE, and what was your rank?? I am sorry that there are many cops like you, who think they Have to Stick Together. My cop friends tell me this is changing when it comes to heinous crimes, like these are. They would not Stick Up for Anyone they thought had committed Murder, for sure.
Just more of my opinions. Maybe someone else will read and understand this case a little more, I doubt you will, but that is o.k. I am willing to back up my beliefs with facts, and I am sorry to say, that I can’t see where you are doing the same.
Glenn // April 7, 2008 at 10:10 pm
I am sick and tired of listening to people express opinions as if they were facts.
Just because someone says something on a web blog or forum, does NOT make it a FACT.
If people in this world could exist on hate then you would be feeding them well jeannienphoenix. It is posts like the attack on exlawenforcement I just got through reading that helped to drive me away from the FindStacyPeterson.com forum.
If what you say is in FACT TRUE, then why hasn’t Drew Peterson been arrested? Where is the EVIDENCE to back up all of your preposterous claims? Isn’t there a law … something about slander and/or libel that addresses false statements in print or via word of mouth that demean or otherwise diminish the reputation of an individual.
I have formed some opinions about this case based on what I have seen and heard, both from the media and personally…. I am near Bolingbrook… I used to live there…. for about 18 years…. I was on many search parties for Stacy…. Even near the beginning of the searches the family has been expressing concerns about how best to make money from all of this… I heard that at search cenbtral… then it was the church on lily ache lane near her home….
This is a bad situation… if Drew Peterson did something wrong…. help catch him…. help the family with evidence…… but don’t go around bashing people because they have an opinion that differs from your own…. and if what you are saying about Drew is your opinion… then it would probably be better to express it as a personal opinion instead of FACT like you seem to be doing to me.
Mind you…. I do not like Drew Peterson one bit…. from what I have seen of this man he seems to me that he is extremely arrogant and seems to ne quite self centered…. It also seems to me that he might be quite capable of harming one or more of the women in his life…. That is all my opinion… and has little or nothing to do with the FACTS in this case….. or at least none that the Illinois State Police are divulging at the moment.
I do not see exlawenforcement as part of a thin blue line trying to protect Drew…. She is too far removed from the case to help him…… and NOT on active duty being retired and all…..
I did see her make some posts that made me personally wonder if it was Drew Peterson making the comments….. I do not know for a fact that exlawenforcement is or is not DP….
my message…. STOP bashing… and start proving..
none of us need criminals walking around.
jeannienphoenix // April 7, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Craig,
Excuse me……I would just like to ask you, “Who is Bashing Who here”. I did not mean my post to be an “attack” on ex.lawenforcement. As you seem to mean your post to be an “attack” on me.
I did Not present everything as “Facts”. I did say some of it was “My Opinion”, just as you have done, in your post.
Just What are you referring to about my post , that you are so upset about ? If you would kindly post any direct questions to me, instead of making such a blanket statement, then I will gladly answer them. Just as I would have to exlawenforcement.
As far as you bringing up the subject, about the money, I did not mention anything about the Money, you did. So, I will not discuss that with you, because I truly do not have Any Facts about that. I could give you an opinion, but you said you wanted facts.
You are the one, saying that is a Fact, what you are saying about the money.. Not Me. Now my question for you, is “Can you Prove that to me, or others who are reading your posts”??? I would appreciate that.
Thank you, and I also thank you for all your efforts you have made to help find Stacy, and help her family. That is Great.
Glenn // April 8, 2008 at 12:03 am
I don’t know who Craig is…. My name is Glenn….
My post was merely an expression of my own opinion… I discussed the part about the money because I did overhear Cassandra Cales having that discussion with one of her family members during a search. I know that to be fact…. because I heard it with my own ears…
Re read your last post to exlawenforcement again… and this time take off your rose colored glasses… you accused police officers of being a part of some thin blue line to protect drew peterson…. accused them of aiding and abetting a murder…. none of this was presented as opinion mind you… it was presented as fact.. and because exlawenforcement was a pokice officer… hmmm must be part of that thin blue line…
then you tell ex how well you know drew peterson… and are bold enough to speak for him… non of this expressed as your opinion, but presented as fact..
I am not attacking you…. I merely said I am tired of all of the bashing going on with these forums and blogs…
To convict someone of a crime in this country it requires evidence……. an arrest…. a trial…… and either a jury of 12 has to vote or a judge has to decide… guilt or innocence… based on evidence…
not on opinion….
I have seen Drew Peterson convicted by many….. in the words they use… (which are all opinion not fact)
I saw you express a whole lot of opinion… and then offer to back it with facts… my statement was call the Illinois State Police with your FACTS… and lets get about convicting the man… in a courtroom… not with words typed into a blog or forum on the internet…
Youn inferred that everything you said was fact.
Stop bashing and start proving…
~ lola // April 8, 2008 at 1:04 am
Glenn
[Quote] “… but don’t go around bashing people because they have an opinion that differs from your own…. and if what you are saying about Drew is your opinion… then it would probably be better to express it as a personal opinion instead of FACT like you seem to be doing to me. ” ]
Take a lil of your own advice. The reason that you got banned from the FindStacyPeterson.com forum was your constant bashing of other members for having an
opinion that differed from your own. i was there and i remember your posts. They were very much like the rant you just did above. And you did again and again and again. Scolding members with your “innocent until proven guilty” speech. I even recall something of a …”this is America ” speech. What you’re still not getting is …
“innocent until proven guilty”, and jurisprudence is mandated for a court of law. It does not govern public opinion, and it sure as hell doesn’t govern my own personal opinion that Drew Peterson murdered both of his wives, Kathleen and Stacy. The investigation is ongoing and there has been very damning statements concerning Drew Peterson from Stacy’s family and friends, as to what was going on prior to her dissappearance.
Including an attempt to kill Stacy in August when Drew sent Stacy down to the garage to get him a Coke and he then fired his gun through the floor and the bullet just missed her. http://cbs2chicago.com/westsuburbanbureau/drew.peterson.defense.2.608427.html
Oh, and then there’s the murder of Drew’s 3rd wife Kathleen. Clearly you have chosen not to believe these people. And you spend your time scolding the people who do believe them.
i would like you to imagine a scenario. Say you have a sister who confides alot of information that her husband is abusive and has threatened and tried to kill her.
She ends up murdered but her husband is ‘ only ‘ a suspect. At the funeral, as you grieve with family and friends sharing your belief that her husband did it, in walks this one guy who keeps scolding and wagging his finger at everyone who states that they believe her husband did it and why they believe it. Again and again and again.
And then this guy keeps running up to you trying to get you to stop them from talking like that. Because geez ! …he hasn’t been found guilty in court yet.
IMO, that guy would be pretty insensitive and obnoxious. And i would bet you’d wanna bounce him outta there within 5 minutes. (He’d last 1 minute with me.)
Then this same guy goes running around with his wounded ego doing his best to trash this grieving family at every turn. Oh, those people were trying to make all kinds of money at the funeral, it’s just a scam, that sister is not even dead. IMO, … anyone who would do that … due to a wounded ego … would be pretty pathetic.
jeannienphoenix // April 8, 2008 at 2:48 am
Glen,
Excuse Me, I did get your name wrong, I’m glad to see you finally must have gotten that Big Problem figured out. I can see why you got so confused. My Mistake.
Now, Concerning all these Facts that you are so Concerned about. Totally dissed off, from the sounds of it, huh? That is quite all right, because sometimes I get dissed off myself, when people upset me. This really isn’t one of those times. Surprised?? You shouldn’t be, because I think you are Very Humorous. Lecturing Me and Everyone else on How We Should Think, and What We Should Say, how we should be on a Forum…..Mercy, I thought you just said this was the U.S.A. ? Did I miss something?
Now, concerning all these Facts that you are soooo Concerned about. This is a “Direct Quote” from your attack on me.
Glenn, on April 7th, 2008 at 10:10 pm Said:
I am sick and tired of listening to people express opinions as if they were facts.
Just because someone says something on a web blog or forum, does NOT make it a FACT.
End of Your Quote.
Oh, how I agree with you on that statement. The Only thing that I wonder about, does that only apply to ME, and Everyone else, but Not to You??? You Said, “I said that about the money, because I did overhear Cassandra Cales, having that discussion with one of her family members during a search.” Correct? I’m sure that is right. You may go back and check your statement. Since you “overheard” Cassandra say this, can I take it as a Fact that you were “ease dropping” on her conversation, per your admission, that You overheard her talking. This was not a statement made directly to you? Cassandra, was in Fact, talking to another family member, Not to You. Again By your own admission, you have to agree with that Fact. Correct??? I thought so.
Now…….. I again Ask you,………. Do you have Any Proof of Cassandra making that statement ? Other than You Just “Saying” And “Posting” on this Forum, that ” You Heard It With Your Own Two Ears”???? Sorry, That Is Not Proof. That is Called “Hearsay” and not allowed in a court of law, As PROOF. Commonly called a Rumor….. I Refer you Back to Your Own Statement in your attack on me.
Direct Quote.
Glenn, on April 7th, 2008 at 10:10 pm Said:
I am sick and tired of listening to people express opinions as if they were facts.
Just because someone says something on a web blog or forum, does NOT make it a FACT.
End of Quote from Glenn.
Good Advice Glenn, Why don’t You Take Your OWN Advice, instead of trying to shove it down My Throat???
. That is Not Working For You. P.S. I am also, sick and tired of people like You, who Jump all over other people, as if they Know Everything. Clearly, You Don’t…..
Oh yeah, almost forgot, “Stop Bashing, Cassandra and her Family, and Start Proving”.
This is My Own Opinion of What Glen Should Do.
jeannienphoenix // April 8, 2008 at 3:24 am
Glen,
You sir, have a reading problem, and have a terrible interpretation of my post. I Did say In my Opinion, and If it can be proven, and again at the bottom of my post, My Opinion, again.
You should take off your rose colored glasses, and Re read it, maybe this time you may actually see, where I stated those things. I doubt it, you certainly didn’t notice them the first time.
You are too busy letting everyone how Wrong They Are, and How Right You Are. IN MY OPINION.
You are the One who Needs to Stop Bashing, And Start Proving. You just don’t like Anyone who Does Not Agree with You. You are the one, who Needs to Back Up Your Post With Facts. I haven’t Seen the Facts for Your Post, yet. I am still waiting. Not “Hearsay” , I want the Facts from you. Remember, Just because You Say it, or Post it on this Forum, Does Not Make It A “Fact.”,,, ……So, please quit attacking Me, Cassandra, Cassandra’s Family, Or the “FindStacy Peterson, Forum. You are starting to sound like J. Brodsky…..IN.
jeannienphoenix // April 8, 2008 at 3:27 am
Glen,
Sorry, didn’t get that post finished. Here is the rest of it.
IN MY OPINION.
STOP BASHING, AND START PROVING.
jeannienphoenix // April 8, 2008 at 3:40 am
Lola,
Take a bow. I applaud you. That was a great post, and oh so True. In My Opinion.
exlawenforcement // April 8, 2008 at 4:20 am
That would be correct start proving. Stop bashing drew ! This has become nothing more than a man bashing forum. Disagree with anyone and here it comes !
exlawenforcement // April 8, 2008 at 4:25 am
One more large point. Who would you go to if you thought or knew that drew killed Kathleen? Your pastor ? And then neither of you goes to either the state police or the fbi ? The fact is neither were done. From August to November nothing was done, so how scared was she ? She stayed right there living with Drew. That makes no sense at all.
~ lola // April 8, 2008 at 7:36 pm
jeannienphoenix,
Thank you. i saw Glenn doing the same pompous, aggressive bullying here to you that he did on findstacypeterson.com . And then he has the audacity to slander Stacy Peterson’s family in an attempt to thwart their fundraising efforts to find Stacy and bring closure and justice to her loved ones. Out of bitterness and vindictiveness that he couldn’t CONTROL and dictate to the Majority of members at the findstacypeterson.com forum.
[GLENN quote - "If what you say is in FACT TRUE, then why hasn’t Drew Peterson been arrested?"]
Glenn, … The investigation into Drew Peterson’s multiple crimes in ongoing. The Grand Jury investigation continues.
IN MY OPINION there is a great deal to be investigated concerning Drew Petersons history of domestic violence, stalking, witness intimidation,
and known criminal accomplices.
Further complicated, …IN MY OPINION… by the collusion and corruption of … certain Bolingbrooke police officers, Bolingbrook Mayor Roger Claar (Drew’s “buddy”), and ousted former District Attorney Jeffrey Tomzack who ALL took part in the death of Kathleen Savio through their negligence of duty, and cover-up of her murder.
Thanks to the media for their spotlight on Stacy’s “suspected homicide” and Kathleen’s recently declared “homicide” the American public is watching with interest.
From Canada i have been watching with interest along with others from other countries. Drew won’t get away with murder this time. He stopped wearing his bandanna when he realized his crimes weren’t going to be swept under the rug this time. The same week that Illinois State Police officially named him a suspect in Stacy Peterson’s suspected homicide and the decision was made to exhume Kathleen Savio’s body on suspicion that her murder had been made to look like an accident.
Body Of Kathleen Savio To Be Exhumed - November 9th, 2007
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/kathleen.savio.autopsy.2.564233.html#end
Search for former officer’s wife goes on as grand jury convened - November 16, 2007
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=78828
(Bolingbrook Mayor Roger Claar controlling press releases)
http://www.wthitv.com/Global/story.asp?S=8070141&nav=menu593_1
“”HE WANTS ME DEAD and if he has to he will burn the house down just to shut me up.”
» Letter To Office of Prosecutor Jeffrey Tomzack from Kathleen Savio - Nov. 14, 2002
http://www.amw.com/pdf/petersonletter.pdf
» Autopsy Report : Kathleen Savio March 1, 2004
http://www.amw.com/pdf/coronerdeathreport.pdf
There has been a viper’s nest of corruption in Bolingbrooke surrounding Drew Peterson. It will take time to detangle that deadly web in which the lives of two young mothers were lost. The FBI and LE will conclude their investigation and Drew Peterson will be indicted for his crimes along with his accomplices.
LE does not disclose their evidence until court proceedings begin. And hopefully, in time Justice will be fully served.
“The Will County state’s attorney’s office remains confident that justice will be served at the conclusion of these methodical and disciplined investigations.”
http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/states-attorney-releases-statement-on-peterson-savio-investigations/
In the meantime, we are all entitled to our personal opinions on Drew’s guilt or innocence.
And he is still free to enjoy the company of his children, provoke his own media circus, and continue “looking for dates”.
exlawenforcement // April 8, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Talk about a media circus, look at what sharon & cassandra did this weekend with Drews 4 year old ! Makes them look real good in everyones eyes. Lets do everything possible to cause an uproar. Do they even think they will ever have access to those kids again ? Not in this lifetime.
WeWillFindStacy // April 8, 2008 at 9:35 pm
*sigh* The only media circus was caused by you, Drew. Sharon took a picture of Auntie Cassandra hugging her nephew in Sharon’s driveway. Anthony was excited to see Cassandra because you have kept the kids from their family because you’re afraid of what the kids will spill about what happened that morning. The only one causing an uproar here is you, Drew. And Sharon and Cassandra will have “access” to the kids again. When you are finally arrested for murdering your last 2 wives. Tick, tock, tick, tock…
Dee // April 8, 2008 at 11:36 pm
Well, I have to say…. I do go on Stacey’s forum and read But dont post. I can also say that some people are way off subject of finding Stacey, But, Yes !!! I do believe Drew is GUILTY. I can also say no one on the computer know’s who the hell they are taking to, And it does no good for anyone to argue. I believe Stacey will be found, And we will all know for sure what happened to her. With that said I hope like hell no matter who killed her, This monster will suffer punishment.
Drew,
if you read this… I hope for your children’s sake you did not kill either one of your wives. If you did ….please come clean and let her family and her children put her body to rest so they and she can have peace and closure.
If nothing else atleast find a way for Stacey to be found.
Glenn // April 9, 2008 at 9:41 am
Here are some FACTS for iola and for jeannienphoenix….
1) I have not been banned the from findstacypeterson.com forum. After the censorship of my posts started occuring on that site, I expressed my displeasure in the form of a private email to the family and then deleted my remaining threads, and then deleted my account on the site. I have a second account for the site but only use it to read what the latest set of drew bashers has to say there when I am really really bored.
2) I also happen to believe Drew Peterson is probably guilty. (opinion mind you… nothing I can prove)
3) I bullied nobody on stacypeterson.com forums and am not doing it here…. what happened to me on findstacypeterson.com forums was that comments like drew is innocent until proven guilty were deleted by Admin.
4) I have never slandered anyone… I was on a search party in November of last year and Cassadra was having a discussion with another search organizer about raising funds. It was within earshot of dang neart every member of that days search team..
5) jeannienphoenix does mention opinion in her post here….. near the end of her post she says “Just more of my opinions.” Earlier on in her post she states, “In my Opinion, That is a Crime. Covering Up, Aiding and Abetting a Murderer !!!!” She was talking about these statements. “That is Exactly what happened when Kathleen got murdered. Too many officers like you, thought they had to Stick Together.” The rest of the verbage is all presented as fact. Since the Just more of my opinions comment doesn’t really say anything are we to conclude that everything you seemed to state as fact is merely your opinion? If Just more of my opinions means that everything she typed was an opinion I stand corrected, but “Just more of my opinions” isn’t even a sentence so it is very open to misinterpretation.
6) I really want the facts to come out in not just the Stacy Peterson case, but also the Kathleen Savio case as well… I want to see justice done…. That means I want to see the real killer, kidnapper or whatever brought to justice, tried and convicted for his or her crimes.
7) I disagree with all of the bashing going on…. and it isn’t me doing it…. because it is counterproductive, and accomplishes nothing good. If half the bashing energy were invested in investigative work maybe this case would be solved by now.
wantjustice // April 9, 2008 at 10:38 am
there is something fishy about this exlawenforcement character, I would not trust farther than I could throw, just an opinion
jeannienphoenix // April 10, 2008 at 2:40 am
Glen,
My, my, my, aren’t you a piece of work. You start your Post off, with,
Quote:
Glenn, on April 9th, 2008 at 9:41 am Said:
Here are some FACTS for iola and for jeannienphoenix….
End of your Quote.
There’s your favorite word, Again. FACTS
iF YOU could only understand the difference in Facts, and YOU just “saying it” OR “posting it” on this Forum, Does NOT make it a FACT…..This is Not my Opinion, Glen, These are YOUR OWN WORDS to ME. Geez, Glen, I am about to give up on you, being able to Read, and Understand, what You Post on here to me, about yourself, much less, being able to Read, and Understand, what you post on here about me.
I will try Again to help you out here. You seem to be The Only One, having so many Problems, understanding that. OR understanding MY Posts. (Well, maybe, except ex LE.)
It seems to me you are STILL, totally MISSING a Lot of KEY Words in my Post. Now mind you, I don’t think this is deliberate, on your part, (or is it?) I just think you have a hard time reading a post, and comprehending what the other poster is saying. AND You are Certainly Over looking a Lot of Key Words, that are most definitely included in my post. Could you please, take off your rose colored glasses, one more time, and go back, and Re read my post, for what the 3rd time now? Please, GO SLOW this time, (maybe that will help you) AND watch for KEY Words, such as, “IF”, And statement about LE. “IF” THIS CAN BE PROVEN, AND i “THINK “IT WILL BE. I do believe you have missed many “IF” and “Think,” words in my Post. I can go back, and point out each “IF” word I used, “IF” you NEED me to. The LAST TIME I heard, when using the word “IF” in a sentence, MEANT that sentence was NOT a FACT………The SAME goes for, “I THINK’. I did NOT claim that sentence to Be a FACT. You seem to be the ONLY ONE having a problem, understanding that “FACT”.
I do not like YOUR interpretation to others on this forum of What I Meant, by My Post. You Clearly cannot Read My Post CORRECTLY. That is WHY, You Have NO Business, Jumping All OVER ME, AND TWISTING MY WORDS. i do take Offense at that…. I also take Offense at YOUR Bashing statement of me, saying,
Quote:
Glenn, on April 7th, 2008 at 10:10 pm Said:
I am sick and tired of listening to people express opinions as if they were facts.
Just because someone says something on a web blog or forum, does NOT make it a FACT.
If people in this world could exist on hate then you would be feeding them well jeannienphoenix. It is posts like the attack on exlawenforcement I just got through reading that helped to drive me away from the FindStacyPeterson.com forum
End of Your Quote.
I will NOT be Bullied, Sir, by the likes of you. You can keep trying to, but I warn you, It will NOT work for you, Just as it didn’t Work on the “HelpfindStacyPeterson”. com site. I can certainly see why the other site censored you. If all you can do is Say and Post, How Wonderful, and Right You Are, and Put Down the Other Posters. I don’t BLAME them for censoring you. I would have, also. After all, It Is Their Forum, Not Yours. That Statement is a FACT, not An Opinion.
. I believe the other readers on this Forum, can certainly Read, and Understand what I was saying in my Post. I don’t think they Need You to INTERPEPT MY POST FOR THEM. (Well, maybe ex LE, she sounds like she may need some help, which I would be glad to help her with, since it is MY post, NOT Yours.) This is what causes Problems on a Forum. One person,who is trying to FORCE everyone to Do and Say everything, Just like HE Says it Should Be Done. Sorry, Won’t Happen with Me. You Post the Way, You Want to, And I certainly, intend on keeping on posting the Way I want to. If you Don’t like the Way I write my Post, More advise for You. Don’t Read IT.
You can cry and Whine all you want to about it, but my advise to you would be to Stop doing that. Take it or Leave It, Doesn’t matter to me. It is YOU that is doing the Very Thing, you accuse me of doing. Again, I repeat. “It’s NOT working for you, NOR will it work for you in the future, on me.”
As far as your post is concerned. Since you are so eager to point out my Post. Let me Post Some FACTS and OPINIONS for YOU.
I will start with :
1. Your Actions in your #1 comment, seems Very, Very Deceiving , to me. They contradict what, you your self posted to me in your rant, bashing and bullying post that you made to me. I Refer you to your very own Quote Above. 3rd paragraph. I read that to say, as you have Clearly Stated in your quote above, that “you had been driven away from the findstacypeterson.com forum.”
Now in Your so Called “FACTS” post for me. Still on #1, You Clearly State, that you have a ” Second Account” on that forum, that you use.
How can you Call that a FACT, when You Yourself are the one, who posted those two sentences. Make up your mind which statement are we to believe?? Which one is a FACT??? Please, enlighten us……And speaking of deceiving, what did you do, delete all of your posts and first account, then go start a second account under a different Name, so admin. would think you were NOT on that Forum any longer??? You have clearly tried to deceive people, by your actions. IN MY OPINION…….. Please, Just the FACTS, more commonly Known as the TRUTH. So far, I have NOT seen it in #1.
#2 Opinion
#3 OPINION………..Another Deceiving Statement. I am not bullying anybody here. Oh, yeah?? That Is NOT a FACT. That is YOUR OPINION. This post is MY OPINION. What were you doing to me in your First hateful attack post to me??? I refer you back up this post to your Quote, paragraph #3.
#4 OPINION, NOT FACT……. AGAIN, You have not shown us PROOF of this Statement…….Just Because YOU say something, OR post something on this Forum, Does NOT make it a FACT. Per your own statement to me, and IN MY OPINION, you seem to be including ALL other posters, in that statement………Again, I refer you back up this post to YOUR OWN Quote to me…
#5 I have already written about #5, above. Definitely, NOT FACTS.
#6 OPINION not FACT…….Oh, Yeah, You and O.J. Simpson want “the REAL killer” found.
#7 OPINION not FACT First Sentence, …”.I disagree with all the bashing going on here”………….”and it isn’t me doing it” .. I disagree with you, you are still bashing my post……. You seem to have good advice, I just wish you would take your own advise, and quit putting me down, and Misinterpreting MY Post. I am plenty old enough, and Intelligent enough to NOT need you to do that for me, thank you very much. You can’t even keep Your Own posts consistent, and Truthful, as I have pointed out to you.
Glen, I can certainly see why you have such a hard time understanding my posts, and a lot of other intelligent posts on this forum, and on the findstacypeterson.com site.
You are the One that does NOT understand the Difference in a FACT and An OPINION..
JUST MORE OF MY OPINIONS.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 4:13 am
Hey Glenn don’t let the turkeys get you down ! Remember what are opinions are “everyone has one ” !! You keep posting because you are quoting what has been said in the press. Some people are rabid and need paxil ! Meantime you go Drew ! Speak out loud and clear. And for the record there is such a thing as “cop humor”, citizens do not relate to it or understand it, it come with the badge. And a resident has to reside in a home for atleast 60 days by law, so Stacy is no longer a resident at that address.
jeannienphoenix // April 10, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Ex.
You just made me think of something. Thanks. I think you just gave me a “Clue” to Why Drew is Not Getting a Divorce from STACY. I think I am starting to put something together in my mind about that. Thanks, again. That really helped me.
In case of wife # 3, he “found” a will.
. He can’t do the same thing he did with Kathy, and come up with a will, this time, so he can manipulate it to “get everything”, that was Kathy’s half, that she wanted to go to her 2 boys. See how he waited a year, to let everything sort of die down, and then had his attorney, give it all to him. That is how he manipulated that, to make sure “he got it All”…..
Now in case of wife #4. Stacy. Has to do something different, Will just won’t work so easily, this time, Nor will another Accidental death in a Dry Bathtub……….. So, set up different scenario: That’s not too hard to do, for Drew. Here is what he came up with………FACTS:…….. Wife Ran Off with Another Man, just so happens, wife, Did Not take Any thing with her. Not even the children, Or Even The Car She Left In…… Wife was Even Thoughtful enough to Call Drew, and give him a “Reason”, she is Not Anywhere to be Found. She is Running Off, with someone else.and told him where she left her car parked, so he could go and get it, Even left it very Conveniently, 5 min Walk from Drew’s House…….This gave Drew a”Reason” for having her Car, How thoughtful of Stacy, to do all of this, “Just So DREW Could “Explain” To Everyone, What happened to her, and tell them, WHY no body can FIND Stacy, AND Why Drew Still Has Her Car. Wrapped that Story all up in a pretty bow, didn’t he???
Dang, I wonder, how Drew could have Explained All Of that, IF, Stacy did NOT call him and say those 2 specific points ???? Hummmmmm….I sure am curious to see those phone records, with the dates and times on them, and to hear Thomas Morphey’s Statement in Court about what happened the day Stacy went “Missing”. Hummmmmm That should be “Very Interesting”.
Well, back to Drew’s Scenario: He has everything figured out, now, Kill Stacy, Plan Phoney Phone Call, Carry out that Plan, Very important part of Plan, have to make sure to get that phone call in there. O.k. Got that done. There is His Explanation for Stacy being Missing, And a Reason for him to get to Keep the Car. Have to figure out How to Keep Everything, remember. So far, so Good. Got His “Story” all Ready to Tell to LE…..Just Because Stacy was so Good and Thoughtful of Drew, as to make that one important phone call, that provided Drew with his “Story”…..Last time, following Kathleen’s Murder, Stacy Provided Drew with an Alibi for himself,….This time, in her own Disappearance , She Still Took The Time, Before Totally Disappearing, to Call Drew, and Provide Drew with a “Story, a reason, an Explanation, for the 2 main Points for LE. The 2 Questions that Drew Knew LE would be Asking Him………Where is Stacy? And Why do you have the Car, that Stacy was supposed to have left you in???….
She was a better Woman than 9 hundred,99 million other women would be, in that kind of a scenario. In my opinion. I know Damn well, I would NOT have done that. I do NOT believe, for a second, a Single woman out of that many women, would be That Thoughtful, as to Take the Time to Stop And Call a Husband , that she wanted to Divorce, and wanted him to move out of the house, who refused the Divorce, so she felt she could do Nothing Except Run Away, Leaving Children, family, friends, and home. All the People and Things that she Loved……. Leaving Everything for Drew to Have It All. Even the Car she Ran Away In.
O.K, Now…..After all of that, How can Drew Legally, (Probably a shady legal, like Kathleen’s will) Get the House and All of the property, Money, and all other Assets, put into Just His Name. (Will is too risky, have to think of something else, this time.) O.K. To Make all of this work out and Appear to be legal…..Step one…..Wait……No Divorce now. If he gets a divorce now, he will be back to same scenario as he was with Kathleen. In a Divorce proceeding, Court would Appoint a guardian for Stacy’s 2 young children. So in Divorce case, How much Money Would a Judge Deem to be Stacy’s Share? This Money would be put away, and legally go to Stacy’s 2 minor children…Darn, That won’t Work Out for Drew to get a Divorce. His Objective IMO is to Get It ALL.
He states that he can’t legally get a divorce, must wait a year. ( That Statement was Proven Wrong by another Attorney, and told to the reporter in (I believe it was ) the Sun Times newspaper, in the same article that Drew made his Statement in…. Drew could file for a divorce, now, no need to wait at all. And since he is so hell bent on Dating, Looks like IF he had any Decency about him, for the Sake of his OWN little Children, who are still living at home, he would get a Divorce. IMO Then he can Date and Carouse around Trolling the Bars…It would still be hard on the kids, for him to keep acting this way, but at least he is showing them to at least be a Decent Man and do the Right Thing, for Once in his life, and Divorce those kids Mother, before he starts trapesing in New Women into their lives. IMO. Of Course, that Never Stopped him before, so I don’t know Why I would think he would manage to do anything different this time…
Now, I ask, “Why,??? What is Drew’s Reason for NOT getting a Divorce???? He has Changed His Story Again, For the last 4-5 months All We Heard from him was how all the Women were After Him, Couldn’t Fight em off with a stick, for crying out loud.. All He wanted was a Date. Didn’t seem to matter with Who, just so it was a Date. Remember, Ashley? The girl that wrote him love notes and left in his mailbox, and then came back and threw kisses at him, etc. Boy, I remember all of that. Going on the Steve Daul Radio Show, having Brodsky get Steve to have a Win A Date With Drew Contest. He must think we have All Forgotten All of that Crap. Well, I haven’t , NOR will I Forget it. He can do all the chameleon acts he wants to. But, A leopard doesn’t change it’s spots. He already has me convinced of Who and What he is. Boy, his new PR man, sure has his job cut out for him, doesn’t he. Seems like the More his PR Man tries, it just seems to Backfire, right in their faces… I would get him “Staged” on every t.v. show I could, Just like they did his last interview in Stacy’s Home. That sure didn’t do him any good. Even his PR Man, wants some publicity, so he gave an interview about how he Staged that whole thing. Set the whole thing up for Drew. Using the kids….I saw that on NG, in case you want to know. Look it up….I think that is even getting harder for him to do. Not many shows even want him on anymore. They are disgusted with him, as much as the public is, IMO.
That is why, I want to know, Why Drew Doesn’t Get A Divorce From Stacy??? Why would He want to Stay Married to the Women, he describes Stacy as being??? He has told many times, what he thought of Stacy, her family, and her friends, for 5 months we have been hearing it, Not Until this Last Staged Interview at home, was done, and his PR Man had to tell Him what to say and do. And had to O.K. all pictures that were taken that day…was The First Time I ever heard him say all those things. …Too Little, Too LATE, ad far as I am Concerned……..So, I ask Again, Why Not At Least Divorce Someone like that, and get away from her, and her family, that he is constantly running down…Even Refusing to let Any of Stacy’s Family, see the kids. Stacy’s Family is Still Related to those kids, and Since he seems to Hate Stacy’s Family, enough, to Forbid them to see the kids. Why in the hell, won’t he just get a Divorce and be done with them???
Then they would have to go to Court for visitation rights….He is not making any sense to me, with none of this.
There is a Reason, he will not Divorce Stacy, The Money is #1, but there is more to it than that….He has to figure out a way to get it All. He has a good start, he got a line of credit on his and Stacy’s home, so he says, and has transferred that money over to Steve’s Account. So much for the little kids, getting Stacy’s share of the house, huh?? If what he is saying is the Truth….Follow the Money, always Follow the Money. I think that is what is taking so long to investigate, Drew’s Money Trail, They have to go back a long ways on him. Along with a lot of Other deaths around Drew, But , they will get it all figured out, they have lots of time. No hurry……
Only One Reason that I can see…….MONEY……..He wants Every thing…..wants it All…..imo…..So, how can he go about getting it all?? Stay married to Stacy, for as long as it takes, and get her declared dead, and as the surviving spouse, he would naturally , Get It All….Maybe, maybe not. Just one scenario. Can anyone think of another one?
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 3:32 pm
I think that works just fine. The kids will get everything they need, Drew will sell the house and move where people are nicer and that will be that. End of story.
WeWillFindStacy // April 10, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Ex, no one likes to live near a double murderer. It has nothing to do with his neighbors. And the only place he’s moving to is prison.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 9:13 pm
I doubt that. No proof once again. He has not been charged or tried except in the publics eyes. Time will change that when this whole story fades, and it will. People are tired of it already. When it gets to be a year then what ? They looked for Hoffa for many years and nothing.
WeWillFindStacy // April 10, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Charges are coming. No doubt about it. This “story” is not going to “fade”. A lot of people love Stacy and want her found. We will find her. Soon. Not in a year. Soon. As much as you would hate for that to happen.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Tell Sharon I will move next door then she does not have to fear for her life as she claims in the press and that way the neighborhood will calm down and the police department can do something better. I would love to live there. Drews kids could go outside without being lured over to her house.
WeWillFindStacy // April 10, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Are you going to buy all of the houses on the street? It’s not just Sharon. And the kids were not “lured” there. He went willingly out of excitement to see his aunt and his neighbor that he loves and misses.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 9:20 pm
As much as everyone would like an answer, no matter what it is, its not going to happen soon. It might never happen and people need to realize that, some times there are not answers to what we want, no matter how badly we need them. It would have been nice to have the answers within the 48 hours time frame, because after that the chances go down alot. That is a fact. But theres always hope. I would love an answer good or bad. If I am wrong I will be glad to admit it, I was wrong about Kevin Fox big time.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 9:23 pm
I have not seen or heard any other people complaining, outside of just the press on the lawns. If there are complaints about Drew then they need to come out. What is to be afraid of ? Hes just a man, no weapons in his possession either.I am sure pd is keeping an eye on the area.
exlawenforcement // April 10, 2008 at 9:27 pm
Now that I am thinking about it, its probally the safest place in Bolingbrook outside of the police station itself.
Sue // April 12, 2008 at 8:29 am
There is a mistake in the timeline mentioned above.
Drew and Stacy were not married in July, 2003 and she had already given birth by then. They were married October, 2007 and the boy Anthony was a year old already. Came from the tv show Dateline which aired in December.
Truth // April 15, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Humm - the first 48 hours? Isn’t that when the attempted suicide occurred? Why would someone do that, do you think?
sissy // April 15, 2008 at 8:54 pm
IVE BEEN THINKING ABOUT THE BLUE BARREL.. IM WONDERING WHILE EVERYONE SEEMS TO BE LOOKING ABOVE GROUND FOR THE BARREL IF INDEED HE DIDNT BURY IT.. IM WONDERING IF HE DIDNT BURY IT CLOSER TO HOME THAN OUT IN THE WOODED AREA.. IF THERES CLORINE IN THE BARREL THAT WOULD KEEP THE SNIFFER DOGS FROM SMELLING THE BODY ID THINK..ESPECIALLY AS LONG AS STACY HAS BEEN MISSING.. MY PRAYER AN THOUGHTS GO OUT TO STACYS FAMILY.. NOT DREW PETERSEN. I SAW HIS INTERVIEW ON LARRY KING AN ILL TELL YA…THIS MAN SAYS EVERYONE ELSE IS LIARS BASICALLY AND THEIR OUT TO MAKE MONEY. HE HAS AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING. AND I FEEL HIS LAWYER IS NO BETTER. THE WAY THEY BOTH KEEP SAYING….THAT DREW DOESNT HELP LOOK FOR HIS WIFE BECAUSE SHES NOT THERE..WHERE THEIR LOOKING ,AKES ME BELIEVE THEY BOTH KNOW WHERE SHES BURIED!! SAD TO SAY BUT I FEEL SHES WITH GOD. ..
exlawenforcement // April 15, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Where ever she is hopefully she has peace.
Basherette // April 23, 2008 at 12:52 am
Aw, come on- play NICELY here, folks!
I’m POSITIVE that there are people out there who like, really like and/or even love DiP…
*wait for it*
… with some fresh fava beans and a nice chianti!!!
Mary // April 23, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Listen, I have breaking news for some of you….Drew Peterson killed his two wives. If you have not figured that out I really feel sorry for you and wonder how you are smart enough to use a computer. There may be no evidence (other than a ton of circumstantial evidence accompanied with several motives), he is a former cop and knows how crime scenes are processed and would know how to dispose of any evidence. Drew Peterson is a very smart and calculating sociopath. I think the killing of the last wife was pure arrogance though…it will put him away. He got too cocky and that will be his demise. He would have never been caught for the killing of Savio had he not killed Stacy, his arrogance and need to control got the best of him. This is a game to him, it is apparent by the way he handles himself publicy. He has always been able to fool everyone. What I am curious about are the crimes he committed on the police force when he was under the radar. It seems there were multiple previous inquiries of his misconduct as a police officer and someone with psychological diagnoses such as this man does not just start killing and committing crimes, there is a history and/or progression present. It will be interesting to see if other things from Drew’s past start to surface. The people prosecuting the case know how to play Drew’s game and Glasgow is smarter than Drew and Brodsky (which really isn’t saying much) but thank God for Glasgow. Peterson is so transparent and I pity anyone who cannot see that by now. I worry about those children and what he has done to their lives. I pray the emotional and psychological trauma hw caused in their lives is somehow reversible. I also pray he does not bring them down and kill them when he takes his fall. It is mindboggling to me that he still has custody of these kids, this is a law in Illnois that now needs a caveat of some sort. Suspects (killers) is spousal murders should not be allowed to have custody while prosecuters build their cases, it could mean more innocent lives lost and Mr. Drew Peterson is capable of anything, that should be apparent to anyone with common sense.
glennm69 // April 24, 2008 at 6:35 am
I wish to say several things….
I am not a Drew Peterson fan….. in fact like a lot of you I think that he may be guilty of committing one or more major crimes.
I am certainly glad that those of you who have posted comments here like Drew is guilty etc. had absolutelly nothing to do with drafting the government that we live by every day. Circumstantial or not circumstantial, until all of the evidence is presented to a jury and that jury has had a chance to examine it all and reach a conclusion of guilt or innocense…… then the man IS NOT guilty of anything. He may be a suspect in a crime, but that does not make him a convicted felon. If the situation were reversed and someone near and dear to all of these “drew is guilty” posters either disappeared or was found dead, the fingers would be pointing at you…. the spouse…. or close intimate friend…. way before an arrest was made or even a trial was begun…. If you know you didn’t do it… too bad…. public opinion and the media have already convicted you… so go deal with it…
I refuse to subscribe to lynch mob justice on any blog anywhere about anything, and I disagree strongly with those who do.
marytruthseeker // April 24, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Glennm69,
I can definitely see your point of view, however; I think you are neglecting to realize and succumb to the facts of this case. Drew Peterson threatened to kill his wife (wives) multiple times and and make it look like an accident. He basically spoke of what he was going to do before he did it. Can his own words be used as evidence, is he a man of his word? People do not make that kind of stuff up. She tried to get help and was unable to because of his ties to the Bolingbrook Police. There were 18 domestic violence calls to the house and a complete and utter failure to protect her for reasons that are unknown to us and may always remain unknown to us. I am sure several people are trying to protect their asses in this situation, including a negligent coroner’s jury that found the death “accidental” depsite a myriad of fresh evidence that was not processed or was processed incorrectly. There are many variables here that raise questions and many people here trying to cover their asses. The Savio family should sue the Bolingbrook Police Department, I blame them partly for her death. These men abused their power (especially Peterson) and it resulted in the death of her and consequently another one of Drew’s wives and the reason is because people like me did not draft the government that we live by or did not bend the rules of it when lives were at stake and the future of children, who did not make these choices were at stake.
kiello // April 25, 2008 at 8:33 am
This is directed to anyone who it applies to: How in the world could you make reference to Jimmy Hoffa in an attempt to compare it to the missing persons case of Stacy Peterson. Even if you believe that Drew is innocent and has nothing to do with her disappearance, as an ex-lawenforcement officer with years(I am sure) of experience in missing persons cases, I think that even you would concede that foul play is involved. To be such a devoted mother, why wouldn’t she contact her kids? Forget the husband, my children, I think not. That being said, have some compassion for the family not being able to grieve properly or even give her a decent burial. I am sure Stacy is with our Heavenly Father, but those left behind will forever be scarred by having no closure at all to this horrible event. No child should be left to wonder the rest of their lives about where their parent is and if that parent is dead or alive. If Drew did have anything to do with this crime then he needs to step up and be a man… no a FATHER and think of his kids. One other point, it is a SHAME that society has not evolved past believing that a woman would take to the wind and just give everything up over a whirlwind romance. This is not a Harlequin romance novel. The way Stacy is described by fellow co-workers, family, and friends, it does not fit to believe that she would leave her children in such a manner. People lets respect at least her memory. If it comes out that she did abandon her family of her own free will, then that is her burden to bear for a lifetime. Everyone is right, it’s America and we ALL have the right to our own opinions. I read all of the postings and it seems that some people are taking all of this personally. LE, as a woman, do you have any maternal compassion for the kids? Some of your comments are so flippant that I think you take this as a joke. I don’t want to offend you, but even as a lawenforcement officer(ex), is it protocol to be so cavalier about what so many others are so upset about. It is fine to lend support, but I mean you are a little over the top in your support of Drew Peterson. For that reason, I can see why people are questioning you and the comments u make.
freedom08 // April 25, 2008 at 9:32 am
glennm69 good post. refreshing that there are some left in this country that believe in the founding principles instead of lynch mob mentality.
marytruthseeker // May 9, 2008 at 7:54 am
It’s not lynch mob mentality, it called people with at least half of a functioning brain who have common sense that can put the pieces of evidence together. Thank God there are more than us of than of you. Many of us all believe in freedom and do not believe in “lynch mob mentality” but we also believe in the lives of young mothers and their right to raise the children they love and bring into the world. We also believe in their right to leave their abusive, violent and controlling husbands in order for them to be safe and survive. Isn’t that freedom also? Isn’t that part of our founding principles that should be protected? The evidence is there, this man should not be free. It is nauseating that he is not in jail and that he has custody of these four children after he off’ed their Mothers. Illinois, I am ashamed of you. For this and the Lisa Stebic case. Illinois is not protecting its women, especially Bolingbrook Police Department. There needs to be repercussions, severe repercussions. This man does not deserve water, he deserves a life of living hell and hopefully God will grant him that, God sees all, hears all and knows what truly happened to these beautiful young Moms.
You must be logged in to post a comment.